Shaming women over past behaviour is useless and damaging.
She may have a sexual history of multiple lovers, but in the present relationship, she may have high proclivity for monogamy and loyalty. You can't infer the latter from the former.
The reverse may also be true: a virginal girl with zero sexual history, but who has a high curiosity or motivation to want to act out her promiscuous fantasies whilst having the comfort of a ''stable" relationship.
Correlation isn't causation, remember. While there may be some correlation between "high sexual history" and "proclivity for present-day promiscuity", the relationship doesn't appear to be causal in origins.
So if you must judge women (or anyone for that matter), judge who they ARE, not who they've BEEN.
And besides, the less you shame women for enjoying their sexual nature, the more likely you are to partake in it. Just sayin' ;-)
That's all I got for this one. Feel free to troll the comments. If you think I'm full of shit on this one, kindly state why. That way we all learn from each other-- or at least, understand each other's positions better.
-- Tom
Most Helpful Girl