This is what ‘Natural Beauty’ looks like 🌸

[Rosexøxø]

Attention Sisters!

[Symmetries]

Here’s a good example of what an attractive woman looks like- just an example.. AND this is more accurate: without make up or dieting. Certainly no filters or photoshop.

A natural healthy woman of her time, painted by male artists who tried to paint live portraits of people in a close-to-accuracy format/ style.

A time period where ‘Kardashians’ and ‘Marilyn Monroes’ did not exist. Sure we embrace NATURAL curves and Natural slenderness of all cultured women, but those who starve themselves- wear slimming contraptions, get surgical plastics added, and powdery coverage, show a woman even farther from the ‘real woman,’ than the ones painted by the attempts of these male artists…

women have submerged themselves in extreme additives and shortages without ever just BEING.

I think it was super helpful to take a look at realistic paintings of women in history- who show bellies are normal, some cellulite is natural, and not all fat is ‘bad.’ They give a helpful blueprint. They offer a clearer ‘perspective’ of what natural is, and certainly can be. They offered their bodies to be captured, and these artists did their best to depict them as close to the truth as possible.

As much as the eye, hand, and brush would allow.

Grateful for these historic relics; these individuals who contributed to the arts and human history.

Hopefully this will broaden your views of the ‘Natural Beauty of Women,’ if not changing your mind altogether, about what should be normalized and what is just too artificial to appreciate.

(P.s. not trying to be racist either, I just gathered ‘Realism’ paintings 🖼 from the Greeks, etc. I wanted to use paintings from the Egyptians to include diversity, but theirs are 2-D and show little individualism).

I just ask you view these photos with an open mind, and consideration for your own comfort to live naturally. ✨ A natural diet. A natural lifestyle. A natural appreciation for yourselves!

All my love to my sisters 👯‍♀️

-xoxo

[ Emblem of Beauty ]

[ Essence of Nature and Natural ]

[ Far from Goddesses…

…yet, Close to the Eyes of Adoration ]

Hope you enjoy this read! As I enjoyed constructing it :]

[Guardian45]

I've ALWAYS preferred 'Natural Beauty' in women. I'm NOT in favor of LOTS of makeup and plastic surgery!

[Rosexøxø]

Amen! Amen brother! 🤣👌

[Guardian45]

Thank you *bows*

[Guardian45]

Thank you for MHG!

[Rosexøxø]

Ofc :]

[Rosexøxø]

*Applauses* 👏👏

[In_Passing]

Men consider an appearance with neutral makeup as "natural beauty".

[Guardian45]

@In_Passing. So I have been told.

[In_Passing]

But it's natural with a little help,. xD Same as plastic surgery, if they look more natural.

[msc545]

People don't have cheeks or lips that red without makeup or blond hair like that without highlights.

[Rosexøxø]

Good point. These women were far more natural. They weren’t as experimental with their bodies. They experimented a bit more in the hairstyle area and facial accents. I see a critic, instead of an encourager here, and that’s all I see, apparently. ;-; Do they look severely ‘adjusted’ in their shape? I think most would agree with me when I say they don’t, and neither do the men at that time. Either observe and admire, or move along. (That’s how it’s done in a museum). :] -I’m not responsible for any complaints either, by the way.

[msc545]

I was merely observing. You said "natural Beauty" which seemed a bit incorrect.

[Rosexøxø]

If we really get technical there hasn’t been an ounce of natural beauty for all the course of womanhood history except for when everyone lived in the natural woods and used rose petals for their lip colorings and honey for their moisturized lips. With that mention- depending on what exactly was used for this unnatural color of ‘red’ lips worn in these paintings, these women could have been technically displaying NATURAL beauty lol. 🍃🌸🍯 Also before I mentioned the natural tools for accents in their appearance, I was opting for saying these women were closer to Natural beauty and the women of 2022. They’re as close to looking straight out the womb than women from any other time period. So you see- it technically is all natural. If you don’t want to accept that, that is fine. I love your observation by the wayyy opens new doors to my mind :]

[Rosexøxø]

Than the women of 2022.*

[Joker_]

@Rosexoxo funny that you have to use technicalities to convince yourself that the woman in that picture is natural in that instance

[Rosexøxø]

@Joker_ technicalities is being more specific to the TRUTH- if you want indirect information and lies in your eyes and up your ass to sit on- then go for it. Stop concerning yourself with something so non-beneficial to you: my perceptions and true knowledge on reality. You really had to introduce yourself to this conversation, as if you did anyone a favor. What do you yourself even gain from that. If we look at your mentality instead, and inability to be practical and purposeful we see that yours is more of a concern than mine. Anyways to each their own. Go write a my take with that kind of intelligence, and then we’ll all see what information YOU know or what you’re capable of inferring on your own, WITHOUT someone telling you or just quoting others.

[Joker_]

sure, but alternatively technicalities can also be used just to be pedantic, which is the way you were using them for

[Joker_]

just read the rest of your insane ramblings. uh, it's interesting the type of information you infer from what really shouldn't be taken so harshly - try being less pessimistic and relax a bit, yeah? it might save you from your upcoming delusions

[Rosexøxø]

@Joker_ all of that had no ‘driving purpose’ in your overall response. You just stuck a bunch of hot headed words on a text box and hit send. IMMATURE. 5 year olds do thatttt Here, let’s just say one thing right now, your whole speech involvement here was and very much still, is Irrelevant and always will be until you actually bring some information worthwhile or stimulating. I’m getting hints that you’re trying so hard just to state something obvious- and as much as that is quite incompetent of itself and unnecessary- it’s also extremely untrue. So you just wasted everybody’s time- not just yours, believe it or not, but mine. Grow up. Go read a book. Cover to cover! Learn something. Get outta here.

[Joker_]

cope

[Guy13]

Someone who has no make-up on and still looks good.

[Rosexøxø]

Best comment yet. Spoken facts. 👌

[Guy13]

Thank you. It really is not that difficult but to turn that natural beauty into beautiful has more to do with personality and character than mske-up. Does that make sense ⁉️

[Rosexøxø]

Makes total sense‼️ 😂🤓🤝

[Guy13]

This is you, right…⁉️

[Rosexøxø]

I wear very little make up now. I rely on character and intellect, yes 🤟😍

[Guy13]

Are you east coast⁉️ Single, at least 20, and…. want to go out 😎. You sound like a perfect find.

[Rosexøxø]

Guy, I thought you had a girlfriend 🤣

[Guy13]

I am starting to date after 2 year break-up recovery. Really didn’t care for women for a long time… was thinking about getting her a ring 💍 right about the time 💩 hit the wall. I love hard but finding a good fit is difficult. I am not ugly. It is difficult when you look as good or better than the woman as they are insecure creatures.-This is why almost 30 and single. I have my own home at 25 and “prepared” for family…4 bedrooms etc. 2700 sqft echo now. It is what it is 🤷🏻‍♂️

[stanstraykids]

is this supposed to be a joke? the woman in the first picture is CLEARLY wearing make up and the other pictures are PAINTINGS 💀

[Rosexøxø]

I really have to figure out how to turn off opinions on my takes because it is just that. My take- and you just read it. Not argue or debate lol It’s clear you don’t know much about history and the effort into those paintings. As far as the first photo goes- that was my own enjoyment- the looks of a real woman beside a similar looking statue of a woman. Helps stimulate the mind… anyways thanks for… What exactly did you contribute here?

[stanstraykids]

i was just questioning your take. you can't post some shit and just expect everyone to agree and not question it. thats a bit silly, isn't it?

[Rosexøxø]

Where in the take did I actually, specifically ask for a silly-talking person, like you, to agree? I was writing it. And enjoyed writing it. 😊😌 You DONT have to read the whole thing if something about it bothers you- like people who read fiction, or those who look at real paintings and history or science and ‘don’t know how to agree’ with it- they move along… well the mature people do anyway… If you had read it all the way through, you would have realized I never asked you for your opinion or approval. I didn’t even make a comment saying: “questions, comments, concerns?” Lmao You’re a person who reads things through before running their mouth right? Like the efficient people who read the instructions manual completely, before they build something worthwhile? No? Oh okay. Sucks to be you then.

[Rosexøxø]

@stanstraykids here, do yourself a favor. If you can’t use your BRAIN to inference and use common sense theoretics to understand these paintings were very realistic-

You can POSSIBLY read this article, I just searched up- which would confirm my inference and theories are spot on. Actually, for anyone to question what I said and not actually take a minute to process it and consider it, doesn’t know enough history and isn’t open minded.

I’m genuinely sorry for you- but I noticed you insulted someone else’s grammar on another my take? So um, yeah. You can appreciate the grammar of this article, at the very least, if you can’t use critical thinking.

Again, condolences- You have to be a bitter critic, whom is closed minded, and doesn’t have all the facts together, anyway.. lol

https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/anat/hd_anat.htm

[stanstraykids]

"they move along… well the mature people do anyway…" yet you wasted your time sending me a whole essay. that is a bit funny to me 🤭 and to point out another thing since i love being a "bitter critic", how are you going to call me close minded while you are the one who can't accept that some people (like me) have questions about your article. it seems to me like all you want from people is to nod and agree with whatever you see; i wouldn't call that open minded! 'anyway.. lol'

[stanstraykids]

also how did you stalk my profile and not catch on that im not taking this site seriously 💀

[Rosexøxø]

Wasted my time? I find educating people, not a waste of time. It’s actually dangerous to let people like you go around vandalizing art work to society lol this is a masterpiece of a my take, keeping it simple, recognizing the masterpieces of the “realism” renaissance- era, filled with masterful artists, who captured their work perfectly, and their “work” (muse) in worthy mention, were all masterpieces, and when it comes down to it- you’re not supporting NATURAL body positivity, not recognizing those artists, questioning the looks of another “people,” and not taking this informative/ perceptive my take, seriously. So I’ll just block you now, since you admitted to whatever that was, and if I see any more negative comments with a certain “juice/ or flavor” on any of my my takes, mostly this one, I’ll associate it all with you because you seem like the rude obsessive type- who can’t just let art be art. As if women’s bodies, and men’s paintings were worth any debate or real scrutiny… Again, I fail to see what you have contributed… you acted like you did someone a service or justice….

[Pleaznhim4me]

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That’s the truth.

[Rosexøxø]

True saying! I just hope the beautiful women will behold themselves in a much better light, than ever before! That’s more important than others beholding their beauty, in my humble opinion! 🤝😃💯

[Subarugirl]

Lol well actually those were the beauty standards of the "ideal" woman at the time. Not an accurate representation of what what natural. Even in realism the artist still puts their own spin on their interpretation of what they found to be beautiful. Just because it is realism, doesn't mean that the art they produced was that of natural beauty, but rather what they thought was beautiful.

[FckY0u998]

same as it is today. guess society hasn't changed or evolved much in terms of that just what society defines as beautiful might have changed but their spin on it really hasn't

[Subarugirl]

@FckY0u998 Oh on the contrary, it has changed drastically over millennia, and the use of makeup has dated all the way back to ancient Egypt and historically was worn by both men and women for the majority of its use.

[FckY0u998]

@subarugirl yeah that part i know about the makeup but how has it changed dramatically? to me it seems like it really hasn't people still see beauty how they perceive it. granted the definition of beauty has changed over time but with each generation or so that particular society will see beauty how it wants to much like previous generations had seen beauty how they wanted to

[Subarugirl]

@FckY0u998 Societal beauty standards have certainly changed drastically. That is quite evident even in the past 100 years.

[FckY0u998]

@subarugirl it is

[Rosexøxø]

@subarugirl what you say isn’t folly, but I will ask you this- the women in those paintings, you think their bodies did NOT look like that and were severely misconstrued both in painting AND in real life? And my second question to you would be: The little products used for lipstick and hair, was it not from honey and rose petals, NATURAL resources? Oh and a third question: were the products used to HIDE blemishes or alter the identity of a woman, at that time? Or ONLY to accentuate their eyes or give vibrancy to their locks? Is realism just NOT real, then? Has realism-like sketches, NOT contributed to our medical history and the images of the human anatomy WE HAVE today, BECAUSE of those realism sketches? And a final question to you: those painters of the era- Did these painters not receive credit and recognition for their work, and knowledge of the human anatomy SURPASSING those of an anatomist in a UNIVERSITY? Can you honestly speak for those painters and what they were trying to achieve? Do you look at sculptures like the David, and say it is a form of CARICATURE?

[Rosexøxø]

@subarugirl You brag to this man of your knowledge of ancient civilizations USING makeup, But if you notice the art of the ancient Egyptians, there was nothing realistic other than color usage and location of certain accessories on their bodies. Their art did not show true geometric proportions, nor accurate hues used of that time. I have my facts miss Subaru, so there’s just no debating what was “Real” or not, nor if it was “natural” or not, not the concept of what is beautiful or not, simply for the fact many people including yourself, would critique the beautiful things in life, meanwhile I can embrace those and admit beauty truly is in everything. That “beholder” saying just has to be used by you all, but for me I can recognize the beauty in a great lot of things. If you want to further this, I’ll simply and politely link you up with the actual article, constructed by official/ legitimate museum and relic keepers, and art enthusiasts. They’ll explain a bit better what I had simply noticed about this time and the human body, and my beliefs of how women should look at that era more so than the ones of America in the 1920s-1940s for their beauty standards. Nor anything in the Victorian era for their use of deadly make up and chemicals which altered the body including uses of the corsets, and women shouldn’t look to modern beauty as that has completely altered women’s identities- an entire identity from the surgical addition or removal of fat/ plastics, to extreme coloring changes, changing skin a whole hue on the spectrum, and layers upon layers of powders and chemicals that need even more chemicals to remove them just so you can see the true woman underneath. The bodies in the sculptures and paintings don’t scream “hour glass,” miss Subaru. They say with delicacy and grace, “natural,” and exposed.

[Rosexøxø]

@subarugirl The faces in those paintings/ PORTRAITS, and sculptures tell us true facial frame and the light colors of the color wheel. Nothing heavy. Nothing drastic. Nothing misleading. Nothing ARTIFICIAL. Nothing confusing. Everything about it, is Real. And Beautiful. If you can’t perceive that. I’m not here to convince, and we’ll both just have to settle for that “beholder” saying, and agree what you beheld in my article and those images of paintings, is different from what I beheld and what the museum relics/ art enthusiasts beheld as I did: as beautiful and real… and natural. Like that of a newborn baby’s bum, with fresh powder, and a diaper-wrap to cover it. Clean. Natural. Pure. Nothing heavy. Toxic. Altering. Nor a facade.

[Subarugirl]

Make up products where made from products like lead, arsenic, mercury, and Malachite... all of which are toxic... I am not bragging, I am simply providing information that can easily be looked up. Just because something is "natural" doesn't make it good for you or healthy.

[Rosexøxø]

Okay and you didn’t answer any of my questions, which were conveniently provided just for you, at the top. You want to pick out one thing because you’re running out of things to address and have nothing else to say. Those items you speak of are clearly the wrong time period- I know very well about the arsenic and lead- you do me no favors repeating this well known fact, which I’m already aware of. What you fail to notice is those tools were heavily used and primarily used in the Victorian Era. The products I am referencing is Honey and Rose petals, and the like. Even the ancient Chinese civilizations used these items because they were natural. Even the most natural Native Americans would endorse this and these methods, as long as we apologized to the flower. Even they would agree with me that these methods and uses, to only accentuate their bodies and parts, were completely “Natural.”

[Rosexøxø]

@subarugirl And you give me a great idea, now I can add to this: not only were they natural, but they were non-toxic, as well. Meanwhile, I’m only assuming here, women in the later periods such as the Victorian, would believe arsenic and lead to be harmless, due to it being a natural component. I also know the advertising at that time was pure fallacy and ill-educated about the affects of such chemical compounds. I don’t have the time to pick and poke here miss subaru. I’m quite aware of your loose eye to look for things to debate others or your need to teach others, but this is not that place. You’re very good at what you do, but this is a my take and you cannot teach me anything, other than fun facts I may have missed or never been brought aware by. I have the historical education. I have the documentaries. I certainly have that article if you’re really hungry for knowledge, yourself. If you feel mistreated. I do apologize for that. This is a my take. Not a question. I’ll leave off saying you and I have some shared knowledge, but ultimately different perceptions. That is fine. *Cue in the beauty/beholder saying* 🤝 appreciate your level of intellect, as well miss Subaru. You, as opposed to other users, I find very interesting and it was a pleasure to go into a little bit of detail a little further on these aspects. Well I’m satisfied… Good day to you 🙂🤝

[Subarugirl]

Okay to answer your first question, no I don't think their bodies or faces looked the way they are portrayed in the paintings. No one would think that they do... there might be some similarities but artists always take artistic liberties. I already answered your second question. 3rd question... all you have to do is look up the history of make up and how it was used. Might as well start with ancient Egypt...

[Rosexøxø]

No need to argue with me or question me: I assure you I did not create these terms, concepts, or eras of history. I did not birth or rule over these people lol

Argue with someone who has dedicated their entire lives to *capturing history,* and they specifically *capture the artists* who have themselves, *captured the people*- whom I discussed in my points for embracing body positivity, and naturalism in humanity- WHICH is also worthy of my mentioning- I have NOT started the “body positivity movement.” I don’t know what you’re trying to prove, but you’re trying to essentially call many people in different lines of work and lifestyles as “wrong?” Or inaccurate. It’s not just me here Miss Subaru; consider the facts, please. I haven’t started anything here other than mentioning great points with the help and facts mentioned in articles and documentaries. Thank you. —>➡️⬇️

⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
https://artincontext.org/renaissance-art/

Please take note of these headings in the article:
• Naturalism
•Contrapposto
• Chiaroscuro
• Sfumato
(Linear perspective/ Vanishing Point) - helpful concept of art which brought the realistic qualities to the paintings/ portraits

If you consider this- the only “liberties” these artists took concluded entirely of the liberty to accurately capture Humanity, in a very Realistic way.

Another helpful article. We ARE talking about the time of “Enlightenment.” Only fitting I share an extra piece of helpful information.
https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/anat/hd_anat.htm

[Subarugirl]

Their artistic talents are admirable and the art is beautiful, but lets be real here, those are just paintings, not a real or accurate representation of the reality of what those people actually looked like.

[TroyDT2]

No makeup? My screen must be broken because she sure looks made up.

[Rosexøxø]

As I mentioned to someone earlier- to scrutinize art or people’s bodies is absolutely foolish, so whatever is made up in your mind is more concerning here, instead of considering any claims you made to be true.. But I guess there will always be cynics and critics like yourself, who will talk bad about art in museums and shame some women’s bodies. Glad I never met you saying anything negative to me. Yeah, I’ll just leave it there… 👌

[ManHater]

This is what is sex at school.

[Rosexøxø]

Well alrighty then

[Joker_]

@CT_CD is a natural beauty

[CT_CD]

Thank you

[Joker_]

You're welcome

[TITAN-IDC]

The saying "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder," goes to say that
defining beauty can be tough. However, God's words can lead us to
discover what our individual meaning of beauty truly is and should be, that is deterred from looking at a physical appearance for God looks at
the heart in all people and things. Use Bible verses to find the
real beauty in yourself, others, and what surrounds us. re-state://background_color_rgba (0, 0, 0, 0), font_color_rgb (77, 77, 77), justifyLeft

[Rosexøxø]

Right because everything has beauty but not everyone realizes it. They may not always see it. Sucks to be them! LOL

[TITAN-IDC]

I think I just fell in luv like most of us guys... just saying..

[Rosexøxø]

Yeah that’s awesome 🙂

[Smoothshave]

Natural Beauty Is Not Wearing Any Makeup And You Are Naturally Beautiful, No Makeup Needed… The Girl In The Photo Is Wearing Quite A Bit Of Makeup, Far From Natural…

[Rosexøxø]

Ty lay that was entirely your opinion of natural beauty. Thank you very much. Also as I yet have to repeat myself again- that first photo wasn’t to support claims. It was for pure enjoyment of seeing ‘woman’ next to ‘sculpture.’ Was purely for a thought provoking effect, but you’re free to see it as you please.