Are there any American movies that actually show exposed vagina?

[Anonymous]

Not to be a perv or anything but I can't think of a single movie that shows an uncensored vagina. I see plenty of tits (but those aren't genitals) and I see dicks and balls to a lesser extent. However when it comes to vagina, I've never seen actual vulva or vagina, only the cliche triangular carpet of hair in movies. Is there some sort of unfair gender law against showing female genitalia in movies.

[Djkoz78]

It was not even real pubic hair. 99% that FFN (FEMALE FRONTAL NUDITY) is shown they shoot in very low light & then cover their vulva with what is called a merkin (fake pubic hair) it's worn like a bikini. As the previous commenter said mostly due to ratings. However I do agree its a bit unfair especially when it seems to be perfectly ok to show male genitalia & not female. You have a lot of females & feminists arguing that they show more female nudity vs. male, but this simply isn't true. Why do I say this? Because comparing female breasts to male penises (or is it peni), that is like comparing apples to oranges. It is not the same thing.

Especially considering that a lot of females & feminists are actively protesting that women's breasts shouldn't be sexualized & women should be able to walk around topless or breastfeed in public. While at the same exact time, Complaining that they always show women nude far more than men, again apples to again apples to oranges, when it should be apples to apples. If women's breasts aren't sexual then when they show men's genitalia without an NC - 17 Rating then it should be ok to show female vulva without low light and without a merkin. However how many female celebs are willing to bare all? Very very few I can assure you unless they are paid $$ very well. Halle Berry was paid 2 million dollars per breast in swordfish.

Not to mention female celebs who claim to do a nude scene and find out later it was a body double or it had been digitally added and these are just the boob scenes. I can think right now at least 25 male actors who've shown their man bits. I'm not going to list them just do a quick google search & you can easily see just how many male celebs have shown their danglers.

Even on primetime t. v. they can show a male butt, but not a female. They can show a man in tight underwear which can easily see the imprint or outline of his cack & balls, but cannot show a female camel toe they can't even show a nipple. Now I'm not with the idea that they shouldn't show either, but with all this so called equality, it doesn't really seem equal to me. If a penis is allowed to be shown on film without any severe rating penalty then neither should a woman's vulva. Or they both receive the same rating.

I really could go into the politics of 3rd wave feminists movement and the double standards on nudity and biology but I won't. Suffice to say is if we really want equality this is just another facet where it doesn't seem so

[Onelife99]

Totally agree with you on this totally unfair double standards

[MrOracle]

It's pretty simple:

Any movie that shows an erect penis or a vulva are automatically rated NC-17. Many theaters refuse to show NC-17 movies outright, and those that do generally find that they make far less money because far fewer people will go see them. This is even true of very mild NC-17 movies, such as Eyes Wide Shut, which also had big stars (Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman) and was director Stanley Kubrick's last movie - the movie made relatively little money in the theaters.

Movie studios have to front the many millions of dollars that it costs to make the average movie, and so they need the movie to make a profit. Many movies don't make a profit still, but that's always the goal, because these are businesses that are looking to survive to be around next year and the year after that. A studio that has several big losses in a row risks bankruptcy and being bought-out (for pennies) by a rival studio.

So there is tremendous pressure on movies in the US to not exceed an R rating, because R-rated movies still make tons of money. NC-17s, as a rule, have very little earning power.

[Asker]

And that is understandable but I'm not asking about a woman with her legs spread wide open soaked with baby oil. I'm just saying a simple exposed vulva. Like for example in Harold in Kumar 2. That man had a "bottomless party" but every single woman. 100% of every single woman at the party had extremely thick hair covering it. It was so thick that it looked fake. However you see movies like Scary Movie one and 2 and Let's Be Cops and Jackass that show dicks religiously.

[Sapphirein]

You are right in your question.. forgive me for my bad English. l'm Italian.. but my sister works for youtube censorship now and for MPAA before... and I asked her the same question... why there are tons of videos on youtube that contains male nudity and penis es... gays videos. .. and very very little of vaginas and female nudity.. and none a vagina on American movies.. she answered me... on youtube... women and girls don't like female nudity... so big number flag it.. and in a short time it will be taken down.. also most of censorship teams are females... so they take down any videos that contain female nudity without any reasons... and they keep videos that contains male nudity any penises.. to be available to the other females to watch them... also feminists and gays make some pressure to keep this.. and because no one notice or protest.. they will continue... in MPAA... people in USA got used to see penises.. so it become normal to show.. and on youtube and MPAA they have some instructions to do this... when she got her job in youtube censorship. Her boss told her that " keep male nudity and take down female nudity as could as possible. .. that were the orders... also some lobbyists of fiminists and gays make some pressure on Hollywood companies to do that...

[MrOracle]

@Sapphirein As I sad, you can show penises, just not ERECT penises. You can show female pubic hair, just not vulvas. The idea being that nudity in and of itself isn't inherently sexual, but you aren't likely to be shown an erection or a vulva without the obvious intention of it being sexually arousing, and THAT they consider porn.

[Panswers]

A movie named -----Trance--- has rosio Dawson full frontal without the mystery triangle lol and it's rated R look into it...

[Spagetii11]

There's an erect penis in 50 shades of grey.

[Natureman1000]

Showgirls has full frontal nudity with several shot of the main star Naome's vagina fully shaved.

[Anonymous]

Sunce you are a childish person, and block people who are smarter than you and giving explanations. I'll explain my opinion here.

-I didn't put words in your mouth offended man. You didn't talk about erected penises. I did. I brought them to the conversation. Why? You wanted an explanation why women's fully exposed vaginas are never shown in movies. Here are the reasons
-it is very sexual view, just like erected penis that is also never shown in movies. Only flaccid penis. Being wet isn't exactly the same in my opinion.
-that would be very weird, unneccessary and uncomfortable angle of view
- there isn't really need in movies to show that because sexuality is shown in different ways. The sounds, the expressions etc. Those are way more important things to show.

Grow up, and accept the fact pther people disagree with you

[Asker]

I don't mind you disagreeing with me but you are putting words in my mouth and you know it. You were also rude to me from the very beginning. So to put this all on me as if I'm some childish/easily offended person is not helping your case at all. And again you are putting words in my mouth. I never implied that the camera should be aimed right up in her snatch. I can quite easily see a vulva from a normal frontal angle. Not to mention if you've seen movies like "Let's Be Cops" there is a close up view of a man's genitals from a back/bottom angle right on a guy's chin. What's the excuse for that?

[Asker]

Just like your "block people because they are smarter than you" I blocked you because you were being a bitch. Try reading through the comments again. I wasn't rude to you until you were rude to me and assuming I was some horn bag who didn't know how to look for porn.

[SansiSavvy]

There are strict laws in America about the film industry and exactly what can and can't be shown. For example whenever you see a sex scene in a film, you will never see anything other than a guy on top. Female pleasure and apparently female anatomy are grounds for an NC-17 rated film. Unfortunely the film industry is very sexist about what is displayed onscreen as far as female sexuality is concerned. That's just the way she goes. There's only one place you can see full blown on film and I think we all know what I'm talking about, pornography!

[Asker]

Thank you, very insightful response unlike the ignorant anon girl down there.

[SansiSavvy]

Thanks. I'm pretty sure I watched a documentary about it once. It was all about film ratings and the restrictions/qualifications for different ratings. I wish I could tell you the name of the documentary so you could check it out... But it just beats me lol

[StrawberryCream]

You people clearly haven't seen enough movies. I have seen spooning, girl on top, doggystyle etc. In many, many hollywood films. And some were full of jiggling boobs and butcheek.

[Asker]

I've seen ass and boobs but never vagina, that's what I'm getting at. Like it's always covered by some random part of the scenery or a giant impenetrable carpet of hair, but then you have things like this. I can promise you that you'd never see a woman in a scene like this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBRfJsH4NGs

[StrawberryCream]

I know that was your point but I just wanted to make clear that it is common to see other positions than just guy on top. Even though opinion owner disagreed. Oh, and also women and men going down on each others, that just isn't shown. There are movies where vagina shows, but they are small budget, artsy indie movies. Not made in Hollywood. Often Hollywood likes to keep things classy. Because appreciated mocie directors don't want to be associated with pornographic images. Expecially if the movie is a flop. It would be unneccessary to randomly show naked vagina.

[Asker]

That doesn't explain why they show penises then. Very close up, HD images of them.

[Anonymous]

Game of throne? It's a tv show though. Oh and porn movies.

Unfair gender law? You are a perv. I have seen an exposed penis in like 2 movies. And I don't think there are movies where the penis is erected. So it's not "unfair" they aren't showing a naked woman with their legs open.

[Asker]

Ok call me a perv all I want, I think it's sexually healthy to enjoy seeing vagina. However this question has nothing to do with me wanting to see it, I have porn and a girlfriend for that. The question is genuine curiosity as to why I never see vagina in movies. I've never seen game of thrones though so that's news to me. I also never said anything about "erected penis" that has nothing to do with the question. I've seen PENISES but I've never seen VAGINAS and I was wondering if there was some sort of gender biased law against exposing them in movies. Not sure why you're getting so offended.

[Opinion Owner]

If you sexually enjoy seeing vaginas tgen watch PORN MOVIES. Maybe they don't show female genitalia in movies as often, but in porn they show 70% more the female and her body. Flaccid penis is not as sexual view as erected penis. It's just like showing a woman naked where you can see her pubic hair/"camel toe". But woman with her legs open where you have full view in her private parts is also much more sexual view. You are the one who is very offended.

[Asker]

Ok seriously you need to stop putting words in my mouth... like wtf. I said nothing about erect penises and nothing about spread legs. I also said nothing about wanting to see vagina. All I asked is why I see penises in movies but not vaginas. WTF? Like I don't understand why you keep making assumptions. An aroused vagina would be a wet vagina. I never asked about wet ones, opened ones, or spread legs. All I asked was why movies have a tendency of showing penises but never vaginas. PERIOD. Jesus christ...

[TexasNightOwl]

Get on Netflix. There are a ton of fully erect penis, including ejaculation coming out the end. Watch Gaspar Noe's Love which is playing now. Starts off with a fully erect penis in a woman's hand jerking the guy off until he cums. In the meantime his hand is used to cover her genitals. There are tons of erect penis. And always a full merkin, head, bed covering, dim lighting, obtuse angles to block view of female genitals. Look at similar shows on Netflix, always the same erect penis, things put in way to block view of female. When was the last time you saw a woman's genitals in a PG13 or R movie. Shit, I don't think they show in NC-17. Always something or angle to block. Don't give me a woman would have to be in a weird position to see her vulva, what is weird is the positions used to NOT show. Yes, they used to show full frontal on women, but not on men. That was because you don't see genitals on THOSE full frontal women because of the camera angles/merkins used. Why aren't they using camera angles and thick merkins on full frontals of men so that you can't see genitals on them?

[Onelife99]

Your information is wrong do some research on the topic

[Red_Arrow]

You are making a common mistake, and one that even gals make. The vagina is the birth canal. It is the tube that goes between the uterus and the "outside world". The opening to the vagina is found behind the inner lips. So you keep asking about vagina and the only way you can see the vagina is if the legs are spread and the lips are open. So every time you talk about seeing the vagina, YOU are the one calling for spread legs. The part you really mean is the vulva. Vulva not vagina. You have been ranting on the women who have answered you and tried to explain that, instead of listening to them. And you have blocked more than one of them. If you would stop being so childish and listen to what they are saying you would learn something. Okay. Now you can block me too.

[Asker]

I hate when people like you have to be so technical. Who really goes around calling it a vulva? You know what I'm talking about. You don't see guys going around specifying the scrotum and the glans and the urethra. If someone kicks you in between your legs you're gonna say balls even if the foot hit your dick or scrotum exclusively.

[Red_Arrow]

Who goes around calling things by their correct names? How about the girls that you keep blocking. And Technical? If someone called your dick your balls, that would be wrong and you would either not understand them or tell them they are wrong. It is not technical, it is just fact. Vagina is not Vulva, and balls are not the penis. Plain and simple.

[Asker]

Dude I understand where you are coming from. All I'm saying is you are obviously being overly technical because the collective organ is referred to as "a vagina." Scientifically yes the vagina is just the internal canal but common terminology for the collective is commonly referred to as a vagina. Nobody calls it a vulva. The entire hunk of finger shaped flesh hanging between my legs is collectively referred to as a penis even though it also consists of multiple different technical parts.

[Asker]

And for the record, I blocked them because they were being rude.

[Red_Arrow]

The penis does consist of various parts, none of which is the penis by itself. the whole thing is what is known as (and correctly called) the penis. And when people were naming the parts of a female, the vulva was the outer stuff. The uterus and ovaries the inner stuff. And the canal between them was named the vagina. It is only in the last few years that many people, including certain female tv personalities started calling the vulva the VaJayJay to be able to say it on tv, and it was an incorrect term that was based on the vagina, even though that wasn't the part they were talking about. And today many people mistakenly call the vulva the vagina. The women answering were trying to point that out. look up vagina in a common dictionary. Or a book on anatomy. Or a Female Parts For Dummies book. They all point out that the canal is the vagina, and they are not being overly technical, just correct.

[Asker]

I don't need to look it up. I know what a vagina is. I'm just saying that when a woman opens her legs, I feel that it's overly technical to specify every little tiny part unless you need to. The penis has a collective name and the vagina is the equivalent. Our reproductive organ is the penis and theirs is the vagina. Each are made up of many different parts.

[Red_Arrow]

The vagina is NOT made up of several collective parts. It is the birth canal only. The collective term, if you want a collective term, for the parts you can see is the vulva. And when you are talking about a guys parts, you are talking about his penis and his testicles. Nobody includes the testicles as part of the penis. Nobody.

[Asker]

OMG I KNOW. I'm saying the female genitalia. Vagina, clitoris, labia, skene's glands, etc. I know I KNOW. I'm just saying that the genitalia between a male's legs and female's legs are made of many different parts so it's better to just have a name for them collectively rather than being scientifically specific all the time. The only collective names there are, are very vulgar ones like pussy.

[Red_Arrow]

Pussy is no more vulgar than dick. And vulva is no more technical than penis.

[Asker]

I know it isn't but pussy is a hell of a lot more vulgar than vagina.

[Red_Arrow]

And it is a totally different thing.

[Asker]

Pussy refers to the female genitals collectively. "Finger your pussy" "Rub your pussy" "Open your pussy" anyway we can agree to disagree on the formal and informal usage of the terminology but on the original topic I thought it was pretty obvious what I meant. You see male GENITALS in movies and shows but you never see female GENITALS. Just hair. All I wanted to know was why. Like I seriously didn't think it was a very difficult question to understand. You can expect to see full frontal nudity on a man but not a woman unless it's covered in hair.

[Red_Arrow]

The difference that you point out in the frontal nudity is that the female is protected by hair. The truth is, so is the male, except his organs stick out beyond the hair. Other than the labia majora which are covered by hair, all the female sexual organs are internal. So the hair is all there is to see. She would have to have the hair removed to see anything more, and that (the removal of hair to make viewing easier) would be too explicit for most movies.

[Asker]

I've seen shaved male genitals in movies. Also most women these days do shave their genitals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBRfJsH4NGs

[Asker]

That view on a female would clearly expose the labia and possibly the vagina and would probably cause lots of social uproar.

[Asker]

Also not to mention, the man's genitals are also SHAVED.

[Eienven]

Red_Arrow, you're wrong. The asker can't be calling for just spread legs if you want to be as technical as you seem to want to be. As you stated, the vagina consists of the entire birth canal which you cannot see with just the spreading of the legs. What you are talking about is only the opening to the vagina and not the vagina itself. To see that, you would need a speculum which would in no way be sexual. In that case, you would need to watch a medical program and not porn. If you want to harp on being technical, then BE technical. So, again, you and the other women are the ones who are making the mistake by trying to say you are being technical when you tell the Asker to watch porn. To see the vagina, you need to be able to see all the way to the cervix or you would only be seeing the "entrance" to the vagina and not the vagina itself.

[Eienven]

Also, your entire comment was nullified by your first sentence. "You are making a common mistake, and one that even gals make." So, if it's a "common mistake, and one that even gals make" then almost every one should already know it and should be able to use their ability to reason to understand what the Asker was asking for. Since you and the women you are "trying" to defend should know what is said when such a "common mistake" is made, then the only reason that all of you made your coments the way you did, was to be facetious. So the next time you feel the need to correct someone on their word usage, do it without being jerks about it. You could have simply said, "I think you, technically, mean the vulva since the vagina is actually internal and the external genitals you see are the vulva, but we get what you mean." Then you could have left it with that since your comments were just as wrong, as I stated in my comment just before this one.

[Eienven]

Oh, and to be technical, you should just say that the Asker is asking about the "labia majora". The labia minora and the clitoral hood often can't be seen unless the view of the external genitalia is a close one. To be seeing the vulva, you would also need to see the labia minora and the clitoral hood (at least, since the clitoris itself, is often not visible even with a close view without "spreading the legs and the labia majora") as all of these parts make up the external genitalia, i. e. the vulva. More often than not, the only parts that will be distinguishable from a distance are the labia majora and possibly part of the labia minora. So, since you who were "[trying] to explain that" the vulva is what is seen are "technically" wrong also, then you probably deserved to be blocked. After all, if you are wrong when you are so intent on explaining how another person is wrong, then you are just spouting gobbledygook and are wasting everyone's time in reading your comments.

[Red_Arrow]

@Eienven - Good grief! I stated that the vagina is the birth canal and that the only way he could see it is if her legs were spread and the lips open, which is true. I did not say he would see the "whole" vagina. And if he looked at his palm he would see his hand, but not the back, and therefore not the whole hand. If you saw a picture of the front of a car and called it a car, would you agree with someone saying it is not a car it is only the front of a car? Get real! You would not need to see all of it to the trunk to call it a car. And it being a "common mistake" does not mean it should continue to be made. And it is important in that it would take special angles to expose the opening of the vagina and even then not the whole thing. So it is not showing vaginas. And although someone else told him to watch porn I did not. Don't see anything facetious in that at all.

[Red_Arrow]

When one sees the labia majora, that is the most obvious part of the vulva so you are seeing the vulva. So I was not wrong, technically or otherwise. As for being a jerk, you are certainly sounding like one.

[DodgersGM]

If anything, there's an unfair gender bias against showing penises in Hollywood.

Seeing a woman's vulva is pretty par for the course, but seeing a man's penis carries a ton of shock value. So yeah, I think you've actually got it backwards here.

[Asker]

What do you mean? I'm confused.

[DodgersGM]

You wondered aloud if there was "some sort of unfair gender law against showing female genitalia in movie," and I pointed out that it was actually males who are asked to show less skin. Thus, the gender bias is against women, not in favor of them.

[hypno-trip]

Schlindler's List is one

[Asker]

I've never even heard of that movie.

[hypno-trip]

actually upon checking the scene I see it was covered by a panty nevermind

[Asker]

lol see what I mean? It just seems so gender biased. Even when someone has a baby or something, it's always a boy.

[Asker]

If it was a baby girl they'd cry about it being pedophillic or something.

[Zombie-Killa]

Any giving Sunday, Showgirls, And Knocked up are the only ones i can think of right now.

[Sapphirein]

You are right in your question.. forgive me for my bad English. l'm Italian.. but my sister works for youtube censorship now and for MPAA before... and I asked her the same question... why there are tons of videos on youtube that contains male nudity and penis es... gays videos. .. and very very little of vaginas and female nudity.. and none a vagina on American movies.. she answered me... on youtube... women and girls don't like female nudity... so big number flag it.. and in a short time it will be taken down.. also most of censorship teams are females... so they take down any videos that contain female nudity without any reasons... and they keep videos that contains male nudity any penises.. to be available to the other females to watch them... also feminists and gays make some pressure to keep this.. and because no one notice or protest.. they will continue... in MPAA... people in USA got used to see penises.. so it become normal to show.. and on youtube and MPAA they have some instructions to do this... when she got her job in youtube censorship. Her boss told her that " keep male nudity and take down female nudity as could as possible. .. that were the orders... also some lobbyists of fiminists and gays make some pressure on Hollywood companies to do that...

[Anonymous]

I don't know if it's American, I think so... But there's a movie called short bus. I know more.. Can't remember

[Anonymous]

Well said Vanny, the real reason for showing penises but not vaginas is political correctness from feminist and liberals. Those scum don't care about offending men but are hyper sensitive about offending women. If all their going to show of women is pubic hair then do the same for men! Just imagine if this situation was the other way around! The feminists and and politic correct libs would be going mad. To everyone who feels this way (men and women) don't just sit there, email anyone connected with TV shows and movies that continue this horrendous sexism to men. Find their contact details online and ask why they find it acceptable to show penises but not vaginas and when will they start showing as many vaginas (vulva, clitoris, ect) as they do penises. Men (and those decent women who support this) must take action now. Email, phone, write to, contact in any way TV channels and movie companies demanding equality in genital exposure. I have done so and so should you. God this whole situation is so sickening. Take action now!

[Anonymous]

go watch porn

[Asker]

Why even waste your time or energy with a response like this?

[Opinion Owner]

why even waste YOUR time or energy with a question like that? U should know that in movies they dont show exposed vaginas or dicks... U wanted to know where u could get those so I gave a simple answer... If ur that repulsed by nudity.. then do not ask such queestions.. Peace.

[Asker]

I think I'm just gonna start blocking bitchy girls like you from now on. Always fucking assuming. I never claimed to be repulsed by nudity nor did I ask about this "so i can see them" I can easily just go on google, type in VAGINA VIDEOS. and bam. I watch a wet vagina being fingered. Why the hell would I need to waste my time on GAG looking for movies that show them so I can wank to them? You also clearly neglected to read the whole question or any of the responses considering you said "vaginas or dicks" my question clearly states that they show dicks in movies.

[Anonymous]

Yeah it's called porn lol

[Asker]

I said movie...

[lewashby]

It looks this thread is full of white knights bud, not much you can do with a lot like this.