Are breasts sexual organs or just oversexualised?

this also relates to the #freethenipple campaign what are your views?
0 1

Most Helpful Girls

  • I mean, they're kind of sensitive so in a sense you can play with them sexually. But that goes for any body part to be honest. People have foot fetishes yet there's no law that says you're not allowed to wear sandals or walk around barefoot. I do think they're oversexualized. The primary reason why women have them is to feed babies. Any other reasons are almost irrelevant in comparison to that. I think it should be legal for women to walk around topless, or to swim topless at public beaches and pools. I'm not entirely sure if most women would feel comfortable with that, but at least it would be nice to have the option. And over the years people would become desensitized to it, and it would no longer be special to see a topless woman.

    Actually not too long ago it was also frowned upon for men to be topless.
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJcKGA9UsAAliUo.jpg

    • Click on the picture to read the text, it's a shame that GaG resized it.

  • Well I don't believe the breast is sexual we make it sexual but yeah you can use it sexually but the organ its self is not sexual. But the problem I have with free the nipple campaign is that we have to respect people wishes not everyone wants to see your boob you know? what's next we going to say showing off your dick in public is ok? I think at nude sites (like nude beaches etc) that's where you can free it off not in everyday situations.

  • Well if you want to get me aroused quickly go for the breasts because that is my pleasure part. There are plenty of nerve endings located in the breasts and some girls are born with plenty of them there. Personally I don't want guys looking at my breasts unless they are in my bed pleasuring them

Most Helpful Guys

  • Ahahaha. Free the nipple? It's an armchair campaign over a non-issue.

    If you make women dress decently, they'll complain they're oppressed.

    www.thenation.com/.../

    If you let women dress like hot sluts, they'll complain that unworthy "creepy" men are deriving sexual enjoyment from their exposed bodies.

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../...eks-getting-handsy.html

  • fewer acts make things more desirable than prohibiting them. I suspect that if it suddenly became a legal trend for women to walk around topless, in ~5 years or so, no one would really notice (constant influx of teenage boys notwithstanding).

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

13 39
  • I don't think they are sexual organs per say but I've been conditioned to view them as private parts and wouldn't want to show them in public for just anyone no matter what a campaign says.

    • I think that's something a lot of these advocates forget. Some women just plain old don't want other people viewing their breasts publicly and it's ridiculous to me that these people act like they're doing all women a favour without taking the consideration of the women who DON'T like the idea of it into account.

    • @RexCatholicissimus I don't think the free the nipple people want to force women to walk around toppless they just want to make it a choice... And I think all women would benefit from having their bodies de-sexualized. I think free the nipple is focusing on a symptom rather than an issue as most liberal campaigns though.

  • i think they can be both.
    interesting. never really thoughta bout it.
    having my tits played with is a super super turn on. the way it feels, not the act. so i think its both. some women dont care either way, they just let the guys play cuz they know the boys like it.
    for me tho, its a necessity.

    • sounds like a good answer to me

  • I wouldn't trust a human who didn't find them stimulating. Man or woman.

    I would consider them liars, or broken.

  • Breasts and sexual organs are meant to be sexual but 'over sexualized' YES I'll agree with you. In the current era they are very much so. The initial stages of 'modern' civilization it was meant to bring 'order' but like anything that man has created even this is growing malignant like a cancer :)

  • A woman's wish to go topless doesn't change the fact that men find breasts sexy or that they are sexual organs.

  • Technically I think it is considered a secondary sexual organ, so it would be technically oversexualized. But breasts are very popular anyways, just as people lust over bodies anyhow over centuries and centuries...

  • Over specialized. Sexual organs are parts made for heterosexual reproduction.
    Breasts are not needed for reproduction. They can be used for sex but aren't needed, and example of this is fingers. We aren't forced to wear gloves because even though hands can be used during sex they don't help your reproduce, so their not sexual organs.

    • Also to guys just because we can get sexual stimulation doesn't mean shit. There are to a of men who like nipple stimulation and walk around topless so that's an invalid argument

  • Oversexualized...
    They're made for babies.

  • Breasts are used more often in a sexual situation than for feeding babies. Therefore I think they are primarily sexual organs.

    Oversexualized? It all comes down to ones personal taste. I don't think they are.

  • I think it is overly sexualized but hey can you blame humans? I mean boobs are really awesome tho! It don't see the point in #freethenipple campaign... I mean what's the point?

  • They're not sexual organs, but they're something that we men love, it normally calls our attention.

  • I don't believe they're sexual organs in the traditional sense, but they are sexual in my eyes.

    The fact that breasts are such a common physical/sexual stimulant to a woman is proof enough of that to me. Now I know some would argue "well not all contact with breasts is stimulatory", which is true, but there have been cases of women orgasming through breastfeeding their own children and an orgasm is VERY much a sexual response. They're not oversexualised in my mind and if they are, it's only because the female body itself seems to sexualise them. Also they physically entice the male body, so again, how is that oversexualisation if men are having natural bodily reactions to a woman's breasts?

    Incidentally on #freethenipple I think it's a very obnoxious movement that's essentially a practice created for no better cause than the satisfaction of one's own vanity and god knows ego (be it a negative or positive ego) and breasts go hand-in-hand.

  • Lol! free the nipple? i never heard of that, i think they are pretty sexual to most
    Boobs are just boobs but women should still cover themselves
    Many Italian shows show a little boob but in non sexual context,(sometimes lol)

    I think they are over sexualised but i dont mind that lol :)

  • Oversexualized indeed.

  • I think oversexualised - They really have no necessary sexual function

  • Oversexualised for sure, breasts are for feeding, a penis is for pleasure, totally different things.

  • Oversexualized. they're just boobs, they're meant to feed babies.

  • Neither.
    Breasts are a sexual attractant. So are a pretty face and a shapely bottom.
    Breasts can receive sexual stimulation. So can a girl's neck and tummy.
    Breasts are an object of adornment and beauty like other female bits.
    Breasts draw on instinctive reactions we are too sophisticated to recognize.
    Breasts are unique like nothing else. They induce complex feelings just by looking at them.

  • I don't think they're sex organs but are erogenous zones

  • im all for free the nipple. if girls want to get their tits out, who am I to complain?

  • Show More (32)