Are any women actually visually sexually aroused by the male body?

[Anonymous]

It seems like "straight" women are more likely to be aroused by a pic or video of hot naked women than a hot naked guy, yet they claim to be straight. And don't say "well my my bf/husbands body arouses me" that isn't actual visual attraction to his body, otherwise every guy who has a similiar looking body to your bf/husband should arouse you when you look at it.

[Anonymous]

ol at anyone who believes women are heterosexual, they are all bisexual, they consume 2.5 times as much lesbian porn as guys and it's is by far the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic (pornhub statistics, like you posted). "straight" women are also literally more aroused by the female body than the male body, indiana. edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007. pdf (read that, it's scientifically sound proof). Playboy once did a test where women where aroused by a lap dance by both male and female strippers, while men where only aroused by female strippers.

Most women will make out with other girls after minimal alcohol, and will be willing to do sexual things to another girl during an ffm threesome.
Normally the thing that makes a girl want to have sex with a guy will be non physical, non gender specific traits and will need these non gender specific traits to feel sexual attraction to them in the first place.

Female sexuality is fluid while men have a hard wired sexual orientation. Anthropologists say women don't actually have a sexual orientation, just an amorphous mess based off sexual narcissistic self affirmation.

[Asker]

They are closer to being lesbian than straight

[dominiquois]

You could be right if anything men are just incomplete women if you look at the chromosomes. XX (female) XY (male). I looks like the male is missing a chromosomal "leg".
62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/.../bv9fpsk3-1414040470.png

[dominiquois]

And thats not mentioning that many women find women more objectively beautiful than men. Like some women would rather stare at Adriana Lima than most men. I think the did a study where women on dating sites only find 20% "beautiful". Often times handsome men have a feminized beauty. Weird.

[Opinion Owner]

Actually men start as xx and are literally steroided up to become XY, i don't know if you are trying to claim that women are superior or something, but the xy deals with anomalies more while women are more stable against disease etc, as in the smartest and most capable people will always be men, as xy deals with genetic "freaks more often'. Either way female sexuality is warped and no women is straight.

[dominiquois]

I'm just pointing out the chromosome difference. Even as you said "men start as xx and are literally steroided up to become XY," Why on earth would a set of complete XX chromosomes lose a piece of itself and become XY if its not a loss? Maybe thats why women have more empathy and are less shallow than men.

[dominiquois]

Lol, @"the most capable people will always be men" You can probably say that in a world where most wars, crimes and violence and general evil don't have men behind it.

[Opinion Owner]

Say what you want but 90% of all things good and bad have men as responsible, men are faster stronger and functionally smarter. You do know an extra chromosome makes you less intelligent (more than 23 pairs), having 2 full x chromosomes doesn't mean you are smarter or superior in anyway.

[dominiquois]

Men have simply brute, animal force and the think they can use that to get their way. Any "intelligence" they gain from chromosome loss is probably a compensation for all they loose. Not to mention that science and technology has employed mostly men until recent times when women have been ALLOWED to have jobs in those fields. Women have been suppressed throughout many cultures and religions to hide the truth. When the bible says the woman was taken out of Adam. It means that Adam lost what made him a woman and "fell" into being a man. The fall of mankind. The male ego in large part revolves strictly around what the women makes him out to be. While a woman "dresses for other women". Like you said men are hardwired to be aroused by women but women are more fluid. Society revolves around women and children.

[Opinion Owner]

The fact still remains that we are faster, stronger and smarter, we are dominant, by very base biology we are superior, we have achieved so much more. And don't quote the bible, religion is bullshit anyway, and plus there is quote in Corinthians that says women must be subservient to men, and that is there place. The only thing that revolves around women in society is sex, other than that, the world revolves around men.

[dominiquois]

The world does not and has never revolved around men simply because its women that give birth to children. Like the queen bee the men are simply the worker bees. The man works to provide for the wife and kids. Many men workout, try to get rich and go to top schools, etc to attract women out of their league but you never see women breaking their necks like that in life just to attract a man. It seems men are more interested in women then women are in men. At least to me it seems like it. If anything women have been the ones that have been opressed not men because to men apparently the need is strong to oppress/suppress women and their expressions (whether their individuality, sexuality, or personal success). Control. Of course there are men who don't do any of those things but those are the exception to the rule. But men have created their own men-only clubs and fraternities to try to monopolize things on earth to favor men and not women but it all goes back to the women in the end

[Opinion Owner]

Sexually men want women more than they want men, but romantically women aren't that appealing to men. Women don't have to break their necks because they are innately sex objects and that's all that is required to attract men. It's (sex appeal) their biggest advantage and pretty much the only advantage women have over men, and what the saying "prostitution is the oldest profession in the world"(coined by runard kipling) is about. That is why men are superior, they had to do things to bread, while women only had to be born, thus men evolved to be better at most things. So if you see the sexual power of women and being perpetual prostitutes and maids to men as being superior than those who created the world and reached the peaks of life, then ok.

[Opinion Owner]

*to breed lol

[little_bird1]

You're mostly right, but you're wrong about one thing - men are not smarter. Where the hell did you get that from? I'm not saying women are smarter, I'm just saying it's completely equal and it has nothing to do with gender or genetics or evolution. You stating that man are smarter based just on gender, proves my point of how stupid you are. :) And pretty shallow as well I gotta say, buddy.

[Opinion Owner]

Higher IQs on average and the top, some Stanford study using 7 types of intellect that had men on top 6 out of 7 times. Women are getting higher high school marks lately on average, but men have higher marks at more demanding fields in tertiary study. This is because men have 10 times more grey matter than women, while women have 10 times more white matter, which makes women more of a jack of all trades, while very demanding work i better suited for men, since the male brain can process more information (grey matter are the nodes that hold information, and literally has intelligence as a synonym, white matter connects grey matter together).

[little_bird1]

Having higher IQ or grades doesn't mean you are smarter. How well you complete tasks also has nothing to do with intelligence. Being smart is how clever you are. Basically, it's proportional to your lever of happiness and satisfaction. The happier you are, the smarter you are. So, ironically, if someone who has way lower intelligence then you is happier and more satisfied with his life then you, it means he is more clever then you hence more smarter.

[Asker]

"The happier you are, the smarter you are. So, ironically, if someone who has way lower intelligence then you is happier and more satisfied with his life then you, it means he is more clever then you hence more smarter." WHAT THE FUCK, NOW I HAVE HEARD IT ALL, YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS, YOU ARE JOKING RIGHT, HHAHAHAHAHAH WHAT, FUNNIEST BULLSHIT I HAVE EVER HEARD, THE HAPPIER YOU ARE THE SMARTER YOU ARE? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA IN FACT MOST CLAIM THE OPPOSITE, THAT DUMB PEOPLE ARE HAPPIER, BUT NOBODY CLAIMS IT AS DIRECT REFERRAL TO INTELLECT.

[little_bird1]

I see you're not the happy one. :D Of course you can't understand what I wrote because you're dumb. Piece out! ;)

[Opinion Owner]

this girl has to be clinically retreaded @little-bird1

[Opinion Owner]

@little_bird1

[Poppykate]

@little_bird1 I am sorry. But it has been psychologically proven that your level of happiness in life, subjectively correlates with your IQ. Let me quickly explain. There is a lot fewer people with a high IQ. It becames difficult for those with a high IQ to form connections/ relationships. For them, it's like living on a island of monkeys. They feel misunderstood, and feel like they can't make a real connection with anyone, and become depressed. Does this make sense? 🤔

[Poppykate]

But asker really does need to play nicer!

[little_bird1]

@Poppykate Being depressed doesn't make you smart. It's actually really stupid. Not being able to connect and co-exist with other humans means you lack something, and that's called social intelligence. Social intelligence is what matters the most in this age that we live in. Your level of success depends on how socially intelligent you are. You could have the lowest IQ in the world, but if you're SOCIAL you're gonna do very good in life. Those people can blend in, manipulate, change shapes and LOOK STUPID for all they care, but they are gonna profit from it because people will notice them. They usually end up getting involved with media, too. They have bunch of money, followers and supporters and they rise to the top. It's a new age survival. All that takes is confidence, communication skills and something to stand out for. It doesn't matter if you're being yourself or not, all that matters is how society responds to it.

[Poppykate]

@little_bird1 What you are talking about is called EQ. (Emotional intelligence)

[Anonymous]

I mean, add a sultry word or two and the right grin and you'll have them trying hard to hold it back. As for sexually aroused by bodies... I don't think men are either to be honest.

Lets be fair here. Unless you're like... 12. Going to a nudist beach won't really do anything for you sexually unless you actively fantasize about this or that. Even if there is this smoking hot girl there it'll just be "meh". Now if she turns and gives you a wink, changes her posture just a little, that's when the entire beach knows you and yours are looking straight at her.

Same with girls. You need that wink.

[KRIEL55]

just like another girl said, it really is because women are way more sexualized in our culture. we often see either extremely photoshopped women or ones with a lot of surgery who just have unbelievable bodies that even grab straight women's attention. but i personally would never actually be able to do anything with a woman, the thought of that disgusts me. i do however get turned on by a specific type of men and the 2 body parts that make me go insane are his dick (obviously) and nice strong arms! i dont know what exactly it is about arms but if he has nice arms, im staaaring. aha and i looove tall guys too just so manly and sexy.

[Asker]

Don't confuse affect and effect, just because the media and culture made women bisexual that obviously means women are still bisexual.

[kaylaS91]

Why do you feel so needed to post all over this site that you're not a 'straight woman' if you find the female body to be sexy, despite being all for sex with men, only?
You do realize that orientation is decided more by who you actually want to get intimate with than simply find attractive, even sexually, yeah?

[Asker]

not according to the dictionary

[kaylaS91]

so you're saying a dictionary knows where to draw the lines on someone orientation better than themselves? There's zero grey area to that then, eh?

[Asker]

"simply find attractive, even sexually," if you find someone sexually attractive, that's by very definition means you have a SEXUAL orientation for them, i should jut accept you agree with me, since you want words to mean what you want them to mean, so you saying no means yes.

[kaylaS91]

... no, sweetie, you're very off mark. Do I find some women hot? yeah. Do I want to go down on them or vice versa? No thankyou.

[Asker]

You used incorrect phrases

[kaylaS91]

oook sweetheart. Whatever helps you sleep better at night.

[WhistleThuslyTWEETs]

@kaylaS91 I know you are wrong, 100% wrong 200% wrong. You also know that you are telling 100% asshole bullshit. Then why you are pretending too much smart?

[f_ckmeup]

why would i want to be sujected to seeing some random dude's weiner when i can just be aroused by my bf's body, with whom I've shared intimate moments with?

Plus. Penises look like sad little flesh elephants, while women's bodies are like majestic unicorns.

[Asker]

Then you aren't attracted to men, AND THERE BODIES, EMOTIONAL ATTRACTION IS WHAT ATTRACTS YOU TO HIM, WHICH IS NOTHING GENDER SPECIFIC, YOU SOUND DEMISEXUAL, WHICH ISN'T HETEROSEXUAL (STRAIGHT).

[Asker]

you actually sound closer to being lesbian than straight, emotional attraction by very definition has nothing to do with sexual orientation

[f_ckmeup]

I really dont know how thats closer to being lesbian? I just dont objectify men as sexual objects, so yeah im not constantly looking at a guy and wondering how big his dick is or if he has abs or not because thats just rude. If anything i look at eyes or smile because its what is being receptive to me when i talk.

[Asker]

I bet you are more aroused y the female body , then the male body, which would make you closer to being lesbian than straight.

[Asker]

"why would i want to be sujected to seeing some random dude's weiner " you have to be subjected to it, it's something you hate, have to endure, you are attracted to your boyfriend for emotional attraction (which by definition has nothing to do do with sexual orientation,) not his body, otherwise every guy with a similar looking body would arouse you, if you have to "be subjected to:" seeing a man naked, you should seriously consider you aren't actually physically attracted to men.

[Asker]

Seriously you aren't actually attracted to anything intrinsically male and can't be considered straight

[LuvYouAll]

The attraction to naked female body is due the mass culture sexualising the female body it really has very little to do with someone's sexuality.

[fuuuark]

Don't confuse affect and effect, that i just the reason women are bisexual, they still are, that's basic logic, and also if that were so gay men would be aroused by the female body, but they aren't indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf Either way that would still make women bisexual, it would just b the reason they are bisexual.

[Asker]

Yeah girl, just because something made you gay, doesn't mean you aren't gay

[Asker]

A d you aren't aroused by a naked guy, but a naked girl, and you think you are straight? thst would make you closer to being lesbian than straight

[LuvYouAll]

Sexuality isn't really only visual stimulation and reacting to it sweeties. Anyway sexuality is not really different boxes to put people in but rather a spectrum where you put yourself in. Getting physically aroused by naked female body doesn't make someone straight or gay it's just a simple reaction caused by conditioning.

[fuuuark]

And that conditioning has made you bisexual or gay, how come it doesn't condition gay men? only the pheramonal and the visual are gender specific. If you are aroused by one of the very few gender specific qualities of women, but not by the most gender specific thing of men, it is laughable to claim to be straight. AND YOU ARE EVEN AGREEING WITH ME, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND SIMPLE SEMANTICS, you say it is a spectrum, well if sexuality is a spectrum than you can't be heterosexual (or homosexual by definition), even the kisney scale agrees with that (if you aren't a 0 or 6 on the scale you are bisexual). You are basically agreeing women are bisexual and closer to being lesbian than straight. Seriously, if you are aroused by naked women, but not naked men, it's ridiculous to claim you are straight, and like i said before, if you are conditioned to become something, you still are that thing, how can you not get that?

[Asker]

Like i said before girl "Yeah girl, just because something made you gay, doesn't mean you aren't gay" that is such basic logic. You seem like anecdotal evidence that women are bisexual but closer to being lesbian

[LuvYouAll]

@fuuuark the terms are something you can decide so it doesn't mean that you can put yourself in so if you identify as a heterosexual nobody can tell you you aren't. Anyway it does affect some gay men too and women just are in general more open to new experiences and are more likely going go tell about feelings that go against what they think should belong to the sexuality they think they are in.

[LuvYouAll]

I never said I was straight in first place luv ^.-

[fuuuark]

Straight women don't exist, and you aren't a sexual orientation just because you say you are, you simply are one, you don't chose. And there is no scientific proof that women sexually arouse gay men.

[LuvYouAll]

@fuuuark sexual attraction and arousal are not the same thing. Your sexuality comes from sexual and romantic attraction. Not what you get aroused by. I could get aroused by naked men but still only feel sexual attraction to women which would in the way you seem to think it goes a lesbian. Then again I could also think I'm bisexual because I get aroused by men and feel romantic attraction to them. So I'd kind of be heteroromantic. We don't decide who we feel attracted to yes, but we decide the name we use when describing our sexuality

[fuuuark]

No you don't decide, the dictionary does, and romantic attraction by very definition has nothing to do with SEXUAL orientation, "sexually attracted to both men and women"- the definition of bisexual in every dictionary. Any way read my long comment below as anonymous, look up female fluid sexuality, anthropologists and neuroscientists agree that straight women don't exist, their opinion is worth more than yours.

[LuvYouAll]

@fuuuark meuroscientists do mot really research sexuality as a part of personality or as a psychological phenomenon but as a physical thing. They use the term sexuality when talking about arousal. I don't know if the term sexuality is defined differently in your culture than it is in mine if it is then we are arguing about semantics. Anyway neuroscientists cannot measure sexual attraction only arousal. In my culture arousal has nothing to do with sexuality tho scientists seem to use wrong terms when talking about arousal I do not know if it's because they want to make it more appealing to the mass or if they simply do not know the definition of it.

[fuuuark]

What culture? scientists opinions have to be taken over those of the lay mans, they are using the correct terms, you are using the wrong terms. Sexual attraction doesn't have a clear cut definition, but physical arousal is one of the best ways, since the visual is GENDER SPECIFIC, Seriously it's proven that women have fluid sexuality and thus can't be straight, i invite you to do as much research as you want. And anthropologists study this exact thing and say women are bisexual, sexual orientation is in their field of expertise, and they aren't exactly scientists.

[cupcakes94]

Oh yeah, male bodies definitely turn me on. But I think the biggest thing for me is faces; penises are just penises, but a face is what makes a guy a person. All it takes is a sexy look.

To address the whole "straight women are aroused by hot naked women" thing, I personally am more turned on by naked guys than girls. Also, I don't think being aroused by another female necessarily means you're not straight.

[Asker]

"Also, I don't think being aroused by another female necessarily means you're not straight." straight people don't get aroused by the bodies of their own gender.

[little_bird1]

Not much by his body figure as much as his movements and his positions. Also depends on his clothing style. Penis plays good part in visual turn on too.

Personally, I get aroused (meaning warm and wet around my pussy) when I see a hot guy. And by hot I mean if he has what I like, not what society thinks is hot.

[Minxxie]

I am attracted by other men's bodies sometimes, but I don't like to ogle people because it's rude and I hate when men do it to me so I don't do it to them.

[SexyStudent]

Most women including me are attracted to a man face. When guys send pictures of their penis to a straight female it is either a turnoff or laughable. That is so homosexual in origin and has been recognized as such for so long I don't understand why men don't get the hint. Sure I like to see a well-built muscular guy but I want to see his face.

[Asker]

But simply a face won't sexually arouse you

[Asker]

it's homosexual in origin because only gay men are purely sexually attracted to men, women aren't

[WhatAreYouReading]

I don't get sexually aroused with just visuals, no.

[WhatAreYouReading]

Oh and because I feel like I have to state it after reading others comments, I don't get sexually aroused with just visuals of either gender. Visuals alone do nothing for me.

[Asker]

Then why not date a women if how someone looks doesn't matter, if you aren't sexually attracted to gender specific traits you aren't straight

[WhatAreYouReading]

Well, first of all I am married and second of all the vagina kind of creeps me out as bad as that sounds. I don't like being fingered or eaten out as it is and have no desire to try a dildo so as far as the sexual stuff goes that does leave much left on the lesbian front, if that didn't matter and none of that stuff was expected then sure why not. Also, I have never fell for a woman. Visuals alone have never did anything for me and I know a lot of girls like that *shrugs*. Guys and girls are wired different and a lot of these terms and these definitions (straight, homo, bi) were coined and defined by guys so I don't put a lot into the labels either but you can, you can label me however you like, I don't really care it wouldn't change anything for me.

[Asker]

You sound demisexual,

[Asker]

You aren't sexually attracted to anything intrinsically male and cannot be considered straight.

[WestCoastLover97]

Please stop posting this question. Other people's sexual orientation or how they chose to define it isn't any of your concern. It isn't affecting your life, it isn't decreasing your quality of life and the only reason you could possibly have to keep posting this question is to troll or get in fights with people on a website, anonymously of course.

[Asker]

When women are more aroused by the female body than the male body, when playgirl was a failure but lesbian porn is the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic, and i have to date these 'straight' girl, it effects my life very much.

[WestCoastLover97]

Nope. It doesn't effect your life. Not all women are aroused by other women. You've presented no factual proof to back up your claim. So unless you can give me proof that all women are attracted to other women and then some proof that shows how that directly effects the quality of your life you're just a troll. Have a blessed day

[Asker]

indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf

[Asker]

read that

[ElissaDido]

I'm not sexually aroused by bodies in general, male or female. It takes more than a body for me.

[Asker]

Then you aren't sexually attracted to anything gender specific and can't be considered straight

[Asker]

seriously you can't be considered heterosexual as nothing intrinsically male is sexually attractive to you.

[Daisymax]

No I don't get arosed at a males body.

[Asker]

but probably get aroused by female bodies, which would make you closer to being lesbian than straight

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

Hell No, why would I be. I mean im only heterosexual and get wet by looking at a naked man. If women didn't find men sexually appealing humanity would have died along time ago.

[Asker]

Well playgirl was a failure, and lesbian porn is the most popular genre to the female demographic, indiana.edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf this shows that "straight" girls are more aroused by the female body in every capacity, so it's obvious "straight" women aren't that interested in the male body, women chose men for emotional connection, stability, babies etc. but are probably closer to being lesbian than straight.

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

Easy , in porn how the women act and moan is fake. vs in lesbian porn it's more real the woman enjoys herself. hetero porn actually porn in general is geared for men and does nothing for the female sexuality

[Asker]

That isn't an excuse, if you are aroused by two women licking each others twats above anything that contains men, you aren't straight, and in those tests, a naked women with no sexual act, turned on "straight" women more than a naked man.

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

What? Lol first female sexuality and male sexuality are different don't assume because she is attractive to it and turned on by imagining she is the one enjoying it makes her gay. Second men like shemale porn? Can you answer watching a gay man with plastic surgery? Thirdly, women watch porn but it isn't made for us but for men and it does nothing for us, when porn for women made by women becomes more popular women will be watching that. plus all statistics made by men want to make women out to be gay

[Asker]

First you say why would i/women be aroused by the female body, and now you are saying it is natural for "straight" women to be aroused by the female body wtf

[Asker]

If a guy watches shemale porn, with a shemale banging a girl it's fine, it's like watching a girl being banged by a guy, if he watches to shemales banging eachother, he isn't straight, "when porn for women made by women becomes more popular women will be watching that." so the porn made for women, is women on women? that's the porn made for them? girls kissing and licking each other turns girls on more than all else, anything containing guys, and you think they are straight, haahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

Um, I don't see shemales as a girl , they look like men to me. anyway, no its both gay n hetero porn geared towards the female sexuality. You don't understand female sexuality take a class on it

[Asker]

Lol at anyone who believes women are heterosexual, they are all bisexual, they consume 2.5 times as much lesbian porn as guys and it's is by far the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic (pornhub statistics,). "straight" women are also literally more aroused by the female body than the male body, indiana. edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007. pdf (read that, it's scientifically sound proof). Playboy once did a test where women where aroused by a lap dance by both male and female strippers, while men where only aroused by female strippers. Most women will make out with other girls after minimal alcohol, and will be willing to do sexual things to another girl during an ffm threesome. Normally the thing that makes a girl want to have sex with a guy will be non physical, non gender specific traits and will need these non gender specific traits to feel sexual attraction to them in the first place.

[Asker]

Female sexuality is fluid while men have a hard wired sexual orientation. Anthropologists say women don't actually have a sexual orientation, just an amorphous mess based off sexual narcissistic self affirmation. Disagree with me if you want but there is far to much evidence (both scientific and anecdotal) to consider heterosexuality the female default, look up female sexual fluidity and see that anthropologists and neuroscientists agree with me (well I agree with them).

[Asker]

I understand the empathetic narcissism that is female sexuality, i have eclectic knowledge of it, and i understand women are by no measure heterosexual

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

Actually neuroscientist can't agree on the female sexuality thing. First tour talking to someone with a BA in psychology. second, nueroscience doesn't even know if we are born straight, bi or even gay. they are doing tests on that, And I'm aure the entire Greek and Roman empire was filled me men who were bisexual. So, I mean aren't men at least white men bisexual, and no you need to be around women to know what female sexuality is. its every man dream that he wants his girl to be bi. Anyway, bye

[Asker]

Well i have a bss in anthro and cog science, and all people in any position of repute say straight women don't exist, they have fluid sexuality. Greeks and Romans were bi, but in the contemporary it seems only women are bi, we aren't looking at affect here we are looking at effect. And no i hate the fact that women are attracted to other women, not a dream of mine. Anyway, why in your first post did you say "hell no women aren't aroused by other women", but now you say it's natural that they are aroused by other women?

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

Yea, I may have probably added I'm in graduate school for nueroscience some thing I've sais on This sight several times. But like I said no proof at all on sexuality none. actually they are doing tests to see if people are born gay or if something happens after birth to make them gay and if not are we born straight. No one knows. Any way, let's let nueroscience answer it when they ha e the answers they don't know this right now

[Asker]

Well right now "science" considers women bisexual, it's actually clear cut to me, the only thing that could be argued is the semantics.

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

Science doesn't consider women bisexual lol. A few test done by private researchers or independent researchers does not reflect science.

[Asker]

Well women being sexually aroused by other women is a fact (over 400 test subjects, it's impossible to yield the same results for every subject if it in't true) while men aren't aroused by other men. And the research teams are the university of Indiana and the university if Essex

[dominiquois]

I am aroused by the male body. Actually I'm more aroused by his mannerisms and words he says.

[Asker]

are you aroused by the female body though?

[dominiquois]

No tbh I'm not. No matter how hard I would try. I admit when a woman has a nice body or face but thats about it.

[sicosico]

Depends on the person and the mood, not a general thing though

[WhaChaChaKing]

If he's good looking then yes I am turned on by them.

[IceEverest]

Media has shown male nude anatomy as a joke... so is the impact in real life.

[Anonymous]

You clearly don't know that many women masturbate to gay male porn

[Asker]

More masturbate to lesbian porn though

[Anonymous]

Not the way guys are, no, but if there's a "type" we like and had a good experience with, then we tend to let that type approach us, or if we have a partner we like and see him coming over or lock eyes with him etc. the recollection of what we've done in the past can cause feelings of arousal to kick in.

There are, of course, the very wild girls who will do anything to anyone, but I can't say what motivates them.

[Anonymous]

If he's attractive, yes. Go look how many Pinterest boards there are of sexy men.

[Asker]

Yeah but they don't masturbate to those pictures, meanwhile lots of "straight" women masturbate to lesbian porn

[Anonymous]

Never honestly I don't know why though

[Asker]

because you aren't straight

[Anonymous]

It's the closeness and the way he makes me feel when I'm with him that makes me feel attracted. I don't really care about his muscles or bodyfat...

[Asker]

Are you visually aroused by the female body though?

[Opinion Owner]

No. Women do nothing for me... Sure I can admire the beauty but I'm no sexually attracted.

[Asker]

Then you aren't sexually attracted to anything gender specific and can't be considered straight.

[Opinion Owner]

And you are lacking the capacity of clear thinkind so you can't be consider a great a ape.

[Asker]

Are you being deliberately obtuse? "the closeness and the way he makes me feel" is in no way gender specific, so you aren't sexually attracted to anything intrinsic to men.