Is it rape if a guy cums inside of you when you told him not to?

[Anonymous]

Why or why not?

[EyeAmNiceGirl]

Rape is about insertion of the penis into the vagina without consent. There is nothing in the definition of rape that has anything to do with a guy cumming; if cumming inside you was part of the definition of rape, then the non-consensual penis in the vagina wouldn't be rape if he pulled out before he came. Let me help you you younger girls here -- if a guy puts his bare penis inside your vagina, he is going cum inside you, that's the natural progression of the sex act. Both the guy and girl lose certain amount of mental capacity as the sex act is carried out; everything in the guy's DNA says to cum deep inside her. This is why the condom was inveted -- to catch the cum, because he's not going to pull it out in the moment that he cums (his brain is NOT working at that moment in time).

[Klara-Hitler]

Of course rape. No means no. Even when you told yes and he fucked you like a dog in the ass and mouth and pussy and ears and even nose for an hour, when you say "no" the guy has to put his patriarchal dick away and stop oppressing you.

Every part of the sex needs consent. It's not like when you say yes when he's fucking you in the ass it means a total yes for having sex with that guy at that moment including yes to everything that might naturally accidentally happen during sex. He has to ask the queen for her consent with every move of his dick inside your glorious anus.

[MoonlitSonata]

Girls changes mind, guy is immediately being oppressive... wait.. nevermind you have Hitler in your name.

[AleDeEurope]

@MoonlitSonata She's being sarcastic.

[MoonlitSonata]

@AleDeEurope I she? I mean there are women out there who feel this way. I hope she is. If you are being sarcastic @Klara-Hitler I sincerely apologize.

[AleDeEurope]

@MoonlitSonata I've seen her around and she's not the type of girl to think like that. Just check out here Take about feminism.

[singlebee]

Go fuck yourself hitler

[Klara-Hitler]

@singlebee I'm an anti-feminist. The most infamous anti-feminist on this crappy site since a year and half ago. I am mocking the concept of withdrawal of consent at any time women wish during sex. The joke and sarcasm is very obvious in this comment.

[singlebee]

Oh ok... I am so bad at reading that sarcasm... Sorry Lol

[Anonymous]

Consent is consent, you have the right to say no at any time, so if you said no just before he came then technically it could be considered rape. But try to remember once he has started to cum he can't stop the spunk from coming out like a pee lol!

Its a bit rude that you asked him not to cum inside you though and he did anyway!

You can always change your mind during sex, i have had many drunk mistakes when i have agreed then half way through wanted to stop but just got on with it instead of standing up for myself and saying i havr changed my mind!

[samhradh_leannan]

It's not rape, exactly, because you consented to have sex. But it is a violation of that consent. It shows a serious lack of respect and consideration for your needs, limits, and rights. It's also downright stupid, because it could result in an unwanted pregnancy.

I would consider it to be a form of sexual assault.

[BearsAnswers]

Consent did not include ejaculation into the vagina.

It's tricky. I could see different judges ruling differently on this. Most places have rape under sexual assault laws, and that means there is less need to get into particulars. A girl can withdraw consent at ANY time. And she is essentially saying "I am giving you consent to have intercourse, but withdraw that consent before you ejaculate." If he ejaculates anyways, he is violating consent.

If he didn't mean to, that's just unfortunate and the guy is a careless ass. If he just did it anyway, knowingly, then that is definitely a stronger case of willfully violating consent, and that's probably going to fall under sexual assault of some sort, if not rape directly.

[FunkyMonkee]

Rape is when he FORCES YOU to have sex with him. It doesn't matter if he cums in you or not. Likewise, as long as you consented to have sex with him, it doesn't matter if he cums in you or not, even if you told him not to. Sometimes guys can't control themselves! They may WANT to pull out at the last second but, it feels SO INCREDIBLY GOOD during those last few seconds, you can't help but leave it in! This is part of the reason why there are such things as rubbers, the female condom, birth control pills for both sides, the diaphragm, spermicides, and a number of other things to prevent pregnancy or sperm from getting into you.

[onetattoo29]

You were willing to preform in the action.

[BellePepper]

It depends on which state you're in.

[AustinMan]

Clearly you were having consensual sex with him and didn't tell him to stop. That he came inside you was extremely inconsiderate but it's not criminal.

[kdizzleforizzle91]

Rape would mean sex against your will. Cumming inside you when you asked him not to just makes him a disrespectful asshole.

[Boromir]

You consented to condom free sex I assume, just trusting the fact that he will pull out in time is simply not the smartest thing to do but does not render him a rapist IMHO. Also depends if he tried to impregnate you on purpose or just 'came' by accident.

[justwannahvefun]

did you tell him you wanted to have sex?

[Jaded5990]

You told him he can have sex with you and you didn't change your mind during. There's always plan b and if you want to turn him in for rape, I suggest you not to. All the best.

[Sara413]

I voted yes because it IS sexual assault. I wouldn't call it rape though.

[aliceinwonderland69]

I sit sexual assault? In what country? I not troll. I genuine ask.

[M_A_X]

I might, MAYBE be able to consider it sexual assault if he planned to cum in her from the beginning, but there's no way anybody could prove that so it's a non-point anyway. A guy who just can't hold his shit in though? That's not rape, that's a matter of "shit happens, be prepared"

[MoonlitSonata]

Assault? what are you smoking?

[Sara413]

@aliceinwonderland69 both Canada and the USA. I assume most of western Europe as well.

[M_A_X]

@MoonlitSonata dat Canadian dank Semen always be assaulting

[Sara413]

@M_A_X whether he planned it or not, by the letter of the law in Canada and most US states performing a sexual act on someone that they did not consent to is sexual assault. If a guy promises to wear a condom and then throws it away or pulls it off when she's not looking that is sexual assault too because she did not consent to unprotected sex.

[Sara413]

@MoonlitSonata I'm not smoking anything. I'm simply relaying fact. Performing a sexual act on a person that they did not consent to is sexual assault in most jurisdictions. This includes things like slipping a condom off when your partner asked you to wear one, cumming inside them when they told you not to, trying to slip it in the ass when they only consented to vaginal... etc.

[M_A_X]

I promise I'll never fuck a Canadian woman then, because if I lose my balance and grab her boob on accident I'll end up in jail with a bunch of people who can't say "about" properly We're not talking about condoms, by the way. Condoms weren't brought into this conversation. We're going under the assumption that they were having raw sex and the guy just couldn't control his shit, or slipped and fell while trying to pull out. Also, no, I'm pretty sure those laws take into account whether it was done on purpose or not. Men do not go to jail because they slipped and put it in the wrong hole, nor should they.

[Sara413]

@M_A_X oh for Christ sake if it's clearly an accident no one is gonna call up the police and charge you with assault. The question specifically ask if cumming inside someone when they didn't want you to is rape. I answered with regard to the legal definition. The legal definition of physical assault is hitting someone not in self defense... we don't see people getting hauled off to jail for slipping and accidentally punching someone in the arm...

[Sara413]

@M_A_X if some guy knows full well she doesn't want him to cum inside her and he does it anyways he is an asshole and as far as the letter of the law is concerned, a sexual offender. Chances are it'd never go to court but that doesn't change the fact that what he did was wrong and constitutes a violation of her body.

[aliceinwonderland69]

trying to slip it in the arse... just lol at life

[Sara413]

If it's clearly an accident he'd feel bad about it, say sorry, etc etc... in which case the woman probably wouldn't even be mad. How I read the question was under the assumption it was done with intent.

[aliceinwonderland69]

Semen always be assualtin' Bitches always be trippin'

[MoonlitSonata]

I did not know that. Thanks for the info. I wouldn't ever do anything to a woman without consent, but it's good to know.

[Sara413]

@MoonlitSonata most guys wouldn't.

[XOXOME16]

No. Wtf? Did he force you into sex? If no then its not rape. 😑

[fauchelevent]

It's not rape, though I think in some places it's considered sexual assault. Either way, if it's on purpose, it's a dick move - though having sex without protection anyway is a pretty stupid idea.

[MoonlitSonata]

A dick move... ;-) see what you did there

[SarahsSummer]

No but it is what's called Rude AF.

[spliff]

Or he probably didn't mean to. Many people I bet have planned pulling out even reminding to pull out during sex and next thing you know, he let's loose. I'm just saying, not everything goes as planned, lol trust me!!

[SarahsSummer]

@spliff got any babies Spliff?

[spliff]

I dooo

[mistixs]

That can get you pregnant which you didn't consent to

[NJ_Casanova]

No, not rape... Unless you were trying to push him off?

[AndyOh]

You were having unprotected sex that YOU let him do. So he does not listen or the sex is too good and he gets lost in his orgasm and can't pull out.
So I don't think you should call it rape. How about not too bright.

[AleDeEurope]

No, you still gave consent to have sex, he was just an ass for cumming inside you when you said no.
Is it rape if the girl uses her teeth on my dick when I said no?

Come on people, let's learn before we have sex...

[This_is_my_username]

@AleDeEurope Smart!
media.giphy.com/media/oZbLnIvz88nNC/giphy.gif

[AleDeEurope]

@This_is_my_username Thank you, my dear :* :P

[This_is_my_username]

☺️❤️ no worries

[BertMacklinFBI]

i believe the rest of the opinions have spoken.

hahaa

[Frost_Byt3]

Even if a girl specifies that she doesn't want him to cum in her while consenting to sex, that doesn't guarentee that he isn't going to. Its not something we can control very well. He may not be able to pull out in time.

I think that by consenting to sex, a girl is also acknowledging the chances of him cumming inside her. Its especially her own fault if she didn't use protection. And if she did, then i don't see why this would be an issue in the first place.

So i think in a situation like this, its best to give the accused the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he did it on accident rather than on purpose - because this is most likely the case.

[Louisetiger1]

Withdrawal doesn't work because cum will come out before he even knows. I think "rape" covers penetration without consent not actually the orgasm.

[WalterRadio]

No. You let him in.

If you didn't want to have sex, then keep your pants zipped.

[lolatyou]

Where else is he supposed to cum. When you let someone put their dick somewhere that feels good, he's most likely going to cum there. Wtf are people thinking sometimes.