If all males in the world were chemically castrated wouldn't that bring huge benefits to mankind?

[Anonymous]

Chemical castration would mean men are no longer able to get erections or sexual arousal, but they can still have children through artificial insemination as they still have their testicles.

First, the benefits it would bring to males:

1- Men who were chemically castrated describe feeling euphoric, as if a huge cloud surrounding them was lifted and now they can see much more clearly. They say that they had been held hostage by their lust for the female body and their constant frustration at trying to get p***y. Now they were no longer interested in it at all.
2- Men can accomplish things for themselves and make money for themselves instead of putting all their work into servicing women in return for getting sex. They also no longer need to take women out on dates, unless she pays of course.
3- Crime rates would be greatly lowered due to absence of testosterone.
4- No more male feminists. Male feminists only exist cause they think by always defending women they can eventually get into their pants.

Benefits to women:

1- Women no longer need to open their legs. They can get all the cuddling and kissing they want without having to endure the male demand for sex.
2- Women will no longer be treated as sex objects because men would no longer view them that way.
3- Women would no longer be able to rely on men as providers as they would have nothing to offer men, since men do not need sex from them. This means a huge boost in the workforce as women would now need to get jobs to provide for themselves.
4- Almost complete absence of rape and groping.

Seems like a good deal to me.

[ENTP_EMO]

Men
1. Men will start putting things up their butt to get a prostate orgasm.
2. Success and "rich" is relative. If every man is successful then no man is successful and rich. If you believe women are equal. Then no one will be rich and successful. Think about what happens to job distribution.
3. Disagree with the crime rate. If women can commit crimes too. Then so can men. Testosterone or not.
4. You assume all men stick up for women's rights want to get into their pants. Assumption based on your sample size.
.
No benefit to women.
1. Noone is kissing or cuddling anyone. There is no deep intimacy because of no sex. Women will be sexually frustrated, most will become lesbians. because lesbian sex is more passionate than dead dick sex.
2. Women will feel depressed because no guy is giving them attention
3. Not an issue in the millennial generation.
4. Better solution. Since we're removing any human rights we want. Why not execute all rapists/gropers? This will solve the overpopulation issue and lower deter people away from sex crimes. I also get to keep my dick!

Time for SEX

[jpmoore89]

This is an awful Idea! Women want and need vaginal sexual intercourse too. Many still do want to open their legs for us men. They just want to be loved and treated with dignity and respect during and after the act, each time. Rightfully so.

Finally, I like having testosterone. I like behaving as a man is supposed to behave. I like horsepower, guns, and stuff. But I was also taught to protect a woman because men can and should be protective. They should also open the door for her.

I want sex with the woman I fall in love with. I want to make love to her and the idea is for her to get as much pleasure and comfort out of the sex as I do if not more because its an act of love and I want her to know how much she is loved because a kiss only will not do.

[Asker]

"Women want and need vaginal sexual intercourse too." Actually they don't. They just want the kissing and touching. And it's not a male's duty to protect females. That's a primitive instinct and we should transcend it. There is nothing special about females that gives them more value than males.

[jpmoore89]

Nothing natural should be done away with, especially by force. If that ever happens, it will be civil war. Secondly, there is something very very special about females to me. They are beautiful and the counterpart to males and as a male, she makes up the rest of me. Finally, I agree that females don't hold more value. Men and women should be equals. A man and a woman together as one flesh completes perfectly the human equation both physically, mentally, and in all other ways.

[Asker]

Females don't need sex like males do. The whole thing is a joke to them. The vast majority of females couldn't care less if their husbands' penises turned gangrene and fell off. In fact they'd probably prefer it.

[jpmoore89]

I have ran across a handful of women who are like what you describe but the vast majority I have ran across in real life and even on here suggests that they want sex with a man every bit as much as we want it. We need each other. That is healthy and natural.

[Asker]

You're misreading some cues then. That's not how the female mind works. Ask any woman what she thinks of Lorena Bobbitt, they will all call her their hero. Women do not crave a man's penis. Not even remotely. No matter what the conditions are.

[CarpetDenim]

@jomoore89 I agree @Asker you’re entirely deluded

[jpmoore89]

@CarpetDenim Thank you :)

[Numznumz]

Tf? Your an idiot. I love sex and giving head. Its obvious why'd you think that though, no right minded woman would want you

[Eva323]

Chemical castration is not good for you. Messing with your hormones is always a bad idea. It can lead to cancer.

[Asker]

Says who?

[Eva323]

Just taking birth control ups the chance of breast cancer by like 9%. Don’t screw with your hormones.

[Iddy_Bella]

It would be a good thing. It would only allow certain men to have children and it would prevent a whole bucket load of rape cases.

[Asker]

All men could still have children. Chemical castration involves taking a drug that emilinates testosterone, not sperm. Also all men have the right to have children. Nobody has the right to decide another person's right to reproduce.

[bowchick]

Wait, eliminating testosterone would have many more adverse effects I guess. I don't know tho

[Asker]

@bowchick it may indeed have many negative health effects. However it can also have positive effects like no more hair loss and a longer average lifespan.

[bowchick]

Ya, we would have to consider all factors. people would be horrified to do this actually. Govt. would be thrown off if not acted wisely

[bowchick]

Lol, not at all.

[Iddy_Bella]

@LegateLanius Not all men rape but with chemical castration the government could prevent rape from ever occurring again.

[LegateLanius]

@bowchick no, that's exactly what she's saying

[LegateLanius]

Fuck that.

[LegateLanius]

That's a violation of basic human rights

[Iddy_Bella]

Either way, chemical castration isn’t even legal in most countries. And, if it’s legal, it’s saved for those who HAVE raped someone or have committed another sexual crime

[LegateLanius]

That's what should happen to convicted rapists but not all men.

[Asker]

@LegateLanius she never said all men are rapists. She does seem to hate men though as she believes most of them have no right to have their own children yet women do.

[Iddy_Bella]

Personally, I think some women should be forbidden to have children too, not just some men. I’ve lost count how many times I’ve seen mothers hit their children 😢

[LegateLanius]

Yeah, that is a violation of basic human rights, though.

[Iddy_Bella]

I guess so, but no one thinks of the rights of the children who grow up in a violent home. I like to think of the rights on both parties, not just the rights of adults

[LegateLanius]

No, governments already have organizations to help protect children. If the government did its job in that regard, it would be different. If a particular government doesn't, they should have people vote for it.

[Iddy_Bella]

Well... I guess Australia is stuffed then 😂

[LegateLanius]

The thing is you basically said that you support taking the rights away from men in order to protect others. That's what really got my goat.

[Iddy_Bella]

I didn’t mean to upset you. The question was about men, so I gave my opinion, but if the question was about women I would still give the same answer. Some people aren’t fit to be parents or have rights when they take the rights of others away.

[JanuaryCanine]

😂😂😂😂😂

[mistixs]

Do you have a source for any of these claims?

[Pamina]

So, have you undergone the procedure yet?

[Asker]

No. This has to be a govenment mandated program so that ALL males get it, otherwise it wouldn't be of any use.

[Pamina]

But you could be a role model and make the first step voluntarily.

[Asker]

Even then it would never lead to most males, let alone all, to chemically castrate themselves. The obly way is for the government to force it.

[Pamina]

It would be a symbolic first step. This level determination might cause a lot of men to support your idea and follow your lead.

[Pamina]

Looks like you don't believe in your own idea. That's too bad. But maybe some other man, one who isn't a coward, will go through with it. :)

[Asker]

I do support doing it on myself, on condition all other males do it too.

[Pamina]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCf0Lz8YRq0

[IUdude]

Ahh bro, this question makes my bronads hurt.

[Benedek38]

The only one here who should be castrated is you, asker. Painfully.
You are describing genocide.

[jacquesvol]

Do you see trolling as a sport or just a pass time?

[Ninene]

I know this is a fetish post

[Ninene]

But to be honest I still am attracted to the male gender and the penis lol

[Asker]

95% of females would be perfectky happy if there were no more penises in the world.

[Ninene]

Well I feel sorry that they think this way

[Asker]

It's just natural female biology. If women liked dicks then they would be having sex all the time, then random pregnancies would have meant the end of the species. That's why females evolved to hate dicks and be repulaed by them. In terms of "wanting" sex, most females who say that just want the cuddling and touching part of it, not the penis.

[LegateLanius]

Bullshit

[LegateLanius]

I think you should

[LegateLanius]

I am against this as it is a violation of basic human rights

[LegateLanius]

Also it does eliminate sperm www.slate.com/.../castration_anxiety.html

[HereIbe]

You are free to do it to yourself.

[CT_CD]

Yes. Then women wouldn't be able to use their seductive powers on men to get them to do what they want

[Anonymous]

Like most things women say they want, there'd be a collective cheer and celebration of progress, followed by the most bratty, high-pitched collective whine over the fallout of unintended consequences.

Look at transgender athletes in women's sports. Women wanted them accepted because they thought a woman was physically equal to a man. Now they can't win against transformers. 😢😢

[Anonymous]

I actually agree. Women have too much sexual power and have very little sexual attraction to men. With this they have no power over men, and pretty much no value at all. That being said, I am not going to get chemically castrated.

[Asker]

It is true. This would level the playing field and eliminate's the female advantage. Sex is just the price females are willing to pay for a relationship. Without the power to manipulate male sexual lust, females will have to start paying the bills and sacrificing to earn a male's trust.

[Asker]

They're only downvoting you cause you're "mansplaining" what women want. Deep down though they know what you said is biologically true.

[LegateLanius]

that's a basic violation of men's rights

[Anonymous]

I completely agree with u mate. I didn't know such a process was available. It would definitely make a different & better world I guess

[Asker]

The only hurdle would be how to convince a government to intiate such a program.

[LegateLanius]

no it wouldn't. that's a basic violation of men's rights