Does anyone else find bare legs sexier than stockings or leggings or pantyhose or tights or whatever?

Does anyone else find bare legs sexier than stockings or leggings or pantyhose or tights or whatever?
Though bare legs vs pantyhose/leggings/stockings/tights/whatever seems to be a relatively common question/debate online, EVERY time I've seen it like 99% of the people who have a say in it are saying pantyhose/whatever, and only like 1% are saying bare legs. And the people who do say bare legs are often downvoted into oblivion.

And since I belong to the extreme minority who prefers bare legs... it kind of makes me feel ashamed at times, lol. Like my idea of "sexy" is wrong.

I get that they're supposed to make the legs look nicer and hide imperfections and all, but if a woman already naturally has near-perfect bare legs, then I honestly prefer that about 10x better than any type of hosiery. Including the model in the pictures above.

I kind of have a fetish towards bare legs in specific... so that's probably why I feel the way I do. And when I imagine feeling legs, I'd rather just feel actual skin rather than fabric.

Now in formal work situations, I guess hosiery looks better, as bare skin isn't exactly considered formal in any way, and guys wear fullbody clothes/suits that show no skin but the hands and face, and I think girls should do the same...

But when it comes to what I find sexy, bare legs all the way.
Does anyone else find bare legs sexier than stockings or leggings or pantyhose or tights or whatever?
Yes.
Vote A
Does anyone else find bare legs sexier than stockings or leggings or pantyhose or tights or whatever?
No.
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
0 3

Most Helpful Girls

  • I voted for bare legs. Stockings, pantyhose do make girls legs prettier, but only bare legs show true beauty of legs. Plus, wearing them is such a pain lol

    • "only bare legs show true beauty of legs" I never thought about it in THAT specific way, but I totally agree! That's a new reason why I prefer bare legs over hosiery. And guys don't really wear that sort of stuff, so I wouldn't know whether wearing them is a pain or not... but assuming the temperature is warm or normal and not freaking cold, then I think bare legs would be more comfortable, and hosiery would be way too hot for comfort.

    • I am a male in my 40s and do find bare legs sexier than legs in any kind of hosiery. I've changed my mind over the years. When I was younger, I would prefer the sight of nylons on ladies' legs. Then my girlfriend quit buying and wearing pantyhose for good (as million other women have done since the 2000s) and that changed my mind over the issue. Besides, truly there's no need for a woman to wear them anymore. If it's cold, pants and socks keep the legs warm; if it's not cold, why should a lady cover her legs with a thin plastic layer? I think it's just a matter of time, sheer hosiery will die out. Most younger males do not notice or care about seeing nylons on female legs, and not a few positively do not want to see their girlfriends wearing them. A friend of mine even gently talked his wife out of wearing. Yes, of course many males are still obsessed with nylons but that won't last much longer.

  • Just me, but I've always thought that seeing a womans legs in some kind of hosiery, heels and a nice skirt or dress was extremely sexy.

    • It is michelle3685. Pantyhose/hosiery all always sexier than bare legs. They’re sexier especially with heels and a nice skirt or dress. Besides I’d love to caress a woman’s legs and feet in pantyhose/nylons. Keep wearing hosiery and you’ll attract a guy like me.

    • @Counterclocking Sounds very nice!

  • I wear them when I have too, its looks more business like and professional when dealing with very wealthy clients.

    • That I can agree with. Bare skin isn't too professional... But when it comes to what I find sexy, I find bare legs to be about 10x better.

Most Helpful Guys

  • I consider going around bare-legged to be quite trashy.
    Hosiery is definitely the more appropriate choice, as far as I'm concerned.

    • "Trashy" how, though?

  • But it depends on the legs. But some hose is really sexy, it just depends !!!

    • Me, personally, I never really found hose or any sort of clothing sexy, lol. The only thing I ever found sexy was a woman's actual body or bare skin. Which is why I highly prefer shorts rather than jeans, pantyhose, or whatever... cuz shorts show off the bare legs. That's just me, though. Maybe I'm just weird.

    • I am with you all the way. But some girls legs are very white and a little colour from some hose can make them more sexy !!!

    • Ah... gotcha. Still, me personally, I like girls of all skin colors, lol... pale as fuck, dark brown as fuck, a medium olive tan town, a slightly yellowish tan tone like Asian girls, etc. And to me it just kind of looks weird if her face and hands are pale white, and her legs are just... a tannish color, lol. But to each their own.

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

2 17
  • Pantyhose is such a pain. I honestly only wear it sometimes to prevent chafing but I'd rather go bare.

    • Ladies should dump pantyhose and always go bare if it's not too cold

  • I both or nethier i couldn't care ethier way one way won't make it more attractive or less.

  • I have always preferred bare legs because, if they are nice, you can see the smooth and soft skin. That is a big part of what makes legs attractive to me. If the skin is blotchy or rough, maybe stockings are better to cover them.

  • No preference, really, but I like silky pantyhose.

  • No..

  • Pantyhose are always sexier than bare legs. Nothing’s sexier than the finished look of pantyhose.

  • Yeah, I prefer bare always

  • I'm a naked leg kind of guy as long as the legs are not fat... then please please cover them up

  • Both look good depending on weather and my girlfriend like both, but mostly without stockings and underwear, wear only mini skirt or mini micro dress.

  • How can i answer that it's a personal choice

    • What would be your choice for a typical night out?

    • Go bare and you'll do well

  • Bare legs are so much nicer than any other option!

  • I love both, but some tights can look really good.

  • Bare legs are way sexier

  • Yeah, I thought that would be a given

  • I totally agree. Bare legs look and feel (under the male's fingers 😉) much better than nylon-clad legs. And young ladies know it as they now go 99% bare-legged and that's a blessing

    • I couldn't agree more. Bare-legged IS the way

    • I disagree! I want a woman that wears pantyhose instead of goes bare legged.

  • Stockings can be pretty sexy, but I prefer bare legs. I have a leg fetish and enjoy the sight and feel of soft, smooth legs, especially calves. We posted pics of my wife's bare legs on social media before and it was pretty amazing how many requested pics with stockings. But us leg men all seem to have different preferences, but there were still a lot who like my mature wife's short, thick, curvy legs.

  • Stockings, leggings etc are a turnoff for me. For whatever reason they wear them, I only see them as a cover when they were too lazy to shave their legs but their cardiolodist said, if you don't show your legs to the public, you will lose 5 years of your life.

  • I find tights and pantyhose very classy for women but bare legs are much more sexy

  • i dont mind when she's wearing tights and leggings but girls

    THEYRE NOT PANTS