Would God Be OK with 'Lucky Pierre' Sex?

Lucky me! Im the Lucky Pierre!
Lucky me! I'm the Lucky Pierre!
In the Old Testament, God is against gay encounters and seems to encourage gentlemen to engage in sexual activity with females. In the New Testament, Jesus doesn't even seem to care about gayness at all because He never brings it up.

But lots of people get their fear of gayness from the Old Testament, even though when Jesus came around and died, and then came back to life and then disappeared for 2,000 years the whole rationale for this was that He died for human "sin," totally exonerating everybody. So now we can eat shellfish and girls like me can wear pants, etc. etc. But the gay thing still haunts lots of people.

But I recently have had an epiphany of sorts. Gentlemen who are craving a human penis in the butt can now do it without the religious guilt! If you are struggling with fear or shame over your desires, become a Lucky Pierre! This way, you can still be engaging in coitus with a woman or girl and God probably won't notice (assuming He even cares) that your anus is being completely stuffed with man meat!
Would God Be OK with Lucky Pierre Sex?
Sadly, a female can never be a "Lucky Pierre." We can be involved in the scenario but we can never enjoy being in the middle in the way a man can enjoy being in the middle, if you get what I am saying. That sorta sucks for me and all the other girls. But since I am not selfish or the jealous type, I figured I'd share my revelation with the gentlemen of G@G. You are welcome!
You are soooo LUCKY, Pierre!
You are soooo LUCKY, Pierre!
YES! Being a Lucky Pierre is a beautiful compromise. Go for it!
Vote A
NO! God will still be mad! You better not do it!
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
3 2

Most Helpful Guys

  • The New Testament actually forbids gay sex.

    Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    The Gospels showed Jesus readiness to forgive as much higher than his readiness to judge and condemn. For example, he forgave many prostitutes. But that does not mean illicit sex is acceptable by Jesus.

    Hence while the Gospels may not wrote about Jesus preaching against gay sex, it does not mean he accepted it. It simply mean he's more interested in saving.

    But after he returned to the heavens, his Apostles condemned sex outside marriage sex as well as gay sex (as shown in the sample scripture above).

    PS: Your details create a "logic fallacy" to your question. This fallacy is called "begging the question", because it makes an assumption that Jesus did not condemn gay sex while discussing gay sex.

    It leads those who have lesser knowledge to think that Jesus accepts it. But no. The New Testament condemned it as well. Hence the Old and New testament are both harmonious in view against sex outside marriage as well as gay sex.

    • Jesus never talked about gay sex. Not at all. And if it is a "sin" then it's OK to do it cuz Jesus already died for it! This is how we got Trump as prez and all the Christians are totally kewl with it. He grabs pussy and fux porno girls but it's OK now! :)

    • LOL! Being "saved" merely mean all mankind has the hope of receiving a heavenly life after they die, because God had chosen to forgive than to destroy. Of course we have all the freedom to do what we want while on earth. But this does not mean what we do are beneficial (or approved by God). For example, God made the Law of gravity, but did not write it in the Bible. We know about it. So we are careful when we are on the edge of a high building. But some still choose to jump down from it, with whatever means they think can prevent death. Indeed many did survive. But some also died because of accidents and mismanagement. Their foolishness cost them to die on earth. But they could still be saved and go to the heavens. Same with fornication, sex outside marriage and gay sex. So what we fuck around while on earth? It doesn't affect God's life at all. But he loved all mankind and warned that doing so is "dangerous". Hence many who disobeyed had broken marriages, or got emotionally torn, or contracted STD thus shortening their lives, etc... and some even committed suicide because of relationship issues. For us who "survived", we are merely lucky. But many had died as a consequence of those acts. Yet they might still go to the heavens because they had accepted Jesus. So the above is how I interpret the Bible. Not about fear of judgement, but about the love of God.

    • Lots of straight couples get married and die early because one of them kills the other. Sometimes a wife will slowly poison her husband with antifreeze in his sweet tea. Or lots of times the husband will kill the wife with a gun or a knife out of anger or jealousy. So the stuff you just typed is complete nonsense! :)

    • Show All
  • Look i have been Lucky Pierre once. To bad i was too drunk to remember most of it. From what I remember I think I had fun. Thats was many moons ago.

    • Thanks for letting me tell the world of this drunken tail of mine and for the MHO as well

    • You are the first Lucky Pierre I have ever known! :)

    • It was alcohol fuelled. I don't think it would have happened if I was sorbor

    • Show All

Most Helpful Girls

  • When I was religious the thing I learned was in Acts when Jesus said “I have not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it”. That gave the Old Testament validity in the New Testament.

    But now that I no longer believe in any of this it is just a big waste of time.

  • I am not sure how to give a comment/view about this but it sounds like it would be fun! so what not try!

  • I am not christian so I dont know what christian god think about it

    • I am not religious either. But I have read parts of the Old Testament and God is against gayness. He called it a sin. But then Jesus came along and died for human sin and then amazingly came back to life! When He did, He said He had to go away for a while but He promised to return. So basically, people should be able to have gay sex now without any issue. HOWEVER, there are still lots of people who, in the past 2,000 years, have still been afraid to dabble in gayness because of what they read in the Old Testament. So that's where I come in with my epiphany! Have Lucky Pierre sex! It's a great compromise!

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

4 9
  • I had a friend in college who was a DJ on the school radio station and she’s invite us on her show as guests. We’d all have some kind of radio name, she was DJ Venus, I went on as White Steve of course, and then one of my other buddies went on as “Lucky Pierre” we were like 18 or 19 and had no clue, and he just kind of smiled and said it was a childhood nickname. And now he’s an out gay dude, married to a guy and all that. Back then we were just like “do you think Joel might be gay? Nahhhh...”, but now in retrospect it’s HILARIOUS. Right under our noses lmfao

  • I was raised Christian, and left, because of the guilt, judgments and hypocrisy! I don't think that even the Christian god cares if you find love and happiness in your bottom or someone else's! Does a 'god' have time to bother about such little things as that?

    Maybe the most important lesson, so often missed, is when Jesus said to LOVE ONE ANOTHER.
    Usually interpreted as platonic, and non-sexual love, but with all the translations, who knows for sure?

    We are biological beings, and some of our feelings are driven by chemistry in our bodies, like hormones, or some 'chemicals' we intentionally intake, like Wine, and Beer, also known in Old Testament times.

    I think that any adult, today can choose their belief, and respecting other people, loving and caring, helping others and just living a good, honest life will be much better than any 'condemnation' written 2,000 years ago by angry, controlling men!!

  • To bad I'm going to be 'Lucky Pierre' anyways. I'll just wear a strap on. Thats my loop hole.

  • I'm not sure that God has such limits to His views...
    I think homosexuality in any form is against His will.
    And He does actually mention homosexuality in passing in the New Testament, but it wasn't as big of a deal culturally at that time. He mentions the rightful destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in reference to the Pharisees.

    • You are just guessing. I think Jesus would be totally kewl with a gentleman being the meat in a French fuck sandwich :).

    • I'm not sure I would call it a guess... But yes, that's my theory. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind." To my interpretation, that pretty much does eliminate homosexuality.

    • But that's my point. The gentlemen would be lying with a woman!

    • Show All
  • what the actual f

    • You and I would make a delicious fruit salad. Too bad neither of us can be a Lucky Pierre :(

  • GROSS

  • I'm thinking that it would be my really worth the effort even if I wanted it LoL.

  • This is why I like paganism. Because slaughtering them and offering them to the gods is a virtue.

    • Slaughtering who?

    • INFIDELS

    • Are you calling Pierre an infidel?

    • Show All
  • Hard pass on that one...

  • I don't think any of that makes an exception

    • *think* is the key word. You don't KNOW, though.

    • Can you prove anything?

  • Actually, homosexuality is brought up in the new testament. It speaks against it.

    • And that is justification for what? Something that was commonly misunderstood and hated, 2,000 years ago? The Greeks had a very advanced culture for their time, and homosexual acts were common, and even depicted in the Frescos. How relevant is it, being 2,000 years old, written by men in a different culture, with minimal understandings of biology, psychology and much else beyond living past 45?

    • Not by Jesus, though.

    • @JackSmy I agree with Jack.

    • Show All
  • Jesus was gay or bi

  • Well... I'd be fine if it was a transvestite who was convincingly a woman, or just a woman with a strap-on. But not a dude.