mind if I ask you some questions?may i message you?
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
so do cut dicks... and most vulvas look gross too, lets just do cosmetic surgeries on everything
@Tara89 No, surgeries on everything need to stop happening. It’s crazy how insecure people are now.
Yup! So go with circumcised. Your odds are better that you won't catch some sort of filthy disease.
@supercutebutt You're response is a prime example of why most Westerners think Americans are idiots. We can only hope that your genetic deficiencies die with you. PLEASE don't procreate... for the good of the species
@Tara89 OMG. Calm yourself, you crazy lady. I don't like foreskin and it has been scientifically proven that circumcised peen is safer peen. So put that in your pipe and smoke it. Furthermore, Americans who voted for Trump are the weirdos. Not me. I'm great. :)
From WebMD:What are the benefits of circumcision?There is some evidence that circumcision has health benefits, including:-A decreased risk of urinary tract infections.-A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men.-Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners.-Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).-Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).-Circumcision also makes it easier to keep the end of the penis clean.Note: Some studies show that good hygiene can help prevent certain problems with the penis, including infections and swelling, even if the penis is not circumcised.
@supercutebutt WebMD... are you serious? The US owned "health information website", that copy-pastes a combination of worst case diagnosis for your symptoms and the latest big $$ driven articles which are in no way credible (scientifically or medically). You may as well have quoted buzzfeed ffsNot a single medical board (from the western/1st World) recommends the procedure, and the APA (US based) is the only one who has recommended it in the modern era; they currently fence sit on the issue. If you possess the cognitive ability to find and digest research papers written after 1980 and that come from a credible (peer reviewed and authored by people with appropriate qualifications - i. e. not brian morris) source you'll find that while pro cutting papers exist they are usually either too small of a study group to be reliable or flawed in their methodology and vastly outnumbered by evidence showing no beneficial net-gain and/or a net-loss from removing a large portion of skin from the genitals. www.researchgate.net/.../...-male-circumcision.pdf start here
@Tara89 No thank you. I will stick to circumcised peen. :)