Is pulling out a reliable method if done correctly?

[Anonymous]

[HungLikeAHorsefly]

The reliability of a method like this is exclusively dependent on your ability to do it correctly. So yes, if done correctly it's an effective method of birth control.

Problem is, nobody, and I mean _NOBODY_ does it correctly. You may think you do, but one of these days you'll be proven wrong.

And then there's the whole STD issue. Which, of course, the pull out method is 0% effective against.

[MrOracle]

It's roughly about 80% reliable, which is better than not pulling out, but not even remotely approaching "safe." The world is full of fathers who "thought pulling out was safe enough."

[Duckysback]

I mean, it’s more reliable than not pulling out. But no, it’s not even close to the reliability of proper methods of birth control.

[CindyRuns]

Nope...

Anytime you stick a Penis in a Vagina, you're risking a baby coming out in about 9 months !!!

[AmandaYVR]

Noooooo. How can this myth still exist. Women can get pregnant from pre-cum. End of story.

[NearlyNapping]

There are people who have driven drunk a thousand times and not gotten in a wreck. That doesn't mean it's safe. There is no "correct" way to drive drunk. You toss the dice very time you do it.

[SillyChrissy]

Yes me and my boyfriend has been doing this for 4 years. No pregnancy scares (yet)

[LingyRolls]

Yes. In fact, it is the method preferred by fathers worldwide.

[ArrowheadSW]

It is NOT reliable.

[Sheyhoney]

Yes but no 🥴😂it’s really risky but it worked for me 🤧

[poneglyphs]

Check your facts

[Sheyhoney]

@poneglyphs wym check my facts bruh

[poneglyphs]

Bruh, For every 100 people who use the pull out method perfectly, 4 will get pregnant. But pulling out can be difficult to do perfectly. So in real life, about 22 out of 100 people who use withdrawal get pregnant every year — that’s about 1 in 5. The reality is withdrawal isn’t as effective as other types of birth control, but it’s definitely better than not using anything at all. Also, your not taking into account STDs or STI'S

[Sheyhoney]

@poneglyphs bitch that’s why I said yes but no. It’s risky and vey ineffective but it worked with ME so read better next time cereal box head shaped face ass

[poneglyphs]

That's a rare insult lol

[Sheyhoney]

@poneglyphs bc that’s a rare defect you got there witcho big ass head 😂😂

[poneglyphs]

Lmao

[sydneyboy]

Id pull out with you babe xx

[poneglyphs]

@sydneyboy ok dude

[andreasucks]

Yeah. I do that with almost all the guys I sleep wirh and they never got me pregnant

[sydneyboy]

Perfect👌

[DiscomfortZone]

I hope you have an abortion fund :)

[andreasucks]

@DiscomfortZone I've been doing it for half my, life unprotected and had no pregnancies. But I'd have no issues getting an abortion paid for

[normalice]

It was for me. More reliable than condoms, in fact.

[Jean-Marie_Céline]

No it isn't.

[ghostqueen]

You'll be a parent in no time with that "method".

[TadCurious]

No. Studies have shown that in a significant percentage of men their pre-cum contains sperm. You could be one of those guys.

[Dargil]

Both a blowjob as foreplay and a snug vagina "milk" a penis. This can result in drawing semen out of the prostate into the penis to mix with "precum", making it weakly fertile. So No.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

How smart are you and how old are you 11 years old?

[Nikki1989]

Fuck no.

[Browneye57]

Uh, no. You really want her preggo eh?
Then you can pony-up 'till the kid turns 18. Good luck with that.

[Browneye57]

On update... So you just make up bullshit. Got it. GTFO

[Asker]

😂😂😂 can’t live life without make jokes my friend.

[Asker]

Making

[Browneye57]

But this isn't a joke - it's fake bullshit you made up.

[Redstang88]

No..

[douride2]

In short NO.

[Desconhecida]

Reliable? Not a chance.

[Hannajenky]

It has worked for me so far

[October808]

No it isn't.