If a lady pokes holes in the condom, should the father have to pay?

Simple question, let's watch as everyone tries to dance around it.
Yes
Vote A
No
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
0 0

Most Helpful Girls

  • I know this happens, and that's horrible to say the least. It happens the other way around as well to be fair.

    When it happens the other way around and the girl doesn't want to have the baby, a lot of men would say, "she still needs to give birth to the baby and then just give it up to the father if she doesn't want anything to do with the baby". But what if there are complications with the pregnancy, what if it'll cost her life to give birth and it wasn't even her choice to begin with since the man she had sex with put holes in the condom?

    Isn't fair to say that one should get know the person you have sex with to make sure you can trust one another? And if this happens to either of them that well, you only have yourself to blame for making bad choices?

    I'm not making excuses, and yes you could call it rape on some level I suppose. But in the end, both were there. Guys can get their own condoms and not rely on the girl bringing them. If she insisted on using her own and the guy agrees, he accepts the risks that come with it or he should say "no" and walk away.

    So should he pay? with all do respect... Yes.

    Should there be a punishment for the girl? Yes. And there should be a punishment for guys who do this as well.

    But I think it's more important to realize, WHY this happens and do something with that instead. Since these kind of things usually happen out of fear. Fear of losing the one they are with, or fear of not having a child otherwise.

    (part from the few exceptions of people trying to get a load of money out of some celebrity)

    • I must disagree. I see it as forcing someone to have unprotected sex when they only consented to protected sex. Seeing as there was intent behind what she was doing, he cannot fairly be responsible for the results of what happened. This is a fine line for me, I do believe that any time you have sex there are risks, and if it happened by accident, then that's a different story, but if she purposefully poked holes in the condom, he needs to be free to go.

    • So bad decision making and getting involved with the wrong person isn't a factor in this case? Aren't we responsible for our own actions? So it's the girls responsibility to bring the condoms? And like I said, what if it happens the other way around? The guy pokes holes in the condom? What then? And then on another matter... How does one proof that that's what actually happened and the condom didn't just break? Or precum is what actually made the pregnancy happen before the condom went on? There are so many plausible scenarios. It doesn't change the fact that you need two to have sex and that the risk of pregnancy is practically always there. And both carry the responsibility if pregnancy does happen. I agree that paying child support should in no way be the same as supporting the mother. But the child deserves the resources needed to grow and learn as any other. And like I also said. I do think the mother in this case should be allowed to get away with this unpunished. I will also admit that I wouldn't know right now on the top of my head waht would be a suitable punishment. But hey, karma is a bitch and she'll be punished eventually anyway. Cause if she's capable of poking holes in a condom, than sooner or later the truth will come out and I doubt she'd be a good mother and she'd have to bare those consequences as well.

    • *Shouldn't be allowed to get away with unpunished! Sorry, stupid phone lol

    • Show All
  • If she can afford to raise the kid on her own and he’s not interested in playing a fatherly role, she should provide everything herself. If she can’t afford to raise the kid on her own, he should pay what he can afford and get shared custody if he wants it, but after their kid turns 18 she has to pay him back. I know that sounds unfair to the father but the most important person in this scenario is this child who didn’t ask to be born to such irresponsible people. My priority here is making sure the kid has the proper resources, not the parents who got themselves into this situation.

    • when the child looks up and asks "mommy why are we poor?" she can turn around and say "because I betrayed my man" there must be consequences in this world, otherwise we descend into shit, and eventually, we do face consequences. Here's a consequence. Men are dropping out of this whole bullshit scenario as a whole. We are done. Replacement rate is dropping like a fking stone and the kids that are born are out of wedlock nightmares, the kind of shit that is encouraged when you put into place policies like the one you are talking about. It's not always gunna be okay, you're not always gunna be taken care of, if you fuck up, betray your man, and have no money, then you are responsible for the miserable childhood your kid will have, and you can live with that guilt. Hopefully once the kid is 18 they can grow to understand the mistakes of their parent and perhaps even redeem them.

    • and by the way, your priority is not making sure the kid has resources, it's making sure the greedy, lying mom has resources. Whether or not she spends them on the kid is up to her. Would you trust a girl who pokes holes in a condom? I sure as fuck wouldn't trust her with anything

    • People raised in poverty are more likely to commit crimes, have health problems, need government assistance, have substance abuse issues, have mental health issues, drop out of school, and have other problems like that as adults. We do not need more people like that in our society.

    • Show All

Most Helpful Guys

  • Well, he shouldn't have to at all and she should be punished for it however in our society legally a woman can do pretty much what ever she wants and the man will always have to pay (hermsman vs seyer stated that no matte the circumstances a male is always obligated to pay child support. In this court case the male was a 12 year old boy who was raped by his babysitter).

  • You can still be required to pay child support for a child you've proven is not yours in some states. Once your on that birth certificate it's hard to reverse that.
    If it's your blood it's your responsibility and we shouldn't raise your child on society's tab. This seems like an obscure problem that can be easily avoided.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

16 21
  • Why would you, as a guy, knowing you were using condoms, not provide your own? That you purchase and maintain control over? This is an easily avoidable problem.

  • I just feel like whenever you have sex with someone you are at risk of pregnancy and you made your willing decision to still have sex. I mean condom can brake. In the situation you mentioned tho, im unsure to pay for what? Abortion? Its ok to split. Pay for the kid? I mean yeah, its your blood and all, you should care about that, regadless of circumstances.

    • If it happens by accident, of course the man must be there for his kid, but if the woman purposefully deceived the man against his will, then it's simply not fair that he pays a dime. Life is about incentives, so there can be no incentive for a woman to do this if we want women to stop doing this./

    • I think even if she broke the condoms you still made a willing decision to sleep with her and pregnany should always be as possibility in your mind. Thats why i think people shouldn't have sex with people they are not ready to have kids with if it happens. And i mean how dense you can be, take your own condoms, take care of protection ysf and you have no issues if you think woman you are sleeping with would do such a thing. Most women wouldn't. I just think you fucked her so yeah therefore you should take responsaibility. Its like I tell my guy not to come in me and still he does it so like yeah but i did decide to sleep with him.

    • there's a difference between an accidental pregnancy and one person betraying another, and consenting to sex with a condom is not the same as consenting to sex without a condom

    • Show All
  • who on earth would do such a thing? yuhikes! if a woman i knew did that - i'd slap her silly! but there is no chance of that happening - my girlfriends would never do that! that's terrible! ugh. i feel like i need to go and shower or something? just awful! and i feel terrible for any guy who has been through that!

    • now imagine a girl that would argue that the man should be forced to pay for this child. That's who I met 5 mins ago on this app. She called me a cuck for even suggesting that he should not have to pay LOL

  • Of course not.

    In fact, I’d consider that a form of non-consensual sex. Rape, in essence. Same as a guy pulling his condom off.

    • He made a concious decision to sleep with her so thats not rape. Its only non consencual of having a kid.

  • No way. Men have a right to safe, sane and consential sex just like any one else. The big issue here is the proof.

  • If he didn’t know, then yes, he’ll have a price to pay. Maybe he should turn on his red flag detector next time he plays.

    • What? If he didn't know? What does that mean? If he DID know he was having unprotected sex, then of course he would pay. Even if he didn't know and she got preggo by accident, he should still be liable. HOWEVER. If the woman purposefully deceived him into having unprotected sex when he only consented to protected, then there is no argument. He was raped and the idea that he should be held liable for any funds is ludicrous, she should be paying HIM

    • How does anyone but the girl who poked holes in the condom know that that is what really happened? Did she confess? Because that would be silly of her to set herself up like that. If so, then no, I don’t think he should be responsible.

  • Why would she do that,,,,,, to get pregnant or give you an std?

    • this question is in regards to preggo god I don't even wanna think of the other thing

    • Glad it was only peggo... did you both still have fun and some great orgasms?

    • dude what r u nuts I would toss this bitch down the stairs, this has not happened to me, I pray it never does

  • The issue is not about the man or woman, but about the child, and the child's welfare and care. Any time a penis goes in a woman's vagina, there is a chance of pregnancy, and if it happens, for whatever reason, you have the responsibility for supporting the child and being a parent for that child.

  • If there is proof of this, then no. But also, he shouldn't have access to the child either.

  • First of all for what? For the condom? I... guess so?

    Second how do you know or prove she poked a hole in it? It could be a factory defect, and if you watched her do it beforehand why would you use it?

    What really is full of holes is this scenario.

  • Pay for? Isn’t sex free? Or do you mean pay a hooker?

    • I mean pay for the ensuing pregnancy

    • Usually insurance pays for the majority of the bills associated with pregnancy

  • Of course. Child support is for the baby, not the mother.

    But she is guilty of a crime and a tort. She should go to jail and be sued in civil court as well. Also, there is a very good chance she would be deemed an unfit mother and lose custody to the father or another relative.

    • children don't spend money, irresponsible, guilty parents do. Of course he should pay nothing as he did not consent to having unprotected sex. How you are managing to avoid defining this as rape and still claiming to be an advocate for woman's rights is fucking beyond me, this is the kind of double standard that any decent person would refuse to stand for.

  • I'd be willing to pay for a taxi to take her home so that I never had to see her again.

  • That's rape and definitely not.

    • Poking holes in a condom is deceitful behavior—not rape. Conceiving someone’s child—not rape. However, forcing sex against someone’s will is rape.

    • @On_cloud_wine Thrn why is it called rape if the guy removes the condom during sex without the woman's approval.

    • @On_cloud_wine The only reason he consents is because of the condom.

    • Show All
  • They guy should bring his own condoms. Problem solved.

  • This is why if girls have the right to abort a baby. With or without the fathers consent.

    Guys should have the right to sign away his right to the baby. Which means no child support for the mother. Or visitation rights for him.

    At least until the child is of age and wants to know him.

  • No dancing around it. You will never convince Child Protective Services that she did that even if you bring in a punctured condom with your DNA in it. All they care is matching DNA. If it matches, you pay.

  • No mater how that hole got there, its your child and its your responsibility to not only support that child, but to be a dad as well.

  • No he shouldn't be forched to pay child support.

  • Nope.

  • Show More (17)