It's never ok to use violence to solve issues except as a means of preventing further violence.
Typically only in cases of immediate threat of violence against you or someone else can violence be justified, but there are exceptions. For example, I think harming or killing a violent abuser may be justified even if they are not, at that moment, hurting you, if you feel it is your only way to prevent further abuse.
Similarly, hurting people to deplatform them when their hateful rhetoric is directly or indirectly causing the deaths of others is probably also justified (like the guy who decked richard spencer), but that becomes grey territory pretty quickly if you keep going down that line of reasoning too far.
Basically violence is such a terrible thing to inflict on someone that you should have no reasonable doubt that your actions will directly prevent further violence.
In that light, the criteria has no room for gendered considerations.
Keep in mind that the violence used should be direct and purposeful; breaking an attacker's leg so he can't then chase you as you run away, or cracking someone's wrist to disarm them or make them less capable of hurting you while they're literally trying to kill or injure you is probably justified. But socking someone in the gut as hard as you can to "teach 'em a lesson" after they angrily slapped you for something you said is not justified, as you are not in any way still in any danger.
No one should hit someone with the intention of "teaching them a lesson" or "making them pay" for perceived slights or disrespect. Only as a direct act to prevent immediate violence or future violence that will otherwise be hard to prevent.
Anyone hitting anyone isn't "right" at all. Women should never hit guys either. Having said that, people can be pushed and/or may need to defend themselves somewhat under extreme situations perhaps? But there's nothing right about it.
There are a lot of things in life that aren't right. Each circumstance has it's own set of rules. If some guy was berating on me I would scratch his face with my claws and knee him in the balls.
Growing up boys are repeatedly told they’re not allowed to hit girls. Some girls hear this and take advantage of it by hitting boys who are not allowed to hit back.
It’s bullshit and I’ve never stood for it. Since I was little if I see a girl hit a boy I hit her and say “why don’t you hit someone who’s allowed to fight back?”
In reality, anyone who gets hit by anyone has the right to defend themself.
Granted, in some cases the man should hold back a little such as when it’s a case of a muscular man getting hit by a skinny twig of a girl. He wouldn’t need all of his strength or even a closed hand to send her to the ground and end the attempted assault.
If she hit the guy first she deserves whatever happens to her. Gender equality and a reminder to keep your hands to yourself♥️
Thanks for mho Love 🙌👏💜
Ur welcome 💜
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Men should never initiate violence on a woman. Men have the right to defend themselves if being attacked, violently if need be, but they should use the minimum force necessary to protect themselves. Revenge is not okay.
Hitting is never right, defending yourself is ok, but I have never seen the need for anyone to hit anyone.
As for a man vs a woman, if the woman can not control herself and tries to hit the man then I would not step in if he restrains her and asks her to stop. Key being restrain, not grab or push or slap or hit.
im the guy with a scar from a knife wielded by a woman... i can confirm restraint was the better option than kicing fuck out of her
Wow, glad you made it out with only a scar. I guess I should have said 'in extreme situations there may be exceptions...'
no... thats my point. you were right... i restrained her and that is all that was needed even in that extreme situation... like you i can't see where hitting a woman is anything more than exhibitting uncontrolable anger... ofcourse some will say in some cases a woman is stronger but i never met one stronger than me
An eye for an eye and a knocked out tooth for a knocked out tooth. Hitting below the belt allowed.
No one should hit anyone. Act like an adult and use your words. Its not right for boys to hit girls, just like its not right for girls to hit boys.
Everyone knows its not right for a boy to hit a girl. But if a girl hits a boy, she deserves what she gets. He shouldn't have to just sit there and take her abuse. He can defend himself and hit back. I don't mean, he should just pummel her but a measured response is fair.
As a child, there was a girl who would walk around the play yard at school kicking boys in the genitals. After her doing this to me several days, I had enough, and kicked her back, squarely, in her "junk." I was villified for such actions and received an overly aggressive punishment. But she never kicked *any* boy again.
If one uses physical violence against a person, they should expect to receive it in kind, if not worse. Why? If we want to be equal, then we must treat each other as such. People need to stop seeing boys and men as disposable roughnecks who we can physically abuse whenever they're incensed.
Striking a girl is justified if necessary for self-defense.
if a guy hits me then in return he can get kicked in his manhood ! thanks
In situations of self defense or defense of those under your protection, sure. But I think the crux of the issue is that people assume the average woman doesn't have the strength or training to pose a valid physical threat to the average man, thus it can be difficult to really convince anyone that acting in self defense was necessary.
Unfortunately (or fortunately?), the justification for answering nonviolent bullying with violence is a bit controversial - even if the bullying is not nonviolent for lack of trying.
No, hitting a girl is never right under any circumstances !
Surely the best way to handle any argument or difficult situation is to make sexual love (make up sex) !
If anyone, regardless of gender, hits you, you have the right to defend yourself.
Yeah of course, self defence at a certain point is completely allowed in my opinion.
If a woman is hitting you and going at you I am more for holding them or pushing them back with enough force to keep her back.
Since most men could kill a woman with their bare hands or with several full force blows I lean toward protecting yourself with restraint.
I do.
Just because she is a girl doesn't mean she can escape,
They did something wrong to others, they need to be taught!
Only if she asks for it (BDSM)
There are scenarios where I would hit a woman. If I needed to in self defence. If a woman was hurting one of my children she’s getting ktfo.
That said in 44 years I’ve found the need to hit precisely zero women. But the possibility remains.
Never... Go outside, take a drive, go to a friend's house. The only reasons to hit her is if she comes after you with a knife or a gun.
So, to clarify, not never, but sometimes.
gonna leave this here
That's a massive rip-off of an old Chris Rock sketch.
@admles dude I'm gonna be real and say I'm probably too young to know that man lol
I'd prefer not to but I will without hesitation hit a woman if I'm put in a situation where I'm forced to. It wouldn't be the first time.
"any situation" no
Self defense to a certain extent yes
Don't kill or put anyone in the hospital if you don't have to
I WOULD say no... jus to avoid like 100 pink dislilkes... but fuckit... bring them on... i think there's some occasions where it is deserved to hit her back... for example... if she does something really bad like cut ur dick off while ur sleeping.. then u can hit her... or if she punches you for no reason jus out of the blue...
here come the dislikes..
but only return the favour in extreme instances where its absollutely neccassery.. in my opinion.. in general try to avoid it
i like how u like everything i type, thats pretty admirable... even i think myself it would be hard to like some of the offencive shit i post sometimes lol
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Most Helpful Guys