What can I do to beat last year's body count?

[purplepoppy]

Last year I knocked up a personal best of 62 guys. I was determined to beat last year's score when at 11 guys in disaster struck as the government ordered a lock down. Do you think it's still possible to beat last year's score or is it game over?

[razelove]

The first thing about being in the game is you never stop playing purple. I know how you can beat it, simply, but maybe not so much how you want to.

You need to go somewhere that has large groups of people, living together, in tents, trailers, not isolating from each other, expose yourself to this and so so many other viruses.

You purple, need to come over to the Southeastern US. We still had Mardi Gras and St. Patrick's day parades while telling people to be careful and stay in more. More infected people per capita than anywhere else in the US. The parish next to mine had to institute martial law because of so many house parties. In mine lots of people are going out on boats, and throwing parties on islands. We aren't sick, the rest of the world is, and we're going to stay drunk until it's over. That isn't corona, it's a bad hangover, and the only cure is to not get sober.

So come on down, and if you do catch it, I guarantee in a puking, shitting, coughing haze you'll meet another southern gentleman that will get down in the same straits. 62? I bet you could hit 120 in the south, and remember maybe 3 lol

[Lliam]

Once shelter in place orders are lifted, set up a kiosk and attend it in a skimpy bikini, or in the nude if the law allows. Have the sign say "Sex 25 cents, discount to public safety personnel". You can explain to customers that you are raising money for charity. I imagine that you could bang out several per hour on a good day. :-)

[WalsallGuy90]

Still possible, definitely. Just need to have a few days spree when the lockdown ends, after months indoors the guys will be gagging for it and you'll have your pick ;)

[hellionthesagereborn]

That's disgusting and unhealthy. That said of course you can "beat your score", all you have to do is announce that your willing to have sex and many guys in this day and age will gladly have sex with a random woman no strings attached (I think its disgusting but in this hyper sexualized society, it won't be difficult finding men who will be willing to have sex).

[integrale77]

Setup a gangbang or an orgy that would be a quick way to rack up the numbers.
I'm free to add to the count 😉

[Telekinetic-Potato]

5 guys a month or basically one guy a week. If you try to have more 3 ways and orgies you could probably increase the number. Maybe a singers club, have you considered posting an ad?

[i1T2daty]

You can invite me across the pond

[BuckWild]

What the hell is wrong with being a slut? The age of double standard is over. The word 'slut' is no longer a pejorative. It's a word of empowerment. It can only be shameful if you want it to be.

[hellionthesagereborn]

Spreading your legs is not empowering, its disempowering actually. But then that's probably why you endorse it, easy sex for you with nothing given in return. Promiscuity and being a "slut" is as empowering as a business owner giving all their goods and services away for free, they are free to do so but its irresponsible and economically stupid and they will be the ones to suffer the consequence not their customers (which again, is why people like you endorse the behavior, it gives you what you want without ever having to give anything in return (at least be honest about it)).

[Jenny4455]

@hellionthesagereborn so your implying all women should charge?

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 No. What I'm saying is that all people charge for sex, its just a difference of what is being bargained for. You can bargain sex for some one who will love you and support you and be their for you, or you can give them sex for the slight thrill it gives you. A man charges for sex, he gets pleasure and no investment then he is willing to reduce his standards on how she looks. If she is attractive and is unwilling to give up sex then he will consider paying a higher price i. e. a relationship with devotion and fidelity, for that resource. Do you think that anything in society is given freely? Are you friends with some one who gives you absolutely nothing? Of course not, they entertain you, they help you when you need them to etc. etc. So every interaction is an exchange, the difference is whether or not its an equivalent and amiable one or one where one party gains and the other loses and with the "sexual empowerment" the only one who gains is the man. She takes all the risk he takes none (he isn't the one who is risking pregnancy and the years of commitment and life derailment that entails. He is even at lower risk of contracting STDs compared to her). Why do you think sleazy men encourage you to have casual sex? Because they get free sex and your the one who is left holding the bag if something goes wrong.

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 I'm not suggesting it should be illegal for a woman to sleep around (in fact I think its absurd that prositution is illegal. Its her body her choice, why does some one else get to tell her otherwise?), what I am saying is that its a poor deal for her, its not healthy for her and it will have consequences. As long as your aware of that, do what ever you think works best for you but don't complain when those consequences come to fruition (like when you find a great guy who after finding out you had sex with every one you could decides he doesn't want you anymore. Just as you had a right to make your decision, he has a right to make his).

[Jenny4455]

@hellionthesagereborn I dont dispute anything you just said. But your initial message wasn't about exchanges between people (emotional, intellectual, physical etc) you compared women's sexuality to a business. You compared a slut to a business giving everything away. It's an unpleasant comparison equating a woman's body to a commodity and is a flawed metaphor anyway as a business owner that only provides their goods and services to their partner is just as stupid.

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 No its not. I would compare a male interaction with a woman the same way. Its comparable situation because you are exchanging goods and services. Why do you think a man is expected to pay on dates? His resources are being exchanged for the opportunity to have sex. Now if that is the ONLY exchange then that is bad, but my point was claiming its empowering to have casual sex is like claiming that a shop keeper is empowered by giving away everything they have for free. That is comparable because the one who suffers is the shop keeper and the one who proclaims its empowering is the only one who gains in that situation. That's why he is pushing this, because if you as a woman give away sex for nothing, he gets sex for nothing. That is a comparable metaphor, you don't have to like it (most people don't (believe me, do you think I'm particularly thrilled at the knowledge that a woman only values me so long as I have resources to provide?(and yes, they do do this. That's why women rarely marry some one who makes less then them and hates when a guy doesn't have a job, she wants his resources (nothing wrong with that either, child rearing is expensive)), of course I don't like that but it is reality.). As for the shop owner, your intentionally being obtuse, he provides a service and goods to those who invest in his business, how is that not comparable to a woman who only invests in a man who is also investing in her? That is absolutely an apt metaphor, you just don't like what it says about the human condition, that things are conditional and that their are consequences to actions and behaviors.

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 Your argument is no different then his. Your arguing that this exchange is about love because it benefits you to do so. Your not dating a jobless man, you are not dating a man who is poor (every study has shown women do not marry "down", that a woman who makes significant amount of money will wait until they find a man who makes as much as her or more rather then be in a marriage with a man who earns less. Studys have shown that women prefer men to be the one to pay for dates. They also show that his income is as much a factor as his looks. They show that if she does marry a guy with less money (or more often something happens that results in him earning less) she will be more unhappy and more likely to divorce.). Why? If its only about love and feelings then his money shouldn't be a factor, his job and success shouldn't be a factor, his "drive" shouldn't be a factor. But it is a factor, the main factor for you (again, you can deny this but every study and every woman's behavior (yours included) will prove any argument against this wrong (not every woman is like this of course but the overwhelming majority are)). So why is that unless you are exchanging sex as a commodity/service for what he can provide? Well the only answer is that it is a commodity and you are trying to get the biggest bang for your buck (no pun intended). You want the best situation the best mate because your taking a risk and putting yourself in a precarious situation by potentially having offspring with that man (because again, kids are expensive, so are houses and everything else).

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 In short both of you are arguing that its empowering to give up your power, in his case a woman's power to bargain her sexuality and reproductive potential for the best mate, and you arguing that love is the predominant factor thus convincing men that its okay to short change them and not have to give back as much as you are getting (remember, you expect him to pay for everything (studies show men spend up to two to four times as much as women on their significant others for holidays (among all the other things I mentioned)). Your arguing that empowerment comes from disempowerment because it benefits you to make that argument. I'm not irritated that people want something for less then they want to put in, I'm irritated that they would lie about that and frame it as if its some how beneficial to the person they are lying to. The fact is a fair exchange of goods and services is not mutually exclusive from an exchange of affection and love. I don't have the friends that I do because they are reliable and I can get the most out of them. They are my friends because I enjoy being with them, we have the same interests, they are good people AND they are reliable. You should be shopping for both, not one or the other. So as I said you can do what ever you want, but lets not pretend its something it isn't.

[Jenny4455]

@hellionthesagereborn and all your points outline exactly why I dont date. Most guys seem to view dating as a transaction like you've just outlined. I have no interest in that mentality and never expect men to pay for me. I pay for myself and the only gifts I accept from friends or family are shared activities where I pay my share. Anything else is politely refused with a suggestion to return it or donate to those in need. I am not a commodity, burden or dependent

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 Well, you can say that, but it doesn't change the fact that its true. Also, its not all about you. First as stated, you absolutely put demands on men, period. This is called "romance", romance is not for men, its for women. Its him proving his worth to her. That is a transaction. You absolutely do expect men to pay (you say you don't date but then say you never have them pay for dates? Which one is it?). You are a commodity. The problem isn't that, its that you act like you don't treat men as a commodity, you do. You treat your family as a commodity. You treat every one that way because we are. We exchange value for something else, whether that is our work for pay, our investment in our children so they can continue our genetic line, our loyalty for the promise of help when we need it from friends, to exchanging resources and stability for access to reproduction. Again, your view is the issue, not the system.

[hellionthesagereborn]

@Jenny4455 If your truly unable to treat things as a commodity then by all means, date an ugly homeless man who treats you like shit. He is unattractive (he is not providing you with good genetics for offspring so no commodity their), he is not providing resources or stability (no commodity their) and he isn't providing devotion and loyalty (no commodity their). If you do that, you'll have proven that you don't exchange goods and/or services in your interactions, and I will humbly admit being wrong. Of course we both know this won't happen as your biologically wired to want stability, biologically built to want some one with good genetics, and biologically wired to want some one you can rely on in hard times just as they are biologically wired to want those things. We have a fair exchange of goods/services, that doesn't mean you have to hate some one (a shop owner should respect and love their customers and their customers if he treats them right will respect and love him. That is the fair exchange both contributing what they have so that both are better off for it).

[BuckWild]

@Jenny4455 You have a brain. I like chicks with brains. It's been shown that the more intelligent a person is the more likely they are to be sexually adventurous. So do you like older guys? Just so that were clear, I'm not offering you anything of a material nature. Only my sweet, sweet lovin.

[4eyes2mouths]

Man that sounds exhausting lol

[Blubby1234]

Maybe you can beat it witr your STD count

[SHREYASH007]

even young understand about STD why these elders don't get these.. maybe they lack it.

[Lynx122]

You can still beat the record it'll be hard work though :D

[TadCurious]

After the lockdown ends just have them cue up like in your previous question. An assembly line approach should enable you to run the numbers up pretty quickly.
#BuyLubeInBulk

[eninning]

Absolutely possible do you need any takers?

[F-eight]

When I first read the question, I thought it was a guy posting about fights he'd won last year buy knocking out guys but that escalated quickly 😂

[aldy333]

Hahahaha me to, i was thinking like u 😀

[F-eight]

Great minds think alike I guess 😂😂

[Agape93]

Yeah you can manage it if you cared enough

[0112358]

Sure. Just gotta finish the year with a bang.

[Apope16]

You are pretty cray cray. I dont think you can go beyond 69. Once you hit 69 i hear stds kick in.

[COMMODOREII]

Thats bullshit

[Apope16]

@COMMODOREII its a joke. of course its bs.

[COMMODOREII]

I know 😂😂 just wanted to see what you would say lol

[Passinggas]

Shit, go for it. COVID isn’t that bad compared to the other stuff, just say f-it and go for it.

[TCredo]

Once all this passes you'll have plenty of time to catch up. Heck even if that's not until December, you just gotta have a few gang bangs and you can beat last year's count :)

[9nsane]

You're a woman, so what's the point in having a body count? Any woman can just go lie on the pavement with open legs and guys will eventually start fucking her. It takes zero effort for you to get laid. It's an open goal.

[TonyBologna25]

Super slut ahaha

[Милашка]

Girl, yuck. You're a slut