Is it morally wrong that I only offer to pay handsome guys to have sex with me when they refuse?

[Circuitous]

It's not morally wrong, but it is potentially psychologically disturbing depending on the mindset that drove you to make such decisions. Apart from the mere aesthetically minded there are quite a few guys that don't care as much about looks when it comes to sexual attraction. Unfortunately, heavenly influenced by biological evolution, this catogory falls in the minority, although not as low as you might think. That aside, it also strongly depends on in which circumstances this scenario generally takes place. For example, in the digital realm on dating apps like tinder, or in socially active places such as clubs and bars, the majority of people that is interested in hooking up will be judging with their eyes rather than mind. And with the majority I mean pretty much anyone, although, I don't mean to generalise. Anyway, in a different scenario the mechanics might be different and the subjectivity of beauty might obtains a whole different meaning. Would you care to elaborate on your particular situation? You can send a PM if that feels more comfortable.

[TonyV]

Morals are opinionated and differ vastly from person to person, there is no 1 right set of morals.

If it dony bother you to pay what you consider "handsome" men to fuck you than go right ahead and do it.

Ibwould never pay for sex, but we are different people with different morals and neither of us is right or wrong.

[Soon2bmi]

You shouldn't keep asking if they turn you down and if you want to pay for sex then find a male prostitute

[lanadelrey25]

I feel bad for you :(

[RemoErdosain]

I don't think it's morally wrong. They're getting laid and even getting a few bucks on the side, and it's all consensual. I see nothing wrong with that. You're allowed to pick who you have sex with, so it's not as if you were forced to choose average looking people

[DogEatsCat1973]

The only way to answer this is that it is only as wrong as if a man only pays pretty women to have sex. Now here is the brutal truth neither is wrong we desire what we find attractive so why would you pay someone to service you if you are disgusted by them? It would be morally wrong however if you sought out what you find desirable and then turned around and shamed the other gender for doing the same thing. If you want to be left alone in your love life without judgement then give others the same respect.

[Lochlan]

No, it's not morally wrong. You're sticking by your preference, pursuing like an emancipated woman, and selecting a mate most likely safer than a gigolo.

Now, if you're in need of service...

[ChocoBrownieMonster]

Just do whatever makes you happy, gotta be selfish to get your kicks.

[Anonymous]

Really, I'll have sex with you! lol ;) But if you are ok with it, then to each their own. I'd probably sell myself if I could lol.

[feedmelove1]

I don't need to pay I get it for free nothing wrong with paying if both agree to it

[Jamie05rhs]

The "A vs. B" is not morally wrong. That's just fiscally prudent.

[Don-_-Don]

No, nobody should care about what you do im regards to that.

[jjj101010]

Does it work? Don’t know many guys who refuse sex anyway

[YHL6965]

I don't know but I personally find this quite scummy.

[Anonymous]

You're a woman; you shouldn't have to pay for sex. If anything you should be charging for it.

[Dargil]

E. Both. They have their assigned roles.

[Danny_dan92]

You have your standards

[Alivegirlll]

yes if you guys don't pay taxes 🤔

[ElDiablo666]

You would not have to pay me.
xx

[Texaskid1]

How much are we talking about?

[WhereAmI]

Hope much will they take? 😂

[asshole_]

You are not a good person. I've told you this

[Anonymous]

Nope. Your wallet your choice.

[coffeewithcream]

Naw, you're good.