In reverse to men’s questions about women’s sexuality, Are most men here on GAG objectumsexual?

[Yads_Is_Back]

Seems like the guys are always asking about if we are really truly straight, although for myself it’s obvious that I just can’t see another woman that way.
Those men here claim that’s “unnatural” in attempt to make women look bad for it, yet they post about how they want to have sex with robots. Lol

So... To reverse the question, are most or all of these men objectumsexual? (For the ones who haven’t spoken about wanting to stick their dicks in robots, I’m asking this. Obviously I know that the ones who have said it are.)

*NOTE: I think my stance on this is well-known on GAG; I’m for neither of these. I’m heterosexual and only with my own species.

And I don’t truly know why the guys ask that on GAG so much - whether it’s genuinely out of curiosity or to complain/verify to their benefit. That’s on them, not my business, and therefore I cannot judge. So this post is a simple question- are you or are you not - and therefore is not debatable because the answer to the question is based on your/each individual’s personal answer.

I specifically asked about the guys on GAG simply because they are completely different- almost totally the opposite- of guys I meet irl, or at least they come off that way. Answering that because I’m sure that question may come up.

[WindAtMyBack]

I think a LOT of the questions by guys about girls being lesbian are a small number of guys asking the same question over and over.

However, I've known and seen quite a few women, that I know for sure are women, say the same kind of thing. I've heard several make the statement that all women are bi.

People have the strangest ideas.

As for having sex with inanimate objects. No thanks. I'm not that good at fooling myself.

"Hey, have sex with a rock and pretend it's a woman."
I'm pretty sure I'll see through the illusion.

I'll add though, that in real life the only person I know who said they would like to have one of those robots, was a woman. She was one of those people who just could not stand to be alone. She'd rather have a robot than nobody at all. I had known her for years and it really took me by surprised. She didn't explicitly mention sex. She wanted someone to watch TV with and talk to.

[Yads_Is_Back]

Agreed. The guys I know irl don’t say these kinds of things or have any desire to be with a robot. I put that in the description too. I was a little less detailed on it, unless someone asked, because many tell me here that the ones irl obviously aren’t going to say that around me because they probably find me intimidating and so they’re covering it up. I don’t know if it’s true, but it does make sense, so therefore I haven’t dismissed the idea completely.

[WindAtMyBack]

There is a LOT of money going into the development of those robots. They must have some reason to think there is a market for it. I've thought all along that it's a novelty market for rich people. People who have nothing better to do with their money. So they buy a robot, which admittedly would be cool to see as a conversation piece. But to seriously own one as a companion, sexually or otherwise, I find to be very very strange. To be honest, if I "resorted" to using a robot for sex, my opinion of myself would not be good. Like how did I sink so low? This is what I mean by not being able to fool myself. Pretending that this bunch of inanimate objects is really a woman. OK, so masturbate and get it over with. The imagery is in the mind. A robot would ruin the imagery. It's too fake. It's a very strong reminder that it's NOT real. It doesn't reinforce the image, it would detract from it. I just can't imagine doing it. It would be screaming loud and clear "loser loser loser" without even adding anything to the imagery. I think I would take a huge hit psychologically. It's like crossing a line that says "That's it, your life has amounted to nothing".

[Yads_Is_Back]

Yes! A lot of the guys on here don’t realize that. So I admire you for seeing the reality and not blocking it out. The guys on here who have this view of wanting robots, though, are just so into the idea of getting back at women who have already thrown them away. That’s what’s sad. They’re giving feminism what it wants and they don’t even wanna acknowledge it. That’s why they need the robots: they’re too easily manipulated by small negativity.

[WindAtMyBack]

I've never noticed that myself. I have probably seen guys who said they'd like a robot, but I guess I never really paid attention. I think that wanting one and having one are two different things though. I think there would be a lot of buyers remorse when reality sets in that it really is "IT" and not "SHE". I wish I could remember what's it's called. There is something related to graphics having to do with more realistic graphics, with robots being a type of graphics. I'm not sure if I'm remember right, but it's something when it gets closer to realistic, at some point it creates a tension and discomfort. It's a problem with those robots, and with video games. Again, I don't remember the detail, so I'm somewhat guessing. Although I have seen the effect before. I think what happens is that when it becomes more realistic, but your brain knows it's not, it create a conflict. You eyes, and maybe other senses see one thing, but your brain knows it's something else. If you think in these terms, and look at one of those robots, there is a subtle discomfort there. Once you notice what it is, it becomes even more pronounced. Your brain functions a lot better at processing robots when they are less real.

[Brian___1731]

Of course not. Some people have such fantasies probably because they don't have a significant other or they can't deal with the problems one faces when you have a significant other.

[NamerOfStars]

Sounds like someone's trying to get herself a spot on the next Fox special, "In search of straight girls". ;) Seriously, I have no earthly idea why so many guys are so insistent on this point- but then, I'm the kind of freakish pervert who feels that other people's sex lives are none of my business.

[Lliam]

I don't know about "most' men/boys on GAG, but I have no interest in sex with a robot. I'm only interested in real, living, breathing, soft, warm females. It seems like fucking a robot wouldn't much different from masturbating. I'll take a juicy woman who moves, moans and reacts for real.

[BlueEyedBirdWatcher]

I would have sex with a robot, but I don't view it as a sexual preference.

It would need to be a robot that imitates a woman, which is no different to bring attracted to a TV screen showing a naked woman

If it did not imitate a woman then it would be a sex toy and I would not be attracted to it intrinsically.

So I say no.

[Yads_Is_Back]

You wouldn’t have sex with the TV screen though; you’d desire the woman. If you’re actually wanting to have sex with a robot, well, that’s self-explanatory and changes things, since a robot is still a thing. But it’s cool, I understand your answer as a yes. I get you. I just wanted the answer is all, so I’m not judging, and thank you for the explanation.

[The_Mad_Pirate]

Men are attracted to form. Women are attracted to function. Do not project women's attitudes towards sex on men, they are not even remotely similar.

[Yads_Is_Back]

@The_Mad_Pirate Yeah... but the definition of this sexuality still applies, and it’s not natural. That’s my point. Either way, it’s not up for debate, but thank you for the heads up.

[The_Mad_Pirate]

Oh... you are talking in the sense of a pathological case then. Or better said, in the form of a sexual perversion instead of simply a cost/benefit result ( you get to have sex with a female body without the nagging/emotional manipulation/resource extraction of a relation with a girl ).

[Yads_Is_Back]

@The_Mad_Pirate You are trying to find different ways to look at it to justify men. It’s not justified, no matter how you look at it. You don’t even have to take a bio class to know that having sex with a robot is not natural. And I don’t wanna sound stuck up so I haven’t mentioned it, but I’ll mention it here since you keep trying: I’m a biochem major currently enrolled in med school, so I know all about the differences in male and female ways. I don’t need a lecture; I got plenty of those in university.

[BlueEyedBirdWatcher]

@The_mad_pirate if men wanted sex without emotional attachment then anyone with enough money would use prostitutes instead of having actual relationships which we do not see in the real world. @yads_is_back do you actually study sexual psychology at your school though? Are you arguing from authority or virtue? I don't really understand your last comment because I don't know what natural means. But if you mean similar to animals I think animals would have sex with a robot, if you mean typical behaviour then you said in your question that most men would have sex with a robot.

[The_Mad_Pirate]

Oh sure, we agree having sexual interaction with sex toys is way out of natural order. But then again the social constrains actually put over society and how it was warped ( for the worse ) sexual interactions between men and women are also way out of natural order. That's why I mentioned the factor related to cost/benefit. Or to put it more simply, it's way more beneficial ( both in financial and psychological terms ) for some men to fuck a sex doll that find themselves trapped with a nagging gold-digging hypergamous crazy bitch who would divorce rape them at the first opportunity. Of course, even though technology were to blame ( dildos weren't invented in late 19th century by the way ), it's most probably current disruption in psycho-sexual dimorphism ( caused by a) the lack of serious predators to human beings and b) the abundance and availability of food and water ) what drives most of these men to prefer sex dolls over women.

[BlueEyedBirdWatcher]

I'm sorry, I do not understand any of that comment. I have many questions, but for one, why would security bias someone to prefer sex objects to real partners? Other than the indirect link to the birth rate I don't think there is any indication this happens in reality.

[Yads_Is_Back]

Arguing from a psychological point of view. I didn’t choose it as my minor or my major, but I had to take classes in it, and I also chose all psychology classes for my social studies component of general studies. Even apart from that, though, it can’t be argued that it’s natural. Pretty much anybody knows that. But if you wanna keep trying, you can go ahead. Feel free. I like reading your comments because you haven’t gotten out of hand, but I haven’t seen anything that justifies against my original point yet.

[Yads_Is_Back]

Also, for the parts that I honestly had questions about myself, my ex who is working on his Ph. D. in psychology had a good stance on this and how it psychologically affects the males as well as the conditions that cause even the desire to want to try it out. (Desperation and negative position in society, but that’s another topic.) I don’t have a degree in psychology or even a minor, I just took a good load of undergrad courses in it, but listening to someone with a Ph. D. in it whose goal is to be a college psychology teacher and academic advisor is actually a completely different and interesting experience. And again... he’s a guy. So he had less of a biased point of view than I do, since even though I’m a bio major I don’t actually know what it feels like to be a male, whereas obviously he does. We both end up with the same conclusion though, which again, people who haven’t even taken psychology can pretty much recognize.

[BlueEyedBirdWatcher]

To argue it's natural. Birds building nests is considered natural behaviour, so logically it is natural for humans to build things. And if I built a robotic lion, lions would try to have sex with it, so having sex with an object is natural. This is basically why I don't believe in the concept of nature, if you believe humans came from nature we are natural, anything we do is natural. But I assume you are talking about something within the concept of nature, could you be more specific?

[Yads_Is_Back]

It’s not natural, and I’m shocked that someone your age would even think it is. Lol Lions don’t have the mental capacity we do, and technically neither does any other species. Yes, we are capable of building things, but having sexual relationships with them is not pro-bio and it’s psychologically ill. Again, you asked about a psychology degree but really this is a common sense thing. Lol And to answer your final question on it: Yeah, it’s called ALL of biology. Pick up a textbook if you want to. Or better yet would be evolutionary psychology. I think it would benefit you more here on this topic. Anyways, I actually gtg. I have somewhere to be. But thanks for your view and answer. I feel like I’ve been discussing this with a kid lol but no there’s no argument that it’s natural. Again, yours doesn’t make sense. And I do recommend evolutionary psychology. That’s your best bet.

[Yads_Is_Back]

Oh, and by the way... There’s also a part of basic psychology (and common sense) that shows that someone who is actually guilty of having the symptoms of a cause of a condition (causes I mentioned earlier) is more likely to defend that the condition is more “normal”. That’s psychology too. Not saying your desperate since I don’t really know you, but psychologically it seems that way.

[Yads_Is_Back]

Lastly, even if you take the psychology (mental) and physical out of it, the question is not up for debate. Since robots are objects, your simple answer to the question would have been “yes,” which is okay. But you felt the need to defend it, which shows insecurity on your part. Well, 2+2 does not equal 7 and never will. That’s why this is a pointless conversation.

[The_Mad_Pirate]

Well, they would if the societal structure is such that leads the opposite sex to behave in a very aggressive or violent way ( either physical or psychologically ), which is what happens when you shred psycho-sexual dimorphism to pieces ( this happens when the females stop needing the males for protection and provision, which can happens due to either technological reason or because there few physical differences between the sexes ). So what happens in those situations is sexual interaction becomes dissociated and society just falls apart. Either way, whenever you reach a behavioral sink males my start preferring other ways of sexual interaction other than intercourse ( fucking a sex doll is just one of them ).

[Yads_Is_Back]

@The_Mad_Pirate Women have done the same. Actually, as you said, they threw the males away first. The males just use this for retaliation. But yeah, you have a good point.

[Bhavin2184]

I'm heterosexual..

[KingdomForAKiss]

https://youtu.be/VjJtmcJM-Rw

This guy... Saw him on My Strange Addiction.
I certainly hope that most men are not objectsexual.

[Ripper_E]

Dolls, robots are just like cold or and vibrators for women. However, if wanna masturbate, I just do it. I'm not going to be for that. I'm extremely easy in comparison to a woman. I don't need a toy or robot to orgasm.

[chriscdi]

well i blame society for this, im gonna be honest, i asked something similar to this because i do see a lot of women "experimenting" with their sexuality, i personally dont believe homosexuality and transexuality and bisexuality are normal because they aren't, its not normal but our society has fought so hard to try and normalize these things, i believe that a man should be with a woman and a woman should be with a man, anything else just isn't normal to me, now just cause its not normal to me doesn't mean i hate these people and thing that they deserve to die, thats an ignorant mindset i dont mind them and i think they should live how they want but to me its still not normal, point is that i believe society has fought to normalize it so much that people believe that its normal and think its completely fine to experiment, its why i believe we have so many women that are bi or claim to be straight but mess around with other women, the reason im specifying on women is because its harder for men to experiment even if they wanted because its more acceptable for a woman to do so than for a man, so i have noticed all the women and i can somewhat agree that its getting harder to find a full straight woman nowadays than it wouldve a decade ago, now you i already know your mindset is more of an old fashion woman based on what youve said in the past so this shouldn't effect you as its meant for other people, you know who you are, either ways i can kinda agree with the men that say this as personally I've seen what they are talking about.

[Yads_Is_Back]

Agree 100% with everything you said

[Danny_dan92]

What is objectumsexual?

[Yads_Is_Back]

Attraction to and preferring to screw inanimate objects

[Yads_Is_Back]

I even had to look up the word for it so don’t feel bad 😂

[Danny_dan92]

I love genuine pussy to much to fuck a doll. Or anything such as a pocket pussy. Personally I found those disgusting. I have not (seen) but have known of fellow marines or guys in general using pocket pussies more than once... And that’s gross. So essentially their sticking their dicks in a hole that is filled with dead rotting sperm.. gross shit. Nah. For me it’s either my hand with lube or lotion. Or pussy

[Yads_Is_Back]

Then again, you’re not anything like the other guys on here. I’m not surprised 😏

[Danny_dan92]

I love how flirty you are 😏😈

[Yads_Is_Back]

It’s a fact. I didn’t mean that in a flirty way. So many guys on here are insecure and I guess proud of being insecure because it’s like they love showing it lol

[The_Mad_Pirate]

You mean like women prefering a dildo over sexual intercourse?

[Yads_Is_Back]

@The_Mad_Pirate I’ll leave that one for you to decide. I say no because it’s the same thing as men using a vibrator ring or an actual toy - you’re not actually attracted to the toy, just using it for pleasure. My description in the question takes into consideration that these men are actually willfully wanting robots as partners due to desperation. However, either way, any kind of sex toy - for males or females - IS an object. So you can decide that one. Both males and females use toys.

[The_Mad_Pirate]

As said, that's just because men and women brains are wired differently. For a woman, the function provided by the vibrator or the dildo will suffice to get her satisfied. For a man, it's form other than function what matters ( the difference in sensitivity between a fleshligh and the "real thing" is not that much ), so it's the doll's boobs, ass, and face what matters most. Then again, and to repeat myself yet again, one thing is getting a doll as an actual form of sexual perversion ( i. e. you can't cum unless you do it with a doll ) and another thing is getting a doll for a cost/benefit relation ( you get the sex minus the nagging/emotional manipulation/resource extraction ).

[Yads_Is_Back]

@The_Mad_Pirate Having sex with an object and not a member of your species is not natural. Doesn’t matter how you try to justify it

[The_Mad_Pirate]

I still don't get your double standard. A dildo or a vibrator is no different from a sex doll or a sex robot, they are bot sex toys that basically serve the same function is just that they are ( mostly ) targeted to different markets, yet you keep trying to treat them as what they are, simply because it serves your argumentative purpose.

[Danny_dan92]

A vibrator gives woman pleasure in some ways I cannot. But on the same not a dildo cannot man handle a woman like I can nor tell her sweet things that her just hearing me say those things make her pussy more wet..

[The_Mad_Pirate]

Oh yeah, of course that there is difference in the PSYCHOLOGICAL aspect off the intercourse between having sex with a human being or getting off with a sex toy. But since she was never addressed that point in the first place in the OP , I didn't brought it up either. But surely, if we are talking about the psychological aspect, sure, there is a world of difference.

[Yads_Is_Back]

@The_Mad_Pirate Well that’s a big part of it, the psychological. Sorry for not mentioning it; I guess I should have. My error on that. But I’m against both homosexuality and objectumsexuality, as l said, so don’t take it as I’m judging just the men. It’s just a reverse question. And @danny_dan92 I’m sorry for us blowing up your notifs

[Danny_dan92]

Lol not a problem. Don’t worry about it

[newfreshstart]

i never asked a woman if she's gay or stright its none of my business

[NYCQuestions1976]

I've always been a fan of meat curtains. That's never going to change. The feeling of sliding myself into a welcoming vagina is unparalleled.

[youreanidiot2]

those guys watch too much porn.

[The_Mad_Pirate]

What the fuck does that even means?

[COMMODOREII]

sabes donde estoy mi amor. 😉😘💓🌹

[jasco]

As of now women just aren't what they was before there no longer a valued thanks to society and thanks to robots and birth control men no longer have to worry about children ssame goes for women but the question is why would a man need a women if we have robots what's there purpose

[Yads_Is_Back]

The same is said reversely. The whole robot thing wasn’t even really considered before women shunned men first and said they are valueless. So that goes both ways, men’s in response to women’s. I see the value in everybody- both men and women - and you won’t ever catch me with a robot. But the hatred of everyone against each other in today’s society is crazy. The question, however, is whether you’re objectumsexual, and I take it yours is a yes based on your reasoning.

[Yads_Is_Back]

I actually see it as men’s way of chickening out instead of standing up for themselves, considering that there are good women and also that the men who want the robots are the most undesired men. That’s not a good thing, but some people say that men using robots will be eugenics at work and kicking those undesirable men out so a really good thing. I think that’s very harsh, and I don’t agree with it, but it does make sense. My main concern is that by getting robots men are giving in to feminism because that’s what feminism wants - to eliminate those men and give them access to the hypergamy ones. That’s exactly what it would do. So that makes me concerned that feminism is gonna have a big takeover, although again the eugenics part makes sense but is harsh.

[jasco]

Oh no I am not against or with robots I wouldn't use them tho i want kids in my future and robots can't do that yet

[Yads_Is_Back]

Then I admire that you want to be a good father 🙏

[jasco]

Thank u

[bklynbadboy1]

I'm definitely heterosexual

[nawtee_me]

Sorry, I could never have sex with a robot. Why would I? It is a robot and not a real woman. If I am going to have sex with something then I had just as soon masturbate. The robot can watch me... ;)

[Jack9949]

Isn’t that a rare condition?

[Yads_Is_Back]

It’s only common on GAG, from my experience

[Jack9949]

Oh God 🤦‍♂️😂

[Tstrbrainer]

I don't have a complete idea on what objectum sexual really means, but I'm only attracted to women

[mrgspoter]

Pmsl 😂,

[mrgspoter]

Amazing 👀

[KittyMilk]

I just need that 100% no plastic robot kitty, that kitty I can make purr and wet

[Yads_Is_Back]

At least you’re normal lol

[KittyMilk]

Yes, I can't imagine having a surgery to have a plastic di (k also