Hat's off to the guy, you got to admire the confidence of such a tiny guy posing nude for days on end. But times have changed and now girls want more, size queens are everywhere, so I reckon if he was alive today we'd have shattered that confidence and he'd be on GAG asking countless dick size questions in a vain attempt to put his mind at ease.
But what do you think? Would he still have the confidence to pose nude in todays society or would he ask Michelangelo to give him a few more inches?
You can't really be too sure. Maybe in today's society, he wouldn't pose nude with a flaccid dick. Flaccid dicks are not really in high demand. That's why they're rarely seen in porn. I doubt that his dick would grow much when hard considering how small his flaccid dick is, but an erect penis would at least show more and be more attractive. However, if he's still tiny when he's hard, then he might be on this site asking for penis size verification, going MGTOW, and complaining about how terrible women are for not wanting him.
@QuestionMark19: Flaccid size doesn't mean anything during sex of course because you can't fuck with a soft dick, but it does mean a lot in terms of sex appeal. When a man strips naked and his dick is tiny, it's not attractive. Also, 5 inches hard is still small. My fiancee's dick is about 5.5 inches completely soft and 8 inches hard.
Most Helpful Girl
SarahP080102 | 1.4K opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Explorer
2 d
Maybe it was scaled down because of Michelangelo's own insecurity
In Greek art, being depicted with a large penis is tantamount to saying "this idiot thinks with his dick". Hence why no one of note is ever sculpted or drawn with one.
They were not shallow people, and knew there are far more important things to preserve for the posterity. Also, from experience, so called "size queens" talk a good game, but are usually shit in bed.
The best selling dildo and vibrator on LoveHoney. co. uk is average sized. So size musn't be that big of a deal.
In terms of your question: Most guys are insecure, but I'd rather suck with 5 inches, than suck with 7. Vice-Versa, If you do well with 5 inches, the bigger guy looks like an idiot.
Dear girl, you must be very inexperienced with naked and aroused males. There are two kinds of guys: growers and showers, the terms being self-explanatory. Growers can be smaller than David yet when stimulated challenge Goliath, swelling in size to out-dick the showers. For daily life, being a grower is much more convenient as a large penis can be both a nuisance and an embarrassment when flopping around in one's trousers in public.
0|3
0|0
DrunkAss | 105 opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Xper 6
3 d
It's only proportionally small, no? He's like 17 feet tall. So even his little baby-looking completely unerect dong is probably like at least 9 inches. I think he'd be perfectly happy and secure with himself.
The renaissance artists minimised sex organs in their works because it wasn't erotica. If it had been, I'm sure Michaelangelo would have sculpted him standing to attention...
0|0
0|0
Pete671 | 1.4K opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Explorer
3 d
His penis is about the same size as mine, so yes probably, unless he got into SPH like I did,,, Apparently in those times a large penis was considered ugly and undesirable, I can sort of see small dick guys getting all the top jobs, and when they're out at work their wives are getting a good seeing-to from the slave,,,
1|0
0|0
havingfun101 | 201 opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Xper 6
3 d
TL;DR: the men most likely had normal sized penises. According to the ancient scribes and online interviews with historians, men of the Greco-Roman world were often represented with smaller ding-a-lings as a sign of virility and masculinity.
Hey, hey, hey... to be fair it was chiseled out in a very drafted studio in winter! It’s called shrinkage and I suspect you know it. Cut a guy some slack.
Cheap ass Michelangelo starving artist crap with no decent source of heat!
@Shdzi211 He shoulda had a chubby, a half an erection, then women would swoon. Anyway, the rumor is Michelangelo was paid to make it look small by the local store masons union so that their wives would feel like they married a big guy. It used to work well until the 1960s. That why all the guys to their wives to Florence to see this amazing sculpture. Shhhhh, it’s a bit of a secret.
@Shdzi211 For the husbands that take their wives to see the sculpture so their wives then realize their husband is huge in comparison. Women aren’t supposed to know so shhhhhh. I just broke the man code for you.
I think at the time in ancient Greece small penises where meant to be a sign of intelligence. So the penis on the David is meant to be a compliment in a way
Considering how large that statue is, I would guess women would be glad his penis wasn't to scale.
0|1
0|0
Anonymous
3 d
LOL. My art history professor actually told us why the penises on those statue are so small. He said it's because the artist didn't want them to be sexualized and wanted to symbolize them as pure.
0|0
0|0
JackofSpades | 460 opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Xper 7
2 d
Mine is about 7' when erect.
But when it's flaccid it's not much bigger than his.
It's probably a pretty accurate representation of and average dick.
0|1
0|0
billluc69 | 4.6K opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Yoda
3 d
at that time a small penis showed a person had wisdom
0|0
0|0
john23232323 | 127 opinions shared on Sexuality topic.
Xper 4
3 d
Michelangelo would choose a black guy for posing if it was today.
1|0
0|0
Anonymous
3 d
People need to stop their obsession with size and come to realize that small is actually cute 🙂
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
G@G Community 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
How Do I Look? 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel & Leisure 
Trending & News 
AI Bot Choice
Superb Opinion