Downblouse pics aren't always with consent. Mutilation of the male body because he is turned on by taking or watching some girl's panties or bare bottom, seems a bit extreme. It's like thinking about having sex with someone that is a stranger. by the way, upskirts aren't always without consent too.
A swift kick in the nuts seems sufficient, especially if its done in public.
I think they should give the girl he was filming the right to kick him in the balls as hard as he can a few times, and then jail him for a year 😁
fortunately uk law was changed last year to include this as a sexual offense
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Make the guy wear a skirt.
Why punishment? I don’t see anything wrong :)
Maybe chopping of the balls is a little excessive, I think a few years is jail would do the trick.
I'd swap their balls for their eyes and cut off their hands for the sheer devilment
Okay Mr Choppy
Why, what would you do? Ignore the victim and give the perv free counseling?
I dunno, state fair dunk tank and a fine? It's funny that you're worried about upskirt photos when Google and Facebook have their hands so far up everyone's ass that they know what you ate for breakfast and about the weird midget porno you watched once.
Why do you think that it’s funny. I don’t subscribe to, and hate Facebook, and there’s nothing much I can do about Google. I use other search engines as much as possible. It’s funny why so many people seem so confrontational on here.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Superb Opinion