Are you a super straight?

Question

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

It's a troll job. Sort of.

I don't think it will get stamped out though because the push to define heterosexuality (and homosexuality) as attraction to a specific gender while ignoring sex is not actually how many people's sex droves work. As one anon posted here, many people's attraction is PRIMARILY sex based NOT gender based. So much like pan sexual was introduced as distinct from (or as a category of) bisexual, the new definitions have left a gap for describing attraction based on sex, which goes well beyond being "a preference" for a lot of people.

Anyway the trolling attempt has predictably set off outrage from the exact targets of the trolling.

tbh the issue is probably most fiery for "super lesbians" since unlike in the straight or gay male dating worlds, there actually is pressure in a lot of lesbian spaces that they should be accepting of "girl dick" or else they are transphobes.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

See I'm attracted to body parts, not genders. I don't understand people who are attracted to genders. I find physical attraction and arousal to ge based on quality of physical features/good genes. Everything else doesn't matter too much unless they're deliberately offensive.

So I'm not even super-straight, I'm more like 'gender blind.' IDAF what your gender is, I'm turned on by your genes most. I do find myself enjoying conversations with gay men more than straight women somewhat often, but I find penises gross (except for mine). A lot of married couples fight and bitch about something for years but stick around for the purpose of male-female sex acts.

RP_Blackburn · Accepted Answer

Why don't they just make a new name for people who are straight and are attracted to trans people? Pretty sure this was already what straight meant, as being trans is already set apart. And I'm sure people would be less upset about that, since trans people are a minority and the new label would be for people attracted to them, not excluding them. Also I bet it would have a better abbreviation.

CrazyGirl2 · Accepted Answer

Ok, first off “super straight” is NOT a new sexuality. But second, if it IS then I demand we straights, and super-straights be added to the existing “letter people” and it be changed to LGBTQQAIPSSS (you have to add straight and super-straight at the end) infact why don’t we just make it easy, and abbreviate it to just HR, as in Human Race?

ohshee · Answer

Na I have some curves in me

Lionman95 · Answer

I have the same preferences as "super-straight" but I´m not referring myself as "super-straight". I´m not into trans people and you may call me transphobic because of it but so be it. I understand that some people need to clarify their sexual orientation but I don´t see the need for calling it something new.

NathanDavis · Answer

they can call me anything they want, it won't change who I am... lol.

wankiam · Answer

no... just a wanker

RMcMaster1886 · Answer

So does that mean you wouldn’t date a woman who was even bicurious or anything? Personally, whatever my partner has done in the past isn’t a factor for me as long as I believe I’m the only person they’re going to sleep with while we’re together

VertigoJ · Answer

If it moves and I fancy it, I will fuck it. I don't know if that helps.

Dargil · Answer

I am an XY. I like XX's exclusively. You know. Sticks out at the top at least a little, goes in at the bottom.

DJB72 · Answer

I wouldn't get involved with a trans "woman". I'm a believer that if you have a Y chromosome then you're not female. If you have two X chromosomes you are. It's basic biology.