Do you think it is morally ok for people above 20s years old having sex with a person at 17?

So the age of consent is in many countries like 14-16 and therefore it would be legal. But do you think it is morally ok? I personally think it is ok for 17 years old having sex with 18-21 years old but it is weird when they have sex with 30 years old. I am asking since many people making a big deal that a woman in her EARLY 20s had sex with 17 years old, who was going to be 18 soon, in a movie called "emily in paris" . I personally dont understand the deal here. Like she was in her early 20s. They are accusing her for being a pedo and she even does not knew that the guy was 17. Like what the hell.
Updates:
+1 y
Maybe i am wrong. I am sorry if i offended anyone
+1 y
Thanks for the replies. I think my mind is changing due to your replies. I know a girl at the age of 16-17 who married a man in his 20s. When people critizise this, she get very defensive and angry. I thought it is ok for a person in her early 20s dating a person at 17
0 2

Most Helpful Girls

  • Personally, I don't have any interest in guys who are in their late 20's, but I don't see a problem with it if the guy is under 28 or so. What amazes me is these comments about 17 year olds being a child. Western culture seems to keep raising the bar higher and higher as to the acceptable age for people to be sexual. I am sure that if you looked at your grandparents and great-grandparents, most of you will see that some were married and had kids by the age of 17. I don't recommend that, of course, but the point in, they were having sex and the culture back then was definitely not as sexualized as it is now. They probably had to figure out everything on their own. Still, they made it happen, and society did not trip out. We have much better options for birth control and condoms now. Also, teens are far more capable of practicing safe sex than those from a hundred years ago and teen girls know far more about sex than our grandparents ever did. Another thing to consider about what is "morally ok"... In your christian religion, the "virgin Mary" was most likely no older than 13 years old, if that. Joseph was probably in his mid-30's, at least. What labels would you apply to that couple by today's western standards?

    • Great answer!

  • No I think its okay for anyone 19 or under to have sex with a 17 year old, but anything older than 19 is weird because they're basically having sex with a child. I know some people might not agree with me but thats just how I see it.
    But if the person was 18 they are an adult I know legally its ok for an 18 year old to date anyone at any age, but I think anything over 25 or 24 even would be weird.

Most Helpful Guys

  • I don't see an issue, but I'm from a country where 16 is the age of consent. In my country, sex is legal between two consenting persons which both are at least 16 years old. Sure, e. g. 40 and 17 would be weird (but not illegal in my country), but is it really completely different than 40 and 18? And especially someone in his/her early 20s dating a 16 or 17 year old, I don't see any moral objections.

    I didn't feel an adult all of a sudden on the day I became 18 years. You become an adult gradually.

  • If it's legal why do you care about what people think?
    Reality is, most women can't tell the difference between a guy at his 16's and himself at 24, depending on the guy even in his 15's.

    There's probably some difference in maturity, everyone matures with time but sometimes not for the better.

    • I agree

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

10 35
  • If where you live 17 year olds are the legal age then I see no issue if the other is in their 60's as long as it is consensual and we should learn to mind our own business!

  • Sounds fine to me.

  • Maven if I disagree with it I have no right to comment on it as along as they both want it not really my place to say anything it may urk me but at that point its a meh

  • The morality of sexuality is hard to set in stone...

    I've heard stories of mid to late 20-year olds boning underage teens but then they get married for life.

    Sooo...

    At the end of the day I say people can do what they want sexually, as long as it isn't abusive, but they can't force me not to be perturbed by it.

    • I think there should be an age limit when it comes to dating minors

    • But it's hard to draw that line without making it arbitrarily and forming double standards. So if a minor is happy dating an adult and vice versa then what's the point in preventing that? The whole purpose should be to protect minors. So when we get to identifying the harmful or abusive elements... the power imbalance, grooming, etc. That stuff happens between adults too, and we don't attempt to use the law against that. The only clear and non-arbitrary line I think I can draw is to say adults shouldn't date anyone who hasn't completed puberty, which is generally around 16.

    • Make it 18 to get sure. Minors mostly dont know a shit. They can't give consent. So it does not mater if it wants. There a lot studies that show how toxic it could be for the development of the minor.

    • Show All
  • You are correct from where I stand. I was 20 and had sex with a girl in high school and she was 16. Should say she had sex prior to me though.

  • Nope

  • I think the most I'd be ok with is a 16 and 20 year old or 17 and 21.

  • It is illegal to have sex with anyone under 18 if you are over 18. That being said, I dated a girl who was 17 when I was 21. I met her at a New Years party. She told me she was in her senior year and I thought she meant senior year in college (I was a junior in college). She was very mature looking for her age. We dated for a few months and actually I was starting to fall in love with her. She really was nice. We never had sex but it came close a couple of times. then she dumped me and went back to her old boyfriend.
    I really had the intention of waiting until she was 18 and maybe we would do it (she was a virgin).

  • As long as they're 25 or below i don't think so

  • It's legal here
    Morally probably not and personally I don't like women in my life unless they are at least my age

    N. b. one of my customers married his second wife when she was 18 and he was 38... they've been together 12 years now

  • Absolutely not.

  • I think once you're over 20 just go for someone over 18

  • Absolutely. I believe if they are old enough to cross the street...

  • It's alright

  • If it's legal then it's fine as long as everyone agrees to it.
    I wouldn't of minded this 44yo woman when I was 17yo! LOL

  • Do we have the moral highground to judge otherwise legal things? IMHO I've got better things to do than care about what two consenting legal age people do. Most people get into the business of others way more than they should. And many times, the reason is a deep rooted jealousy. I find that pathetic.

    Me? I don't care as long as it is legal. Just as I don't care about gays and such. None of my business what others do.

    • What does IMHO mean? I can show you studies and statistics that show how toxic it could for the minor to date way older adult person. And just because the age of consent make it legal, it does not make moral. In some countries the age of consent is 12(!). So it is common sense and normal human behaviour to judge it.

    • In my humble opinion The age of consent where I am from is 12 only in special cases so that stupid kids don't get into prison. I don't care about morality. I don't think I have the power to judge other people openly, beyond the confines of my mind. I am not better than them to tell them what is right and what is wrong. I care about law. If it is legal, I have no power to interfere and I do not wish to, either. Again, what legal age, consenting people do is not my fucking business. If any abuse happens, then it becomes my business. I am a soldier, not a priest or a preacher. My best friend, when he was 15, was hot for girls at 24-25. It was perfectly legal, he was happy as fuck, no harm was done. Was it immoral? Did he got off worse? Hell, if anything, I was slightly jealous. It was his preference and he got lucky with it.

    • I was educated such that I don't judge people for their preferences so long that it abides the law.

    • Show All
  • I don't think it's inherently immoral

  • I think it's Okay but legally no from where I am from. I heard one guy who was 18 and had sex with a girl was 17 and someone found out and told the authorities and now the guy is a registered sex offender. I feel maybe there be a law changed for a age to be ok to have sex.

  • Yes I think it is ok. The age difference isn't really that great. 17 with 20. Only 3 years.

  • There is nothing wrong with it.
    I enjoy younger girls, I find better company.
    As long as she is not underage.
    But I prefer girls 25 to 30..

  • Show More (25)