Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Because his parent, the medical professionals where he was born, the culture where he was born; or all three, acknowedged the fact that there is no medical advantage to being circumcised and the scientific evidence shows that any minor advantages are far outweighed by the deficits caused as well as the risks involved with the amputation of a healthy body part? Why the F would he "be done as a baby"? Now that almost every parent has the access to the internet, the only excuses are negligent ignorance and/or a willful neglect of your own childs body and rights. FFS
Why didn't you have your clitoral hood removed as a baby?