Do you agree with this persons answer? A husband and wife are required to perform sex with each other by law?

[Still-alive]

It was an answer to a question about rape.

So even if you don't feel like having sex you are or should be required to have sex anyways. agree?

[IronLady6354]

I strongly disagree that sexual intimacy should be required by law. However, I do agree that when a couple gets married there is an understanding that they do commit to one another to meet each others' sexual needs. I'm not saying that one person has to have sex every single time the other person wants it, but I do agree that a sexless marriage is something that should be off the table unless there's an explicit agreement otherwise (which I don't think the vast majority of people would agree to).

[SomeBlondeChick]

It's not stated in any law to have sexual intimacy with your partner. In fact I'd love for someone to quote this bogus law.

[razelove]

If I'm not sleeping with my wife often, and she's not enthusiastic about sleeping with me, there's a problem. Like someone has cancer, some serious injury, or we're getting a divorce problem, on either end of that not matching up.

You wouldn't need to pass a law like that, it's a legitimate reason to get divorced. Same with if someone gets injured or is ill in some way and can't perform, you understand that and be there for them. I mean, it's marriage, not car ownership. We prop each other up.

If either side is bringing things down, then it isn't a marriage anymore. Whether that's denial of sex, not worrying about whether your partner enjoys it or not, or anything else that you work together on.

Sex is just a single facet of marriage, but it is a big one.

[Jesus_is_the_guey]

If she ain’t giving it to him she’s giving it to someone else a divorce would be better than forcing her to have sex though the only exception is special circumstances like physically unable to do it but if she’s able and not willing she’s definitely lost interest and its better to move on and find someone better suited than to force her to have sex but people rush into marriage with the wrong intentions and the wrong mindset caring more about looks than the souls and persons in the shell of what they think they love

[crazyish]

That is ridiculous. That was an answer to a question about rape? Whoever said it was pretty much admitting to rape... wow just wow.

[ChrisMaster69]

@crazyish it’s so fucking scary that it’s even in print

[crazyish]

@ChrisMaster69 exactly my thoughts smh

[Still-alive]

My husband forced me to have sex he raped me right? ↗

she's in here. im getting into an argument with her who's now saying that its ok because the bible says so and the bible is the law we should all follow

[crazyish]

It's a female? Rape is morally ok? Because the Bible says so? You have got to be effing kidding me.

[Screenwriter]

I'm stll not sure where this opinion that if you're married or in a longterm partnership you OWE your partner sex whenever your partner wants!
This is just crazy. Sex, like anything a couple does TOGETHER, has to be mutually agreed upon. It's the same was disagreeing where to vacation. He wants the mountain, she wants the beach. Compromise is a mountain lake. Both get some of what they want and are happy.
If one person begrudgingly has sex with the other, what kind of sexual relationship IS this? There's nothing joyful and loving about that!
Of course the extreme of no sex at all isn't right either. Something's wrong if that's what it's degenerated to.
A couple usually has a rhythm. The rhythm can sometime get off beat. But eventually it comes around and there's harmony again.
Forcible sex means that partner doesn't care about the other partner's desires or lack of it.

[GingerCatLover]

@krakenattackin - What law & which country? Some 3rd world shithole? Because it certainly doesn't exist in most civilized cultures & western societies.

[purplepoppy]

If it was law there would be regulations on minimum number of sessions per week.

[KrakenAttackin]

There is a clause in divorce called "sexual abandonment" which can be used as "fault" in divorce.

[Still-alive]

@KrakenAttackin go away you rape apologist

[KrakenAttackin]

Go away you Beta Simp, white knight.

[Still-alive]

@KrakenAttackin im not the one who thinks its ok rae your wife if she doesn't want it

[KrakenAttackin]

I think of a husband forces sex on his wife that should be grounds for divorce but not a rape charge. Believe me, he will get raped in the divorce process.

[Still-alive]

@KrakenAttackin and that makes you a rape apologist and thankfully he will be charged with rape if she ever came forward.

[KrakenAttackin]

Wow, you are an Uber-beta. Have you ever even seen a vagina? Other than the mirror?

[Still-alive]

@KrakenAttackin a few. Your attempts to emasculate me are useless bro so just stop embarrassing yourself you rapist.

[GingerCatLover]

@KrakenAttackin It's called constructive abandonment, ya loser, and it is when the spouse removes themselves from the martial house in spite to refuse the married partner having sex. Quite different than someone saying not today. Not today if approached the wrong way - e. g. coerced, threatened, etc. for sex - will result in justifed jail time.

[DaisyM23]

I get that they’re saying consummation of a marriage is what many divorce laws are based around, especially in the past, which I also disagree with, but it’s also wrong to say sex HAS TO happen just because you’re married

[PaynefulPleasures]

More fake news cool 😎
Nah if it came down to that & it wasn't mutual divorce ✌️

[menina]

I strongly disagree. This is basically someone saying that raping someone is okay. No, a marriage is not only sex and no one should be forced to have sex when they don't want to. I know this sounds like a cliche but "NO means NO".
Also, rape victims are not allowed to say that they don't want to have sex. So, whoever posted this nonsense has no clue of what they're saying.

[ChrisMaster69]

Fuck that’s brutal,

which US state is that one from?

the majority of the west have moved on from this stuff.

[ChrisMaster69]

@still-alive it’s the numbers of those that agree and strongly agree, I really hope they do not have daughters, as they are basically agreeing to someone raping their daughters, granddaughters etc.

[midnightmoon05]

I am not into arguments, but I do hope those who wants to get married understand, it’s part of their duty.

[Still-alive]

But does that mean anyone gets to just take it even if the other doesn't want it?

[Xoirwinkan]

Nice to hear a woman say that.

[midnightmoon05]

@ Still-alive Anyone? No... there is love, respect, commitment, duty between a married man/woman. When we return to that, love/relationships will be easier. A husband and wife can show their love towards each other = love making. There is no other way.

[Still-alive]

but if one person in that married relationship says no can they just take it by force? yes or no?

[midnightmoon05]

Think - respect and love. No force, understand, communicate why. All the time. Then it’s not a marriage. Sometimes, tired, sick. No force.

[Still-alive]

Ok one more time and stop weaseling out of it. If a person in a relationship isn't feeling like having sex but the other does and decides to take it anyways is that ok in your eyes? Yes or no?

[midnightmoon05]

I don’t live in that world. And working hard to make changes who are suffering through the fall of the society. I hope more will learn, realize, that we need love, family structure, value back. None these hurt angry kids demanding for their selfish needs. To answer, get out of any relationship/marriage that requires forcing someone to gain immediate gratification. Sex can wait. But not forever. Learn to value yourself and your partner. If it’s consistent, get a divorce. Learn from it, heal from it. Hope for a better relationship after.

[valentina4eva]

strongly disagree wow 😵😵 what law is that exactly? sounds completely made up..

[Jesus_is_the_guey]

A. It states wifely duties on vows which includes sex B. Yea I know but the law isn’t always morally correct I also strongly disagree with the comment in the pic

[valentina4eva]

o lol, wedding vows aren’t laws tho..

[Jesus_is_the_guey]

I mean there are legal vows and personal vows
https://bronteprice.com.au/what-are-wedding-vows/

[valentina4eva]

from ur own link it’s this: “I ask everyone here to witness that I, AB, take you, CD, to be my lawful husband (or wife or spouse or partner in marriage) and I ask everyone here to witness that I, CD, take you, AB, to be my lawful husband (or wife or spouse or partner in marriage”.

[valentina4eva]

def nothing legally saying a woman has to have sex w her husband if she doesn’t want to😱😱

[GingerCatLover]

@Jesus_is_the_guey Too bad real law, as in law that'll see any guy or woman who blatantly forces the issue to the point of being considered coerced, threatened, etc. (essentially rape) potentially rotting in jail, says otherwise.

[Jesus_is_the_guey]

Totally missed that I always assumed it was prt of the legal part of the vows because of how common it was either way I disagreed with the pic lol

[Jesus_is_the_guey]

@GingerCatLover ok but you’re acting like I was pushing for it to be ok when I clearly said I strongly disagreed...

[TheCunningLinguist]

There is no law in the west that any married person must submit to their partners desires. Not doing so however, may be grounds for divorce. "Alienation of affection".

[Jean-Marie_Céline]

No, there's no law that obligates someone to give sex to their husband/wife.
However, the husband/wife has the right to ask for a divorce for "failing to perform conjugal duties".
It may sound weird, but in my region some men and women have actually filed for divorce for this reason.

[midnightmoon05]

That is correct. One can file for divorce if partner refuse to perform in some period of time.

[wittymilf]

Different countries have different laws on this one. It would be sad to think you’re spouse only has sex with you because it is the law though.

[Still-alive]

Do you agree with any of these laws though?

[wittymilf]

Not at all, marriage wouldn’t be special if it were mandatory

[Inexpensivefurniture]

What the fuck? No one is REQUIRED to have sex by law, and you shouldn't feel pressured to have sex because you're married

[Gwenhwyfar]

That’s crazy!!! And completely untrue.

[karaspara]

Wow not sure what country that’s a law in and not sure I wanna know

[DaveToo]

There are many reasons why one partner or the other doesn't want, or can't have sex. There is no law in any county, state, or federal government that requires either partner to have sexual relations with their partner.

[Stevefiveo]

Yes, it's 💯 their job to sexually satisfy their spouse.

[Still-alive]

its not their "job" they should do it out of love not obligation/

[TheBigGuy9]

Stupid question

[Still-alive]

Why?

[TheBigGuy9]

I don’t know why I wrote that to be honest lol

[Still-alive]

k see ya

[KrakenAttackin]

Moral law yes.

[Xoirwinkan]

Denying your partner sex is emotional abuse. Would you tell your partner they may not use the internet? That is nasty unloving behaviour.

[Still-alive]

Sure but does that mean you get to just take it even if she dkesnt want it?

[Xoirwinkan]

No, I am saying its her duty to do it, at least most of the time. You need to discuss so many things before you marry someone.

[Still-alive]

ok good because some people think just being married gives you the right to violate the others body against their wishes

[Xoirwinkan]

No, but he/she should have a very good reason for denying their partner sex.

[Still-alive]

and if she/he doesn't?

[Xoirwinkan]

Refer to my first reply.

[Still-alive]

you'll rape her? Got it.