Do you think a man who impregnates a woman should get a choice in whether she gets an abortion or not?

[Anonymous]

[BeMuse]

It's his kid. Either you agree he is half responsible for the situation, or you don’t. You can’t enslave a man financially claiming he is responsible for the kid, but take away 100% of the choice concerning if the kid is aborted or not. That would make him 0% responsible for the situation. With no choice, there is no responsibility. No taxation without representation... That said, you also do not have property rights over his child either. It’s 50% his, so if you make the choice without him, you are stealing one of his family members and then killing it. If someone stole your child and then committed human sacrifice on it, it would be an atrocity in your eyes, but somehow women think they are the good guy in that same story when they do it. Any other day of the week the person would be on America’s most wanted with a nation wide manhunt...

[ChrisMaster69]

As part of the action that led to the pregnancy, yes he should have a say. A lot will depend on relationship level and how much that say counts.

for example, a casual encounter and is pregnant then some guy she’s not in a relationship having a say is not the same level as if say they were married.

if it’s a relationship, then they ideally should discuss it, however this is not always possible.

the woman has the final choice with consultation from medical professional.

[ChrisMaster69]

@ Pretty Pink Anon thank you for MHG most appreciated

[EmmaMary]

Definitely not a choice, however he is fully entitled to voice and contribute his opinions accordingly.

[EmmaMary]

Thank you for the MHGirl.

[Lliam]

No. But I don't think she should have a choice as to whether or not he has to support her or the child, either.

[MrCommodore]

It depends, like is he financially committed to pay child maintenance for 18 years if she decides to not have an abortion?

I don't think one person should be able to involuntarily obligate another person to an 18 year financial commitment without some consultation and consent.

If a girl gets pregnant and decides to keep it against the wishes of the biological father, then she should forfeit any claim to financial support.

[FoghornLeghorn99]

Exactly!!!

[ohshee]

I want to say yes because he should know but at the same time he doesn't really have much of a say if he didn't use a condom in the very beginning

[FoghornLeghorn99]

If the woman didn't MAKE him use a condom should she have a choice? The choice was made before she spread her legs.

[ohshee]

And the reality of that is by both people the other reality is no matter where in protection or not anything can happen it took both people so both people need to know and understand the consequences it's not the child's fault but no matter what that child should be brought up in a world that they are treated with respect and it is taught to be better than both of their parents

[PurSeduction]

I would say if you are risking and are incapable of preventing to impregnate someone. (Taking precautions etc.) You should not have any choice.

[abc3643]

No. Not at all.

[DonkeyDan]

Oh that's a complicated issue, I'll just say yes and no lol

[boggboss]

I believe je should have some impact in the decision yes obviously he dont get to choose but he should be heard

[slatyb]

No, because he doesn’t have to carry and deliver. Pregnancy and birth are uncomfortable, biologically expensive, and risky for the mother. His effort is about nothing. He can impregnate another woman if he wants a child.

[FoghornLeghorn99]

Then knowing that, don't get pregnant in the 1st place.

[BeenThereLovedIt]

The man should have a say - meaning if he doesn't want a child, then he should have the option to opt-out and not be financially responsible if the female still wants it.

Alternatively the female should have the final say, but if she wants it without a father in the picture, that's on her.

Chapelle got it right.

[Bricealan]

No, the choice is hers

[Agape93]

Nope.

[Agape93]

How?

[CoolGuy7532]

I do think his opinion should be taken into consideration depending on the circumstance.

[qwert1234]

He gets an opinion but the ultimate choice is hers.

[FoghornLeghorn99]

I'll stay out of her uterus if she stays out of my wallet if I CHOOSE not to support an unwanted kid. Turn about is fair play.

[PoliteSpeaker]

2 people cannot have equal say lol. There is no 3rd party to break the tie. If the woman is the one taking the risk of death then she gets the say. That is a completely objective opinion.

[Browneye57]

You make it sound like you weren't really there. FAIL
No honey, you stripped down and fucked him. And if you did it without BC and got preggo, then either raise the resultant offspring, or give it up for adoption. Killing babies cuz you were too stupid or lazy to prevent pregnancy, is evil and depraved.

[R4zor]

I used to hate what you say but I am starting to like your logic mate

[PoliteSpeaker]

Not everyone operates from the same morality. In the same space a women could die giving birth and depending on the woman, whether that is a higher possibility or not then she should have full say so. Let them have one thing. Y'all just can't let the control go.

[R4zor]

@PoliteSpeaker Stfu then let go of the BS child support leeches

[Browneye57]

@PoliteSpeaker - Why not? Why is it okay to kill an unborn child cuz YOU fucked up? You and your 'possibility' bullshit. What a giant crock of shit.

[Iron_Man]

Yes..:

[Made4sex]

I do t think either of them should get a choice. It is a life.

[Morgan_99]

No, not at all.

[R4zor]

what a hoe

[nawtee_me]

Yes, it the sex was consensual then he should have a say in it.

[REDHOTLINE]

Of course yes.