Girls, women can choose who their attracted to?

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Saying “women aren’t visual” implies that women don’t feel attraction to a man’s looks, hence why many guys wonder if women don’t find men attractive to begin with.

By default women don't feel sexual attraction to anyone. By default they have no sexual attraction for guys. Among people whom they have personal connection, get to know, familiar they only feel sexual attraction to them.

But before that there is no sexual attraction as like asexual?

[ChrisMaster69]

Not sure what exactly you are asking.

yes girls are visually attracted to things, just not in the same way as a guy is visually attracted.

For example look at Hollywood, Music industry etc, a lot is geared towards attracting women to watch, have a good lucking lead etc.

Guys however are far more visual, hence porn and porn mags etc. historically porn mags would put photos in for their guy readers and erotic stories etc in for women readers.

Also attraction is not always sexual, being attracted to someone does not mean you automatically think about sex. Attraction means you want to know more about them, who they are etc.

I’ve never had any guys I know comment about this ‘why many guys wonder if women don’t find men attractive to begin with’.

We know that women like certain things, it’s something you learn about at school. It’s like how to pull a girl 101, however it’s not just looks, that works to a certain point, it’s also how you interact with them.

[DonkeyDan]

Its not as straight forward as that, saying that women aren't visual doesn't mean that they don't find men attractive, but more that they aren't as sexually turned on by men's looks than men are of women's looks. The visual aspect is more sexual for men than women. Women's sexual connection is more emotional. Women don't tend to look at guys and think, oh he's hot I really want to have sex with him, like we do with women.
The problem is you see attraction and sexual attraction as the same thing and they aren't.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

I am not talking about asexual attraction. If you say attraction and sexual attraction is different then what do you mean by attraction? Women aren’t as visual, less visual. What do you mean by it? Intensity or frequency?

[DonkeyDan]

Attraction can exist without it being sexual, if you dont understand that i can't say anything to help you understand.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Women aren’t as visual, less visual. What do you mean by it? Intensity or frequency? I am not talking about asexual people.

[DonkeyDan]

I'm not talking about asexual people either. Right, men are visual in the way that we can look at a woman and say to ourselves oh I'd love to fuck her, well the majority of the time wonen don't look at guys and say oh I'd like to fuck him, because their attraction isn't as visual as ours. Their attraction is more of an emotional connection than a visual one, so if they like the guys personality. Yes they can look at a guy abd say oh he's attractive, but thibjibg about fucking him isn't the first thing they think about.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Still I am not talking about asexuality. Demisexuality is also asexuality. Are you saying after forming emotional connection with a guy (asymmetry face, chicken leg, 4.5" height) they will automatically sexually attracted to him? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[DonkeyDan]

As I said in ny last message I'm not talking about asexuality either. I dont think there is any point continuing this conversation, you obviously don't get it an never well, good luck.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

You please read again then spread your fantasy.

[SueShe]

Your assumption is only partially correct.

As for me, I would go anytime with a person that has a number of physical disadvantages but has a generous heart, an intellect that allows for deep, meaningful and sensible conversations and a personality that stands out of the crowd rather than with a guy that is obsessed with his physical appearance, the size of his penile appendage or his height.

What counts in life is what is inside this shell.

Inner beauty stays as long as the person lives while the outer shell is fading away with time and is just the shadow of what it was once.

I am not at all interested in the looks of a person because looks say strictly nothing about a person's qualities.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Have you ever pay bills (coffee bills)

[PrettyPriya]

What does her ability to pay for coffee have to do with anything? So curious.

[SueShe]

I always pay my own bills, even for coffee

[SueShe]

@prettypriya Maybe that coffee is a very expensive item where this gentleman lives.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

@PrettyPriya experience says, women who say this type of spiritual word in real life they are often gold digger. Because according to them they don’t feel sexual attraction instantly, at the first glance. They have to spend time with the guy, have to know his personality, sense of humour, kindness, heart in order to feel sexually attracted to him. It really takes 30 days on average to get to know a person. 30 days means 20 dates, 20 free meals. After spending time then they will say, still they can't feel sexual attraction. So, it’s not working. Let's find new guy, let's spend time in order to know whether sexual attraction work or not. New guy, new meal, free meal. Nice business.

[SueShe]

Why do you always have to have sexual attraction? The problem with you guys is that everything has to boil down to sex. Just leave it out for the time being. It is not that important. However, you seem to prioritize it at all costs. Why?

[PrettyPriya]

@pineapplevirgaflycow I read about half of what you opined and gave up. My apologies. I will have my significant other read it, when he has some time, and see if he agrees.

[PrettyPriya]

@sueshe I happened to miss your comment. Well put. My SO and I are more focused on career and such things that advance or otherwise enrich our lives to prepare us to get married, have a family and provide. My attraction to him is certainly much deeper than looks. Sadly, I wish more guys would realize that and what you said.

[SueShe]

@PrettyPriya I hope you found the love of your life with your SO and wish you well for your future and family. True, men are (in general) visual creatures and don't want to think ahead. They fail to realize that beauty is not eternal. Once they get fed up with the looks, girls are just discarded in favor of another one that is good looking and the risk to get a gold digger is indeed very large. However, guys that are only after the looks of a girl are the ones that fall into their own trap and then wonder why some girls profit from their own stupidity.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

It doesn’t invalid the fact that all girls are inherently prostitute and sale sex. But they get aroused by seeing nude hot women, aroused by lesbian porn but marry men because men have money and identity. It’s the fact. Women aren’t innocent angel, it’s funny to hear that women care about inner beauty lol

[SueShe]

Hmm, how should I interpret your profile picture where you obviously seem to mishandle a woman on what appears to be Kolkata, at the corner of Tarulia 1st. Ln. and Canal 2nd. Ln.

[PrettyPriya]

@sueshe You may have not noticed, as I did it quite quickly, but I have removed an offensive comment aimed at you. Just might be one to watch out for.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Another lusty prostitute comes here. Holy inner Beauty lol

[PrettyPriya]

Who are you calling a prostitute?

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Because you sell sex in the name of fucking holy inner beauty. Bloody liar. I know your past very well. Don't try to be over smart here.

[PrettyPriya]

You must have me confused with someone else. I do not sell sex. I am (and have been for some time) happily in a relationship. Concerning my past... I am unsure what you are on about as you don't know me.

[SueShe]

@PrettyPriya No, I did not notice that you remove some offensive comment. In view of the turn of the events and the less than civilized way this gentleman behaves, I will hide this question and have his account frozen. What do you think? He is obviously having a bad day and needs to vent at the wrong persons.

[SaoirseS]

Looks like, smells like troll to me. Ramblings of a delusional mind.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

If it’s troll then which one is serious

[Effably]

You missed a word mate.
Women aren't As visual. It is an important word, best to not drop it. Also or course anything is just a generalization.

I think we can all alter who we are attracted to to some degree. Not sure if women arguably having more factors for attraction makes that choosing more or less challenging.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Women aren’t as visual, less visual. What do you mean by that? The frequency or the intensity?

[Effably]

Intensity I suppose. If visuals are 60% of male attraction and attitude, personality, so on are the remaining 40% then for women it might instead be 40% visuals and 60% other stuff. Visuals are still a major item on the list.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

Then women shouldn’t get aroused by seeing nude women, nipples.

[Effably]

Not sure how you get to that conclusion. If they are into that they'd still get 40% aroused by it, no? And a guy 60%. Then some mental expectations and what not and we're at 50 and 70. Nowhere does this prevent arousal.

[pineapplevirgaflycow]

How did you determine this 40%?

[Effably]

I randomly wrote out a number less than the other number I wrote out for a comparison. It is just to serve as an illustration, not a factual rule. The operative word to tell you I was doing that was "/If/ visuals are 60% of...".

[bean2k21]

they go for idiots who can't spell