Nope because I want abortion out but I also practices abstinence and will only have sex with someone I've formed a bond with, love, and could see a future with. While we already talk about "her body her choice" mothers are already forcing circumcision on their sons and also many demand covid mandates making them already hypocrites in the first place. Plus they don't always work, no dude it touching my nuts, nor is a knife, and they somethims go wrong. I want my family name and legacy to live on. That's why I would never undee any circumstances take a form of make birth control. There's no way I would ever jeapirdize that. And also I would never be a dead beat daddy either I would love and protect my children at all costs.
Typos due to small phone 😣
I have gotten vasectomy a couple years ago.
I never wanted children, I enjoy casual sex and I hate condoms so it was a no-brainer for me.
Aside from the obvious benefits, the psychological effect of not ever having to worry when you finish inside a woman (especially if it's a casual encounter) honestly makes for much better sex.
When you are using a condom, there is still that risk of it slipping off or tearing, so you kind of instinctively hold back and I don't like that personally.
Can't say it get me more sex.
Except for my ex who has PCOS and always stresses about pregnancy, she is very eager to hit me up for rebound sex now lol.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Yet another member of a gender that gets guaranteed bodily integrity protections AND legal protection from battle slavery talking about others taking "responsibility". I wonder if she'd accept the discomfort WE are expected to deal with.
And suggesting it by means of an invasive surgical procedure that isn't always reversible and doesn't always work- AND somehow ignoring the fact that an older guy who'd had it reversed would be able to impregnate them, which takes the whole "no unwanted pregnancies" argument down by itself.
Sorry, ladies; you claim the power, you get the responsibility.
If I were to get a vasectomy, I wouldn't want it to be reversible. They have a higher failure rate. So I'd only get one if I knew I didn't want any more children.
Do you want children? If so, you're out.
I have children. Fair to say I wanted them. I also didn't want them at 13, so I don't think a permanent vasectomy is a good idea.
Coolness x
It for sure can't guarantee more sex, but sounds good if its truly reversible.
This suggestion is wrong on so many levels, plus it violates the Constitution.
I already got a vasectomy. And yes I'd get another one if it meant more sex.
I did! Yes.
Ya know i would
Probably not. Just FYI, there have been cases where a vasectomy did not prevent pregnancy. Those little swimmers will do just about anything to fertilize an egg.
Then I'll resort to abortion but thank you for your concern.
Requiring it by law won't work in any free country, could only work in communist countries.
There is also always a chance that a reversal could fail, so if it is required by law and then a reversal fails, then what?
Your question though is if it could guarantee, key word guarantee not just higher chance of more sex though and I didn't want to have children, sure... but since condoms will always be required to protect against STDs/STI it seems only useful if those break.
I have no idea how that would guarantee more sex though. Guarantee implies it is a sure deal and will happen.
No, I would find a woman who didn’t mind that I don’t have a vasectomy.
Do you mind wearing condoms?
I don’t mind during the beginning of a relationship. There are alternatives to condoms and vasectomy. This is the sort of thing that should be discussed early to make sure there is compatibility.
Well, wanting kids is a personal dealbreaker and a major turn off to me.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Superb Opinion