If a woman pokes holes in a condom or secretly stops the pill to get pregnant when a guy doesn't want a kid, should the guy have to pay child support?

yes
Vote A
no
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
0 0

Superb Opinion

  • Legally speaking, if he is the father he has to pay it. In my state, if a woman CHEATS and gets knocked up by the other guy, her husband still has to pay child support if he divorces her when he finds out she has been cheating and the child isn't his.

    The laws are written in the best interest of the child first, to make sure they are taken care followed by the best interest of the state, or tax payer. Making someone pay, even if they are not the father, saves tax payers money.

    I am one of the few that supports Roe V Wade for men as I've seen too many men ordered to pay child support who want nothing to do with the child BUT because they have to pay child support, they exercise their visitation rights every chance they get and emotionally harm the child. In one case the father said as long as he had to pay he was taking every legal visitation and when he got home, he put the kid in his room and ignored him the entire time.

    Gave him toys and other things to play with, but now the child was away from his friends, alone, scared and felt abandoned and lonely.

    In this case the mother refused visitation for at time and after a few months was held in concept and threatened to be put in jail and lose custody of the child unless she allowed visitation PLUS time to make up for what was missed.

    Reporting him to the state, did little to remove those rights as he was doing the bare minimum of what was legally required. Child had clothing, food, water and that, just not a emotional connection and was ignored.

    How damaging is that to a child? I'd say its too much and should never happen.

    All he wanted was the mother to agree for him to give up parental rights, which would mean no visitation and no child support, she did not want to be eventually did for the best interest of the child and the child has been doing far far better since then.

    So I agree they shouldn't have to, but it isn't how things are setup and likely never will be. If I am ever in that situation I'll let him give up rights, as my child will come first.

Most Helpful Girl

  • Yep. It isn't the child's fault the mother is a conniving b*tch. That being said, the father absolutely should go after the mother to the fullest extent of the law if he can prove either happened. Pregnancy is always a possibility when having sex even when on birth control. It's a risk you take and by that alone, doesn't absolve him of his financial responsibility.

Most Helpful Guys

  • IMHO... Yes, he's still required to pay child support. He knowingly had sex with the girl, and even though she misled him, he is still responsible for his actions.

    It would be an interesting court case though. You never can tell how a court will rule.

  • "Should" doesn't enter the equation. Legally, you will. So don't have sex with someone that you don't trust with your life, because the next 18 years of your life is in their hands.

    • What i mean is: even though legally you have to, should this not be so?

    • It doesn't matter. "Should," is an irrelevant thing. It's sitting on a rocking chair, wasting time. Whatever conclusion anyone comes to about what should happen will not change what will happen.

    • @asker yes it should be , because you not paying child support or seeing the child is only hurting the child in the end. The child is not at fault for her mothers selfishness

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

3 2
  • Yes he would, because even though she did something screwed up he still consented to having sex with her , which there is always a chance of getting a woman pregnant from. I know girls that have done this before and it’s entirely fucked up , majority of them have their child a dead beat father because of their selfishness of wanting to trap a man to stay in a relationship with her, when in reality it doesn’t work that way.

    • Gave their child*

    • three questions: 1. What about the fact that "stealing" (men secretly removing condom) is seen as rape? She did consent to the sex. They say also say it puts her in danger of STDs but so does poking a hole in the condom. 2. There is in a lot of places the charge of "rape by deception" which is obtaining rape through deceptive means or fraud. Stealing is included in this definition yet poking holes in the condom is not. 3. In Canada, a man was charged and convicted for sexual assault (it was upheld in the supreme court) for poking holes in a condom. Yet, no woman in Canada has EVER been charged for this and the woman who the man did this to did not have to pay child support because the conception happened via sexual assault yet men always have to pay when this happens to them

    • @asker just because that argument holds up in a court of law one place, doesn’t mean it does in another. My question is how can they even prove that holes were poked verse the condom just breaking

  • No…..

  • Should? Of course not. Will? Yes; that's what Hermesmann V Seyer, and the laws it inspired, were all about. It's what a slate of completely one-sided reproductive rights gets you.

  • Unfortunately these are things that would have to be proven in court.

  • It's the chance you take having sex. Nothing is foolproof. Also, you're morally and legally responsible for the child

    • three questions: 1. What about the fact that "stealing" (men secretly removing condom) is seen as rape? She did consent to the sex. They say also say it puts her in danger of STDs but so does poking a hole in the condom. 2. There is in a lot of places the charge of "rape by deception" which is obtaining rape through deceptive means or fraud. Stealing is included in this definition yet poking holes in the condom is not. 3. In Canada, a man was charged and convicted for sexual assault (it was upheld in the supreme court) for poking holes in a condom. Yet, no woman in Canada has EVER been charged for this and the woman who the man did this to did not have to pay child support because the conception happened via sexual assault yet men always have to pay when this happens to them

    • @asker stop copying and pasting the same questions over and over when someone admits that your logic is still wrong