A man paying for the first date is paying for pussy. Thoughts?

Updates:
1 y
Appreciate all of you taking part 👏 most could respectfully disagree for those who did.
1 1

Most Helpful Guys

  • So this is the frustration for guys, because if your a guy that is out there seriously looking then paying for first dates can become very expensive... but in "NO" ways does paying for something entitle you to more than dinner. Period.

    Any guy that thinks taking a women out on a expensive first date is going to improve his chances of getting laid or entitle him to more is a foolish person that is trying to over compensate for his own short comings.

    Last time I was on the hunt I went on 17 dates with 14 different women in three months. I only did coffee dates or walk in the park dates... I did one dinner date and I never did it again. First off it was too expensive to spend that type of money on women that did deserve it, and yes I was pissed when it didn't go well and I had to sit through a date with someone I was not vibing and got ghosted later without getting laid. So that was one mistake I promised I would never do again.

    Any women not willing to take a walk in the park or have cup of coffee is not worth my time. Out of those 14 different women in three months I took on first dates I got laid three times. On the second or third date... and the one I am with now I took on a walk in the park on my first date, and "SHE" took me to the zoo for second date. I got laid on the third date and i all in all I spent less than $50 buck on her and she is amazing's.

    Out of the other ones I got past the first date with where never more then coffee. The first women, took me on a over night beach trip by the third date and she paid for the hotel. So got laid again for less than $100 bucks. The second women I took to dinner on the second date spent like $180 bucks on it, and yeah I got laid... but it didn't workout. Having sex too fast put her into a tail spin and I wonder now if she only did it because she felt like she had to since I spent so much on dinner for her.

    • This is exactly the type of comment I was looking to see. People who have actually been there and done that and know what the hell they're talking about. Thank you lol This is part of the reason why in general I'm against guys paying for the first date, because the upside of not paying for the first date is good for both you and the girl. She doesn't feel pressured in any way or that she owes you something at all, you don't get frustrated because you didn't over invest yourself and someone who was investing back in you. If it doesn't work out you can part ways and all that happened was maybe you wasted a little bit of time for the both of you, instead of thinking you also wasted money. And if it does go well it's even better because you know fully from the start she was in it for the right reasons, and you both know that you're there because you like each other and that the vibe was so good. Not because you paid or does XYZ for her, so the context of the entire relationship is better because you didn't pay She knows that she must have really liked you to still have sex with you and go places with you when you weren't paying for her. There are way more up sides are you having her pay for herself then for you paying for the date As a guy you win no matter what. If she likes you she won't care. If she doesn't like you she will care and now you know she didn't really like you like that anyways. When a girl sleeps with you after you not paying for them or having a very very cheap date, they say to themselves that they must have really liked you because you didn't have to do very much and you were enough for them

    • I 100% agree jabber... stick to the activity based dates. I went to a minor league base game with one for a second date... that was $20 bucks a ticket, and had hot dogs and beer at the game for like anther $20... she was the one that took me on the beach trip. But spending too much money on a date with a women just seems to set things off on the wrong foot as far as expectations. Like you're trying too hard to impress her and feel foolish about it, because you had this expensive awesome first date and now were to go? Its not like most men can maintain that for long, and if they do they are looking for something more. And a warning to the ladies out there, you should avoid expensive first dates... because again for the same reason he is trying too hard to impress you and if he does not get laid then he can become and an asshole while pressure and sexual tension builds. So I recommend that you avoid expensive first dates all together if your into it for the right reasons.

    • Baseball games and hotdogs is Lowkey really good option. Cheap alcohol, game is relatively boring so you're motivated to have conversation to get to know each other, you still get a feeling of going out and doing something even though you're just sitting down having a good time talking. Making memories with random emotional spikes from the game when something does actually happen. I've only done it a couple of times, but it was an easy transition every time. Baseball game > Bar > Home > Good things happen

  • I disagree.

    When I was single, the 1st date was reconnaissance to determine if she's worth a 2nd or more dates - sex was never on the table.

    I paid for critical, accurate information to make a good decision.

    In the grand scheme of things, if the aforementioned decision saves your time, stress and your net worth, the price is worth it.

    • You could do all of that for free, so what are you really paying for? Or I should say, if you can do it for free then were you actually paying exclusively for reconnaissance reasons?

    • The free information is usually to eliminate THAT specific woman. Women who can hold your attention longer than others who haven't eliminated themselves? That's worth the 1st date to establish is she worth your time going forward.

    • I totally get that, but you don't have to pay for that. You can have that experience for free lol

Most Helpful Girls

  • A man paying in the first date when both agreed to go in a date because there is a spark
    Going on — means that the man— is paying himself a tribute that he is a gentleman ! If the women goes on and opens her legs simple because first date was paid then she is a low value women, if you accept that attitude then well congratulations your life is trash. And you won’t understand my message

    • I understand the message perfectly fine, I just simply disagree. But I respect your opinion

  • What’s wrong with paying for pussy. It’s nice to come across one heterosexual male nowadays.

    • Ha ha it's against the law 🤣 😂

    • When they make guns against the law, then I might take the law a bit more seriously.

    • Lol they need guns to enforce the law

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

8 17
  • More likely you are just paying for the first date... lol

    • Lol agreed. And a lot of guys get butthurt about that when it doesn't go somewhere they wanted

  • No, not always although it would be evident that he had great time and interested in the pussy…. OR some guys just like treating OR traditional-proper manner….

    • Today, in the majority of cases a guy is not treating just out of the kindness of his heart. That's why if it doesn't work out they complain about what they invested in the girl and how it didn't go anywhere. because the heart wasn't in the right place Personally I tell guys not to pay for a girl unless they can honestly say they're doing it solely out of the goodness of their heart and not because they want anything from the girl whether it be sex, affection, attention, or anything If they can't honestly tell themselves that, then they shouldn't pay. Because you are inherently paying for pussy at that point

    • Like I get it, and that's fine if you're doing it because it's proper. But if any part of you is hoping that she will hold you in good favor, or give you attention or affection in some way then it's not just because of the proper. You're doing it to get something I just think that's a very normal human reaction that when you invest you expect some type of return, and that you have to be careful what you gift to make sure that it really is just a nice thing

    • I know better than THAT, however, there is no lasting Respect or Integrity or Husband material PERCEIVED if the cheap bastard wasn’t really cheap at all…f-in User. He loosened that Wallet once I gave him Something…”Why do men think we’re stupid. I wasted 6 months of my life…cute and cheap I could have managed…Damn, this is not the Commodities market.””

    • Show All
  • Having the dinner paid for doesn't automstically mean we're going to have sex. He paid for the date, the relationship is not guaranteed, especially if his mindset is like yours

    • Lol the amount of girls that make this a moralistic opinion is astounding. Especially when they misrepresent the thought. Where did I imply, suggest, or say that paying for a first date automatically means you're going to have sex? I will wait Because you're putting words in my mouth that aren't even remotely true

  • That’s untrue for most.

    • What do you mean for most?

  • And these guys wonder why they can't get laid

    • Which ones?

  • You're single right?

  • When I was young and dating it was traditional that the guy paid on dates. Girls had a free pass.

    • That's what a lot of girls are trying to push today even when they make the same money and are not traditional themselves. Want equality (non traditional value) but also want a traditional man (inequal benefits)

    • Like if a girl is legitimately traditional I can respect her having that view because she matches what she's looking for. But a lot of girls just want to double dip or reserve the right to double dip

  • @jabberjaw Lol !! ultimately he wants a good tight pussy 😊

  • i think a man paying on the first date is signaling that he want's a traiditional/conservative woman.

    • If that's the case, if she's not already that then all he's doing is telling her the type of behavior he wants from her. Ie, she'll fuck other guys. Just not you

    • i think what such a guy is signaling is that he wants traditional gender roles. with him being the provider and her being the house wife, caring for the upbringing of the children, hence not needing to sort out her own finances. refrain from making this about me. it is not about me. i'm not defending my personal dating preference. i personally prefer modern women who pay their own shit.

    • also i think you have equally good chances of getting a cheating dud on both sides tbh.

    • Show All
  • Not on the first date, but definitely down the road.

    • When does it tip the scale do you think?

    • Several dates, maybe less.

    • I guess I should say, What specifically determines now you're paying for it versus not paying for it? I have my thoughts on it personally but curious

  • Untrue.

  • It's whatever those two agreed upon.

    • Bit of a sidestep but fair point regardless

  • Nope. I don’t think very highly of women that put out on the first date so I’d actually be disappointed. I’d tease that bitch so brutally, let her think she’s getting the dick, build her up for hours with all sorts of foreplay, and when she’s begging for it, crying for it…send that slut home and let her obsess

    • Sounds like you don't like women very much sir lol

    • Sounds like you need to work on your comprehension skills buddy. I said “women that put out on the first date” and who said I don’t enjoy teasin em

    • Not every man is a whore like you, most, but not all.

    • Show All
  • Not true at all

  • Nah, a man paying on the first date is buying information. If he doesn't like what he hears he settles for pussy.

  • A man paying dinner doesn't mean you're getting in her pants. Lol this made me laugh so hard. In my years being a single woman I never slept with a guy first Date. Not even one month 2 months nope 3 months nope 6 months maybe. The guys kept coming lol.

    • To be fair there are guys who will continue texting a girl for months on end even when she's ignoring them LOL

    • That's very true.

  • Yep true

  • A man paying for anything that the girl is not contributing to is him paying her for her time, demonstrating that his time is worth less than hers! It is also him communicating that he sees her as above him. Men have fallen for 'the man just pays' BS. But continue doing so while women continue to laugh. And in answer to your main question is... if all sex was completely off the table, how many men would still take her to an expensive restaurant...

    • 100% in agreement

  • women are prostitutes waste of time

    • That's aggressive sir

    • no thats reality

  • You are correct.

  • Show More (5)