Women with more than 5 sexual partners have 80% failed marriages and commitment issues, thoughts?

Women with more than 5 sexual partners have 80% failed marriages and commitment issues, thoughts?
Women with more than 5 sexual partners have 80% failed marriages and commitment issues, thoughts?
Updates:
1 y
That second picture is an actual study if you guys are interested. Just type it in and it'll pop up
1 1

Superb Opinion

  • Nature has designed sex as one of the most enjoyable and pleasant activity between men and women with a purpose of encouraging them to produce babies – as many as they can to keep life everlasting on earth. That is why it is quite normal to have multiple sex partners for most animals (and birds, plants or any type of living objects). But keeping or maintaining pure genetic line of family, system of marriage (and pollination between selected species of plants or matting of animals) was established. For this committed sex partner is a basic need, because producing babies of pure genetic code naturally required sexual relationship with one and only one sex partner. I think this was basic concept behind system of committed relationship in marriage. Sex was not for pleasure only; it was basically to produce future generation of pure family line. If pleasure of sex is main goal of life of anybody – definitely they will have multiple sex partners – and no commitment in relationship or marriage. This is why persons having multiple sex partners are supposed to have no committed marriage life – they will go for separation for their sexual pleasure. In our Indian – Hindu culture – any sexual activity outside marriage is considered most ugly thing, and we are monogamous in our sexual life. According to some religious believes this relationship last for ever – for seven life one after another.

    • Interesting mentions here

Most Helpful Guys

  • please don't understand this as a personal offense towards you but that's objectively speaking utter bullshit.

    there is a significant correlation between the number of previous sexual partners and divorce risk of the first marriage. As Smith, Jesse (2021): "Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce" confirms referring to the famous original study: Wolfinger, Nicholas H.: (2016) "Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex.

    go read the studies if you're not gonna believe me. but according to the 2016 study, even women with more than 10 partners only had a 33% divorce rate, vs 30% in women with only 2 partners. so I don't know where your 80% for 5 partners comes from but i'm taking the liberty to assume that it was Buzzfeed or some other sensational media site that spreads missinformation. both studies also account for "the ammount of times people went to church" in their regression models, which i know (as i'm a social scientist) will have significant compounding effects, as people who are more religious are less likely to divorce and less likely to have sex outside of marriage to begin with. so accounting for religious factors skews the results, which are probably overall mostly correct anyway as in: there's probably a strong link between previous sexual partners and divorce risk.

    BUT you gotta ask: does the person who only ever had sex with one partner have a "subjectively" better marriage than the person who fucked more than 5 and maybe had 1-2 divorces? because none of these facts says anything about that.

    • so tl;dr. women with many sexual partners are more likely to divorce their first marriage BUT it's most definitely nowhere close to 80% of the women with many sexual partners. it's around 30%.

  • 1. Statistics show truth and reality.

    2. Most women hate the truth and reality because they can't handle dealing with the consequences of their decisions/actions.

    3. This will not affect women's decisions. They will claim it is false, then become another of those statistics themselves.

    For anyone that can comprehend logical thinking: If there is one pizza that tastes great you will like it a lot if you enjoy pizza. If there are 1,000 pizzas, all made exactly the same, you will not enjoy all of them. It is called the rule of diminishing returns. If you have too much of something, it becomes less enjoyable, even if each one was the exact same quality.

Most Helpful Girl

  • I mean, it's probably true.

    I could give reasons why, but I think guys should behold this statistic, and either ignore these types of girls altogether, if they want a committed relationship.

    Otherwise, they can just be sexually involved with those girls, as they both see fit, and then not have a committed relationship/ serious relationship, nor expect one.

    The girls who have had less than 5 could be considered *by serious guys* for serious relationships.

    If guys think this data is true, make the appropriate adjustments. If not true, then keep going about relationships as you and the other party see fit.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

9 14
  • I wouldn't be suprised since it's easier to compare people when you have a lot to compare to. Especially if your current partner is boring, not particularly successful, or as attractive as a previous partner.

    I doubt my body count would ever reach that high unless something happen so I'm good, good to know.

    • The thing is, I don't think most women feel inclined to have a high body count But the ones that do are always the ones getting viral and made to look like this is standard for women when it is not.

    • Yeah, you see them a lot on line and it's usually the girls with the highest standards for men. I do think most women have a sexual history but not such a high number like 15 or 20 guys.

    • I mean, doesn't nearly everyone have a sexual history? Its not saying much

    • Show All
  • New study finds that girls who learn how to cook, clean, sew and embroider, and don't play sports, go to dances, speak to boys, or leave their parent's homes until their parents approve of a suitable husband stay in marriages 80% of the time, because they are too stupid and submissive to think for themselves or survive on their own.

    Handmaids and Stepford Wives never get divorced.

    I wonder why patriarchal males feel the need to seek affirmation for their twisted views about women. They really feel that men are superior. It makes me question their self confidence.

    • I'm confident But also not naive to the biology or science around men and women sexuality The study above had two women scientists or authors... Read it

    • Some study is "the" science? I wonder what the authors' agenda was. What are their ideologies? Traditional Christian values?

    • Tell me, honestly, you think men and women are the same when it comes to sexuality? Your answer to this will determine a lot

    • Show All
  • Okay, I'll look into the study when I have more time, I guess what I would be curious to know if they mean sexual partners as in casual sex partners or long term sexual parters as in boyfriends etc. I'm guessing they referring to casual sex partners in which case it wouldn't surprise me, but if it were the latter than I would have to wonder if these women were choosing Chads as @krakenattackin mentioned in another comment which would put another layer to things.

  • Correlation does not prove cause-and-effect.

    Imagine that we could idenify a girl who is prone to becoming promiscuous and we are able to control the circumstances so that she cannot engage in sex with any partner until she becomes engaged. And she marries the guy. Do you think this manipulation will make it more likely that she remains married to the guy for the long term?

    I think it is more plausible to think that girls who are promiscuous have certain personality characteristics that give than tendency, such as a willingness to defy social conventions, a desire to be adventurous, a disregard for societal judgments, desire for instant gratification, etc. And those same characteristics would probably make them more likely to seek a divorce rather then feeling a duty to remain in a relationship and work on resolving the problems.

  • the heritage foundations research is usually faulty and poorly executed, i wouldn't put too much trust into it

  • Far more often luck of the draw, not personal issues.

    Anyone has the choice to not be alone, and go through multi partners, and still end up solid.

    Personality creates cheaters. A person who would never cheat, won’t. If the local pickings are slim it’s hardly a persons fault or problem.

    • I kinda blended the cheating with commitment issues without realizing at the time. But my thoughts still apply to either or.

  • Yes, promiscuity is co-related to negative relationship outcomes in both genders. Which is why both my husband and I were only interested in people with strong morals while we were looking for a spouse.

    https://ifstudies. org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness

    Women with more than 5 sexual partners have 80% failed marriages and commitment issues, thoughts?
  • Definitely something in it. They get bored or decide their partner isn't good enough anymore

    • Well, it's not really for those reasons I don't think.

  • My thoughts are "Welcome to what Catholics have been saying since... forever".

  • not true at all

  • I think it has to do with developing a habit of walking away. To put it another way cuddling releases hormones that induce a desire to stay or continue. Wham, Bam, thank you, ma'am. does not usually lead to cuddling.

  • I don't buy that. At a higher number of partners, sure, but not 5.

    • yeah maybe. Maybe not.

  • Well, I’ve been with more than 5, and I am insanely committed once I am in a relationship. That doesn’t change for me. I think it boils down to personality, honestly

    • Fair point

    • Well, there's always going to be that one person in the crowd that says they've seen a solar eclipse. But is this common? Actually do you know anyone in your circle that has? I don't That's if they are truthful. I think for most women, generally, the above is the truth. If a woman is saying otherwise, she's either lying or in denial or just not part of the general population of women for some reason. Personally, a lot of lying and denial exists because I don't think a woman is more inclined to be honest about this because it is somewhat of a taboo subject despite it being felt and seen in reality

    • @kat247. Wait until you hit the wall and end up marrying a simp.

    • Show All
  • I ssay BS, based on that fact alone.. What is this based on? The fact that she's had ONLY 5 or three fact that she's had 5?🤔

    It seems like an utterly useless statistic to be, I would feel like the more experience the better, but that's just me 🤷🏻‍♀️😂

    • So, maybe for men the "more experience the better," but not necessarily for women. Why? Well, to keep things short it is because men and women are just different biologically. I think what the fact is supposed to imply is that, women with over a certain number of sexual partners will cause commitment issues, future divorces, etc. All of this because men and women are different. Women have more investment, emotions, and selectivity when it comes to sex This contrasts with men, where they have nearly no investment, can have sex purely out of physical pleasure, and are not selective. I don't think it's healthy for women to have been with a lot of men. Mentally/emotionally especially or even more so

    • Omg 😂

    • @lovingjo. So how long have you been married? didn't think so.

    • Show All
  • I wonder if the Heritage Foundation is one of those liberal groups that push their BS onto anyone who will believe in it

  • I believe it. Those I know that have had many partners never seem to be happy.

  • Its a comical stat, Because its true, and because women refuse to admit promiscuity damages their ability to have happy marriages.

    • They can refuse, but it is literally experienced and felt in reality. It's also written about and studied Why do some deny it? It's almost easier just to be honest

    • right!

  • You mean like 5 past boyfriends or

    • Or what Read what is written "5 sexual partners"

    • Ohhhh okay, sorry my bad lmao

    • Show All
  • True for both genders

  • … and they deserve it.

  • Show More (3)