CIRCUMCISED or Uncircumcised?

[ZeroZeros]

[sa230e]

The difference is that the uncircumcised penis has not been surgically altered to remove the foreskin. Every male is born with a foreskin. The foreskin is sort of a sheath of skin that covers and protects the penis glans (the "head" of the penis) much like the clitoral hood protects the clitoral glans. Just like the clitoral hood it can be pulled back to expose the penile glans.

As for what that does for women, there's a book called Sex As Nature Intended it by Kristen O'Hara that argues that the presence of the foreskin enhances sexual pleasure for both men and women. You can read it online for free: www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/html_ebook.html

Some people may disagree with her work. Different people have different tastes and pleasure is subjective so your mileage may vary. Mental and cultural perceptions of the penis can also have an effect on tastes and preferences. I'm sure girls here will have their own opinions. But I bring it up because it does go quite a bit into how the mechanics of sex with a circumcised penis differs from an intact one.

Personally, as a guy, I wouldn't get circumcised for any money. I love my foreskin and the pleasure it brings me. The only thing I don't like is the cultural prejudice that still exists in North America towards the foreskin. It really makes you feel like an outcast for being the way nature made you.

There are a lot of myths about it that won't go away because circumcision is still the norm here. Particularly about hygiene. People tend to believe that because the inside of the foreskin is a warm, moist area, that it is prone to infection and must be scrubbed religiously. I'd like to point out that the same can be said of the vagina but we don't surgically alter it. Actually, like the vagina, the foreskin contains of culture of protective bacteria that defend it from pathogens and washing religiously with soap kill them off and can lead to yeast infections - much like douching does for women.

PS. Why did you put your question in an image instead of plain text?

[JuicyBrain]

I think circumcised man have an aerodynamic advantage at high speeds. Otherwise, it's only a question of esthetics, but it all depends on what you prefer and especially what you have been brought up with in terms of education/mentality and porn.

I am uncut and have absolutely no hygiene problems whatsoever. Since I have never been circumcised, I cannot tell you if it's more sensitive but I would believe it could be since it's not rubbing all the time. They are pretty much the same when erected. I would say that the rim of the glan kinda serves as a break for the foreskin when erected so it looks kinda like a turtle neck LOL.

I am against circumcision for the simple reason that it is not needed and is basically the mutilation of the penis just for the hell of it. It's mostly done to babies too, so the baby never gets a word to say about it. I think it's the first time that parents fail at their task of protecting their baby from unduly harm.

Many American girls nowadays want they boyfriends to be circumcised just because they've grown accustomed to them and are kind of repeating the pattern, not seeing that it is just as wrong as forcing chinese girls to bind their feet or African girls to be excised and/or infibulated.

[Anonymous]

1. Prefer uncircumcised
2. Because more sensitive, more fun, more natural.
3. No difference in performance, a penis is a penis. And a lot of men underestimate how much they have to wash their dick anyway whether circumcised or uncircumcised both need cleaning very regularly.
4. Yes except one has a foreskin, that's a stupid question. What did you think? That uncircumcised dicks were going to be corkscrew shaped when erect or something?
5. An uncircumcised penis is more sensitive. Circumcised penises are more used to touching things and that can desensitize it a bit. Uncircumcised penises are kept nice and safe behind a foreskin so they rarely brush against anything and are very sensitive.

(All of this is only in my experience, there may be exceptions and I may be wrong)

[MissNowhere]

Uncircumcised.
I don't support child mutilation.
If there was no such fucked up thing as circumcision, all dicks would be the same in that aspect and there'd be one less thing some guys would have to worry about when it comes to their penises.
Why ruin something that's natural? If the foreskin wasn't supposed to be there, guys wouldn't be born with it. -_-

[R3d_Anonymous]

Preach! Amen!

[Fortres]

Not to mention the benefits. But, good post

[MissNowhere]

@Fortres Yesss, of course there's plenty of benefits haha

[justbanANNAz]

this matters to me as much as thigh gaps matter to men.

[jjmarvin]

But magazines told me my evil penis likes thigh gaps now.

[justbanANNAz]

@jjmarvin please dont b a smartass. doesn't work with me.

[jjmarvin]

If by being a smartass you mean telling a good natured joke then yes, i was being a smartass. I was making a joke about how magazines lie to a target gender about how demanding the opposite is.

[jjmarvin]

You know, seeing your humor and then riffing off of it and adding to the humor. I could have just as easily saw your comment and said "don't be a cunt, i don't like it" But then I'd have to be a pretty shitty person for that to be my first reaction.

[justbanANNAz]

cool story bro. u do realise u can't always expect people online to interpret ur 'jokes' in the way u meant them right? using the c bomb on me only makes u look like a loser with a small vocab anyway. @jjmarvin

[jjmarvin]

Oh shit you're right. The fault doesn't lie with you being a cunt who's first reaction to someone being nice to them is to assume some nefarious motive. It lies with me, someone with a positive outlook that didn't expect you to be such a crybaby about it. And shit, you're right. Cunt makes me sound dumb. Should have said something like smartass so i could sound witty and verbose. How's this. Madam, I do find your cuntiness has imbued your latest attempt to rebut me with dubious sagacity

[coconutelixir]

Doesn't matter.

[AleDeEurope]

We should start with female genital mutilations here in the West, lets see if girls change their mind... oh the hypocrisy is running rampant here.

Bring the downvotes! xD

[ConsultantIsBack]

Ya just wait for the non-US dudes to come rolling in and downvote us and our aesthetic cocks. BRING IT

[ZeroZeros]

Don't worry. I'm not judging. Just an open discussion

[AleDeEurope]

@ConsultantIsBack I'm not gonna downvote someone that prefers cut dicks, but I will if they give a lame argument like "they're cleaner" or stuff like that, which is completely not true. I have an uncut dick and I'm super clean, and it takes no effort to clean it.

[ConsultantIsBack]

I'm just kidding brothers. Lots of guys here start fighting in a heart beat over foreskin. It's kind of amusing tbh. I have no idea for comparison since I don't know any different.

[AleDeEurope]

@ConsultantIsBack Yeah, people get too passionate about it. I do think it's wrong to cut a kid's penis when they're a baby cause they didn't choose that. If they choose to do it when they're older, then do it, but not as a kid.

[Humping_Tornadoes]

Well said.

[RexCatholicissimus]

You're basically asking the male equivalent of "do you like your vag's clit, or clitless."

[R3d_Anonymous]

Actually, the female equivalent of circumcision would be removing the clitoral hood. Removing the clitorus would be like removing penis head. Just saying.

[ZeroZeros]

@R3d_Anonymous thanks for your clarification

[Frost_Byt3]

Well im glad that I'm circumcised. There has been a movement on how "circumcision is OH, so terrrible!" So women are trying to force themselves to believe that they prefer uncirc, but according to most, circ is more visually appealing, and you can't deny the fact that guys who are circ last 10 times longer in bed than guys who are uncirc (because they are less sensitive).

[AleDeEurope]

Yeah, go to Europe and ask what girls prefer xD Also most girls that have tried both tend to prefer uncircumcised

[Frost_Byt3]

@AleDeEurope that still doesn't eliminate the fact that circ guys last longer in bed.

[AleDeEurope]

They don't, and even if they did, why would a woman want a guy that lasts longer, if the other can get her to orgasm while the cut guy can't?

[Frost_Byt3]

@AleDeEurope Dude, it is literally an undeniable fact that removal of the foreskin gets rid of a lot of nerve endings, making a curcumcised penis less sensitive, and therefore they last longer in bed. I have no clue how you can even effectively debate against that. And as for the second part of your response, what exactly is it that makes an uncut guy more effective at making a girl orgasm than a cut guy? Nothing. Both cut and uncut guys feel exactly the same to a woman during intercourse. So the only room for preferences between the two is when it comes to visual appeal, which women unanimously voted for circumcised penises... at least until that became the politically incorrect answer that is. I hope you realize that the only reason women are starting to claim to prefer uncut guys is because of the new anti-circumcision movement right? They just don't want to be attacked for having a politically incorrect preference so they are trying desperately to convince themselves that they

[Frost_Byt3]

Actually prefer uncut guys, when in reality--they don't.

[AleDeEurope]

I never argued against the fact that when you remove the foreskin you get rid of nerve endings, but it's still not true that we last less that cut guys. An uncut guy doesn't need lube, which means it creates more of a "soft" sensation for the woman. Also the foreskin is like massaging the inside of the vagina, therefore creating more pleasure. An uncut guy tends to be thicker because, well, they have a layer of skin that cut guys don't have. Again, go to Europe and ask women what they prefer, lets see what they answer.

[ZeroZeros]

Thanks for the info

[Frost_Byt3]

@AleDeEurope They will answer uncut simply because they haven't experienced cut guys. And if you admit that cut penises are less sensitive, you are admitting that we last longer in bed. A less sensitive penis automatically means lasting longer in bed. Its a direct correlation. Also, as for your penis being supposedly "thicker", you realize how thin the foreskin is right? The difference between a cut penis and an uncut penis is like the difference between a rock, and a rock with a sheet of paper wrapped around it. It literally makes no difference in terms of thickness. As for the not needing lube bit: Yes, you are correct. Uncut guys have natural lubrications BETWEEN the penis and the foreskin, NOT on the outside of the foreskin. Therefore, there is no difference in lubrication on the outside between a cut and uncut penis. The only time it makes a difference is when you are masturbating. During sex, uncut guys still need as much lubrication as cut guys in order to glide smoothly

[Frost_Byt3]

Inside of the vagina. Also, this "massaging" sensation is mythical because when you get inside, the foreskin will be staying in the same place, while your penis is slipping up and down inside of it. So if anything, a cut guy would give a woman more sensation than a cut guy because he is actually moving his penis, instead of it staying in the same place.

[Frost_Byt3]

more sensation than an uncut guy

[AleDeEurope]

No we don't need lube. I've never in my life used lube, and none of my friends have ever used lube. You know the foreskin retracts when the penis is erect, right? Therefore when you glide in, the skin is retracted, and when you glide out, it goes back to normal, therefore lubricating the penis.

Girls in Europe still see American porn and still say uncut is better.
Just because it's more sensitive doesn't mean you finish sooner, you just get more pleasure.

Take a look at the bullet-points in this article
www.huffingtonpost.com/.../...d-sex_b_1380359.html

[Frost_Byt3]

@AleDeEurope I'm completely aware that the foreskin retracts, but when it does, it only releases the head. The outside of the shaft is still as dry as a cut penis, therefore, a cut penis is in no more need of lube than an uncut penis. As for your second point, its called familiarity. Uncut penises are familiar to them which is why they are hesitant to consider something they aren't familiar with. I can guarentee you that if a woman experienced both uncut penises and cut penises in the same quantity, and being no more familiar with one or the other, then they would sway towards cut penises simply because they are more aesthetically appealing. And again, being more sensitive, automatically means that you will finish sooner. Why do you think they make numbing cream in order to make men last longer? The less sensitive you are, the longer you last. It is simply a fact, but i you wish to continue denying it, fine by me. Whatever helps you sleep at night. Your post isn't credible because

[Frost_Byt3]

Its the experience of one woman who just happened to sway toward uncut penises after having experienced both. There will always be outliers, and i never claimed that ALL women would prefer cut penises, i simply claimed that the majority would prefer cut penises. The aforementioned woman just happens to be a part of the minority.

[Mesonfielde]

I just think circumcised penises look weird because they're dried out and callous and the skin is hardened up. If I were female, that would NOT be my fetish.

[Mesonfielde]

Circumcision is unnecessary genital mutilation.

Refer to my opinion here: www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q1707067-cut-or-uncut-filler

But this is the very short version.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCSWbTv3hng

You can also refer to some of my older opinions.
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q1238275-how-do-you-feel-about-circumcision

and
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q1639087-what-do-you-think-about-male-circumcision

[Spotme]

All dicks do look weird..

[TripleAce]

Uncircumcised is better... hygiene is nonsense, we take showers to clean ourselves... id suspect youd clean your dick too when you bathe

Most importantly the nerve endings are not desensitized when the skin is there to protect it. If a guy would pull back his skin and pull up his boxers it would actually hurt because its that sensitive... so sex is better

Easier for girls to give hand jobs since there is skin to pull up and down

[legslover79]

actually, from what medical sience says, uncircumsized dicks are more sensitive, because the skin is still around the head, so its not feeling the effects of the material of the pants and underwear on it. and when its hard, then it gets even more sensitive. if no one believes me, look it up

[Spotme]

Preference - Not.
Why - I would not like to cut of a piece of my junk for fashion.
Performance - It works great.
Hygiene - It's not at all difficult to be clean.. I have no idea why people even bring that up.
Same when erected - I think circumcised ones look bigger.
Sensitivity - I think it's more sensitive yea.

[ConsultantIsBack]

Circumcised dick checking in.
lol I love how personal we all get here.

[SurströmmingLover]

I'm uncircumcised because there's not a single reason to be circumcised.

[Iron_Man]

All I can tell you is I am glad I am Circumcised

[ConsultantIsBack]

upvote

[Iron_Man]

Thanks

[Spotme]

Good for you.

[takumii]

Circumcised face is better.

[clampfan101]

Only for medical treatment.

[Anonymous]

Circumcised definitely.

[Anonymous]

I am uncircumcised and and I love it.

I think it definitely increases the sensitivity, and makes it more pleasurable. This could be seen as good or bad; good because more pleasure, bad because one might have a harder time lasting during sex (I can cum pretty fast).

I haven't had any problems with my natural uncircumcised penis, and my foreskin is very tight, it won't retract when soft or hard. I am a virgin right now, and I do anticipate that my tight foreskin might cause a problem with that, but I don't know.

I haven't had any problems with hygiene (no infections or anything). I suppose it is important to clean it though, because an uncircumcised penis might be more likely to develop a smell to it.

But yeah, I love my uncircumcised penis!

[Anonymous]

I'm 17

I have a circumstanced penis

You want to ask me anything about it?😃

[Anonymous]

The difference:
Uncircumcised penises give a lot more pleasure to guys, because of the way the loose skin slides up and down when then penetrate.

Circumcised penis rely on the friction of what they are penetrating. The skin is more tight, so wetness or other lubricants are also really important.

[Bimbobambo]

I was uncircumcised, had sex, felt good. Now Im circumcised, had sex, felt better. The lose skin sliding up and down doesn't make it feel better, actually it "protected" me from the really good feel of just having a bare penis feeling the pussy.

[Anonymous]

www.mademan.com/.../...bout-sex-uncircumcized.html

I myself am not circumcised. People always use the argument that apparently uncut people have smellier penises but I wouldn't know since I bathe daily...

[Anonymous]

If you aren't in support of Female Genital Mutilation, then you shouldn't be in support of Male Genital Mutilation.

[Anonymous]

The last time I answered one of these, I got scolded for my answer, I will not answer this

[ZeroZeros]

Dun worry about it. I'm pretty open about it

[AleDeEurope]

Yeah, you're always gonna get downvotes no matter what your answer is

[ZeroZeros]

@AleDeEurope thanks for your opinion. But i want to know his opinion too

[Opinion Owner]

I'd rather not