Why are guys freaking out over sluts when women have been putting up with this nonsense for years?

[Anonymous]

I want to know why. Guys are freaking out saying "well have your fun while you're young, we won't take you when it's time to get married" Or "have more respect for your bodies." Let this be clear, I am not a slut, but this makes no sense to me. Ever since I was young my parents have told me that when guys are young, they are pigs. They just want to sleep around and they're going to hurt me. So it's best to wait until they get older and more mature before I focus on a real relationship with them. Don't you see! Women have been putting up with this bullsh*t forever! We're forced into putting up with men's slutty ways, watching you have no respect for your bodies, and then have to settle for you later after you've had your childish fun. All the while we have no fun at all. Now times have finally changed, things are more equal, and guys get to see what it's like. To see women having sex for fun, using guys, and then having to settle for her past later. HOW can guys get upset about this since this is what we've ALWAYS had to put up with? And still do!? They say things like "if she slutted around in her past, then she'll probably cheat on you later or she'll never be satisfied in relationships." HELLO! men have always been the sluttier sex, statistics show that they cheat more as well, and yet we're still told to just deal with it while you're young and you'll get better when you get older. Why do guys see it as OK for us to put up with it, but you refuse to?

[TheMisogynist]

I don't see any guys "freaking out" over sluts. But your argument is completely backwards. Women are hot when they are in their 20s, and pretty much start falling apart once they hit their 30s. That is important for women because being hot is what attracts guys. Guys on the other hand age well. Not only do they keep their looks longer, but they generally grow more mature, and get better jobs so they become more appealing to women as they age. If women were smart (which they aren't) they would all snag a guy when they were fresh out of high school and still hot as hell, have a couple of kids, and get the guy really invested in the whole marriage thing, that way, when they suddenly wake up one morning and realize they are ugly, the guy is pretty much stuck with him. Instead you get lots of women who want to be sluts (and god bless their little whore hearts, I love em!) and they slut it up until they wake up ugly, then say "oh sh*t, I better get me a husband quick!" and they end up settling with some guy that they wouldn't have given the time of day to a decade earlier. That's because the guys she used to see are now dating younger women, because, like I said, the guys are still attractive to women.

This whole arrangement is actually awesome for guys. Because we get to sleep around when we are young, and then we end up marrying some young hot thing when we decide to settle down and relax, or if the guy is a loser, he just has to wait patiently for some girl that used to be hot to come crawling to him begging for his attention, which is probably some great poetic justice. And it is a horrible deal for girls because they end up with some schmuck that you would have passed up if they weren't so busy whoring it up. The irony is that this whole horrible arrangement was brought about by the sexual revolution, which was all part of the womens lib movement. So basically, women tried to liberate themselves and ended up shooting themselves in the foot. Which is no surprise to those of us that realize how dumb women are.

[Asker]

One, I'd never end up with a guy who was a slut like that and an ageist. The kind that sleeps around for decades and then marries a girl young enough to be his daughter. Two, I don't sleep around myself and three, hot genes run in my family. My mom is 51 and looks like she's 35. I have nothing to worry about in that dept. I just think it's a very unfair system to demand sex from women or you'll leave, but then condemn her for giving you sex.

[l-hedoniste]

I'm a slut, and I could never figure this out. I have lots of sex, and lots of fun, and the girls I see having a lot of sex are having a lot of fun. The boys are happy, the girls are happy, it's how the world should be, right? Apparently not. Whatever.

I have to admit taking comfort in the fact that the guys who hate sex-loving girls usually wind up with sex-hating girls, suffering through the miserable sex life they deserve.

Karma's a bitch, my kind of girl.

[Anonymous]

It's simple. Most people are stupid. No one needs to be using another person or have sex just because it's something to do. Everyone thinks and likes to say women put up with it, I never have. I refuse to be with a man who act like a whore and I have never had a problem getting a guy. But so many girls will say "oh, he's just being a guy.", and they excuse it so for decades guys get away with it and see nothing wrong. Because once they are ready to settle down they will find a good girl who will look over all of they're past and still want to be with them. So it's not exactly the guys fault because women let it happen.

[Asker]

That's very true, you're right. If less girls accepted it, guys would be force to choose just like we are.

[Opinion Owner]

Yup

[saltycheeks]

sorry but essentially you are excusing men once again and putting blame on women. Men are capable of thinking you know. It is not women's fault that men think a certain way. If a man cannot find a fault in the logic that he can screw around and a woman can't, that's his fault and not the women who excuse men who think that way...

[Opinion Owner]

Yes. But women are the one's having a problem. So to men there is no flaw. They are getting what they want. I'm trying to say since women want to get angry about it, then change. Anger just makes us all look crazy to men, because to them this system works in their favor.

[saltycheeks]

To misogynistic men there is no flaw*. A man who realizes that men & women should both be equal would realize that obviously women are not equal in the situation. Yes women are having the problem but who is causing it? That would be men. You cannot blame the victim. That's like saying women should change how the dress if they don't want to be sexually assaulted. Yes I know its a stretch & I'm sure/ hope that's not what you believe but its what came to my mind first. Women aren't causing the issue

[Opinion Owner]

Both genders are causing the issue. But I can only speak from a women's point of view because I'm not a man. I just think if we want a change then we need to change it. I don't expect a man to fix it when it's me who has a problem and any man who thinks it's okay is not worth my time. Also you can be dressed like an old woman and still get assaulted. But in the past I have seen women say they were assaulted when it was their fault. So all these topics can go both ways in certain cases.

[saltycheeks]

sorry but the issue is men thinking they can screw around & women can't. Essentially you're saying that both women and men started the idea? lol no. Men started it. Were women excusing it the best way to handle the issue? no but the fact is they're not the cause for men initially having the belief. I don't feel like arguing too much but I think its messed up & anti-feminist to blame women for the way men think. And lastly there is no argument on the assault topic. A woman is never to blame

[saltycheeks]

because a man chose to assault her. Women do not cause assaults. The person who assaulted the woman is the one who caused it.

[Opinion Owner]

I didn't say we both started it. I said I'm not going to blame anyone but myself. I don't really care what everyone else does. But I would turn down a guy who sleeps around the same way a guy would do to a girl. Men are gonna do what they want, same as women. If most men don't want to change that's their business, but these men won't be with me. Most women just deal with it which lets men get away with it most of the time.

[saltycheeks]

ok this will be my last comment but you're now saying that you never said we are both causing the issue. but you already said both genders are causing the issue so I don't understand. And of course what we learn as we grow older is to take responsibility for our actions but if you're not the cause, then how are you to blame? Victim blaming gets you nowhere. How do you expect change if you don't fix the cause of the problem? The problem starts with men so I don't see why women need to change

[saltycheeks]

or how that would fix anything.

[Opinion Owner]

No one is the victim! I refuse to be a victim of it. Which is why I don't date guys that think women shouldn't be able to do what they want with their bodies. See that's how there isn't a victim because I refuse to be one. It's not hard to understand. If more women stop letting it happen then men couldn't be such sluts and then get pissed at women for doing the same things. I'm not leaving it up to anyone else to stop it from happening, not men or women. Also most women rather complain about it.

[Anonymous]

guys believe in double standards that benefit them. meaning, they do what they want, and you are to sit around and wait quietly until you are chosen. of course there are ways of getting around that, such as stop giving a f*** and don't tell people your business. if you choose to slut around, do it in different zip codes and don't let people know what you do. be discreet and nobody will know how slutty you choose to be

[Asker]

Good advice!

[saltycheeks]

misogyny is gross isn't it?

I find that most men who say stuff about a girl being sexual are usually insecure. I'll leave it at that because I'm not in the mood to debate on here but no one can deny there's a clear double standard. When we'll move past it, I have no idea

*waits for 7 billion thumbs down

[Asker]

Misogyny is gross. I wish we could just all accept each other as sexual beings (since we're all designed to have sex). If only men wanted it, then humans wouldn't have lasted long lol But idk, I feel like I would accept a guy's past if I were in love with him. But now that I see how many guys wouldn't accept a girl's past no matter what, it makes me think harsher of guys.

[saltycheeks]

Honestly as long as they didn't cheat on anyone I would not care. They'd probably be better in bed anyway lmaoooo.

[taster]

hmmm..how about a Thumbs Up instead? lol

[TheMisogynist]

misogyny isn't gross. It's actually a LOT of fun!

[saltycheeks]

lol you would say that self-proclaimed misogynist

[Firebird3127]

I don't see it as bad for either gender to have experience while they are young and nobody is getting hurt. As long as both people know they are hooking up, not getting married next week there should not be a problem. The crux of the issue here is that the social opinions of male and female sexuality have been formed over the centuries by a patriarchal church that governed all aspects of life from sex to pregnancy to birth to death and everything in between. Now that the church does not have nearly the amount of control over people's daily lives as it once did, women are finally allowed a chance to go after their sexual desires, and parents who are part of the previous generation or earlier, cannot fathom the differences between the society of young people who reach sexual maturity today and the young people when they were our age. I do have a question though...all those slutty guys having sex for fun have to be having sex with somebody, so how does that figure into any of the above?

[Asker]

I agree, the numbers don't match up at all. But most still believe that men have more partners than women even though it's not mathematically possible. The problem is, all those girls that the slutty guys are sleeping with, they won't take seriously for marriage. They want the girls that didn't put out, even though the guys put out all over the place. We're forced to accept it because that's "just how guys are."

[kheserthorpe]

I don't think women are forced to accept it - they choose to. The reality is its the most in demand men who have a ton of sexual experience, and women will choose those men again to marry. I suspect that being 'good with women' is actually attractive TO women since it suggests an ability to produce man-whore sons, who from an evolutionary standpoint, are fantastic. Men might feel the same way of paternity wasn't an issue. It is, or at least was for most of history. (It still is).

[Terrifical]

Men do it because they have nothing to lose. -_-

[udolipixie]

Guys expect better character from women then they expect in themselves.

Men expect women to uphold standards they value & choose not to uphold themselves and make excuses to not uphold them.

[vidovido]

first of all ... when you ask a question you should respect the way people think when they answer ... everybody sees the world differently ...

in my eyes slut means a man/woman who has sex with random people and it's his lifestyle ... everybody may have slept with strangers but only if it's their lifestyle so they're sluts ... it's so obvious that everybody who has a brain in head will avoid of such a person as a partner, no matter if is a he or she ...

as the guy below said there are so so many guys who turn down casual sex opportunities ... I don't know why girls think every guy is a walking penis with no character ...

after all we all should learn to stop accusing a whole group or sex or whatever ... we are humans and not monkeys ... we behave differently and not so simply based on the instincts

[Asker]

I respect until they start calling names like the jerk did below. Calling a girl a slut when you've slept around casually and have no idea whether she's even had sex or not is pretty idiotic. What do you mean when it's their lifestyle? Are you saying a few random encounters is OK but not when it's made a habit?

[vidovido]

i don't say it's OK ... me myself am off to random encounters ... never have done .. maybe it's just not my style ... but I mean it happens to many people to have some random ones to experience or after a ended up relationship ... and yes I mean it's not OK when it's made a habit ...

[AltTech]

I'm not promiscuous, never have one night stands, and have never cheated. I'm more than within my rights to set standards as to what I'll accept and what I won't.

[Asker]

How many partners have you had? Sometimes even if a girl hasn't been promiscuous, a guy will rule her out for having too many boyfriends she slept with or something. It's ridiculous.

[AltTech]

I'd never hold a woman to a standard I wouldn't live up to myself. Doesn't mean there is a set number, attitude is probably the biggest part of it.

[Asker]

What do you mean attitude is the biggest part?

[saltycheeks]

aside from cheating, what is bad about the other 2? Is it because the girl might not respect herself?

[AltTech]

@ QA, if a woman has a promiscuous past, her attitude towards it could very well allow me to overlook it. Someone who is regretful of their past and doesn't repeat it is admirable in my book versus someone who is proud of it.

[AltTech]

@ saltycheeks, self respect is only part of it. Guys are very territorial, knowing not just that another guy has been there, but that tons of guys have been there is very disappointing. And if the girl is proud of that, it makes it even worse. I'll admit the QA has a very valid point about double standards in regards to male promiscuity, so I can only speak for myself.

[saltycheeks]

ok well to the self respect part I believe it isn't impossible to be promiscuous yet be selective and maintain your standards. To the territorial part, I guess I understand that point you made but I can't help but say it seems immature to me. To throw away a potential relationship because a girl has been with other people is a bit much. I mean, if she is with you than that's all that should matter. It sounds like a kid is happy about getting a new game. He finds out other people have played and

[saltycheeks]

now he isn't happy with it. But of course you and I both know that it is ultimately you who chooses your standards. you don't seem judgmental which is nice so I understand your point of view.

[AltTech]

I wouldn't equate a used video game (which is a tangible object) to a relationship that involves love, trust, and a deep emotional connection (all intangible feelings). Take the emotion out of the situation, and a guy probably isn't going to care one way or the other what the past of his partner is.

[saltycheeks]

I think its pretty clear we just have different beliefs on this. I guess we should leave it here because I see this going in circles lol. I think its all comes down to how we feel on the matter and at least you can back up what you're saying. It is also admirable that you hold yourself to the same standard as whomever you choose to date. Thanks for giving legitimate answers lol

[kheserthorpe]

Intellectually, I agree with you ... I think.

TBH, I didn't slut around. I kind of wish I had. I imagine that if our experiences were not so different, it wouldn't bother me if a woman had. Maybe that's lying to myself, I don't know.

I do sometimes wonder if it IS actually different though.

I think for one thing, because of the fact that paternity is not known, while maternity is, and because the mother _always_ gives resources to her kids, we evolved to have different worries. A man worries more about his partner's fidelity, because if she is unfaithful, he ends up raising someone else's child. A woman worries more about her partner's emotional fidelity. It really _didn't_ impact a woman much for most of human history if her partner knocked up some other woman, but if he fell in love with another woman, she might lose his support and resources.

Second, I thought growing up 'men want to have sex with tons of women, but they can be monogamous, so it should be the same'. But that may be a bad assumption.

The reality is, a good looking woman can _always_ have an affair or NSA sex with a more desireable partner then her regular one. By contrast, most men have affairs with women who are _less_ attractive then their main partner. Men do not get many opporutnities to have affairs with women far hotter then their partners. If they did, maybe women would _only_ marry very 'moral' men. Its _possible_ that once women are comfortable with NSA sex, the temptation for them to cheat would be _higher_ then for men, because they have more opportunities for NSA sex when married with desireable partners.

[Asker]

I can see your point evolutionarily speaking. I just wish the rules weren't so harsh. Some guys hold the standard that a girl must be a virgin even if he's not. Or, she can only have 5 partners while he's had 25. Things of that nature. A guy doesn't need to accept a woman that's screwed half the county. But if he's not accepting of her having the same amount of experience he has, it's hard to respect him or think him a rational person.

[kheserthorpe]

Yeah. I wasn't one of those guys, and I'm still not, but I'm not 100% convinced I'm correct not to be. TBH, I've been burned in life far more by low libido women then cheating etc. If I were single again, I'd probably look for FWB, and only consider moving to a relationship when I knew she'd want to have sex with me even without a relationship. But I'm unusual, and dealing with my own baggage. I'm not sure running FWB leads to happiness for most women.

[Asker]

You're not sure you're correct in not holding the double standard? If you did though, you'd be the kind of guy who wouldn't respect a woman for being your FWB so that is sort of a contradiction.

[kheserthorpe]

Correct. I don't know if I'm wrong in NOT holding a double standard. It doesn't make it fair, but I guess life doesn't have to be fair, or at least not symmetrical? For example, I'm happy to be with a woman who makes virtually nothing as long as she's not lazy, but most women who want to be with me seem to care what I make. The things we want don't necessarily have to be the things we offer others, as long as both are happy. To me, the insane contradiction is ...

[kheserthorpe]

Guys who look down on women for what they do WITH HIM, as opposed to what they do with other guys. Guys who are like 'i made her do all this filthy stuff and she did, what a slut'. A girl being filthy for me is a plus in my mind, period.

[Asker]

LOL I don't get that either! That was another question of mine. How a guy looks down on a girl for being slutty with HIM. I've asked my guy friends why they hold that kind of standard, because all it does it makes girls not want to hook up with them. It makes them more prude and conservative in bed (if they ever get in bed with him again at all). I think guys with views like that are the guys with insecurities we can't even dream of.

[Cantremember]

You based your entire argument on "my parents told me...". Not a good backup for so much hate I feel.

[ladsin]

... people can sleep with whoever they want, if you really want to feel free to sleep with 20 guys, just as I feel free to sleep with 20+ girls, I don't feel its desecrating or whatever to my body

[SunSeeker]

Oh uh, watch out, we got statistics in the house! Now nothing I saw will be of any value :(

First of all, two wrongs don't make a right. Meaning, if you've met a guy with an extensive sexual history, "catching up" to it is not going to be the necessary factor to make it work.

Second of all, not EVERY guy is a man slut. As a matter of fact, very few guys I know have had as many sexual partners as a woman. This may be a shocker to you, but some guys actually DO care about respecting their bodies and not freely distributing themselves like candy at a doctor's office.

If you don't want to deal with a guy who has slutted himself out, guess what? You don't have to! You're perfectly well within your rights to have standards, heck I know I do, but you obviously cannot be hypocritical about it.

Anyway, don't just go sleeping around with men just to tie the game, I think you'll end up pretty unhappy like that in the long run.

[Asker]

I only mentioned statistics because it says in my psychology book that more men have had extramarital affairs than women. I didn't just pull it out of my ass. But I agree, I'm not looking to tie the game by sleeping around. I just wish more guys weren't sleeping around and then hoping to land a virgin wife later. That's an unfair standard.

[SunSeeker]

Yes I've read that, in my psychology book as well, but those tests depends on people being honest about it as well. Anyway, hopes and expectations are different things entirely. I certainly myself as well hope women aren't sleeping around as much but I basically have come not to expect that. I still maintain my standard, but there's nothing I can do about it except not be a hypocrite so when I meet that girl, my past won't have ruined that opportunity.

[Asker]

So you would accept a girl with a past similar to yours?

[SunSeeker]

Yes of course! I'm not the proudest of my history in my younger days, not that I was ever a man slut but there were some unwise choices I made. But in the past few years I've been pretty sexually modest and if a woman had the same situation and was in the same mindset, I would most definitely accept her.

[dwiller943]

Because men are hypocrites and want what they don't deserve.

[Jersey1]

Men are drven to have sex, I dont think women are to near the same degree. it is very strong, women dont get it. There have always been loose women, it helps as men shpuld sow some wild oats when young. But when they look for the mother of their children, well the criteria changes. Thenwe dont want sluts, we want someone thatbwe can buold a life and family with. Thats how it works. dnt be mad, it just is.

[Asker]

What's the rationale then? Why couldn't you build a life and family with a woman who has slept around, but we could build a life and family with a man who has. What is different about the man inherently that makes him a better life partner as a slut than a female?

[Jersey1]

Men have a high sex drive, much higher than women. They have a natural need to be a slut. Women are more selective and can go a year without sex without a huge problem, so being a slut shows a lack of character and so doesn't make a good mom. It just is.

[Asker]

So if say women have a much higher need to be emotional, a man that showed his emotions too much would make a bad father/husband?

[Jersey1]

It doesn't work like that, you know that. It just is, that's all.

[Jersey1]

... and actially, a lot of women wouldn't want an overly emotional guy... Crying all the time etc.

[Asker]

Well I'm just having a hard time finding anything to back up your theory that a woman acting the way a man does sexually makes her a bad wife if the same isn't true in reverse for men doing things that women traditionally do more of. Both sexes were designed to have sex or we wouldn't procreate. That's like saying women need to eat more instinctually, so if I come across a man with a big appetite, he must be of poor character and thus a poor husband. I'm just trying to get a good rationale. If the same doesn't work against men in some way, then your rationale fails. That's just science.

[Jersey1]

It doesn't matter if you agree or not. You aren't a guy and so the choice and the reason for the choice aren't yours. It is what it is.

[Asker]

I'm not saying I disagree. This question was for you to provide a real rationale which you've been unable to do. And you're right, about half the guys on this question disagree with you, so it's just a matter of picking from the other 50% of the guy pool.

[Jersey1]

I have given my rationale. You chose to ignore it. I didn't say anything about otehr guys on this question.

[Asker]

But i disproved your rationale because there's nothing similar like it in return for men. Therefore it just doesn't make sense. There has to be another reason for your preference.

[Jersey1]

Men and women are different in biology and pyche. It does not apply to both.

[cyrus7]

you don't have to settle for manwhores, no one said that

there ARE guys who don't do that you know

[Words_and_Wisdom]

I love sex. I love women who love sex. I love women who are comfortable telling me that they had sex with X number of guys. I'm comfortable if I'm dating someone and she wants to have sex with other guys. Hell I'd help her find other guys to bang her (as long as she helps me find other women to bang myself.)

[Anonymous]

I think the real problem here comes from the delusional, politically correct notion of equality between the sexes! Delusions are NOT reality! Let's be real here!

If a MAN has a sexually promiscuous past with 40 or 50 prior sex partners but no STDs or babies, he can still be pretty acceptable on the marriage market. On the other hand, if a WOMAN has the same sexually promiscuous past with 40 or 50 prior sex partners but no STDs or babies, it's easily a deal breaker! Why? Because equality in this context is not REAL! And no amount of pretending can change it! It IS a double standard! But it is also REALITY!

[Asker]

Then enlighten me to the reason this is the case. Why is she not as eligible? What's the rationale?

[Opinion Owner]

QA - For better or worse, cultures are slow to drop traditional gender roles that have been deeply entrenched for hundreds or even thousands of years. Some gender role double standards come straight out of mother nature! And some gender double standards come out of harsh, practical reality! And neither one of these will tolerate an argument! For instance, men DO NOT become pregnant! MOTHER NATURE DON'T PLAY THAT! Though we cannot argue with basic mother-nature-reality on absolute prime gender roles, we can make gender role changes in NON-prime areas. For instance, if women want equal pay for equal work, mother-nature-reality doesn't mind! People are free to make that goal and acomplish it-- IF THE PARTIES CAN AGREE! That brings us to the sex promiscuity double standard you complain of. Mother-nature has no problem with women who are highly experienced in their sexuality! In this, the problem is one of agreement-- or lack of agreement. In the past, a bride's PURITY was a major item.

[Opinion Owner]

cont- Bridal purity was once so important that a marriage could be ended over non-virginity on the woman's part. Of course, this didn't apply to the man who sowed his oats for a decade or more before deciding to settle down for a marriage. OBVIOUS DOUBLE STANDARD! Men were very concerned about the possibility of marrying a woman who was already pregnant by another man. In fact, the very tradition of engagement was specifically intended to insure that the woman in question was NOT pregnant! And even today, men are STILL concerned about that! In addition, men want a certain sexual exclusivity when marriage is in the picture. It's true! A lot of men will screw any woman who puts out easily, but would never consider such a woman for marriage. It's totally unfair! But this is reality! And believe it or not, some men were never a part of the man-whore sex scene. Such a man might not want a wife with ten times as many prior sex partners as him. By tradition, men didn't have to be pure. Ciao!

[Anonymous]

Your question and responses to the answers are full of fallacies.

Men aren't the sluttier sex, nor do we cheat more. The studies prove that.

A woman sleeping with her boyfriend doesn't make her a slut, a woman sleeping with random dudes makes her a slut.

Men have a right to avoid sluts, women have a right to avoid players.

You can try telling men they have to accept sluts all you want, we don't. :)

[Opinion Owner]

link

[Opinion Owner]

link

[Asker]

Players are sluts to be clear. And some of us do avoid them. But as I said to the person below, my psychology book said that more men have extramarital affairs than women, and they also report more sexual partners than women. I also don't know a single man that would turn down having sex with a random woman as long as she was hot. Which, by yours standards, makes any man who has or would do that sluts (and that's most men since I don't know any would would decline the offer).

[Opinion Owner]

I don't care what your psychology book says. It's spreading misinformation. If you don't like the double standard, then what you do is shun male sluts, not tell me I have to accept female sluts, I don't.

[Asker]

I think all of that depends on what your definition of a slut is and how many partners you've had yourself. I'd bet that compared to me, you would be sluttier, and one of those men I should "shun."

[Opinion Owner]

A slut is a person who's had more casual encounters than has had relationships. I would not consider a woman who has had more casual encounters than relationships. I have turned down plenty of opportunities for casual sex in my life, simply because I'm not a slut. So before you go off half cocked thinking that every man who's "demanding" non-sluts is either a hypocrite or a frustrated virgin, you need to get your facts straight.

[Asker]

If you reread my post, I was saying that you're probably sluttier than me, even if you've had more relationships than casual encounters. Which I doubt you've even followed that rule yourself as most young men have less relationships than casual encounters, so don't lie now. I never said you were a virgin, although a lot of men demanding non-sluts are hypocrites and frustrated virgins. If I follow your lead, I should shun you because I"m sure you've had more sexual encounters than me.

[Asker]

That's what I thought. Hypocritical standards will get you nowhere.

[Opinion Owner]

What do you mean, that's what you thought? I have been clear that I don't hold women to a higher standard than I hold for myself, you weirdo. You think you won the debate because I was gone for 20 minutes?

[Opinion Owner]

I've had the exact same number of relationships as I have casual encounters. Can you say the same thing, slut?

[Opinion Owner]

The reality is that women LIKE men who sleep around. That's the basis of the double standard. If you want the double standard to cease to exist, you simply have to stop getting wet for players. Done deal.

[Asker]

Do you read at ALL? I guaranteed that you're more of a slut than I am, because I'm a f***ing virgin you idiot. The fact that you've had casual encounters at all is disgusting and it's laughable that you think calling me a slut makes things better for you. You're an a**hole.

[Opinion Owner]

You called me a slut first. :)

[Asker]

because you actually are one lol yet you say men won't accept sluts. Look in the mirror.

[Opinion Owner]

No, I'm actually not. I prefer real intimacy, not casual encounters. Sluts prefer casual encounters, not real intimacy, they are incapable of real intimacy. You may be a virgin, but you have the mentality of a slut. :D

[Asker]

No, even if a girl preferred intimate encounters, guys would still call her a slut for having casual encounters. Which is what you've had. And yeah that makes a whole lot of sense, a virgin who doesn't believe in casual encounters has the mentality of a slut? Go to college, you need it.

[Opinion Owner]

I said I'd call her a slut if she had more casual encounters than relationships, you lying piece of crap. Get it right.

[Asker]

Maybe YOU would, but most guys would call her a slut for having any at all. You illiterate piece of crap.

[Opinion Owner]

So in other words, you admit that you are completely wrong when you said I was a hypocrite? Who's the illiterate one again?