Gender: Intelligence and Historical Figures (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
20Opinion
Seems legit. would explain why females are filling more spaces in uni's etc. Mind you... who do we rely on to progress in society? The elite intellects who invent and pave the way for us. The vast majority of those are males..
Women didn't have the chance to actually achieve many things because men were oppressing them. Physical strength was vital when we were talking about dominance. Men were always physically stronger, and women got pregnant. All these variables come into play, but that doesn't mean women are less or more. It just means there were intervening obstacles which didn't allow us to work the same way. However, as society actually realizes this, more women are stepping forward. But there's still lots of dirt under the rug. Everyone simply ignores it, because women still earn less than men because society still expects females to be homemakers and stay-at-home moms. This needs to change.
It won't as long as women like keeping those roles. Not all women of course but a lot. How many women still seek out men for financial purposes, sugar daddies? How many women still want men to pay on dates etc.
"as long as women like keeping those roles.". But also, it'll change when men stop expecting women to clean their floors and cook their meals, and raise their children on their own.
This is the responsibility of both men and women. Not just women.
But here's the thing when you say that. Those men are actually willing to pay for the dates and time with the girl.
As long as these men do that, women will take advantage of it. Simple as that. This is why men don't seek out "sugar mommies" because women aren't really willing to be a part of that role.
What about Cathryn The Great?
God bless Good Queen Bess!
think you need to go back and try again
Thanks for the take!
Thanks for the report.
IQ is only one measure of 'intelligence'
Did I say it wasn't?
interesting