Another great take. I always knew it was BS. Thanks for doing a bit of research and exposing this to many readers. We are depleting natural resources and effecting the environment however, as you wrote, we are not the major cause of climate change. There are dozens of more influential factors in regards to fluctuating temperatures and trends in climate.
The last time carbon dioxide levels were higher was a half-million years before people were here. And there is no precedent for how some of the chemicals now being introduced into the atmosphere might affect its composition, because they don't exist in nature.
You're only partly correct. "Global warming is a lie". I put that in quotes, because it depends on the connotation in which you mean it. If you take it the way the media means it, then yes, it is a lie. If you take it as the root words and split them a part, then it isn't a lie.
I was beginning to worry the conspiracy theory nuts died off somewhere. Glad to see you're still around, it's good for entertainment :)
8
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
okay, i do believe there is global warming but i also believe that it is NATURAL, for the earth to change. Of course we humans have some PART of the change but there is also the NATURE that does most of it. Earth has been changing ever since and never have EARTH had stayed the same. Nothing we know and expect earth is suppose to change for the better or not. i believe of all of the past living creatures who lived before us and is no longer with us due to the earth CHANGING. i know of our population is quite high but we're not the only ones who's changing the earth.
It's not that we are causing it. It's been shown that it's a natural part of the planet's cycle. But, it's more that we are accelerating the process through our use of industry and machines that cause excessive amounts of CO2 and Methane to be released into the atmosphere.
Global warming is a hoax. God created the earth and then he created man and woman from man. He created man to subdue the earth. Earth was created by god for man. The earth does not end by global warming, it was created by God, and it will end by God. God will end it when He feels it is time, this will be a time when man kills man.
You could be right but the main reason I think we should try to be greener recylying and using the cleanest energy sources possible is to avoid making the world uninhabitable for humanity. Pollution is essentially pissing in the well.
More profound warming has occurred within the last rolling ten thousand years. I am of the opinion it is not a "lie" but carbon is not the only factor. The averages that we are breaking have been from records that have been taken for only a little over a century. 2.5% is the percent above two standard deviations. As many areas as they take the temperature this record will still get broken often.
It's happening. Perhaps the questions we should be asking is: does it matter? What are any appreciable implications? Whom would be the best source to consult? Can humans not adapt? Is it actually good?
Part of the reason for the Syrian civil war was because of drought causing shortages and farmers who couldn't make a living off the land moving to and overcrowding the cities. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/11/3241.short
Say New Orleans and Houston flood, again, but permanently, and everybody moves out; they're going to need somewhere to live, it causes conflict. Movement of masses of people always does.
@goaded Those droughts likely would have occurred anyway. What would they have done then? Sounds to me like this information needs to make it to those farmers beforehand so they can plan accordingly. Not plead to other nations about their bad luck. Where are they helping other nations during times of abundance? You didn't see the Irish during the potato famine going to America where they weren't needed. They got to work and assimilated into the new world.
Why does the burden of other people's problem who CHOSE to live at or below sea level next to an ocean fall on people who chose not to? Why not let it flood and built the city around it with their own resources? Why not take a proactive approach and relocate beforehand? If the poor want to take a risk on cheap real estate ignoring the flood zone, that's their business. The "conflict" should be confined among themselves.
How is someone supposed to leave New Orleans (or New York, or San Francisco; they're on the coast, too), they'd still owe money on their homes and not be able to sell. Most people don't choose to live where they do, they choose not to move away from everything and everyone they've ever known (or, they can't afford to move away).
@goaded Who do you speak for? What kind of "man" talks like that? My meth addict cousin who's poor, in jail, and has been all across the country probably has more agency than you. There were postbellum carpet baggers who had more pioneering spirit.
I've been to New York and saw little outside of Manhattan worth salvaging. That state is one big welfare project. There are entire towns dedicated to recovering drug addicts. I took strolls through local parks and saw mindless, motionless people sitting around staring off into nowhere. New York has a nice little system of importing immigrants displacing locals driving them into poverty while having an incarceration system that creates a feedback loop of criminal/welfare/drug use. And GLOBAL WARMING is another propaganda tool to guilt countries into accepting poverty stricken immigrants who recreate it in their host countries. I bet San Francisco is no better. California sucks now from what I've heard from former residents.
@goaded That's up to you. You could start to demonstrate any semblance of it by answering the questions with reasonable solutions instead of yielding to "feelings".
It isn't that global warming is human induced. This would take place but over the next thousands perhaps, hundreds of thousands of years, instead it is taking place over the next hundred or couple hundred. This acceleration in the decay of climatic stability towards the next ice age or mass extinction is almost solely caused by humans.
You are incredibly intelligent and more than that, capable of telling truth from falsehood. Well done, don't let the brainwashed plebs stray you from your path
I'm no science expert, but I know enough that if you're pumping all that toxic into the air 24/7 365 for decades upon decades it will sure have effect on earth.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
62Opinion
Another great take. I always knew it was BS. Thanks for doing a bit of research and exposing this to many readers. We are depleting natural resources and effecting the environment however, as you wrote, we are not the major cause of climate change. There are dozens of more influential factors in regards to fluctuating temperatures and trends in climate.
The last time carbon dioxide levels were higher was a half-million years before people were here. And there is no precedent for how some of the chemicals now being introduced into the atmosphere might affect its composition, because they don't exist in nature.
You're only partly correct. "Global warming is a lie". I put that in quotes, because it depends on the connotation in which you mean it. If you take it the way the media means it, then yes, it is a lie. If you take it as the root words and split them a part, then it isn't a lie.
Humans are just accelerating the cycle.
I was beginning to worry the conspiracy theory nuts died off somewhere. Glad to see you're still around, it's good for entertainment :)
okay, i do believe there is global warming but i also believe that it is NATURAL, for the earth to change. Of course we humans have some PART of the change but there is also the NATURE that does most of it. Earth has been changing ever since and never have EARTH had stayed the same. Nothing we know and expect earth is suppose to change for the better or not. i believe of all of the past living creatures who lived before us and is no longer with us due to the earth CHANGING. i know of our population is quite high but we're not the only ones who's changing the earth.
It's not that we are causing it. It's been shown that it's a natural part of the planet's cycle. But, it's more that we are accelerating the process through our use of industry and machines that cause excessive amounts of CO2 and Methane to be released into the atmosphere.
OMG we have a geologist over here! I am assuming you graduated from the university of Google, after a hard 200 minutes of “research?”
Another day, another climate change denier.
www.skeptic.com/.../
Global warming is a hoax. God created the earth and then he created man and woman from man. He created man to subdue the earth. Earth was created by god for man. The earth does not end by global warming, it was created by God, and it will end by God. God will end it when He feels it is time, this will be a time when man kills man.
You're not serious?
@goaded afraid he might be
Preach!
You could be right but the main reason I think we should try to be greener recylying and using the cleanest energy sources possible is to avoid making the world uninhabitable for humanity. Pollution is essentially pissing in the well.
More profound warming has occurred within the last rolling ten thousand years. I am of the opinion it is not a "lie" but carbon is not the only factor. The averages that we are breaking have been from records that have been taken for only a little over a century. 2.5% is the percent above two standard deviations. As many areas as they take the temperature this record will still get broken often.
It's happening. Perhaps the questions we should be asking is: does it matter? What are any appreciable implications? Whom would be the best source to consult? Can humans not adapt? Is it actually good?
Yes, lots of death (droughts, storms, wars over resources, etc.), scientists, not the dead ones, no.
@goaded All those things happen already... What do you mean by "lots of death"? How, exactly?
Part of the reason for the Syrian civil war was because of drought causing shortages and farmers who couldn't make a living off the land moving to and overcrowding the cities. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/11/3241.short
Say New Orleans and Houston flood, again, but permanently, and everybody moves out; they're going to need somewhere to live, it causes conflict. Movement of masses of people always does.
@goaded Those droughts likely would have occurred anyway. What would they have done then? Sounds to me like this information needs to make it to those farmers beforehand so they can plan accordingly. Not plead to other nations about their bad luck. Where are they helping other nations during times of abundance? You didn't see the Irish during the potato famine going to America where they weren't needed. They got to work and assimilated into the new world.
Why does the burden of other people's problem who CHOSE to live at or below sea level next to an ocean fall on people who chose not to? Why not let it flood and built the city around it with their own resources? Why not take a proactive approach and relocate beforehand? If the poor want to take a risk on cheap real estate ignoring the flood zone, that's their business. The "conflict" should be confined among themselves.
Why don't the poor just stop being poor?
How is someone supposed to leave New Orleans (or New York, or San Francisco; they're on the coast, too), they'd still owe money on their homes and not be able to sell. Most people don't choose to live where they do, they choose not to move away from everything and everyone they've ever known (or, they can't afford to move away).
@goaded Who do you speak for? What kind of "man" talks like that? My meth addict cousin who's poor, in jail, and has been all across the country probably has more agency than you. There were postbellum carpet baggers who had more pioneering spirit.
I've been to New York and saw little outside of Manhattan worth salvaging. That state is one big welfare project. There are entire towns dedicated to recovering drug addicts. I took strolls through local parks and saw mindless, motionless people sitting around staring off into nowhere. New York has a nice little system of importing immigrants displacing locals driving them into poverty while having an incarceration system that creates a feedback loop of criminal/welfare/drug use. And GLOBAL WARMING is another propaganda tool to guilt countries into accepting poverty stricken immigrants who recreate it in their host countries. I bet San Francisco is no better. California sucks now from what I've heard from former residents.
Did you seriously just question my manhood? What an ass.
@goaded That's up to you. You could start to demonstrate any semblance of it by answering the questions with reasonable solutions instead of yielding to "feelings".
It's happened before, but since people it's accelerated at such a faster rate. So global warming is real and not something to scoff at.
I look forward to your next post on how the earth is flat?
media.giphy.com/media/27EhcDHnlkw1O/giphy.gif
It isn't that global warming is human induced. This would take place but over the next thousands perhaps, hundreds of thousands of years, instead it is taking place over the next hundred or couple hundred. This acceleration in the decay of climatic stability towards the next ice age or mass extinction is almost solely caused by humans.
upload.wikimedia.org/.../...-and-co2-1880-2009.gif
Don't you know that you are not allowed to use real facts when trying to correct blatant lies and myths?
@Red_Arrow The GOP started a post fact culture. :- I don't think I'm part of that.
i think anyone with a brain knows it is true and happening
Nuh, uh. Global warming is an issue we should all be concerned about. Blame is irrelevant.
You are incredibly intelligent and more than that, capable of telling truth from falsehood. Well done, don't let the brainwashed plebs stray you from your path
I'm no science expert, but I know enough that if you're pumping all that toxic into the air 24/7 365 for decades upon decades it will sure have effect on earth.