No matter, in reply to another respondent to this question, the author cites his own preferred alternative media outlets. These presumably showing the world as it really is. Though it is a safe bet that those outlets merely reflect his own biases. This leaving the author in an intellectual hall of mirrors. Begging the question of why his preferred media outlets are objective and all the others are not. How then did his preferred outlets avoid the biases that so permeate all the others. It's a conundrum.No matter, we are fortunate that the author is so much smarter and wiser and better educated than all around him that he sits at the pinnacle and can instruct us in our failings. Nope, no bias there. Smug self-satisfaction and pace Bagheot a "diffuse distrust and an indiscriminate suspicion," yes, but fortunately no bias.
I agree 100%
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
I only watch shows like Secular Talk, The Hill, Young Turks and Ring of Fire because I do not fall into the mainstream trap unlike most Americans People who watch the mainstream media are clueless stupid zombies
Exactly! Did you know the okay symbol is now considered a hate symbol? i just figured it out few days ago and apparently this has been going on for months. Although it seems the okay symbol is problematic now only when you do it upside-down somehow! Only because White supremacists used that. Now, people's reactions has been insane. Some people are like: Oh yea this is hate symbol now, don't use it. Ignorant people! this has been all over the news. I'm like this is exactly the problem! lol! you people are stupid enough to allow bunch of hate group redefine a symbol for you so easily just like that. The problem is you guys watching too much news. That's exactly the issue here. Retarded people are it's best!
The only news that I watch are Secular Talk, Young Turks, The Hill and Ring of FireThe mainstream media are just state run media and only old people watch them
... Okay. I would challenge your narrative as patently untrue. Be specific when you say "The mainstream media."WHO? WHICH media? WHAT outlets? Actual names here.
Fox, CNN and MSNBC
... Okay, but as we just covered...Anyway, The Hill does its own reporting but those other outlets you listed don't really count as actual sources-- they don't do their own reporting. Rather, they just repackage and give opinion and analysis on reporting that OTHER more mainstream outlets have done, like the Post or the Times or whatever. It's better to go to the source. If an outlet is telling you exactly what you already want to hear, you may want to wonder about how it is exactly that they came by that information.
These sources like telling things like how they are instead of telling everything even
I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. Perhaps you could be more specific.
They are harsh and tell the truth Not telling anything 50/50
... Okay, I think you're missing what I'm saying. No, they don't always "tell the truth" either, they mostly provide commentary rather than doing their own actual reporting. Are you not understanding what I'm saying?
They are failed news organizations who are state media
Fox news is not a failed news organization. It was founded specifically to spread propaganda and it has done so quite successfully. Even if every normal source of revenue a news organization normally has such as advertisers stopped doing business with Fox News they would still operate on investors who support it for its primary purpose which is and always has been propaganda.
All three news network are the same. All of them are in bed with Saudi Arabia/Israel, Wall Street and the Military Industrial Complex
what are you telling me that for when i just told you we aren't all so stupid to not see it? i sugest you re read my initial answer
A lot of old people are stupid enough. No people my age are watching these clowns
I bet that you will love my another questionShould we send George Bush, Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Hilary Clinton into a Black Hole? ↗
yeah yeah and i was the same condescending ignorant fool when i was young too but you dont know it all and when you get to my age you will have learned you will never know it all but if you want to open your mind further i do suggest you get off the agist crap and infact look further into hypernormalisation and a read of guy debords 'the spectacle' might help you out too. and this is worth a watch sometime...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IG3mTTI_RY
but what do i know... im old lol... i would say the same to you as i would say to greta. you are blaming the people who have been shouting for years, the same people that saw action in the 80s over the ozone layer so maybe you need to accept ignorance is not attributed to any age group. we are all capable of it
Okay blue anon lol
All three are clueless and full of shitA bunch of clowns
Spoken from a clown