How am I a brainless robot!
You take the ridiculous and baseless accusations Trump makes to deflect blame from himself that a 10 year old could see through and repost them as if they're true. Your posts are simplistic and robotic. You've displayed zero critical thinking or analysis and your blind adoration of everything he does, every thing he says is comical. Even his most hardcore supporters can recognize he's got a number of faults but they just don't care. You on the other hand, seem completely unable to see any of that. You've posted about 15 of these and they're all basically the same thing over and over and over again. "Is Trump the greatest president ever? I think so." We get it. Everyone here gets it. You think he's the second coming of Christ. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish by keeping this up day after day.
No they were talking about that before COVID. It's so they can cheat like the last election.
You’re entitled to your opinion.
🤔 it's not opinion. You can cheat the mail in votes. Hillary cheated the popular vote but it's tough to chest the electoral vote, which is why Trump won.
@Red_Dragon That's complete bullshit dude. But you still actually believe Obama and Hillary Clinton were running a child trafficking ring out of a pizza place so really no one should listen to a thing you say cause you're nuts.
@jakerson181 I really don't know what the pizza thing was about. Never looked into it lol. They were running child trafficking rings. Hillary's side admitted it. Bill has been going to pedo island with Epstein for years. The plane chart was released remember? I think it's funny they still are trying to push Russian collision. Meanwhile Biden is about to get in more trouble over the Ukraine thing.
I was trying to save an inevitable debate by agreeing to disagree but apparently you didn’t want to take that option.Regardless of if it was discussed before this or not the reality still stands that opening the polls normally during the pandemic is not a good idea. Voting from home is a better option.
So long ID is required.
@Red_Dragon Hillary's side admitted they were running child trafficking rings? Really? Did you really just say that? Dude, I think you may be living on another planet than the rest of us? Everything you claim is all unfounded bullshit being pushed by far right conspiracy nutjobs on sketchy websites and YouTube videos with dramatic music and baritone voices talking about exposing the scandals they don't want you to know about. You got any actual EVIDENCE that any of what you claim has actually happened?
@jakerson181 There has been people in Hillary's camp who has admitted it yes, but they have also been charged. NXIVM members, Epstein was going to tell, etc. The Clintons have also killed countless people including those in an around the drug trade stuff. I can get into that too if you want.
@jakerson181 Evidence? There's too much. It would take weeks to post it all. I can't think of the names but for example when Bill was having drugs shipped here a shipment fell off a train and two boys discovered it. I'd have to look up their names but they were mysteriously killed along with anyone who was investigating it. That's just one small example.
I don’t have any issues with ID being required in some way, as long as it’s a way to vote that doesn’t require disregarding the fact there’s a pandemic currently going on.
I think we both want fair voting. All citizens should.
I agree with that.
@Red_Dragon Save yourself the trouble dude. I think you're out of your fucking mind and I wouldn't want you to look any more foolish than you already do. In the meantime, read the article I am attaching. What's in that article are what are called facts, not ridiculous, wild, unsubstantiated and baseless accusations.www.nydailynews.com/.../...inton-article-1.3971471
@Red_Dragon I just saw your second comment. "Evidence? There's too much. That's why i can't post any of it. But these two kids found a box with drugs that fell off a train, they then both died mysteriously and..."That just literally made me laugh out loud.
@jakerson181 the families of the slain would say otherwise. You sound upset. You lost.
@jakerson181 Look up Barry Seals. They even did a movie on it but I'm not getting into the Clintons. There are two types of people.. people who know what all they did and people who refuse to know.
@Red_Dragon Barry Seal? The pilot who smuggled drugs for the Medellin Cartel? Tom Cruise played him in the recent move? That Barry Seal? He was murdered by the cartels when he turned informant for the DEA. That was in 1986 during the Reagan administration. What on Earth does that have to do with the Clintons?Look dude. I'm just going to stop now. I don't want to be cruel or unkind but I seriously think there's something wrong with you.
@jakerson181 you clearly didn't watch the movie not understood it lol. Wow. What does it have to do with the Clinton's? 🤦🏾♂️
@jakerson181 You don't know cruel. Talking online isn't cruel. Lol.
@jakerson181 Bill wasn't just a president. It ain't like he got up one day and was automatically president. He had been in government long before that. But again we'll leave it there.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
🤔 If he said that then I'd have to disagree. But I feel like this is in reference to immigration or like cheating with bots or mail ins.
I had to read the captions since I'm at work. What he is saying is that if you did mail in votes the Democrats would cheat again and yeah you wouldn't have Republicans winning anymore. Because of cheating.
Want me to explain how they'd cheat?
He claims they will, but during the last election, his supporters were the ones caught for voting more than once lol Whilst it can be used to cheat, the fact remains the same: you make it easier to vote, republicans will lose. Hence why he opposes making it easier.
Hillary used bots which is why she won the popular vote but not the electoral. You saying Trump supporters voted twice is the first time I've heard that. Even if that's the case then let's make ID required. I'm all for that. That and only legal citicizens voting, but see the Democrats wouldn't want that. Yeah that's the Democrats argument. That by making it "easier" they will win. No by making it "easier" they will cheat... again.
None of it really matters because the electoral vote is very hard to cheat. They haven't figured out how to get around that yet.
Unless you are political analyst suggesting the Republicans will never win again - is complete garbage!
You can't "use bots" in an election. And if you could it would certainly be something that republicans do, since they try to cheat every other way. Hell they turned a whole impeachment hearing into a sham just to send the message they absolutely want to cheat, as long as it keeps them in power.Not sure why they didn't think it through, though. If the country collapses they lose all their power and all the money they've hoarded becomes useless. Yet they seem to be pretty intent on it. If they were clever they'd start helping Biden win - nothing will drive the trump trolls into civil war faster than Trump losing in a landslide this November.
@normalice both parties have used it. Yes you can.
@normalice Well I'm not a trump nor Biden troll. But that was also partly why we couldn't focus on the Coronavirus too and I remember AOC got upset because she wanted to push for the green new deal and nobody was there. A couple Republicans spoke out and said "Well everyone is focusing on the impeachment your party is pushing for." Biden abused his power on camera as a vice president. Trump has been proven not guilty by democratic party Robert Muller. They searched all his phone calls, emails, etc. Etc. Pelosi and Adam Shift have been proven to be liars. Want some more or you good?
You are definitely a trump troll. The most common trump trolls are the the "both parties" trump troll. There has never been a valid "both parties" statement. Equating the two parties, on any level, is strictly for the purpose of helping republicans. Combined with how fluent you seem to be in far right propaganda, you are definitely either a trump troll or pay so much attention to them that you do a spot on impression.
@normalice I'ma stop you right there. Want me to tell you things I don't like about Trump? I can do that too. But see you couldn't tell me what you don't like about Biden and others but you are in fact what you accuse me of.
@normalice by the way you've been on here for years. I've seen you on here before I left for like 3 years and you're still here. That tells me a lot.
Correct, I can't list anything i don't like about Biden, because that would be doing your trump troll work for you. If I can endure the mental pain of wading through all your far right bullshit propaganda sites to figure out what you don't like about trump, you can certainly endure the mental pain of understanding what left columnists have to say about Biden without me gifting you with results.
@normalice Well no I can list plenty of things both Biden and Trump has done. So am I a troll for both? Lol. You don't make any sense, dude. I'm not far right. 😂 I'm not even conservative. I just call it as I see it.
@Red_Dragon I'm not saying you don't call it as you see it. I'm saying that what you see appears to be dictated by what is most entertaining to look at - which is why the far right fake news tries so hard to be entertaining instead of accurate.
@normalice I see that on both sides. Honestly Trump and Biden are both entertaining to watch lol.
You see the far right trying to portray it happening on both sides, because it's a benefit to any scammer to be equated to the non scammers. It is true democrats tend to try to make their information as entertaining as possible. But the difference is republicans don't attempt information at all. They just go straight to the entertainment and lace in their misinformation as part of the scam.
@normalice I'd have to disagree on that but then again you seem bias.
You can't be biased against scammers. Or, to put it another way, if you knew that someone was definitely trying to scam you, how much time should you spend considering their offermthat you know to be fake? I'm having trouble coming up with justification for any number greater than zero (feel free to justify any other number), but of course a big part of the scam is to assert that not paying attention to the "totally not a scam" is a bias against it.
@normalice All politicians are trying to get you to vote for them. Just like every salesman will try to get you to buy something. So why is Trump the only scammer to you?
No, the entire Republican party is a scam party. Trump is just the most brazen of them. He used the "hate the left" attitude of fox news viewers to basically say the best way to hate the left is via unwavering loyalty to him. So, he's set it up such that he can openly fire inspectors generals who threaten to expose him, fight the release of his tax returns despite the claim that he would love to release them being part of his scam, violate the emolluments clause, violate the constitutional ban on presidents bribing foreign countries.. The list goes on and I hate typing on this thing. Anyway, these are all classic "appearance of competence" strategies scammers are most known for, as opposed to the "possession of competence" required to produce real results. But republicans have been doing this since Reaga n- it's just that trump made it far more onviois.
@normalice oh I can bring up plenty of stuff both sides of the media does. Ready? Okay so Liberal lawyer Robert Kennedy Jr. said Anderson Cooper and others in CNN are paid by big pharma such as Merc and Pffier. CBS did a scam where they had hundreds of hospital workers pretend they are overbooked when they aren't. CBS also said that a mass bombing in Iran I think? was going on.. well the footage they showed was just a small demolition test in one of our states. How many times has Stephen Cobert did skits on other people he didn't like? CBS head guy resigned after being caught in sex scadals. Want me to keep going?
I mean... you can keep going if you'd like, but I'm not seeing the connection to anything I'm talking about. Unless you are suggesting anyone you mentioned was elected into office? I'm saying the majority party of the most powerful legislative body, arguably in the world, looked at all the evidence, to include an admission of guilt, and instead of exercising their power to uphold the law, used it to misdirect and pretend to buy into the narrative (provided by the accused) that the most serious accusation in all of U. S. history should not be taken seriously. There is no explanation for this that makes any sense and also excludes republicans not taking their oaths of office seriously. And if they've lied about an oath, what are you imagining is their lower limit and, more importantly, what are you imagining is holding them to that limit? Because here's the thing: their oath of office was specifically written to include the promise to respect whatever it is you think is holding them to the lower limit you're thinking. Their violation of it even a tiny bit indicates the potential for botomless corruption. Once you accept that it's possible, it becomes difficult to unsee it - like understanding a machine that produces the hologram makes it impossible to continue believing the hologram is real life. This, by the way, is called disillusionment. It's common for those transitionioning out of religion, pyramid schemes, the republican party, or addictions. Problem is they are different names for the same thing: the stubborn refusal to acknowledge that magic isn't real.
@normalice none of that made any sense nor had any basis on fact. You basically just said Republicans are all liars. Fine if you want to believe that.
@normalice My point is the media will scam either way. There are liars on both sides. Hence why I have no allegiance to either.
I already refuted that point by informing you that democrats only scam to the extent they have to to keep up with the enormous advantage unbridled scamming gives republicans. Yes. Republicans are all entirely liars. Or rather, they don't care if what they say is a lie or not so long as it works. I'm sorry you couldn't at least follow the house intelligence committee hearings during the impeachment, though. "Scammers putting on a front" is literally the only way to describe the behavior of the republicans during that..
@normalice Let's not even go there with impeachment. I promise you'll lose that debate.
I watched the entire house intelligence committee hearings. That you even think there is a defense of trump worth posturing with tells me you did not watch it.
@normalice Ask your Democrats what they think.
What a feeble cop out..
I've been wanting to argue with a trump troll about the impeachment for 6 months. You're the first to claim interest in obliging, but like trump himself, you were just putting on a show..
@normalice I'm not looking to argue with you. Wouldn't that make YOU the troll?
Like I said. Feeble..
en.wikipedia.org/.../2018_North_Carolina%27s_9th_congressional_district_election"The North Carolina State Board of Elections held an evidentiary hearing in February 2019. On February 21, the board unanimously voted to call a new election because of fraud by Republican operatives. Several Republican campaign operatives have been indicted for their role in an illegal ballot harvesting and ballot tampering operation. In addition to illegal collection and handling of ballots, ballot tampering was admitted in witness testimony, including filling in blank votes to favor Republican candidates. Harris declined to run again. The state legislature passed a law requiring new party primaries. "
At the district level huh? Interesting. I didn't know that. Thanks man. I have no affiliation to either party but it is interesting. For example since you said NC I don't like Cooper or Burr. Cooper is Democratic and Burr is Republican. I haven't seen where Republicans have cheated at the national level recently but maybe I'm wrong? We know Hillary cheated and still lost.
That was national, it was for a seat in the US House of Representatives.And, no, Hilary did not cheat.
@goaded good to know. And yes she did.