Yeah the media also claimed he has a virtually 0% chance to win, many claiming he had a 2% chance to win. They also say he makes fun of disabled people, and that he tells people to injext disinfectant.
He has made fun of disabled people. That's on video. And he did suggest that taking disinfectants internally may work against Cov-Sars-2. And Republicans really are breaking ranks, most recently Jim Mattis and Colin Powell and Lisa Murkowski who supported Jim Mattis' comments. A number of the staff of former President Bush have formed a PAC to support Biden. He's losing support from Republicans. Each Republican that comes out in opposition makes it easier for the next one.
No, he didn't make fun of a disabled person, he makes that gesture whenever he's imitating someone in a demeaning manner, it has nothing to do with someone's disability. Here's a 1 minute video demonstrating precisely that, him imitating non-disabled people in the same manner (and I'm assuming you have one minute to spare, so I expect you to watch this video. If not, it's clear you're not open to a notion that opposes your current opinion, and are afraid the video may disprove your delicate stance. So if you want to be taken seriously, I'd advice you to watch the video and take responsibility for your words): https://youtu.be/CsaB3ynIZH4 And no, he didn't suggest that taking disinfectants internally may work against anything, he proposed to the doctor beside him and other doctors "look into" forms of injecting disinfectant. If you'd like, we can actually pull up the footage and I can quote him literally word for word? And cool, some Republicans support Biden. Here's a #WalkAway campaign about leaving the democratic party and joining the Republicans, of which has 245,036 members on Facebook (https://m. facebook. com/groups/OFFICIALWalkAwayCampaign/? ref=group_header&view=group) and 148,000 subscribers on youtube (https://m. youtube. com/channel/UCDb4InP9mRZR9oogD1b2dOQ). We can play this "oh here's an example of someone doing what I say some people are doing" game all day, there are countless examples of people who are changing parties. It happens literally every election.
There's admittedly some truth to that but you can't discredit the position of president entirely.
They have their powers and plans yes. But he's full front and center. They're behind the curtain. any president has to still go through them ultimately to get things done and only give them 4 years term limit while they have none. Just next runner up for the Billboard
That's true. In fact, I've heard people in recent years ask that presidential candidates talk about what they can work with congress to get done, rather than what they claim they want to get done (like building a wall or canceling all student debts), which I entirely understand. You can tell a side you'll do what they want, but if you don't have a reasonable plan to get congress to act on it, it's all just words.
Indeed. Just a fresh brain to fuck with every 4-8 years
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
There have been several billionaires that have publicly admitted that they're going to fund a project with the sole intention of ensuring Trump doesn't get reelected, lmfao.
YES! these satan worshipers are morons! Americans must stand strong. And go for Tucker or TRUMP!
It'll be tough, politicians always say what they want to get done, never say what they think they can work with congress to get done. And the house hates Trump, they will push back on nearly everything.
How is he a dictator? 😂
He does whatever the fuck he feels like while ignoring the Constitution. Keep in mind, if it weren't for about 10 Republican Senators, he'd no longer be in office. I'm not going to debate with a trumper any further, so save your typing fingers, and have a good night, mr anonymous.
I'm convinced. The sky is green and and it is because I said it is but I won't give you an example as to why. 'Preciate it, my guy. 👍
He's vile. End of story for me.
As thought-provoking as ever, my sincerest gratitude.
I appreciate your sarcasm, but it would be wasted words if you haven't seen enough by now. We will simply - disagree. Enjoy your evening.
What has there been to see? I asked you a simple question and you couldn't give me an example. This is the third time you've said something along the lines of "I'm done here." So either take responsibility for your words and actually be done here or take responsibility for your others words and actually support your claim.
Dude.. there are pages, and pages, and pages, ad nauseum, of things to see. Look them up for yourself. A debate with a trumper, for me, is pointless. His lies never end. Never. Ok, one of my favorites is a little thing, but it's a big thing, that has nothing to do with the Constitution but is indicative of his illness. After he gave a speech to the Boy Scouts, he announced he had been contacted by the head of their organization and told "he gave the best speech ever". His press secretary said " he misspoke" ... whatever the hell that means. The head of the scouts organization not only REFUTED Trump's claim that he contacted the President, he issued an apology to those in attendance regarding Trump's remarks.There are countless stories like that where he claims he was praised by individuals, and was not. And that's relatively small. What he did to get impeached, was not. Blocking testimony of WH officials, withholding critical documents, is big, and he should have been allowed to get away with it. I could go on and on "taking responsibility" for my words - something the President rarely does except when it benefits him. There's no disputing that. Happy?
So his dictatorship is evident due to him allegedly lying about people talking positively about him, and him not seeing witnesses when witnesses had already been seen at the house, of which many of them they didn't actively pursue (like in the care of Mr. Bolton) but suddenly it's the Senate's job to pursue because you chose not to? Not to mention, the house arrogantly claimed they had an "ironclad case against Mr. Trump, and compiled more than enough evidence to justify removing him from office." So when someone not only has, allgedly, sufficient amount of evidence, they have MORE than enough evidence, then you still need MORE evidence?
Oh, give it a fucking rest. If you don't avail yourself of more than ample evidence that is all out there in the public domain of what a major fuckup Trump and his slapped-together administration is, all you're doing by trumping Trump on G@G is making a fool of yourself.
Another remark full of claim, lack of substance. Why not actually respond to what was said and refute it?
Trump SUPPRESSED much of the real condemning evidence, but there was plenty to convict and remove. There still is, but the Republicans were, and still are, sucking his dick and failing to evaluate his actions. I STILL don't understand WHY the people who refused their subpoenas were not jailed, nor is it clear that the President even has the "power" to block his cabinet or staff from testifying when subpoenas are issued. You also make it sound like the Republicans actually "listened" to the evidence presented. They did not. They did not even consider it. The scandal plagued Nunez, Jordan, et al, did nothing but try and undermine the veracity of life long civil servants who worked under both parties. They were, and are, disgusting people, like so very many Trump supporters. The evidence was there, still is there, and God only knows what's in the documents he blocked, and what the people closest to him would be under oath to say.
Democrats during prior impeachments explicitly claimed that an impeachment should never be bipartisan because a true reason to impeach would not be held by only one party. But it's okay when they do it, right? And when you've been hearing people trying to get Trump out of office from even BEFORE he was in office, you stop listening to people crying wolf. The impeachment was illegitimate. Just like the Russia thing, just like all the other ridiculous claims people have been making. You people are driven so passionately by hate.
I'm driven by facts, and personal knowledge of the Trump family and his doings. The impeachment was perfectly legitimate. Since Clinton was the last impeachment, the reference to your claim of what Dems claimed is irrelevant, because circumstances have changed. Clinton was impeached because the House believed he lied under oath. Trump wouldn't dare allow himself to be sworn in to testify under oath, and we all know why - he can't tell the truth. The last thing he wants out, is the truth. The "Russia thing" was not a ridiculous claim. The only exoneration Trump got was that Mueller did not find direct collusion, but he did say in no uncertain terms, that Trump was NOT exonerated of obstructing justice, but he wanted Congress to deal with it. You don't try several times to squelch an investigation if you have nothing to hide. As for your reference to getting him out of office prior to, I remind you that the VERY DAY Obama was elected, John Boehner went on national TV and stated his party would do everything in its power block anything Obama wanted to do, and see to it that he was a one term president. There's nothing but good reasons for loathing Trump. He's a disgrace to concept of a democratic republic.
No, you know who I don't want in office? Someone who hires people who donate to organizations who bail out arrested, rioting criminals.
Just like all the people who said they'd leave the country, right? I'm guessing you're not willing to be held to that?
Lol i think this time they might have to since trump will tear the country apart if he stays in power
They said that last time
Yeah but last time where wasn't a global pandemic and he didn't set poilce on peaceful protestors bc he wanted to take some pictures
You mean the same peaceful protesters that are breaking into businesses, stealing products, harming and quite literally killing people, and setting buildings on fire? Those peaceful protesters? I believe those are called rioters and a nation that doesn't send in their military to stop it is just stupid. These are innocent businesses being destroyed/looted and innocent lives being harmed/killed.
Exaggerations aside, I'm not certain, but I'm fairly confident he will.
Thanks hon, we need it
@Agape93 No problem. :)
If Trump does win next time, we may be speaking Russian 4 years sooner!
@bailey11 Killery already sold us to the Russians before Trump had a chance to.
Dump, dump, dump! (Or are you a Russian bot? If you are, of course you don't mind if Trump wins. You'd be singing a different tune if he was the leader of YOUR country!)2020: the year to dump trump. #dumpTrump2020
@bailey11 I am doing well with Trump
Russian bot? You mean the same "Russian bots" that Reid Hoffman, Firm Democrat, payed someone to make profiles with Russian sounding names to the mass-follow the political opposition in an attempt to deceitfully paint the opposition as a Russian operative? (https://siliconangle. com/2018/12/26/reid-hoffman-apologizes-funding-fake-russian-bot-campaign-alabama-election/)
Only thanks to the electoral college. The majority of us wanted and voted for Hillary.
@bailey11 only because media said Hillary won California before polls closed not to vote
@888theGreat and that's why we have an electoral college. A popular vote is nothing less than tyranny of the majority. You could literally decide who wins the presidency with just California, New York, and Florida and say "to hell" with the rest of the country. Thank goodness we live in a representative republic instead of a democracy
Exactly. I mean we have stats for a reason.
Not if Biden beats Biden first
We do. And anyone living in the U. S. needs to care. What a sitting president does affects all of us. For example, over a thousand people die each year in the U. S. because Trump rolled back environmental protections.We better start caring!
It hasn't even happened yet and you already know it's going to be done illegally? You probably wanna contact the authority if that's the case, bud.
i guarantee you, he will do it, illegallyGUARAN FUCKING TEE IT
Can you explain why?
read the mueller report. it's all thereif you believe barr and his republican cronies, you are a right wing, cuck
I don't even know who barr is. But I'm asking you to explain why, not tell me to go read something. Too many times have I been sent on a wild goose chase. The burden of proof is on you.
barr is the AG of the country. he's supposed to protect the people from the president, not do his dirty work against the peopleBARR IS A FUCKING RETARDand is trying to protect a criminal
go read it dude. it's all there