Hmm, (superb). Is this a new feature or what.. and based on what they consider opinions superb? Who cares about bot opinions, we want people's feeback.Most helpful 🤔.. but I can't see that because of this superb thing. Well, I do hope this really was helpful if you did consider that. And hope the "poem" was of fun too, although it was too realistic and not fantastical.As, coming from a culture where poetry is famously knowns for being well done, it is said: "Sweetest of poem is the fantastical / fictitous".That's Arab culture fyi.That's why I noted it getting realistic or formal below.Though they say, either too clever or too silly is what attracts people. I hope it would be considered of clever-related part.
None of it is intellectually stimulating
You care more about STEM from the other comment. That’s fine. I’m actually a mechanical engineer. I design actuated valves for big pharma. Still prefer these topics though.
How can you have a high IQ and prefer something so simple as politics?
You kind of sound like Elon Musk making comments about how too many intelligent people choose finance over STEM lol. I'm going to presume you're of the few in our population that processes life through almost solely logical thought given the context matter of this question. Do you think it's logically sound to make an assumption about a convoluted and broad subject in which you admittedly posses no knowledge of? Is it a logical statement to say of those of higher intelligence are all of the same makeup and stimulated by specific identical subjects? I feel as if I'm able to ask you these questions without you taking offense, because again, I can see you're logically driven. Look up Ben Shapiro- whether you're left or right, there's no denial that the man is brilliant. I could list plenty of others. Critically thinking through issues in many facets such as engineering, and outside of engineering is stimulating to me. I wouldn't describe politics to be simple by any means. Knowing the ins and outs of law, and how government systems operate from generations before us to today has an extreme amount of depth. Contrasting that with societal changes and culture in an attempt to formulate opinions deciphering them to be right and wrong carries within it even more depth. It also teaches you about yourself and your own personal values. Adding in the drama the media, it's extremely entertaining. To me- it's reality TV with substance.
Sociology and history are for people to feel like they have a high IQ
Not really a lot of people in sociology are wannabe cops and stats prove the average cops aren't all that intelligent and most people who study history usually go into teaching or working at museums, but I did a little search and they have fairly high IQ's you can't link intelligence to justify a person's major, there's a correlation but no real direct correlation
What stats prove that cops have low IQs? I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I’m talking about IQ as the main measure of intelligence. Sociology and history are too easy. A simpleton could learn sociology and history and do well. They aren’t impressive and barely important.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
You seem like the type to have a low IQ and try to “make up for it” by saying you’re “smart” in other areas. It doesn’t work like that
IQ is the most important measure of intelligence. All the others are useless.
Do you even know what "IQ" stands for cause you ain't using it right... Plus its bunch of bullshit others are useless in fact probs tens of times more useful then one tested on tests...
IQ stands for Intelligence Quotient. It’s a measure of intelligence that measures your ability to think logically. You could argue that EQ is more useful, however it really isn’t, nor is it impressive. EQ is a matter of being relatable to other people and understanding them. That isn’t impressive in the slightest and isn’t a real measure of intellect. Basically, if you can’t do math, you aren’t intelligent.
No... Completely wrong... Intelligence is subcategory of logic... Not other way around... Every intelligence is logical concept within brain and mind, but not every logic is correct...
If you really want good example look At 90% of nerds... Very good at math but shit at socializing and psychological warfare... Pathetic people who only see numbers... One aspect of intelligence is useless on its own to bring normal life to individual...
Google what IQ is. That isn’t the definition. Nerds also create our technology, engineering, and find scientific discoveries. Who gives a shit about socializing? So you can make a woman’s vagina tingle? Keep caring about pleasing others.
Read some books instead of googling everything... Far more accurate explanations from people actually care about self development and knowledge...
You take your IQ for granted. That’s why I say that I wish I could extract IQ from others to increase my own. It’s easy for you
I'm not sure I follow your meaning
Those who can propel society are those with high IQs. It’s those people who can do well in math, technology, etc that will advance civilization. Too many people care about boring and non-intellectual topics like politics and sociology.
I can agree with that, but politics are a necessary evil. The problem with high IQ is that it's not cool, or entertaining, and the masses want to be entertained more than they want to be effectively governed, so we end up with the freakshow that is Trump and friends.
So you do like politics?
Yes and no. I follow it I just dont trust politicians
History is in the past. It’s incredibly low IQ to define everything by history
Nopes, patterns repeat. I don't know who you are or how 'smart' but that isn't a perticularly 'smart' thing to say. If I want to see how debt cycles work I'd read thier history and about how they happen. Data doesn't mean anything (maybe), it depends on your interpretation. I'm not a big history buff, in fact I might be worse one of the lot but the idea that you can't learn from the past just seems a bit odd. If that's what you're saying. I doubt almost anyone defines everything by history, what are you even trying to say? Doesn't make the subject useless. Secondly, iq tests are normalised they're called sats. Additionally I doubt iq tests actually measure 'intelligence' so there's not much point anyways don't know why you wanna normalise them, that's just not how it works.
Using history to define every little thing and make people change is low IQ. For example, since I’m a black dude, dating a white girl would historically be bad since in segregation times, that’s how black people would get killed. Using those time to define the present is incredibly low IQ. IQ tests are a measure of logical thinking capability, which is the most important thing your brain can do. The point is to segregate those who have high IQ’s and learn from them from those with low IQ’s. This means getting better jobs, schools, etc. There are many low IQ people who are in higher positions, but can’t do their jobs.
Okay, that's not what people mean by history repeats itself or learn from history. There's no such thing as low iq and that's not what iq measures and that's not how your brain works (as far as I know). There's no part that's responsible for 'iq' it's fine tuning of correlation and causation. Brains are computers and even computers don't work like that. Iq increasing generation by generation, do brains 'improve' in biology? Probably no. They just learn something new and how to solve newer problems, I'm not sure how to explain this to you but that just isn't how it works. Secondly your point is moot, most high level positions are occupied by pretty qualified people who did good in tests and went to the better schools (or at least I would think so) unless you're the guy that owns the buisness then it's yours to do or run whatever/however you want with.
Religion bores me too
Religion does not bore me but frustrates me cause I struggle trying to reach my spiritual goals
I don’t believe in such a thing, but good luck I guess
Pls kill yourself if democrats agenda ain't clear to you...
It’s for the low IQ
It means use it everywhere instead of having to go through google searches to find a proctored exam.
If the exam isn't proctored and can be given to people under different circumstances it will no longer be standardized, which would render the scores people get useless.Actually I take that back, there are things you could do to make conditions similar across situations nvm.
If you can’t do shut because you’re too incompetent, then most likely you have a low IQ.
There are 7 different types of intelligence. The smart one knows common sense in everything does not exist. Iq means nothing. What can you do in this world. What can you produce. Hire the one that builds a rocket ship, not the one that talks about rockets. Or lose money in your business having no product to sell.
Yeah it's boring for people who have low iq and who don't know what's going in the world.. cause they are happy in their little rainbow world...😃😃
Not really. I care about how the universe was created through the Big Bang. I care more about STEM.
Well good you are talking to a pre med but that doesn't mean you can't take interest in politics... I love science as much as l love politics...
Dad always politics is show business for ugly people
Not for job entrances, driving tests, school entry, etc
Maybe for school entry they should but that is usually based on exam results.
Politics doesn't run anything, economics does. Drama doesn't mean action, remember that. : ) (Maybe, just maybe)
Politics is for the low IQ
Didn’t I read somewhere that you hated blacks as well?
Not from me. I don't hate anyone based on their ethnicity and race.
Oh. My bad
Why is that?