Your whole comment. Evil people in groups that desire to destroy the peace, livelihoods and cities must die. There's no need for people like that in society. They serve no purpose but to destroy.
Who determines Evil? Who is the wrong side of society? Honestly only history has a final answer but that happens long after. History is made by the victorious after all. I still stand with what i said but it's still a long time till it's finally in stone.
Your conscience can't tell you what is obviously evil?
My conscience like any other person was only the call to action. only after the dust is settled that action becomes questioned. Only after everything is said and done it is determined as a righteous or an evil motivated part of history.
LOL for the Bull meme
The second you destroy someone’s property is the definition of lawlessness. Terrorism is using violence to push your political viewpoint.
@joeldaltonAnd in a civilized state, the response to lawlessness is through legal means, i. e. the judiciary system, with certain exceptions such as threats to your life. That does not mean you can shoot whoever you want in a big crowd of people who happen to commit a crime
@tartaarsaus I have the right to self defense. And the judiciary is sitting with its thumb in its butthole. Normal people who want to take care of their families and go to work are getting fed up with the riots and will ask their representatives to take extreme measures to stop it.
Thou shalt not kill means though shalt not murder. Read my post on this thread. You’ll see a segment of scripture from Exodus that’s says if you kill someone who is breaking and entering at night you’re not guilty of anything. Killing in self defense, to preserve the life of others, both in cases where it’s the last resort and in war are condoned in the Bible.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Funny thing is the rioters and looters count other people's possessions more worthy than their lives.
I do agree that the rioters and looters put more value on possessions than life, but if we average folk did the same would we be any better than them? I agree with the heart of what you are saying, but it would start a slippery slope of killing people for damaging our property, which opens the door to killing people for looking at our property and eventually killing people just for offending us. There has to be a line drawn somewhere on the killing or what is the point of a society?
Have body cams and have owners recording everything when they shoot these devils.
I think they're a good idea. Didn't have them in 1968 and most computers (and their required support equipment and A/C) were the size of a room, if not a small house.
Its not about hatred. Its about protecting what's yours. People will think twice before burning someone's car, house and business knowing they can get their brains blasted if caught in the act.
I trust people to know how to protect their business and possessions. The Koreans sure knew how to protect their personal property during the 1992 L. A. riots with guns to anyone who got near their business to try to rob it or burn it.
You are far more trusting than I
Screw them. I believe they should be killed.
Beyond life. If they are spotted trying to lit a fire to businesses and destroy property then they should be smoked.
Setting fires would be a threat to life
You gonna try to arrest someone of these people. One even shot a cop in the back of the head at point blank range in Vegas. Good luck with that sheriff.
@Exterminatore And good luck to you on your reading comprehension test. "On sight" doesn't mean "When they show intent to do harm", it means "as soon as you see them".
I understand that. I’m saying many of these people are violent offenders. If they even attack police who are already armed with a number of weapons, what do you think many will do to you if you were allowed to arrest them on sight? Also how many pairs of hand cuffs can one person carry? How will you transport them or hold them until they can be turned over to the authorities?
And I don't support you telling me how to run my page.
Its easy for you to say when you don't have your business torched which you depend on to put food on the table for your family. Rioters are horrible human beings not worthy to live in a decent society.
I’ve had a business fail so in a sense that’s like if someone burned it down. Lost $70,000. In the end I’m still grateful to be alive and breathing and that’s an opportunity that I’d take away from someone who may grow to regret their actions. Don’t get me wrong. I believe in justice, so I agree they just suffer the consequences but taking a life for material possessions is not justice. An eye for an eye would be if I go to their homes and burn it down. Now that would be more equal, but definitely not taking their life.
Business failing for a lack of skill or financial trouble doesn't equate to some prick purposely lighting it on fire especially when you did nothing wrong to them.
I agree, but I know what it’s like to come from nothing so I value life more I suppose.
Unbelievable you will say that considering he got jump by the mob and beat up with a skateboard. Kyle was running away from the mob and the mob decided to attack him.
Debate to exactly what? The mob are devils. There's no need for people like them in society.
We can't just execute people. If they are attacking us we can defend ourselves and others but we can't just kill people. Many times we get mad enough to want to do that but that would just be angry talk, not something that we would ever want to aspire to.
Killling off evil and disgusting people from society is a blessing. No need to worry about these devils anymore.
Don't you call yourself a Christian?
Yes. Read the Bible and you'll see God agrees and commands purging out the evil from a society.
New Testament, or the old one?Funny how God agrees with everyone who reads the Bible.
Its what God commands and I agree with it. God was the leader of the ancient Hebrews and gave specific orders how to deal with evil degenerates lest they corrupt the land.
And how does God define "evil degenerates"?People who would terrorise innocent people in a Temple, perhaps?By overturning tables and whipping the privileged, perhaps?Or maybe something else.
Go read the Bible and you'll find out.
That’s no good for obvious reasons but even if it was agreed that was a good law— you never know if they were physically corralled there or not. Innocent people would be murdered.
@VIVANT I’ll put a cow catcher on the front of my car.
That sounds like a fair compromise that we can all agree with
This parable by Jesus is in reference to demon possession but it serve as well to show a spiritual truth that you must be armed and ready to defend your stuff otherwise people will destroy and steal from you.Luke 11:21-22:When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace. But when a stronger than he comes upon him and overcomes him, he takes from him all his armor in which he trusted, and divides his spoils.
That's a metaphor jesus tells after driving a demon out of a mute. the "strong man" is the devil, "his palace" is the world, "his goods" are the possessed, the "stronger than he" is jesus who, upon conquering the demons of those who are possessed, jesus "divideth his spoils" among those now free from possession.You've totally taken it out of context and it's a reach to say to interpret this as shoot rioters on sight without due process of law and a trial by jury.by the way, your proposed law would be unconstitutional because it forgoes the right to a trial by jury. This isn't Afghanistan.
No. You need to re-read it. The strong man is the spiritual sound person but got overtaken by dark forces.And He was casting out a demon, and it was mute. So it was, when the demon had gone out, that the mute spoke; and the multitudes marveled. But some of them said, “He casts out demons by Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.”Others, testing Him, sought from Him a sign from heaven. But He, knowing their thoughts, said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls. If Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? Because you say I cast out demons by Beelzebub. And if I cast out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges. But if I cast out demons with the finger of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace. But when a stronger than he comes upon him and overcomes him, he takes from him all his armor in which he trusted, and divides his spoils.
You have a right to trial when put under arrest according to the constitution.
it's totally unconstitutional. if you're accused of a crime you have a right to due process and a trial by a jury of your peers.
Rioting is in general. Legal in most countries. It's the damage that can get them into trouble.But looters that's a different ball game they can be shot on sight...
Why not? These people are society ticks and waste. Destroying livelihoods and cities which cost often billions in damage.
Thou shall not kill
I think owners of private property have a right to kill if you attempt to destroy their stuff and government according to the Bible have a right to kill evil doers.
I only kill if my family is being harmed