Republicucks, as I like to call them, don't respect democrats. It's just what they do. they never will
It is not you we have a problem with, it is your actions. Similar to how a family hates the drugs that their drug-addicted child is struggling with but not the child him/herself. Your behavior should be condemned as it is detrimental to society. You are 16 anyways, you will probably outgrow this phase soon.
You have a problem with gays and abortionists. GET OVER IT
Exactly. I don’t have anything against gay people personally, but I personally dissaprove of such choices.
And according to popular sovereignty, states should have a right to abolish such acts that they deem detrimental by popular vote.
@FackThePackers21 I think it would be nice if Christians and atheists could co-exist peacefully in different states. People with different values should migrate to different areas.
@Dave31989 You've already said that, mate.
Also I blocked Dave by the way. He was really FREAKING out bro lol
Ahahahahaha, no keep them unblocked. It's interesting seeing how the libtards view ongoing events. Sometimes their view surprise even me based on how ridiculous and far-from-the-truth they are.
Too bad boo hoo
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
have you not looked around? it already is a war. Fuck the left and fuck you too.
Like I said, they need to know when to let it go.
Like i said Fuck the left and fuck you too.
Get over it.
Why would I “think about” being gay if I’m only attracted to women? 😂😂😂
Apparently you lack reading comprehension too. If we're referring to gay marriage as an issue, assuming you've never thought about it wouldn't be to say that you're gay. It would we to say that you haven't thought about the legality of gay marriage or about other people who might be gay. The world exists beyond you.Based on your previous posts, I don't even know why I'm responding to you. Your political analyses read more like a student's attempt at mimicking his father's views than anything else. Almost everything you wrote about the ramifications of the SCOTUS issue on a previous post was ridiculous and it took another conservative to actually tell you that.
The legality of homosexuality was never at question. Homosexual marriage, however, is violating an established system and should be abolished.
@FackThePackers21 An established system according to who? Marriage is an evolving social tradition that began over 2000 years before Jesus was even born. This is setting aside the legal issues involved with hospital visitation rights, adoption, tax cuts, and related government benefits that are not captured in the common law contract in the USA. This isn't about gay people wanting to show up at your church and have an orgy to spite you. They want equality under the law, and the ability to have a federally recognized institution that bestows equal rights to a gay couple as to a straight couple.
Religion didn't begin with Jesus, bub. Past Prophets all preached normal marriage. The thing is, a straight couple isn't the same as a "gay" couple. Therefore, they can't have equal rights. That's like giving maternity leave to men.
@FackThePackers21 ? Ancient marriage had nothing at all to do with religion. Or even love for that matter. Ancient marriage existed to prevent female infidelity and to ensure a man that his children were his. There existed no opinions of "Prophets" at the time.Also, what you're calling "Maternity Leave for men" exists. It's called Paternity Leave. And it exists in many countries that have a high standard of living index.
Two guys making out sounds gross to me 🤷♂️
Oh you got a rainbow flag in your background. Lol that explains it
Again I ask, so what?
I believe in Christian Theocracy not Democracy. Humanity is naturally sinful
Those are two very liberal positions
You sure your not independent?
He's a troll lol
Yess definitely sure. Everyone is entitled to make whatever choices in life that they want. No reason for me to judge or take away rights
God has a plan for humanity and homosexual relations isn’t part of his plan.
@FackThePackers21 Exactly. People need to understand that homosexual thoughts are involuntary but actions are punishable.
I understand your beliefs but as an atheist I dont agree. Banning gay marriage won't save their souls, will it?
That's not the point. For one, it's violating the institution of marriage that is sacred to theists. Secondly, it would deter more people from choosing the "Homosexual lifestyle."
@FackThePackers21 Who decides to be gay? Most people just like who they like. I don't think it is a choice.
Science says otherwise bro, https://www. BBC. com/news/health-49484490
@SuccessfulHornDog It absolutely would. God does not punish people for involuntary thoughts but only acts of immorality.
This video sums up the Abrahamic religions' views on homosexuality: https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=tH21ykq05ow
@FackThePackers21 That video doesn't prove anything. I heard something that stuck with me about the timing of the release sex hormones in utero. That explains why there is no specific gene in gays. It could be considered a birth defect, even though that is not a pleasant thing for a gay person to hear.What if there is a gay gene but it is only present in the mother and that causes the altered development of the fetus?Just some possibilities
The study above proved that it wasn't scientific. The video was simply a religious view of homosexuality. What you are saying may be plausible but it's all just blubbering until proven otherwise. Until now, there is no biological indicator of sexuality.
@FackThePackers21 Is there any test for depression or anxiety? How about for alcoholism. I doubt that there is a single gene responsible but it could be the result of multiple genes that set up a condition in which these conditions could exist
@FackThePackers21 Actually the consensus among the scientific community that studies this (i. e. Psychology, Psychiatry, Neurology, Genetics Neuroscience, etc) is that sexuality is most certainly biological/genetic, just like many other psychological behaviors. Intelligence, personality, temperament, emotions, perception, etc are all rooted in biology, so it would be extremely odd if sexuality was randomly the only behavior not caused in part by our biology/genetics. If sexuality was not caused by biology but was purely environmental then that would mean we would not only be able to choose our sexuality, but also change at will. However, studies carried out in the mid-1900s clearly showed that you cannot change someone's sexuality. That link you presented earlier about science not finding a "single gay gene" proves nothing and shows your ignorance on this topic. Scientists have always been under the impression that multiple genes (not a single one) are responsible, the same way multiple genes are responsible for just about everything else about us.
@Starrk That is just a hypothesis, until this day there has been no biological indicator of homosexuality. It is what it is. I do get where you're coming from though, I should've explained the study better. Thanks for your input.
@FackThePackers21 You are correct that scientist do not have anything concrete at the moment, but current studies have discovered genes they believe to be involved in sexual orientation and enough data from twin studies (monozygotic twins) to accurately know that biology plays a role in sexual orientation. So while we don't have anything rock solid that we can point to with confidence, our current findings are pointing us into the direction of biology playing a role as opposed to it being entirely environmental.Also as a disclaimer. When talking about sexual orientation, the term "environment" is not referring to one's social upbringing, culture, peer group or life experience, but instead the prenatal environment a fetus is exposed to in the womb. Our mom's womb is the first enviornment we are exposed to. The chemical/hormones we are exposed to in our mom's womb can have irreversible effects on the neurodevelopment of a fetus and thus impact the fetus' future behavior. So even if science comes out and say "homosexuality is 100% environmental", that still doesn't mean it's a choice and it certainly doesn't mean it can be magically changed.
@Starrk Not "magically changed," through therapy. There's a long track-record of success. Of course it doesn't work for everyone. Just like how some people can never get off drugs.
@FackThePackers21 As a Psychology graduate, I can assure you there is no long track record of successful therapy in changing one's sexuality. Actually, it's the opposite. Also, there is nothing inherently wrong with being gay, straight, bisexual, or asexual, so actually, there is nothing to "fix" or "change".
@Starrk You are entitled to your opinion, I have many studies and references that I can bring up but then again there are others supporting your point of view.
@FackThePackers21 I would love to see those studies because I know for a FACT that there is no empirical or scientific basis for the claim that "sexual orientation can be changed with simple therapy or any other method". The American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association would have been caught word of such a study.Whatever studies you're alluding to, I can guarantee you they're not empirically sound.