Second amendment? Yes! Hopefully he does something about the idiotic fascination with arms this country has. “He has admited to wanting socialist policies so we are screwed there as well.” what does that even mean?War, I give you that, he’ll most likely start a war and that fucking sucks.
@NYlatefun Right, because as we all know law abiding americans are all criminals and need to be punished. Also lets ignore the fact that 80% of guns used in crimes are stolen, are used in crimes by criminals who don't obey the law, every time a nation bans guns their crime rights jump (yes, this happened in the UK and in Australia (and in fact the University of sydney proved that it did nothing to stop violence), and lest ignore the fact that over a million crimes are stopped a year with non violent force by armed citizens. Also lets ignore the fact that the only reason why you would want to prevent a person from protecting themselves is because you intend on hurting them in some way (the reason why we have the amendment to begin with).Socialist policies means socialist policies, increased welfare which harms the people (provable), increased taxes which hurts the people (provable) more government control over peoples lives which means less freedom (provable) etc. etc. (I mean going after the second amendment is just one of many examples of socialist policies (every socialist nation did this before they took full power and butchered there political opponents (every single fucking time which is weird why we have to have this play out again (and you will say well the next time will be different as the left always does)). Yes, war sucks, why you would support a man who was fully behind Obama's wars (who had the more then any other president in history) is beyond me, but its likely because the left doesn't value human life (hence no democrats denouncing the far left violence, the execution of multiple conservatives across the country etc.).
Your reply about “socialist policies” tells me that you haven’t read their proposals. No, Biden won’t increase taxes for the average American, for people making over $400k/yr, most Americans aren’t there. So no it’s not provable.
"I'd rather Hillary win, because at least she didn't get carried in by a guy." Bill has nothing to do with Hillary's political career?
While he introduced it, she ran it. And it's the people's choice to have her as president. a lot of people hated bill.
I doubt she would have been Secretary of State if her husband had not previously been our president.
Nah, Clinton was terrible. He ruined many families how he dealt with the drug epidemic. The only reason she got a following, was because people didn't like trump and where voting against trump not for Clinton and of course there's her being a female where you had women wanting a president, etc etc. I'm just saying Hillary, because she actally ran for the president position herself
Also, Kamala doesn't even like biden. She called him racist and sexist, she's just coming along for the ride.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What bible thumpers? As for right wingers acting insane and hysterical, have you lived under a rock for the past four years? What the hell do you think the left has been doing? Also we have multiple states, MULTIPLE STATES with huge issues of voter fraud currently, all of which are in favor of democrats (apparently this vote was so important that dead democrats started voting in florida). I think your very much mistaken in this (conservatives are going to lose their shit but they have every right to do so because the democrats have done everything in their power to destroy our system (they have violated multiple constitionally protected rights and have tried to destroy our electoral system among other things).
If you make more than $400k a year or take short term capital gains on your investments and your net worth is over $1 million, yes you’ll pay more with Biden. Only marginally, but more. otherwise you’re fine.
@NYlatefun No. At which point have democrats reduced taxes? They haven't, trump did but democrats never have. Also you will pay more because your punishing people for making money, that means they will have less incentive to work that hard (if you know you can move up a tax bracket and get screwed over why would you?). Businesses get taxed more so that means they will pay less because their bottom line won't change, it just changes who gets what is left over and it won't be the workers. This is why these systems fail constantly, they don't take into account how the world actually works or what motivates people, they sound pretty on paper but can't function in reality.
@hellionthesagereborn Did you understand my reply? I’m just stating the facts. Under Biden wealthier people would pay more than under Trump, that’s it.
@NYlatefun Yeah, because Trump reduced taxes for every one (but especially the middle class), what your stating is that under bidens tax plan we will all some how pay less which is absolutely false because he admited to rolling back Trumps tax plan meaning our taxes will go up and so will the wealthy. We all pay more under Biden, not just the rich. That is a fact.
@hellionthesagereborn what Biden is proposing is what I stated above, again, taxing the wealthier. 🤦♂️
@NYlatefun No, he is proposing rolling back trump tax cuts and then charging the wealthy more. www.washingtonexaminer.com/.../biden-promises-to-undo-most-of-the-trump-tax-cutsAlso again, taxing the "wealthy" i. e. people who are better off then others but not the super rich i. e. 400,000 dollars a year vs. the million and billionaires (like himself) is going to have a sever impact on every one hence the reduced taxes Trump gave resulting in an overall in crease in wages for people (blue collar specifically but to a lesser extent white collar workers as well). So no, that is not all he is doing, more taxes for every one, extra taxes for those who make 400,000 dollars a year.
Im worried about Biden sparking shit back up in Syria and piss Russia off with Ukraine. Trump at least kept the peace with an adversary.
"Allies" disliked Trump because he called them out on their bullshit. They loved the sugar daddy America that fudge packer Obama created
Lol that doesn’t make any sense! Trump followers = conspiracy theorists!
I thought Trump was elected partly because the Obama economy ended so badly
@Tea-Spaghetti No... Perhaps google Dem presidents vs Repub presidents on economy. The graphs are staggering.
I feel like these charts show that Obama economy was not really that great? www.businessinsider.com/charts-contrasting-trump-economy-obama-bush-administrations-republicans-democrats-2020-10
Well to be fair I don't understand the graphs too well but according to articles I read the economy went up and down largely out of the control of presidents sometimes.
@Tea-Spaghetti Do you know how graphs work?
Yes I know how graphs work but I don't really understand how economics work so I kind of hands off the subject. Overall though it seems though that Trump and Obama economy were not too different because economies are outside the control of presidents oftentimes.
Like what this guy said at the end of his article basically www.latimes.com/.../trump-vs-obama-who-really-did-better-on-the-economy
Anyways I think the one who doesn't know how to read graphs is you because I didn't see a significant difference between Obama and Trump graphs and yet you said Obama had "record economic growth"? Like where did you pull that from your butt?
@Tea-Spaghetti (slaps face) the actual growth is much higher during Obama’s term than Trump’s. You have to look beyond the “lines” in the graph and look at the numbers...