13. Voting machines used in 33 states proven to switch votes from Biden to Trump.14. Media calling Arizona while the polls were still open.15. 95% voter Turnout in Philadelphia where the poll watchers were ejected.16. Whistleblowers willing to testify to voter fraud.
@genuinlysensitive How many rounds we need to go? You really want to just keep repeating outlandish theories and anyone take you seriously? I mean, I'm not playing anymore, instead I will do what the media finally figured out.LOL at youDismiss youignore your tantrums and aftershocksBut I'm feeling mildly generous so here's a laughable debunk of #14
14.https://youtu.be/OJDKS3d2RHkStill waiting on you to debunk this or the other cliams. While you are waiting, here is some more:www.zerohedge.com/.../it-defies-logic-scientist-finds-telltale-signs-election-fraud-after-analyzing-mail-ballotwww.msn.com/.../ar-BB1aKTybwww.msn.com/.../ar-BB1aMk7c
@genuinlysensitive All of those assertions were thrown out of court for lack of evidence, so I don't need to PROVE anything.Here's something interesting for you:www.thevintagenews.com/.../Be careful when siding with dictators. I'm done with you and your facist leader.
Says a lot about you when uou accuse someome of being a fascist when they clearly aren't. An actual fascist wouldn't have even held the elections to begin with.
How easy it is for you to dismiss the transition from Democracy to Fascism. It doesn't happen overnight. It's been slowly happening for 4 years now, you just don't see it, and if anything, your support is nothing short of enabling it. I will not respond to you any further, it's pointless.
Be Careful siding with dictators. People who try to rig elections are FASCISTS in the Truest sense!The fact that they GO to court is fact that they are evidence:1. 138k ballots for Biden is from the raw election data2-7 ballots found in dumpster 2-3 CONFIRMED by yourself8-9 CONFIRMED by yourself, Can you see a ballot clearly 25 feet away? The whole point is to ensure the votes are counted CORRECTLY, if you can't see the votes how can you do your job? This is what third world dictators do:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-3724319010. Never even seen this11. It says right on the ballot "Do not use sharpie or marker", also here is the OFFICIAL Pima county video on filling out ballots:https://youtu.be/5qbYV9BHKak12. As of 5 days ago there were about 10,000 dead people found voting in one county in Michigan.
@genuinlysensitive Hey as I said, I'm done proving you wrong. Every assertion you've made has been thrown out of court because the [lack of] evidence didn't support the accusations.Trump is as of today ZERO for 19 cases. The CISA and DHS have both released statements saying there's been no legitimate fraud, and that this was the most secure election we've ever had.You are clinging to fairy tales in a universe full of alternative facts that cannot be supported. In the real world, the facts support that Trump lost. Get over it and stop being a sore loser FFS.
True in 2016 Hillary supporters were called "sore losers" and they have been proving it EVER scince. Despite multiple recounts in 2016, and 3 years of a DEBUNKED "Russia Collusion" attempt, they refuse to investigate clear evidence of election fraud.
I like how the left screamed Putin in 2016 but now have turned the other way around and say that interfering with the elections can't happen.
Like the "right wing conspiracy theories" that:-There are no WMDs in Iraq-Hillary polls are fake-The Steele Dossier is fake-Russian Collusion was a hoax-Nick Sandman didn't initiate or harass anyone and was actually a victim of harassment and slander/libel by several media outlets-Kavanaugh wasn't a rapist -The Ukraine impeachment was a hoax-The Coronavirus came out of the BSL 4 lab in Wuhan-BLM and Antifa were rioting killing people and causing Billions in damage, and what was called "Mostly peaceful protests" were RIOTS!Like those "right wing conspiracies"?
so much evidence - Such as the only problems were limited to the battleground states - pure coincidence. riiiiiight
Maybe the Trump driven alternate media is conditioning you. There will be no evidence. He's never had any for anything he says.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
And by the way. . . what the fuck is a guy from Latvia doing trying to critique an American election. I have been to Latvia. You guys have nothing to say to any nation when it comes to corruption in government.
"what the fuck is a guy from Latvia doing trying to critique an American election."What is an American doing when he's telling me what I can and can not do? Freedom, baby.
I am free to claim a lot of shit. . .But if it is shit. . . it is shit. Freedom does not change the nature of fact.
Poll watchers were ejected in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Arizona, that alone is enough to nullify the result and send people to jail. Days later after "finding" hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden he takes the states. This is the element in America that "truly embraces authoritarianism and fascism".
@genuinlysensitive Nope poll watchers were not ejected. You guys are just posting lies. There were no ballots "found". And everything you post is coming out of trump's mouth. People challenging the election were not allowed inside these facilities.They are not poll watchers. Both the Republicans and Democrats have poll watchers at every single election.
Your 'fact of the matter' still doesn't change the overarching fact that I am free to post.
Yep and so am I.Just pointing out you are not an American citizen. No one here comments on the corruption in Latvia seeking to sow discontent there.
"Yep and so am I."-Agreed."Just pointing out you are not an American citizen."-I wouldn't have noticed."No one here comments on the corruption in Latvia seeking to sow discontent there."-Most of the former USSR is full of corruption, it would be like calling a spade a spade. But you're free to do so, no one's stopping you.Also, pointing out corruption sows discontent? So you mean one side is for corruption? Why would they be discontent from it being pointed out?
No one is stopping me? What good does it do me?If/when Latvians collectively want a new government and a new system, they will rise up and install one. It is none of my business.The difference is you have your nose in the United States, a nation who knows a lot more about free/fair elections than Latvia does.
"What good does it do me?"-I dunno, that would be up to you."... they will rise up and install one. It is none of my business.''-Sure, if you say so."the United States, a nation who knows a lot more about free/fair elections than Latvia does.''-I wouldn't have my nose up in it if that were actually the case. That and it's (at least for now) the current world superpower - whether you like it or not, it is in my interests to keep up with your politics.
ok, I'm genuinelly curious now, because the two of us have had this kind discussion multiple times now. If you were to be as blunt as humanly possible - what is it that you want me to do? Is it to not express my opinions on matters that are outside of my country? Specifically in regards to the US?
This seems have upset you. I mean, my point is simple. You are from Lativa. A nation, I have visited. It is well known the corruption and issues Latvia has. But I am not Latvian. I know nothing about Latvian culture or people. Many nations on this earth have much worse issues than Latvia has. Why would I throw stones at their culture, government or nation?But you came here to criticize the American electoral process, without knowing a thing about it. Because our system isn't like most systems. It is decentralized. And the reason why so many Republicans refuse back Trump's claim is because they used the same system in this election to keep their respective offices. Georgia has a Republican governor and Attorney General. But you know so little, it isn't like that would mean anything. We both know this isn't a discussion about any evidence or real claims.And please. . . you don't care about free and fair. Because you don't even care about what is happening in your own country. As for the influence you pretend the U. S. has over Lativa. . .too bad. . . so sad. I mean, move to Russia. That should solve your issues.
If you were actually serious about freedom and fairness. . . bluntly, you would start with your own nation.The system we have in place is brilliant. Each state has their own process for conducting elections. This system was built to combat the ability of a single state to corrupt the process. Trump could claim that one state screwed him. But to claim that five states coordinated against him but the claim is dog poo. . . because Republicans not only conducted the election in those states. . . they were even re-elected in the same election.Other nations tally total votes. Or have run offs when there is less than 50%, etc. But our system allows for states run by democrats, republicans and other parties to participate, oversee and decide the process.It isn't infallible. But it is as full-proof as it gets.So speak to me. . . when your concern about fairness isn't full of political bias.
- I am not upset, fyi.- How am I throwing stones by pointing out the flaws of another country? Nothing in this universe is above scrutiny."I mean, move to Russia. That should solve your issues."-And here I can say that you don't know anything about Eastern European relations because all that would accomplish is a life of misery and would do me no good.In the end - you neglected to directly say what's on your mind, you merely repeated your somewhat vague point again and I am left to, yet again, repeat my own - I will continue on posting my opinion wherever, whenever, to whomever, and however I want and you are fully welcome to criticize me but it does not do anything to stop me from expressing my opinion - warranted or not, informed or not, needed or not. I will express it, if I so please. It really is as simple as that. I suggest you just learn to get used to it, instead of fruitlessly bringing it up each time because I haven't had the slightest inclination to change afer the dozens of criticisms from you. Don't you yourself see it as a futile effort to deter me at this point?
"-And here I can say that you don't know anything about Eastern European relations because all that would accomplish is a life of misery and would do me no good."You know what? You are right. Now just find the question or take where I talk about Eastern European relations and make the claim that I know more than Eastern Europeans themselves.I can wait. We have time.I mean, your point is obvious. You are the expert on American politics even as Americans correct you on your assumptions. But no one knows more about Eastern Europe than you. I made no vague point. Dude, you said the same thing at the beginning of this conversation. That you have an opinion. So I said. . . people can have opinions about a lot things.Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one.Informed opinions are different.So I am just pointing that out. You are a Latvian from Latvia. . . a nation that has more problems with corruption that the U. S. And you are lecturing us on what you feel are irregularities without knowing a single thing about how our process works.So I was just letting folks know the context for your "opinion".If that makes you angry. . . too bad. . . so sad.
-You obviously still don't get my point or you are purposefully ignoring it. At no point have I ever said that I am an expert on all things American.-Where am I lecturing? I am merely asking questions and expressing opinions. Point me to the exact post where I was actually lecturing you people. I'll wait.And as I have already stated (a statement you continue to ignore) - I am not angry. Just confused at your insistance that I dissist from posting. I still do not yet know of the full reasoning behind your displeasure over my posts because you continue on restating the same vague "you're not from here so begone" statements.
"You obviously still don't get my point or you are purposefully ignoring it. At no point have I ever said that I am an expert on all things American."Ah. . . so let's start being disingenuous. That was never my claim. You are lecturing us on our election. You are elevating baseless claims that actually has lead to election officials receiving death threats for the first time in their lives. And you are thousands of miles away in Lativa parroting these lies.I would never be so bold. Not just about Latvia. . . but about any nation or culture. I would have to know a lot more than I know now. . . and I would have more evidence than youtube videos.So you are going to claim I told you to stop posting.Nope!I gave context for your claims.Again, if that makes you angry, too bad so sad.I say you are angry because you constantly misquote me. My words are right in front of you.
No you're the one constantly misquoting me.
Yawn. . . never misquoted, you. I spoke directly to your claims. You claimed all of these votes were found in dumpsters based nonsense you found on the net.You have nothing that actually was discovered by election officials, filed in a court case or brought to the attention of investigators. And you tell the forum the election was a sham.So I gave context for your argument. And you have been pissed ever since.Here is a case of actual vote fraud that has been charged. But you didn't post it. I wonder why?www.kwtx.com/.../
And as I have said a bajillion times now - I can express opinions however I want - I don't have to come with a butload of links to fraudulency claims.You can look here for one https://everylegalvote.com/countryThen there are plenty of discrepancies
Also, you are still being disingenious and condescending. I've told you three times in a row I'm not mad and yo continue to insist on it, ignoring my written word. If you won't take me for my word, I feel no need to heed anything you say because it would fall on deaf ears anyway.
"People challenging the election were not allowed inside these facilities." So that is the deal? Anyone who is a republican is "challenging the election" and not allowed in? LMAO Kim Jung Un could come up with a LESS lame response!
Nah, you didn't say that a badjillion times. You just repeated false claims and said you had a right to your opinion.And I again for the badjillionth time gave context for those claims. You have been pissed off at me for that, but I don't care. I will just keep cutting and pasting the same response.
Haha!!! You are pissed at me for being condescending. I will admit to that. I am no where near disingenuous. I am totally serious with you about my views. It is hilarious that the man spreading conspiracy theories online is talking about being disingenuous.
Not that you will but you might be interested in watching this www.youtube.com/watch
It's not official yet, watch your mouth.
"only voted to get the dictator out of office" do you realize how ironic this statement is You can't vote out a dictator...
A dictator also wouldn't allow himself to be ousted by an election.
@mistixs there is already talks of “what if he doesn’t leave the White House” and how he will be escorted out for trespassing simply because he just cannot accept defeat. Shut your feeble minded ass up, fuckin twat. He was voted out. Now we’re gonna see if his bitch ass is going to leave willingly.
@Usernamej58 well I wouldn’t be so eager to leave my safe place if jail was hanging in the balance for me. We will see what he thinks he’s going to do. He is Hitler incarnate and his supporters can suck a fat one.
There was no need to be disrespectful to others, merely because they disagreed.
www.forbes.com/.../ here is a proof for you.
"he will be escorted out for trespassing simply because he just cannot accept defeat" The definition of a dictator is "a person exercising absolute power" and if people can escort him out, then he doesn't have absolute power, so he's not a dictator. Comparing our country to Nazi Germany demonstrates you have no idea how privileged you are. Try going to many other countries & publicly wishing death on the country's leader, like many liberals did when Trump was diagnosed with COVID. See what happens.
There have been talk's of that for over a year. They have been planning this fraud for at least two. They ejected poll watchers, "found" hundreds of thousands of ballots only for biden, Voting machines switched votes from Trump to Biden, confirmed dead people voting by the thousands, and hundreds of whistleblowers in swing states have come forward to sign affidavits that they saw voter fraud. You do realize that voter fraud is what dictators do right? Hail Biden Jun Un!
Says the people who cried about fake Russian interference for 4 years
Like it or not Biden is your president and Kamala is your vice president “if you don't like it here then leave ”😂
@captain_voidwalker Putin engaged in a massive disinformation campaign to elect Trump. Do you know who uncovered that? Trump's own intelligent agencies!
There is no definitive evidence that the election was rigged on a wide enough scale to effect the election outcome, yes; however, there were many voter irregularities that need to be investigated. If you think otherwise you are either uninformed, a credulous moron, or a partisan hack job.
Some things should be investigated but I kinda find it pointless because it won't help Trump win
Voting machines switched votes from Trump to Biden, Poll watchers ejected illegally, ballots recieved after the deadline, hundreds of thousands of ballots all for Joe Biden at 4 am across six swing states "found", hundreds of thousands of votes "found" on flashdrives for Joe Biden. Sounds like a North Korean election. Those elctions are fair... right?
@genuinlysensitive Yup. If it looks like a duck, and acts like a duck, and sounds like a duck, the odds are that it IS a duck!
@Massageman My comments keep dissapearing. I guess "someone" doesn't like me pointing out that Poll watchers were forcibly ejected in multiple swing states, software "glitches" aka features confirmed to change votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of thousands of ballots found all for Biden, 95% turnout in Philadelphia. All signs of vote rigging, even the BBC agress:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190
Trumpers just hate facts, don't they? LOL
You mean the areas containing many poor or black people that were shipped broken voting machines so they'd have to queue for 5, 6 or more hours when 10 miles away rich white people were voting republican and saying they didn't see a problem?Or how about the attempts to change the rules to require ID for voting, which tends to disadvantage the poor as they can't afford passports of driving licenses?Or do you mean the part where armed groups attempted to storm the counting centres?Or the part where the sitting president attempted to stop the counting of legally placed mail-in votes?
@PhilEvans No, I think she means closing down most of the polling places in predominantly black communities. OR maybe she means limiting ballot drop boxes to one per county in major metro area thought to be Democratic strongholds so a million people had to use the same drop box and some had to drive 40 minutes to get there. OR maybe she means using robocalls to target minorities falsely telling them if they've had any credit problems voting by mail could make it easier for them to be sued.OR maybe she means trying to use the power of the presidency to literally make the post office intentionally slow the delivery of mail-in ballots.
1) you don't have to make two accounts to get your point across2) please provide sources. I'm curious why I haven't heard about these things when I likely would have heard of them because the media is heavily biased against Trump and will jump at any opportunity to make him look bad.I say this as someone whose political views are deemed "liberal" or "Democrat" by every online test.
I have nothing to do with Phil Evans or his account but I appreciate the false accusation with no evidence. I saw his post and decided to add some more ways in which the right wing tried to surpress the vote because he had missed some and you clearly need to be aware of all of them. After all Trump and his toadies did to suppress people's opportunity to vote in the first place, having people like you suggest there were shady things that were done by the Democrats is genuinely galling.The examples I cited are pretty well known and a minimal effort on Google on your part will give you all the information you need but since I'm a nice guy, I'll give you some hints. The robocalls were in the Detroit and Flint, Michigan areas, the limiting of drop boxes was by order of the Governor of Texas, If you google "closing polling places", you'll see it has been happening all over the red states in minority areas and as far as the Post Office, no one should have to give you information on that. It's been a national story for months.Now your turn, validate your claims of "shady" aspects of the election with some proof, not right wing unfounded accusations, but proof.
You can believe I'm yet another sockpuppet, if you like, but here are some links:Robocalls: Do you think Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl will end up in jail? ↗Texas:www.washingtonpost.com/.../Drop box limiting was also in Ohio, even after three judges ruled it was unreasonable.www.pbs.org/.../dispute-over-ohio-drop-box-limit-ends-as-advocates-drop-suitThe voting rights act used to protect voters against unreasonable changes to voting laws in states with a history of racism. The Roberts court decided it was no longer needed, and now there are 1600 fewer polling places:www.motherjones.com/.../
@PhilEvans You are kidding, right? The left-wing fraud apparatus is a well-oiled machine with decades of experience. The right is pathetically just beginning to learn how the left has stolen elections for decades. Do one second of research and you will see the legions of vote harvesting, outright theft of ballots, duplicate ballots, tens of thousand of votes cast with just one vote at the top "BIDEN". No one votes like this, almost EVERYONE votes down ballot.Liberal fraud is undeniable, unmistakable, unforgivable, and essentially a declaration of WAR on the average American.
@KrakenAttackin We might find people claiming those things, but no evidence.
@jakerson181 who TF do you think runs those polling places? Even in my suburbia the polling places are run mostly by angry black women.
@KrakenAttackin Why are you responding to posts from 18 days ago? Is there really that little going on in your life? Take your racism and go burn in hell, you fucktard.
@jakerson181 Ooooh... Little Jakerson is on his period. You need to keep drinking Soy to get your hormones on balance sweetie.
@KrakenAttackin Great comeback, you pathetic tool.
Well poll watchers were ejected in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, and Nevada, all violating state law, so that alone pretty much invalidates the results. Interestingly all the areas they were ejected Philadelphia, Pheonix, Detriot, and Las Vegas, all had massive voter turnout all going for Biden. Accoring to the BBC these are red flags of voter fraud.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190
Poll watchers were forcibly ejected in multiple states, and the areas they were ejected had 95%+ voter turnout all for Biden. Even the BBC says these are red flags of voter rigging. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190
Poll watchers ejected from polls in 4 states violating state law. That alone is evidence of voter fraud and those 4 states easily swing the elction. On top of that you have voting machines used in 33 states confirmed to be switching votes from Trump to Biden. Not to mention all the ballots "found" after the election deadline hundreds of thousands in all 6 swing states literally all going for Biden. And you say that there is NO proof?
Yeah, Biden was kind of a nobody before 2020 other than being Vice President of the United States for 8 years and a popular senator before that for 30 years and having run for president twice before. Yeah other than that, almost no one knew who he was. You're really funny bro. Do they have comedy clubs in Pakistan?
Go and ask a random American on the street when they first heard of Joe Biden, only political addicts knew of him before. Also, nobody cares about Vice presidents.
Dude, you're some guy 7000 miles away in fucking Pakistan for God's sake. Everybody knows who the Vice President of the country is. How do you even have the stones to think you have the slightest idea of what people on the street in the U. S. know or don't know about Joe Biden? Where does that kind of audacity come from? You just make yourself look like a complete fool.
Don't be so emotional, sweetie.
There's no emotion involved. I'm just trying to help you understand how clueless you are. But I fear my efforts are in vain.
Dems didn't accept reality in 2016.
@purplepoppy Pay attention here, you are witnessing the beginnings of a civil war in the U. S.
I wonder what you thought about democrats expressing the idea of Russian collusion in 2016?
@ThisDudeHere Americans do what the fuck they want anyway
I assumed you were American, my bad.
"credible source"? What is a credible source to you? The same sources that said the Steele Dossier was real? The same sources that said Russian Collusion was real? The same sources that said Kavanaugh was a rapist? The same sources that said Ukrainegate was real? The same sources that said Nick Sandman "harassed" a Native American man? The same sources that said Trump said to "inject bleach"? Yea because THOSE don't sound like very credible sources!
@genuinlysensitive So do you have any evidence from a credible source or not? Or just project veritas bullshit, facebook posts, trump tweets and silly memes.
@genuinlysensitive why doesn't project veritas take their supposed evidence to the fbi so they'll start an investigation? i'm sure trump would welcome that and even help them. oh i know. because it's all bullshit and they'd probably be arrested for making phony accusations.
They already have taken it to the DOJ.
@genuinlysensitive Trump has filed 10 lawsuits alleging voter fraud so far and lost ALL of them because he has no evidence. lol. It'll be the same result with any project veritas bullshit.
@genuinlysensitive Looks like project veritas is in trouble for bringing fake allegations to the authorities. 😂 Gee, who couldn't see that coming?www.salon.com/.../
@jakerson181Really? Instead of having a civilized debate, all you do is go around the website and insult those who have different views than yourself.
@ADFSDF1996 No, I insult people who go around the web making up stories about a "sham" election with absolutely zero evidence. I'm always happy to have a civilized debate, in fact I prefer it, but those people aren''t interested in having that or hearing a differing viewpoint. They are only interested in spreading misinformation to support their partisan agenda in delegitimizing a legitmate outcome and in doing so, weakening one of this country's most cherished institutions, free and fair elections and making us look like a laughingstock in the eyes of the world. And I'm sure, you recognize exactly what they are trying to do as well. So save your disingenuous rhetoric about civilized debates. With all the propaganda I've seen you spread, you're not the person to lecture anyone else.
Well lets see there is confirmed software used in 33 states that was found to switch votes for Trump to votes for Biden, poll watchers ejected in mulitple swing states, and multiple instances of 4 am ballots being "found" all for Biden, to start.
@genuinlysensitive That's all complete bullshit that has already been debunked and you know it. Nice try though. See here's the thing you Trumptards just don't seem to grasp. You can claim things are "confirmed" all you want, but you can never offer objective proof and you think baseless accusations from right wing blogs or Youtube videos are "evidence". That's not the way those of us in the real world prove things, skippy.
Lol so much for being interested in "civil debate".
@genuinlysensitive Are you really interest in civil debate? You'll change my mind by presenting proof, not memes. You can start with proof about those 4 a. m. "found ballots".
@genuinlysensitive And just to help you, the U. S. intelligence community under Trump verified there was election interference by the Russians by trolling and spreading misinformation on social media and hacking e-mail accounts. But no one has claimed they actually falsified votes or dumped fraudulent ballots into the system. But great try at false equivalencies.
Lol, You are going with the Debunked "Russian Collusian" what's next, there are WMD's in Iraq, we just haven't found them yet? www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../Also there are cases of electronic voter fraud switching votes, but from republicans to democrats:www.msn.com/.../ar-BB1aKTybwww.msn.com/.../ar-BB1aMk7c
@genuinlysensitive The Gateway Pundit? According to Media Bais fact Check "Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news." Not exactly the New York Times, is it?And are you still seriously still linking those two other articles? Did I already not address them in your other question earlier? "So there was a glitch and the Democratic County Clerk saw the error as she audited the results and called the city clerk to change it and award the victory to a Republican."That's your evidence of fraud by the Democrats? That a Democratic clerk saw a mistake had been made by the software and she changed to results to give the win to a Republican instead of a Democrat? You didn't even read your own article cause the article makes your claim of intentional fraud look ridiculous and you look like an fucking idiot. Listen, you mental midget, stop wasting my time with this far right wing blog conspiracy bullshit. Either provide documented evidence of fraud or fuck off. On second thought, just fuck off.
When there is a "glitch" that only switches votes from one party to another, it is NOT a glitch, it is a FEATURE. Thankfully not all democrats hate America enough to go along with the fraud! Not to mention we have screen shot evidence of those 150k or so votes ALL for Biden, and one of the poll watchers who saw the 4 am delivery. As for "media fact checkers" these are the same people who:-said there were WMDs in Iraq-said Hillary would win-said Russian Collusion was real-said Kavanaugh was a rapist-said Sandman instigated harrasment against a Native American-said the Ukraine hoax was real-said that the Coronavirus came out of a fish market-coined the phrase "mostly peaceful protests" to describe riotsYea doesn't sound like they are too "reliable" to me...As for your trolling and name calling, I give it a 4. Go Home To Mommy!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Oogo1Zu5To
@genuinlysensitive Media fact check bias assesses the impartiality of websites. All the things you claim they 'said" is just the pathetic babbling of a conspiracy theory junkie who gets all his "facts" from far right opinion blogs. It's really the sign of someone thoroughly cocooned in their echo chamber and afraid to come out.I've tried to help you but you're too afraid of reality to let go of the conspiracy bullshit your right wing con artist conspiracy bloggers have brainwashed you with. So keep posting your articles with anonymous scientists and poll watchers who only speak Mandarin and the rest of us will watch you guys flail around like turtles on their back with a mixture of amusement and disgust as your lawsuits get laughed out of court and your conspiracy theories get debunked. All of your claims don't amount to a pile of spit and we will both get to watch Joe Biden sworn in on January 20th. If I have a Biden inauguration party, I'll be sure to send you an invite.
@jakerson181That’s nonsense, you clearly know nothing about a civilized debate. Wasn’t it you who called everyone on this website an “idiot” not that long ago? I remember when you tried those antics on one of my posts and I soundly refuted all of your points, instead of being humble you resorted to petty insults. So for someone who likes to go around this website to insult people, you are in no position to be pissed about so called “misinformation”. Just cause you don’t agree with something, doesn’t make it a “conspiracy theory” or “misinformation”. It’s common sense especially since many so called “conspiracy theories” throughout history have been proven true.So grow up pal, this website isn’t an echo chamber for your political biases. Don’t like this website, then leave. Nobody is forcing you to use this website.
@ADFSDF1996 "I soundly refuted all of your points" Thanks for the laugh. People who constantly have to assert they "soundly" won every single debate they are in are a great source of amusement for me.People like you are like the bully in school who hits the kid in front of them in line in the back of the head and when the kid turns around angry and ready to defend himself, you scream out for the teacher and yell about how mean and violent and nasty they are. You'd probably also ask them why they aren't interested in having a civil debate.Even someone as partisan as you would have to admit poltically, this website leans heavily right. The nastiness and vitriol I see against Democrats and Liberals here day after day is disgusting. How come I never ever see you jumping into those threads to lecture them about civilized debate? Why is that?To even try to lecture me about how "this isn’t an echo chamber for your political biases" when that's exactly how Trump supporters use this website on a daily basis is pretty rich. The lack of self-awareness people like you have as you sternly criticize others for doing exactly what you do constantly is stunning. You use unsubstantiated propaganda and nonsense to "win" your arguments and then you congratulate yourselves for winning every debate you've ever been in by using facts and logic while dismissing anyone who disagrees with you as brainwashed by the mainstream media. You claim the New York Times and The Washington Post are left wing rags that are not to be believed and cannot be considered valid sources as part of the MSM but then you try to claim some Youtube video with dramatic music promising to tell you what "they don't want you to know" by some rando with 2000 followers is the authoritative final word on the matter. You're truly debate legends in your own mind.
@ADFSDF1996 And honestly, how many of the right wing Trumptards on here who post question after question that are just desgned to do nothing more than bait and insult liberals and serve as dogwhistles to others like them to respond and do the same are really interested in having civil discussions? Why don't I ever see you encouraging them to be more civil?I don't start out insulting anyone but I sure as hell won't refrain from responding back in kind when I'm insulted or the groups I attach myself to are insulted. I know bullies never like the people they bully daring to stand up for themselves. They find that offensive. They believe those people are just supposed to take it and run back to their safe space and their mom's basement and have a good cry about it but are never ever supposed to fight back. Well, I fight back. And if that bothers or upsets you... tough.
@jakerson181“ People like you are like the bully in school who hits the kid in front of them in line in the back of the head and when the kid turns around angry and ready to defend himself, you scream out for the teacher and yell about how mean and violent and nasty they are. You'd probably also ask them why they aren't interested in having a civil debate.”Look who is talking. Now you are just projecting what you tend to do on this website. You go around insulting everyone who disagrees with you and when someone calls you out on your attitude, you yell “no fair!” Look in the mirror and see who the real bully is.This website isn’t actually a right wing website. If it truly were a right wing website you would have been banned from this website long ago. The problem is that you can’t handle the fact this website doesn’t take sides on politics, it’s one of the few non partisan websites currently active. And quite ironic how you call me partisan while completely ignoring the fact that you are probably one of the most partisan members of this website.Criticizing liberals and democrats isn’t the same thing as hate. You should know that because there’s many other individuals on this website who criticize conservatives/republicans yet I don’t hear you complaining.You’ve also got quite the nerve to complain about Trump supporters posting non questions as questions, yet you ignore the fact many left wingers on this website do the same. So pretty much, you are showing your hypocrisy.
@ADFSDF1996 First of all, my comment was that this website leans heavily right. This is a chat site. The entire content of the website is what people post. Whoever owns and runs this website does not post blogs or editorials or articles they write. There literally is nothing on here other than perhaps FAQs and software that tabulates point, MHOs, SO's and other statistics that is not user generated. So when I say it leans right, obviously I am referring to the people who sign up and post here, not the owners and/or the people who run the website or the website as an entity itself. Are you really that dim that you didn't understand what I meant or did you just seize upon the comment to post a long silly lecture in just one more sad effort to break my balls? If I said a warehouse has some very dangerous stuff, would you challenge me with what's so dangerous about walls, floors and a ceiling or would you be able to ascertain that I meant the stuff in it, not the actual structure of the building itself. And if you try to tell me the number of conservative/Trump supporters on here don't outnumber and probably significantly the number of liberals and democrats, I will just laugh at you.
@ADFSDF1996 And you're right, criticizing liberals and democrats isn’t the same thing as hate. But it's not just criticism. It's some of the most vile and nasty name calling and characterizations of liberals and Democrats, what we believe and our values I have seen on any social network I've been on. The overt racism, xenophobia and misogyny that is allowed is stunning. There are conservatives on here who do nothing but antagonize and call anyone who disagrees with them names. I could name specific users but I'm sure you know who they are. But while you try to call me out and bully me, I have never, ever once seen you say anything to them. Why is that? Do you really think you're being non-partisan or impartial. Just yesterday someone posted a question and made the comment "It’s time for liberals to get packing and start sterilizing themselves!". Another talked about if these imaginary protests by Liberals that right wingers kept saying would happen if Trump actually was declared the winner occurred, Trump supporters should just shoot them. Do you consider that just "criticizing liberals and democrats"? Do you think that's OK? These people make me look like an amateur.I've wasted enough time responding to your bullying and nastiness. You call me out but completely turn a blind eye to when it's done by anyone with whose poltical beliefs you agree. Here's the bottom line. I don't start things but I'm not going to shy away from responding back in kind to those who insult. If you don't like reading my comments, please feel free to join the other Trump supporters who have blocked me.
@jakerson181 You sure like to Gish gallop don’t you. So much blabbering yet you fail to acknowledge your own hypocrisy. You claim Trump supporters spout vile speech, yet you spout vile speech against anyone who disagrees with you. It’s not my fault you don’t know how to agree to disagree. And what’s the point of saying there’s more conservatives than liberals on this website?
The meme didn't list backdating ballots or faulty tabulation software, but it's a good start.
www.forbes.com/.../ is this fair?
So voting machines switching votes from one candidate to another is fair? Hundreds of thousands of unpostmarked ballots per state magically appearing all for one candidate is fair? Kicking out poll watchers is fair? The media calling states before the polls close in that state is fair? You have a werid definition of "fair".
@genuinlysensitive there is more chances of having fraud within the polling booth than a mail in ballot. Plus Donald Trump also votes by mail in ballots. So... Trump can whine all he want but it was fair.
Yes there was voter fraud in the booth the Dominion voting machines were caught switching votes from Republicans to Democrats, not just Trump but in Congressional races as well:www.msn.com/.../ar-BB1aKTybwww.msn.com/.../ar-BB1aMk7cAdd that to the growing list of voter fraud.
@genuinlysensitive and here are seven more for you to read up on saying that the election was fraud-less. www.nytimes.com/.../voting-fraud.htmlhttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53353404www.vox.com/.../trump-2020-campaign-election-irregularities-fraudwww.forbes.com/.../www.cpr.org/.../www.aljazeera.com/.../postal-worker-and-vote-whistleblower-recants-allegationswww.latimes.com/.../republican-officials-counter-false-claims-of-election-fraud
You realize he didn't recant right?www.projectveritas.com/.../So if that is fake news, isn't it possible so are some of or all of the others? As for Forbes we are talking about hundreds of thousands of votes not 9As far as VOX, any outlet that tries to censor comedians because they make a joke one of their fragile little "reporters" can't take is an outlet I am not going to trust.The BBC article deals with problems in PAST elections not this one where 80 million ballots were sent out unsolicited. Speaking of the BBC here is an interesting article about how to spot vote rigging, and yes all of them fit this election:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190
If there are 9 votes, there can be more than 9 too. You're correct on vox and BBC.
Yes but because one side refuses to even acknowedge it is a clear indication that they are in on it! Cui bono?
@genuinlysensitive Why are they afraid to recount?
You mean the far left. Don't let them co-opt the word ''liberal'' much the same way they co-opted "diversity" or ''tolerance'' until the words lost their original meaning.
LIberals are the useful idiots of the far left. Liberals are the spear-bearers who march into voting booths and #BLM protests at the order of the far left masters.
Just like Obama, Biden, Hillary, Brazile, Comey, Paige, Strzok, and a whole lot more.
Why believe trump? www.forbes.com/.../ this is why.
The massive voter fraud will be exposed just like the Steele Dossier, the Russian Hoax, the Kavanaugh hoax, the Ukraine hoax, the he said inject bleach hoax, and the rest of the media's hoaxes.
@Twenty2 Thank you.