It then being a paradox. It is possible to alleviate poverty, but not to cure it. A balancing act that, to recur to Kirk again, recognizes that, "A sound economy cannot exist without a political state to protect it. Foolish political interference with the economy can result in general poverty, but wise political encouragement of the economy helps a society toward prosperity." That "wise political encouragement" being to know the limits of what man and government can and cannot reasonably do.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
That's not true. Many people prefer simple lives. But they don't want poverty.
@Jamie05rhs Give some poor people $500,000 with advice on how they can invest to to provide a stream of income for themselves, come back 6 months later, and many of them will have squandered it.
@OlderAndWiser You're not wrong. But no one said anything about giving away free money.
There are several flaws in that.
Yes, but they are flaws that can be fixed rather than flaws that guarantee a collapse of the system.
Your system uses power as a dictatorship. It violates democracy and your whole bloody belief system. How ironic. Most people don't give a shit about politics.
You're just throwing out random buzzwords.
More like exposing your agenda
That's just more buzzwords, lol.
Sure, keep on rationalising
You sound like this woman herewww.google.com/.../
You are further using rationalizing as another buzzword. That or you desperately need a dictionary.
Stop making assumptions. Your ignorance is outstanding.
That was an observation, not an assumption. And you just did it again.
Your observations are just your interpretation which is your opinion.Just like all your arguments, they are flawed because they contain bias and an element of self righteousness. This is backed by your triggered responses.
You are trying to use the "bias is impossible to avoid" argument to justify making no attempt to minimize your bias, and instead maximize it for an extreme self validation. I don't know if its too late to get you to stop but I can say you could chase that tail forever but you can't catch an illusion.
Stop talking about yourself
I wasn't. If you look carefully, you might notice the word "you" instead of "I"
Literally everything you say applies to you...It's so very strange and hypocritical. But you don't even realise it.
It doesn't, though. You just hope it does so you don't have to acknowledge the reality of how little returns you've made in your investments with relevancy.
Thats highly subjective whats relevant to you.I literally disagree with everything you say
Does it bother you
I'm a little old to be bothered by internet conversations with annonymous people.
But you sure are bothered at times
In real life, of course. I don't know what to tell you if you're trying to bother people on the internet just so they are thinking of you. Maybe pretend to be a young liberal and join Parler. You'll definitely get some old men's attention that way!
Dude you get triggered by my views all the time. Especially by my age gap and gender views.I love shoving to your face because it pisses you off
I think you might have me confused for someone else? The only way you've ever managed to annoy me, that I recall, is by repeating questions I've already answered.Or at least I don't know what you've imagined you've "shoved in my face," but thus is the first I'm hearing of it.
So you get annoyed by my responses?That shows I invoke a reaction out of you. And what about all the criticism you gave me?I guess it doesn't matter because your memory is bad. You must be fun to piss off in real life
Not your responses but when you ask the same question over and over. I don't like explaining the same thing multiple times.What about the criticism I gave you?
I'm sure its possible to pretty much eliminate poverty in countries like the US right now. Nobody really cares to work on that problem.