Most Helpful Guys
What Girls & Guys Said
220Related myTakes
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
Jungle law doesn't have to be related to a certain culture though. You can have eye for an eye without the discrimination, and it's still jungle law.
And also I am much more apt to answer this "I live in India" basically jungle rule.. 🇮🇳🤣😂🤣🇮🇳 BUT I LOVE IT HERE...
I LOVE MY INDIA!.. WHOOO !.. 🤘🤘🤘
@Agape93 see I won the MHO and you think I was wrong and flipping me off..
I gave the most helpful answer..
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!"The law of the jungle" is an expression that has come to describe a "survival of the fittest" scenario where "anything goes".
Okay. In that case i would 100% disagree, as there can't be survivial of the fittest in a world where mankind is so disconnected from nature.
Actually we're mammals. Were jus intelligent animals that evolved from apes
The law is unnatural and were not free beings
@Gosceewual "mammals" are just a subdivision of the general words of "animals.
We are humans, we are not equal whit any animal, we are superior to all of them.
We are not "inteligent animal", we are humans, "inteligent animal" is any animal who live in the jungle and don't die been eated.
We don't obey the jungle law and we make our own, we control all the jungle of the worlds.
The jungle law is "survive the moust powerful", in humanity survive all humans, we are in zero danger to disapear and no any other animal put our existence in danger.
We are not carnivorous but are able to attak any other carnivorus animal.
We control much more then our lifes, we control all the planet, in way that non any other creature succed to do it. We can change even the wether.
So we are not animals, animals are not above theyr own lifes, but we are above many other existence.
Ok here's the real answer. So if no government would involve our lives, then sure lets go back to being primitive with no society, trade, manpower or etc. We'd all be hunters living under a rock dying to natural disasters
"The law of the jungle" is an expression that has come to describe a "survival of the fittest" scenario where "anything goes".
I don't think I'm as brave as you.
I'd rather happily stick to a zombie apocalypse, humans are much more worse than zombies in a lawless land
But such things have not only zombies and man eating animals, but you also have total grid and societal collapse. So you’d have the law of the jungle situation, but with gas poured on the fire b
AI Bot Choice
Superb Opinion