Your thinking is backward. There is.001% voter fraud and yet they banned mail in ballots to control the election.
My thinking is only backwards to you because it is opposite of your opinion. You can’t prove that there hasn’t been more fraud therefore, they got rid of what was creating fraud. There should be a 0% of voter fraud during an election.
I can actually prove there’s.001% voter fraud.
Right but there should be 0% with a fair election. There’s no excuse.
You know 1% or 100% are impossible standards, right? It’s physically impossible.
0% is possible when they ban stuff that is condoning cheating ☺️
No…that would mean perfection. Perfection is impossible. As we are human.
Perfection is possible when there’s nothing to incline cheating ☺️ would you be happy if your possible girlfriend was cheating by 0.01% or would you hope she isn’t cheating at all?
You really need to bone up on philosophy and statistics. Humans can never achieve perfection. Period.
You need to own up to the fact that there was no insight of cheating until they added mail in ballots during Covid. People took advantage. Regardless if it was only 0.01%, people took advantage and you lost out. Be mad.
So because.001% defrauded the election, we should make it harder for 50% of the country to vote?
What’s your argument about it being too hard to vote? I swear on Christ if you say “people work all day” I’ll lose it. Any decent job should be providing their employees with time to exercise their rights and if they don’t you are Pansy for not speaking up to your boss about this issue or quitting
You are a pansy***
Odd, you're talking nonsense- you can't prove any such thing without forensic audits being conducted, especially considering the greater reliance on mail-in votes and collection boxes than in the past.
Odd because they took away mail ballots and put further restrictions for a reason. That right there is proof. You don’t take something away if it is proven to not have any cheating attached to it. Blah blah blah
If Trump won with Mail in ballots you’d be saying jack shit. You’re imagining non-existent fraud in the most secure election in history.
That you have to throw in the double standard. Honestly, no I would not. Mail in ballots are not fair to either side and I would prefer a fair election whether Biden or trump wins. Evidentially it wasn’t the most secure election if they banned a lot of things that made the election to be unfair. 🤷🏻♀️ don’t understand what you don’t understand about that. If it was fair, they wouldn’t have banned a single thing
Now you have to throw in the double standard*
Here’s my bottom line: if there is stuff being currently banned now , then it was not a fair election. Don’t care if Trump or Biden won. It’s a matter of, it could’ve been an unfair election. If this were the other way around, you wouldn’t be bitching about people not being able to vote at their “convenience” anymore.
Mail in ballots have been around for more than a year, so have they not even existed, you would have not a single clue that there can be a more convenient way to vote other than making actual time to go to your local voting office
Have only been around for a year*
Odd, stop simply mouthing platitudes that you can't back up and don't parrot DNC propaganda. Mail-in ballots and drop boxes aren't as secure as in-person voting, and that's just a fact, so you can't honestly say it "was the most secure election in history".
@Avicenna What exactly is the scenario here? You think every liberal committed a felony just to elect Joe? As I said, if Trump won you’d be saying jack shit.
@OddBeMe what don’t you understand that if the government banned certain things from the previous election that it is deemed an unfair election? That would go for even if trump got elected.
Just because I prefer Trump over Biden , that doesn’t mean I don’t think the right side isn’t as corrupt as the left. Both have the capability to cheat when unfair stuff is implemented into an election
@OddBeMe: I don't know exactly what happened, i. e., to what extent there was fraud (no one thinks there was none at all), but I do think a forensic audit should be conducted in all states. Trump was an incumbent and he was expected to do better than Republicans usually do with minority voters since he prioritized them, so it would not have been surprising had he won. Now, I don't think he expected to win Michigan, and Pennsylvania was also going to be a tough state for him to win. Wisconsin is truly a swing state, but Georgia and Arizona? And don't forget how the Democrats never accepted that Trump won in 2016. They still don't to this day.
@Avicenna so your only proof is “how’d he lose Georgia?” And if you were charged with murder based on that kind of evidence?
@OddBeMe: I guess the concept of proof is lost on you Stalinists. I never claimed to be able to prove it myself- I said a forensic audit should be completed to find out, and let's do it in every state. Just because you bizarrely claim (without proof), that you"... can actually prove there’s.001% voter fraud", doesn't mean the rest of us claim to be able to say without the results of a forensic audit, something you should support 100% if you're convinced voter fraud is almost zero. But, yeah, Georgia is a state that really should be audited.
@Avicenna you're behind. That’s been done.www.politifact.com/.../
@OddBeMe: LOL, THAT'S your "proof"? To begin with, your site admits that the audit of Maricopa County, not the full state, "is still ongoing". You've proven nothing, and your source is clearly a partisan hack. Recounts are not forensic audits, and AFAIK, there has been no forensic audit in Georgia. I know you're gullible, Odd. but now we'll add completely dishonest to that.
@Avicenna Would anything other than Trump in the WH be enough for you fcks? No.
@OddBeMe will you ever understand whether someone wanted trump to win or lose, policies being banned is a sign of an unfair election.
Policy changes like voter ID?
Mail I’m ballots, valid ID etc. yes those changed because of possible fraud. If that wasn’t the case, things wouldn’t have changed. You can’t say there wasn’t possible fraud when things have changed because of POSSIBLE FRAUD
Let’s be honest. You’re ok with policies that limit Democratic leaning voters but are against policies that help democratic voters.
No , let’s be real I am against an unfair election. If had policies didn’t get eliminated or added, I wouldn’t be the ones to question it , because that would prove that those couldn’t be a source of possible fraud. I think you are just overall afraid that without those policies in place last voting season, trump would’ve won. Your reasoning on why mail in ballots should still be a thing is completely weak. There is no excuse on not having a valid ID and you should make time to vote if voting is that important to you
But where’s the evidence that Mail in voting leads to any fraud? You don’t have any.
There doesn’t need to be any, it’s the simple fact that they took it away, that proves that those had a significant play in possible fraud, what don’t you understand about that? There doesn’t need to be proof, all the proof is there, they took them away for a REASON. If it was fair THEY WOULDN’T HAVE TAKEN THEM AWAY. Jesus Christ dude
Took what away? Mail on voting has been around forever. Trump mail in voted his whole freaking life!
And guess what? It’s gone now because of possible fraud. 🤷🏻♀️
It’s still around in most states. If anyone legislated to ban it recently it’s because they’re pushing the Big Lie that Trump won.
And it got banned in many states because of exactly what I am saying which you still can’t see.
No, you’re just falling for the big lie. Send me evidence that mail in voting leads to fraud.
Like I said I don’t need to, states have banned it as it could’ve affected the ability for a proper election, again why on earth do I need to repeat myself 30 times before you finally understand , possible does not mean definite fraud, it means POSSIBLE fraud. Jesus fucking Christ. You’re the most dense user on here
How do know politicians aren’t banning it to sway the election?
Because if that was the case they would’ve called it DEFINITE fraud. 🤦🏻♀️ this is embarrassing that you can’t concept this
Who’s “they”? The politicians you have faith in?
You mean the ones that you have faith in , the ones that made the actual mail in ballot in the first place? You wouldn’t be having this argument about possible corrupt politicians if they all agreed with you, just like me and you wouldn’t be having this argument right now had it been definite there was no possible fraud.
As I said, mail in ballots have been around for a very long time and all your right wing heroes have mailed in their votes.
Yes and it has been taken away from some states because of POSSIBLE fraud. Jesus Christ. If it was definite that there was no fraud me and you wouldn’t be arguing because I would understand but when there’s possible fraud in the air, yes it’s a problem
There was no fraud. And you know that because you keep saying “possible” fraud”. can't undo the election because you believe it’s possible. However unlikely.No one would risk going to jail for one illegal vote.
My grammar lately. 🙄 Biden is health is failing him. Give him a pass.
Wow what bs “give him a break his health is failing” really?
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
The judges throw out the accusations of "fraud" because there wasn't any evidence you claim there was.
There positively was. For example illegals voting and the dead voting. These things did in fact happen.
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!