@OddBeMe completely related. Let’s clarify one more time. A sitting Supreme Court justice. The highest court in the United States, listening to a case presented in front of the court is guilty of one of two things
1) lying about the number of kids in the hospital to push her political views 2) completely ignorant
@joeldalton, the leftists confirm once again that they want to ban speech that doesn’t agree with their narratives, not their own nonsense.
Sotomayor was surely aware not only that we she said was wildly inaccurate and That she was deliberately spreading misinformation. But the concept of protected speech is lost on leftists.
In an era where the White House dictates media coverage and social media bans, the proposal to ban „misinformation“ is unconstitutional and immoral.
That's not an answer to the question I asked, now, is it? @Avicenna, do you want to try? I mean we're all against misinformation here, right? We wouldn't want people to get the wrong ideas about what we're talking about, would we?
What did the mandate require of employees of large companies? If you don't know that, then Yes or No: would it have forced them to be vaccinated?
@Avicenna @joeldalton Since you're both unable or unwilling to answer the simple question: No. The mandate did not require anyone to be vaccinated. They could choose to wear a mask and be tested just once a week instead. At no cost to the employee or employer.
You do seem to be very hung up on Harvey Weinstein’s dick. I'm sure you'd have got a part. Of course, he didn't offer his victims the option of wearing an extra piece of clothing. And being obnoxious leaves you the option of not answering simple questions about what the mandate really involved.
@goaded And your autism has you fixated on this fucking mandate. But it’s a moot point, DOA. Fuck Joe Biden. And Sotomayor needs to be censured for spreading misinformation.
Like you haven't been spreading misinformation for the last 18 months.
As usual, you're trying to pretend something that wasn't 100% right was 100% wrong, which it wasn't. Kids are being hospitalised, despite your claims that they've got nothing to worry about.
The fact checks on what Sotomayor said all mention about 85,000 total hospital admissions for under-18s since 1. August 2020, but now, a week or so later, the number's gone up to nearly 92,000.
@goaded Even though I’m right, I’m not a Supreme Court justice. she is a liar. And so are you. Fraudci even admitted over half of the children in the hospital are admitted WITH covid, not BECAUSE of covid. Your fraudulent house of cards is starting to fall. It’s hilarious watching your death throes.
@OddBeMe. Was that a statement made as fact as evidence in a case he was considering? Of course not. But you’re a liberal. I’m used to stupid points being made.
you dipshit There's making a mistake and being ignorant of the facts of a case she's supposedly qualified to rule on. She's an embarrassment to the court. This is what happens when you fill job openings with racial and gender quotas.
Lol, no. You dipshit. Sotomayor is an embarrassment every day. Again, she spread covid misinformation on purpose. She should be cancelled and disbarred.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
30Opinion
Yes, it should, although perhaps not on GaG since we have a very vigorous group of people who tell the truth here.
Depends on the sites tos of course.
id argue yes though
Absolutely, because you knowly have Bad Intentions.
No, who decides what is misinformation? Especially, when what was considered misinformation 3 months ago is now considered the truth today.
Like what?
Fauci funded gain of function research in the Wuhan lab.
the US govt did, sure.
Misinformation is whatever the state doesn't want you to know.
Absolutely not. If anyone has something to say.. Then say it!
You can't stop people from lying. That would be unconstitutional
I wish people were smarter to tell the difference
Half of the things you post on GAG would be eliminated.
What misinformation was that?
Since I don’t subscribe to misinformation I couldn’t possibly know…
Then you can't know what it is. Just make an unsupported, ignorant question. Typical.
I know what gay sex is without experiencing it. Your logic is flawed.
What "logic" is that?
this will be used to silence info the government doesn't like
Are we going to ban Sotomayor?
For?
She claimed there were over 100,000 children in the hospital with severe Covid and many were on ventilators. This is false information.
Yeah she’s wrong. Like Fauci was with masks. But were they deliberately spreading misinformation?
Yes. Absolutely. You are going to excuse a Supreme Court justice not knowing the facts behind a case she is going to rule on?
So what’s the difference between a mistake and deliberate misinformation?
You are excusing a Supreme Court justice for being ignorant of the facts of a case she is ruling on.
No, I blame her for being ignorant. That’s not deliberate misinformation dingus.
Did she correct her mistake publicly and vote that the mandate is unconstitutional?
1) those aren’t related.
2) how many repubs do you want to apologize for mistakes? Starting with Trump.
Trump? What about @joeldalton? Tell us, @joeldalton, what did the vaccine mandate require of employees of large companies?
@OddBeMe completely related. Let’s clarify one more time. A sitting Supreme Court justice. The highest court in the United States, listening to a case presented in front of the court is guilty of one of two things
1) lying about the number of kids in the hospital to push her political views
2) completely ignorant
And your response is WhAt aBOuT tRuMP?
Gtfoh
@goaded the mandate I told you was unconstitutional? That one?
The one you said was, before it was decided by SCOTUS, yes. What did it require of employees of larger companies?
@joeldalton, the leftists confirm once again that they want to ban speech that doesn’t agree with their narratives, not their own nonsense.
Sotomayor was surely aware not only that we she said was wildly inaccurate and That she was deliberately spreading misinformation. But the concept of protected speech is lost on leftists.
In an era where the White House dictates media coverage and social media bans, the proposal to ban „misinformation“ is unconstitutional and immoral.
@Avicenna Maybe you'd like to tell @joeldalton what was required of employees of larger companies in this mandate?
Neither of you? Don't you know what the mandate entailed for employees? Yes or No: would it have forced them to be vaccinated?
@goaded did Harvey Weinstein force those actresses to suck his dick?
Making someone’s life miserable if they don’t comply is coercion.
That's not an answer to the question I asked, now, is it? @Avicenna, do you want to try? I mean we're all against misinformation here, right? We wouldn't want people to get the wrong ideas about what we're talking about, would we?
What did the mandate require of employees of large companies? If you don't know that, then Yes or No: would it have forced them to be vaccinated?
@Avicenna @joeldalton Since you're both unable or unwilling to answer the simple question: No. The mandate did not require anyone to be vaccinated. They could choose to wear a mask and be tested just once a week instead. At no cost to the employee or employer.
@goaded right, and you didn’t have to suck Harvey Weinstein’s dick, you just could never get an acting job.
You do seem to be very hung up on Harvey Weinstein’s dick. I'm sure you'd have got a part. Of course, he didn't offer his victims the option of wearing an extra piece of clothing. And being obnoxious leaves you the option of not answering simple questions about what the mandate really involved.
@goaded And your autism has you fixated on this fucking mandate. But it’s a moot point, DOA. Fuck Joe Biden. And Sotomayor needs to be censured for spreading misinformation.
Like you haven't been spreading misinformation for the last 18 months.
As usual, you're trying to pretend something that wasn't 100% right was 100% wrong, which it wasn't. Kids are being hospitalised, despite your claims that they've got nothing to worry about.
The fact checks on what Sotomayor said all mention about 85,000 total hospital admissions for under-18s since 1. August 2020, but now, a week or so later, the number's gone up to nearly 92,000.
@goaded Even though I’m right, I’m not a Supreme Court justice. she is a liar. And so are you. Fraudci even admitted over half of the children in the hospital are admitted WITH covid, not BECAUSE of covid. Your fraudulent house of cards is starting to fall. It’s hilarious watching your death throes.
Great, so that's only 4,000 kids in the last week. And she got her numbers mixed up, that doesn't make someone a liar, it makes them mistaken.
@goaded she didn’t get jack shit mixed up. Then she needs to be removed for incompetence.
wow so if any justice gets something wrong, they're out?
www.reuters.com/.../after-fumbled-oath-roberts-and-obama-leave-little-to-chance-idUSBRE90H16L20130118
@OddBeMe. Was that a statement made as fact as evidence in a case he was considering? Of course not. But you’re a liberal. I’m used to stupid points being made.
I love when new rules are added.
Joel just take your toys and go home.
You bring up completely irrelevant bullshit and think you're dunking on someone. That's what makes you hilarious.
How’s it irrelevant? You said a Scotus Justice makes a mistake…boom that’s it.
you dipshit There's making a mistake and being ignorant of the facts of a case she's supposedly qualified to rule on. She's an embarrassment to the court. This is what happens when you fill job openings with racial and gender quotas.
I’d say an embarrassment is fcking up inauguration. He shoulda been ousted for that, right?
Lol, no. You dipshit. Sotomayor is an embarrassment every day. Again, she spread covid misinformation on purpose. She should be cancelled and disbarred.
Misinformation effect is a beautiful thing
no i don't think so