this graph does not show Viewers for any given Media... "humans are free? Natural News? Before it's news? OAN? who are these people? they have almost "No one" watching so, its very misleading. If your going to Include "Blogs" I am sure we can find thousands of Radical left wing-nuts
The graph is inaccurate and it counts small independent right leaning news the same as large network left leaning news sources. That alone shows that it is intentionally misleading and "fake."
Well over the past 5 years what we have observed is that a lot of what was called right wing conspiracy theories turned out to be true, and a lot of left wing "facts" have turned out to be false.
Fox is there twice and it's supposedly better than Newsmax?
Where is Dave Rubin? Larry Elder? The Epoch Times or Russell Brand?
Candace? Prager U? Bill Maher? Ted Cruz and Rand Paul both put out their own content. Desantis does a ton of press conference.
Joe Rogan? He has like 10 times the viewers CNN does these days.
Honestly, Forbes YouTube channel is the best place for fair and accurate conservative content. They don't comment. They just roll the tape of the politicians talking without any edits whatsoever.
The graph is obviously out dated to say the least. Mayby from 10-15 years ago. Bill Oriley wasn't so great, people used to trust PBS, NPR and the AP before we knew better... But now Fox hosts Candace, Mike Roe, John Stewart, and Tucker Carlson (formerly on CNN/PBS/MSNBC) they do exclusive interviews with the candidates, even grill republicans like Ted Cruz on air.
Times have changed. If this ever was accurate it was a very long time ago.
But let's be honest, the real issue is that most of those sources have gone with CNN and lost 90% of their audience in the last 5 years.
Only the dumbest 10% of CNN's former viewers still even consider them a news Network. So why are we even talking about this same biased graph I saw where I was a child?
Graph is fake news. Cnn that covered the trump russia hoax for about a year when they knew it was a nothing burger... smh thats not fact reporting. Many other serious issues on this chart. Its basically a junk graph.
2
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Who is deciding here what’s truthful and what’s not? Who are they paid by?
It's difficult to make out because it's so small (clicking on it doesn't enlarge), but from what I can see I would have to say no. It looks to me like an even spread, a nice bell-curve, with the more moderate outlets being at top-centre.
What exactly "IS" the Right Wing, and how does the West Wing fit into all of it?
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
The graph is relative to the Overton window of 2020 or whenever this graph was produced. It’s laughable that, on this graph, CNN and The New York Times are “slight left” because they gave >90% negative coverage of the last Republican president.
Considering that is from an opinion piece, and not factual.. No.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
One would have to assume the creator is absent of bias, which I doubt given that at a glance I can see media entities on the left that are far more left and far more biased than represented here.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
57Opinion
The right-wing media does NOT tell the news. It's there to offer a venue for right-wing politicians to spew their lies.
this graph does not show Viewers for any given Media... "humans are free? Natural News? Before it's news? OAN? who are these people? they have almost "No one" watching so, its very misleading. If your going to Include "Blogs" I am sure we can find thousands of Radical left wing-nuts
It is a sampling to label the most space. If you go to the site you can instead label by viewership (I think).
The graph was produced by the fake news. And where is ABC, CBS, NBC, Time, Newswek etc. They are the worst.
The graph is inaccurate and it counts small independent right leaning news the same as large network left leaning news sources. That alone shows that it is intentionally misleading and "fake."
Well over the past 5 years what we have observed is that a lot of what was called right wing conspiracy theories turned out to be true, and a lot of left wing "facts" have turned out to be false.
With CNN high on the fact reporting scale, this is a joke, right? Lol. 🤡
Exactly. This chart is a classic example of fake news.
AP and PBS are at the top.
Fox is there twice and it's supposedly better than Newsmax?
Where is Dave Rubin? Larry Elder? The Epoch Times or Russell Brand?
Candace? Prager U? Bill Maher? Ted Cruz and Rand Paul both put out their own content. Desantis does a ton of press conference.
Joe Rogan? He has like 10 times the viewers CNN does these days.
Honestly, Forbes YouTube channel is the best place for fair and accurate conservative content. They don't comment. They just roll the tape of the politicians talking without any edits whatsoever.
The graph is obviously out dated to say the least. Mayby from 10-15 years ago. Bill Oriley wasn't so great, people used to trust PBS, NPR and the AP before we knew better... But now Fox hosts Candace, Mike Roe, John Stewart, and Tucker Carlson (formerly on CNN/PBS/MSNBC) they do exclusive interviews with the candidates, even grill republicans like Ted Cruz on air.
Times have changed. If this ever was accurate it was a very long time ago.
But let's be honest, the real issue is that most of those sources have gone with CNN and lost 90% of their audience in the last 5 years.
Only the dumbest 10% of CNN's former viewers still even consider them a news Network. So why are we even talking about this same biased graph I saw where I was a child?
If you think PBS and the AP are trustworthy and unbiased you are either a clown, or blind deaf and voting my mail from a nursing home in California.
Where's Veritas? Where's the New Your post?
How do you figure John Stewart and Tucker Carlson are both regulars on Fox now and the chart hasn't changed in 10 years? 😂🤣😂🤣😂
"But but... I saw it on a graph and graphs can't lie" 🤦🏼♂️
That's is a bias diagram. Many from CNN and MSNBC have said they bias reports on purpose.
https://thefederalist. com/2019/10/14/cnn-whistleblower-reveals-network-vendetta-against-trump-obsession-with-impeachment/
When the BBC is topping the charts for fact reporting you know you have a problem.
Graph is fake news. Cnn that covered the trump russia hoax for about a year when they knew it was a nothing burger... smh thats not fact reporting. Many other serious issues on this chart. Its basically a junk graph.
Who is deciding here what’s truthful and what’s not? Who are they paid by?
It's difficult to make out because it's so small (clicking on it doesn't enlarge), but from what I can see I would have to say no. It looks to me like an even spread, a nice bell-curve, with the more moderate outlets being at top-centre.
No, leftism and progressivism is a mental illness. You'll see.
Who collected this data? A lesbian atheist who sits around watching TV while she's waiting for her next abortion appointment?
Leftists never give up when it comes to censoring anything that isn't their propaganda.
What exactly "IS" the Right Wing, and how does the West Wing fit into all of it?
The graph is relative to the Overton window of 2020 or whenever this graph was produced. It’s laughable that, on this graph, CNN and The New York Times are “slight left” because they gave >90% negative coverage of the last Republican president.
The left says critical race theory is wrong.
Your argument is irrelevant.
Considering that is from an opinion piece, and not factual.. No.
One would have to assume the creator is absent of bias, which I doubt given that at a glance I can see media entities on the left that are far more left and far more biased than represented here.
No, this graph doesn't PROVE anything, it gives some evidence which supports the premise.