ROFLMAO! I'll grant you her as gorgeous, but he's actually kinda plain. Charming, athletic, razor sharp mind, strong personality, and empathetic, along with rich as Croesus, which doesn't hurt. She's to be commended for looking past the surface and spotting a gem "in the rough"... ;)
Given the level of medical scrutiny they undergo routinely, and the fact that neither of them is an idiot, I imagine basic precautions to avoid unwanted pregnancies are not beyond them. ;) If they didn't want kids, they wouldn't be having them.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Where is the money coming from?
@TURK-CONQUEROR Taxes Im sure and the works. Thing is we will always pay taxes and even though we think we have some form of control we have no choice truly in it.
Taxes to support our ancestral over lords is ridiculous. No wonder the French and Russians executed theirs.
by the way. I'm NOT British or a monarchist. But Harry & Megan are a cute couple! LOL!
There is something else to ponder here. Many countries have their own 'Royal Families' too. Only they are usually elected or seize power. The Kennedys, The Trudeaus, The Gandhis, The Kims and many others.
Also. The royals earn far more for the UK in tourism then they cost in living expenses.
Well said - nailed it.
People who have something against the British Royal Family don't appear to be able to form their own balanced opinions, because the only arguments here I've seen are "What do they do?" and "They're a drain on us"... errrrm no. Go and educate yourselves! SMH
The Irish have a very good reason...
@InTimoreDei Well to be fair they "did" yes, not so much anymore though.
More than you think. People don't realize what's going on.
@InTimoreDei Feel free to explain...
(without an explanation you have zero argument)
Are you pro life?
And why is that? They earn the UK Millions upon millions every single year in tourism and such and they are a well respected diplomatic figure. William and Harry are both long serving veterans who do an absolutely ludicrious amount of charity work. (William does a ton of mental health work for young people and Harry does lots for disabled people and injured vets).They make a ton of money and do a ton of good, If you have a problem with that then you are a tard.
@Riggers Oh no, they don´t. And nope, they are not as well respected as diplomatic figures. Many actually look down on them. And neither Markle nor Middleton are more royal than any hoe off the street.
In 2017-18 The royals were paid 76million in tax payer funds. On the flip side they brought in 1.8 Billion pounds into the economy, And specifically royal palaces / events generated 550million in tourism. And trade deals secured by Royal Diplomats made another 150million. If you're trying to tell me 76 Million in expenses does not outweigh the 2.4-2.5 billion they directly contribute then you must have a mental disability.And i agree. They are not more royal then a back alley prostitute. But really the 'Royalness' of their blood is hardly relevant to the point. I always find people who have such profound hatred of the Royals, Despite all they do for the British people and the amount of money they earn, Are generally just worthless leftist degenerates who despise the idea of being born into wealth. And believe everyone should struggle in the same way in which they have.
@Riggers Sorry, but that money would have come anyway. Neither business nor tourism need royalty. On the contrary, those people are a disgrace to their country. Any nurse does more for the disabled and injured than than does carrot top and his brother.
Do you even live in the UK?
@Riggers Nope, but my family is partly from there.
Its very concerning as to why you have such a venomously hostile stance on the Monarch of a country which has little to do with you? Do you know how much the British taxpayer pays for the royal family? 69pence per person... 69.. Fucking pence...If 69 pence per year for all the enterainment value and billions of national income they generate anually is too much for you then you don't even deserve to live in this country.There are so few things left in the UK that are actually a part of British history and heritage, the Royal family being one of them. Our Monarch will stay for as long as our country exists so there is little good whining about a bitch over it. Just deal with it if you don't like it.The UK Taxpayer was robbed of 98 Billion pounds last year from people claiming state welfare because they are too lazy to work. Literally people draining the economy for absolutely no fucking reason other than laziness.Compare 98 billion to 76 million. If you serious think the 76 million is a bigger issue your priorities are absolutely fucking backwards economically.
@Taylor_C you sound rather deluded on this one. The Royal Family are no drain to the British people whatsoever, on the contrary, and are loved by most, and Harry particularly is generally considered the peoples favorite since he has a lot of respect for all he's done and continues to do! Anyone who can't see that should probably take themselves for a good look in the mirror to be frank since it just sounds like bitterness.
@Coastalchic An increasing number of people question the existence of royalty, regardless of political stance. Leftwingers want equality, hence no royalty, rightwingers want meritocracy, hence no royalty. They do not do more good than anybody else, and the notion of royalty is seriously immoral.
So you just go along with it without questioning it? Really? What does that prove? More and more people went along with the Nazis at one point! They actually do do a lot more good than quite a few people, that's not to say most people are bad, just that if they had the choice to evade those responsibilities, they gladly and somewhat understandably would, yet the Royals don't so I don't agree with those who are too quick to ignorantly judge. Please tell us why you believe it to be "seriously immoral" for whatever reason? You can't make such a strong statement without any valid justification.
''left wingers want equality''. This argument always baffles me. The Royal family is 42 people. That's 0.000062 of the British population. You seriously think stripping 42 people, 0.000062% of the population of their wealth will solve an equality issue? I'm sorry but. If you want to get rid of the royal family. The centuries of history, The countless charity and betterment work they do, all of the tourism they promote and the billions of £ to the economy they generate, Just because you are jealous over the fact of the family they were born into. You are just a retard.Where is the equality for all the disabled and struggling people the trust funds and charities of the royal family helps when they are left alone with no support? Where is the equality of local tourism based business around the city of London when tourism absolutely plummets due to no Royals?Where is the equality of the British people who will loose billions in national income, experience inflation and be worse off financially without the trade deals the Royal family secure?Stop speaking on behalf of a people you do not belong to. The overwhelming majority of the British people like what the Royal family do. And people of all Ages can see William and especially Harry as role models.Worry about your own shit show of a country.
@Riggers Exactly why should those 42 people be singled out and allowed to live a luxurious lifestyle on tax money? You want to pay for a royal family? Then you and those that want them pay for them. Make it voluntary to donate. But fact remains - they do not do more good than anyone else and they are piss poor role models.
''why should those 42 people be singled out and allowed to live a luxurious lifestyle on tax money?''> Because for my 69p per year they help thousands of our countries most vulnerable people through direct support via charity.''You want to pay for a royal family''> Yes... Its 69 Fucking pence. 69 mother fucking pence. I know you use Euro so Sterling currency may be unfamiliar to you, But 69 pence is so fucking nothing i can't even comprehend how nothing it is. ''Make it voluntary to donate''> Uhhhh. no... By that logic i should be able to opt out of my Tax money going to benefit users who claim dozens of billions every single year because they are too lazy to work? You cannot opt out of things you dont agree with.''hey do not do more good than anyone else and they are piss poor role models.''> Do you run charities? Have you done multiple tours in the army and upon leaving set up olympics style games which changes the lives of injured veterans? No? Well i guess that means they do more good than a normal person like you.At this point you are literally denying blatant fucking reality. The Royal family earns billions and only costs millions. That isn't even up for debate, that is statistical economic fact. There is no denying it. I don't give a flying fuck if you dislike them. if you dont like them whatever. But you cannot deny their charity work, and you cannot deny the fact they are economically profitable for the UK.Your viewpoint is fucking stupid, You have no regard for reality, you deny publicly available and well documented statistics that are recorded from multiple non bias government spending watchdogs and you would rather see the suffering of hundreds of thousands of people who will no longer recieve charity support because you hate the idea of a mere 42 people living a cushy lifestyle in the name of 'equality'.The only 'trash' here is you.
@Riggers I think she's too dense to grasp it. At this rate next she'll be saying "why fund the NHS".
@Riggers You equate paying tax money to the royal family to tax money paid for health care or miltary defense? Disgusting. It doesn´t even matter how much money they actually receive. They are not needed by the country. No, they don´t do a lot of good. Others do more good and better. If you extrapolate from the thought of their right to exist being they do good will work for the country, then you should support the idea of aptitude tests for being included in the royal family, because there are people much better at everything they do. Whatever money they give to charity is not theirs. It´s tax money. The idea of birth right truly disgusts me.
@Coastalchic So you think those that disagree with you are dense? I´m not denser than I have managed to acquire two college degrees and have a way above average IQ.
A bunch of clownsm
Why the hell do you have to pay for them when they are so rich?
@AspenShiver Because they act on behalf of the empire. If they didn't have a fiduciary responsibility, then why would they bother?
Sorry but please tell me what they do that is so important.
@AspenShiver Google "duties of the Royal Family" and "duties of the British Monarchy."
Yeah, I did but people just say it's a big ongoing soap opera and tax grab.
@AspenShiver Well, tell "people" that' they're idiots, too. "The Queen can't be in two places at once, so she relies on the rest of the royal family to help fulfill engagements and connect with the public. As a team, the royal family has about 2,000 engagements, entertains 70,000 guests, and answers 100,000 letters every year.And there are about 3,000 charitable organizations that list a member of the royal family as a patron. Many have established their own charities, too."Many of them have day jobs, and serve in the military, as well. Herself is the head of state, the head of the military, and the head of the church, all at once! Imagine being the US President AND the Pope...
You have a very optimistic view of extremely greedy people.
@AspenShiver they're not greedy! They have a lot of responsibility that the rest of us have the luxury of choice to avoid, if you care to find out for yourself.
@Coastalchic They aren't greedy? Lmfao Imagine hoarding all that wealth and making tax payers pay for your parties with pedophiles.
@AspenShiver hardly! Predictably convenient you fail to acknowledge the HUGE amounts of charitable work they do along with public military service. But you know, that's clearly not important to people like yourself. The term greedy seems to be used ironically here. It's sad.
@Coastalchic I'm sure there are dark and selfish reasons for all that charity work, funneling funds, getting access to kids for pedophile parties with knighted Jimmy Savile.
@AspenShiver You clearly need help. So do yourself a favour.
@Coastalchic And you like then because they are rich and shiny. Pretty sad.
@AspenShiver Okay so apparently dilusional, bitter AND defensive. Way to go to demonstrate any ounce of maturity and provide any inch of valid debate. No more words needed.
@AspenShiver Ah, yes. you used your cosmic superpowers to peer into @Coastalchi;s mind and not only see that approval of the Royal Family, but why. I think the REAL problem here is that you didn't get INVITED by the royal family to attend all those pedophillic parties with the uppercrust that your lurid imagination insists must be the secret hidden purpose of all the "diplomatic" functions they hold. That they hide form the literal HORDES of press who attend and report on their every word and gesture. Uh huh... Sour grapes; that's what it is. YOU want to rape children at taxpayer expense, but you're not a royal, so you want THEM to be punished for your twisted fantasies. See? I have awesome mind reading abilities, too. Just like yours...
I bet you believe all of the fake news you're fed over there. You're entitled to your opinion, but it only really counts if it's based on truth, which clearly yours currently isn't.
((Sorry; the "" sarcasm tags got hidden, probably by an HTML interpreter. I wonder if tit'll hide them in quotes, too
Hahaha @taleswapper that made me laugh. Something definitely isn't right there though to believe something like that to be so sinister.
@Coastalchic You do realize that charity work is often a cover up for shady dealings right? Or are you REALLY that naive? Also, you started getting personal with me, saying I needed help. I suggest you quit your projection. What a pathetic thing to worship, royalty, that is worse than celebrity worship.
@Coastalchic Always happy to provoke a smile. Cheers! :)
You're obviously a pedophile that defends other pedophiles @taleswapper You've probably partied with Jimmy Savile, you look like a pedophile. You even
You even look like a pedophile.
@taleswapper Always good to see sensible and decent people here too! :) GAG certainly proves to be quite questionable and hilarious at times!
🍿 🍿🍿 🍿🍿 🍿🍿 🍿
I find it strange how hard you defend these rich pedophiles.
@AspenShiver Stil raving and frothing at the mouth, I see. Pity, that...@Coastalchic, "Always good to see sensible and decent people here too! " Shhhh... you're ruin my reputation as a pedophillic-looking pedantic irascible old coot... ;)
I love how you two defend a Queen that knighted MANY pedophiles then you project your pedophile urges onto me. Fucking disgusting you both are. How much do you get paid?
@taleswapper Hahaha!I just can't stop laughing at the sheer lunacy!If some people can't read then maybe they should try beating themselves around the head with a few books instead ;)
@Coastalchic No, it's a fact that the Queen knighted Jimmy Savile and other pedophiles. The sick part is you think that is ok. I have to wonder why you think that's ok. The only two conclusions I can come to is you are a pedophile yourself. Kys
Only pedophiles defend other pedophiles.
Not our fault 🤷🏻♀️
@J3nny take them back
Nah fam. You can have them.
Yes it does but he does not pay tax no royal has tp pay tax everything is for free those two are been sent to live in Africa
@DECENTSCOTTISHLAD999 a royal could shoot you dead and not go to jail.
@TURK-CONQUEROR Very true that's why diana is dead the royal family had her killed
@DECENTSCOTTISHLAD999 Dianna was stupid and wouldn't play the game.
@TURK-CONQUEROR l would not play the game for those freaks
No they call you racists if your white and bigots if your conservative. All the while you carry on paying for them to not do shit
@up_64 I mean, you're not wrong... 🤣
its a mixture
@up_64 How does that even happen? What and why do you pay for them?
You pay for them in taxes
@up_64 What exactly do you pay for though?
I would expect such a retarded opinion from an American child like yourself @AspenShiver
@Riggers Yet you can't even answer something worthy that they do, all you have is an ad hominem. You and your child molester queen are on the same level.
Child molester queen that's rich
Child molester queen? . At least we don't have hollypedowood, bill Clinton and Joe biden
@up_64 Well that's true, they all need to be locked up with the Queen and her pedophile knights.
Give me proof that the Queen is a pedophile
Queen their entertaining.
@Historylover18 She knighted all sorts of pedophiles and many native people in Canada accuse her of it during one of her visits where children went missing. Of course someone with that much power and money would erase any evidence. She should be renamed elizabeth bathory.
@AspenShiver unfortunately rich pedos never see jail time.
Lmaoo. Gender neutral? 😂 they seek attention this much?
Confirmed as not true “it’s more about breaking down royal stereotypes, so allowing the child to not have a title, let the child explore itself.”
Getting feisty there ;)
@MollyTheOriginal Heh heh ;)
He is at least 80% European lol
@Mh1999 at least 90 considering meghan markle's mother is not even 100 percent black- she has a lot of european in her... due to slavery and i can tell because her mother is lighskinned.
@sexylexi99 i know calling him biracial is weird but whatever make people happy
Obviously he is 50% European and 50% African
His father is 100 % European so he got 50% European his grandfather is European so 25% European so he is 75 % European his grandmother's is. a light skin black she definitely have some European him being 50% black is impossible
@Mh1999 yes because a full African is very darkskinned and can't be fully regarded as the same as an African American