which would u kull though surly taking out more women is more beneficial as then less breading going on. kill men and you just increase competition for women and also reduce your work force?affecting babies will also reduce the population but poss at wrong end of the scale its the elderly that put strain on populations as they are less productive and more dependant
Haven't you heard about the gender imbalance problems created by the one child policy in China though? With the world's most skewed gender ratio at birth, and 115 boys born for every 100 girls, on account of families getting sex-selective abortions to "take out more women" before they're born? And Wuhan having one of the most skewered gender ratios of any province in the world, with roughly 1.2 males for every female there? In such a situation, wouldn't it be more beneficial to cull off more guys than girls, to even things out?
why would usa kill off its cheap labor force in china and also improve china economically by removing their sick and elderly population?
It said to mess with China economy
tell us more for what benefit?
I don’t knowI just read this as a headline on some news on internet.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
well wouldn't that be easier than inventing a new flu like virus in another country?
but flu is passable as natural fluride would be traceable
you know all American water companies and most uk ones already add flouride right? its banned in most of Europe. and whats happening as we come out the eu? American beef and chicken. then there's polution killing off the weak. in the last ten years alone the average mortality rate has lowered by four years. one in two people get cancer most of which is caused by pollution or poisoned food. i think your theory is one tin foil hat wearing conspiricy theory too far
ye i know fluride gets added but it has been for years there's no obviouse effect on uk and us populations. besides better teethus chick and beef not a cert yet wait and see on that and again no proof affects pop that muchye cancer going up but also treatment is working better with it so again not sure what that proves although treatment expensive and like is say dont remove aging populationyes pollution going up but not as much as in china we dont get smog like they do and uk government removing petrol car sales so more electric non polluting ones soon again no quick population effect like the outbreak in china!
you dont look very deep for a conspiricy theorist do you... florosis has been attributed to not only disfigured teeth and brittle bones but also now many medical professionals are linking it to dementia, fybro myalgia and several other neurological conditions... as for the meat industry, its the biggest polluter and produces the biggest carbon footprint of all industry and transport included plus the hormones and other shit they use to sanitize meat can be linked to several cancers... its been going on so long unchecked so why you think anyone needs to invent a virus thats little more worrying than common influenza i dont know
if it linked then why do they still do it?
for the reasons you indicated, cutting population. as shit becomes automated and there is talk of introducing ubi the corporations no lonfer see us as a resourse but a hinderance to amassing more wealth.
well if you hid under bedsheets and dont ask questions then they will get away with it.even if its not govenment plan it then show their incompitance to deal with simple outbrakes of minor disease god help us with major disease
why? im not suggesting its a weapon more a population control
It's a unbelievably weak means of population control based upon the vast amount of more effective biological agents
Seasonal flu is more useful at population control
ye but the other biological weapons would be seen as that. im talking more of population control with out as much traceability?
What is traceability? And who's gonna do it? Assuming some entity used biological pathogens to reduce pop. the result would be lethal well beyond a few hundred people.
If you think a gov't has desire to effectively reduce population, you must understand they are more capable than this.
It's scary how only a slight amount of microbiological knowledge reveals the ease at which disastrous pandemic could be achieved
not if the rich and ones that planned it had the vaccine already developed and taken. they could cut the population down and they would be ok. and like someone else pointed out everything is becoming automated to population is a hindrance nowadays and cuts down on profit.
how can it be genocide when it done against your own people. its more population control removing old and ill people.
why dont u think so?
They do it all the time already in many different ways.
Like things they pout in our food e. g Aspartame, which is cancer causingThings they put in our water (and milk in the UK) e. g FluorideAs well as the many extremely harmful things they put in vaccines e. g Formaldehyde and aluminium as well as many others. I mean besides that they put fetal cells in a recent vaccine too without telling anyone so I mean, would you trust them?
but all the mp's etc eat all that too so how can that be govenment driven? and if so to what purpose?
MPs are like the lowest level of government, they don't matter to the higher ups. The people above them are the ones calling the shotsWhat purpose? Because they can, that's the only purpose a psychopath needs