regular people should be scared of that social media censorship
if anything they have boosted the story. those idiots lol
it has been verified the info on the laptop is genuine
Has it? Awesome. Link please
the biden campaign hasn't even denied it news.yahoo.com/...ed-father-burisma-121318628.htmlthe emails are real, you just don't want them to be... i look forward to your attempts to weasel out of the story by attacking the source or w/e you usually do
I’m sorry, Where did it say they emails have been verified? I must have missed it
overly literal word necessities are a sign of a dishonest person
I’m dishonest because I want these email verified before I believe them? And you don’t find it the least bit suspicious that the evidence they have been working so hard to find just drops into their lap? And I’m the dishonest one? Bwhahaha. Okay
yea you don't demand that rigor from any other source or any other story. just when the left tells you that's the talking point of the daybiden's campaign was asked, they didn't deny it
Wow You know me really good for someone you have never had a conversation with before. Are you psychic? Or are you just assuming because I don’t buy into the same BS you do, that I it must mean that I believe all these thing you attribute to the “left?” And you call others dishonest. 🤦🏻♀️
Don't be so ignorant. Twitter for years let these Russia collusion stories run on their website, but within 2 hours they closed the account of the press secretary for simply retweeting the story from the New York Post.It was so "suspect" that Joe Biden put a lid on his campaign yesterday Oct 14th when the story came out.by the way, if you've been living under a rock... there was NO COLLUSION. In fact, one of the lawyers on the case plead guilty to lying.
@bellybuttonlint she knows she's wrong she just doesn't want to be confronted with it
@bellybuttonlint Who gives a shit about Twitter? I don’t get my news from them, so I really don’t care what they do. I don’t think Biden should even acknowledge any of this until it’s been verified as on the level. They are right to keep quiet. Wait... are you still talking about the Mueller investigation? That’s not what we’re talking about here hun. But if chanting NO COLLUSION makes you feel good, I say go for it. Try LOCK HER UP while your at it. It appears to bring some people great pleasure just to say it.
Given to the FBI, verified from the Beau BIden (the deceased son) Foundation.
@Liam_Hayden yup now we know for certain its real
@AnonymousI agree with you.On a different subject, if someone wants to block a person they just have to click their profile and block them. However, in your case, one can't view your profile. So you can't be blocked. How do you do that?
Hillary should be locked up... she's called Crooked Hillary for a reason.And the story has been verified... why do you think Joe Biden put a lid on his campaign the day it came out? Keep drinking the Kool-Aid from the Demoncratic Plantation... the party of the KKK, Jim Crow, and Slavery. All 3 originated from the Demoncratic party.
@007kingifritThese liberals are often wrong.
Here is an even more interesting link, about the videos being of Hunter Biden raping and torturing little girls in China.According to Alex Jones, this will become public in a big way tomorrow.banned.video/watch?id=5f8b7cca9d7ca5144824dc5e
@Liam_Hayden If it had been verified, Fox News would be running the headline every 5 minute. As of right now, they are still calling it “ Potentially incriminating emails.” Im still sceptical. Where are you getting your information?
007kingifritSo you do really believe that asking for verification makes a person wrong? (Some would call that critical thinking 🤔) You think we should believe everything coming from Trump and his cronies because why? They have been so honest about everything else so far? Give me a break. 🙄
@David92506 I think just posting anon does that. I started posting on hawt topics as anon because thin-skinned people couldn’t accept that fact that other people might have a different opinion. They say something nasty then block you before you could respond. Happened enough times that I am permanently anon on most topics.
@cth96190 Alex Jones? Bwhahaha 😂🤣😂🤣Dismissed
Ha! The Biden campaign put a lid on it until Thursday... sounds like someone who is "innocent." If he was so innocent he should have to face scrunity. Hillary got 3x the money and spent 3x the money as Trump in 2016 but still lost because Trump made 3x the campaign stops.Same situation again... except Trump is literally making 7x the campaign stops than Joe Biden.MAGA 2020!
i don't think biden's going to win at all, not even close
i hope your right... and if memory serves me well hilary was supposed to win by a landslide.
@007kingifritYou are working on the assumption that the election will be genuine.The Democrats are already engaging in massive electoral fraud.Millions of fake votes will be entered into the system.Last time, as well as fake paper ballots the electronic voting machines had been programmed to record votes for Republican candidates as votes for a Democrat.I have seen a multitude of videos of this, made by people on their telephones when they went to vote.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
lol i'm so sick of you lefties resorting to a russia scapegoat everytime something bad happens to youits not "convenient" we have been hearing about hunter biden doing this shit since the impeachment... this is the whole reason trump was investigating hunter biden
this is literally objectively worse than what trump is accused of doingits almost the same things you accuse trump of doing but worse and with proof
... What are you even talking about? What is even the harm of it in the first place? The fact that Hunter Biden got a better than job than he would normally have? Big fucking deal. Also are there any members of the Trump family aside from Trump associated with the white house? There you have your irrefutable evidence.
its a very big deal, the mayor of moscow giving millions of dollars through backdoor channels to the vice president's son? that's bribery you're so dishonest nobody is dumb enough to think this isn't a big deal
Bribery? Is not bribery legal in USA? Citizen united as just one of many examples.
no you're an idiot and you don't know what citizen's united does at all
Citizens united, Supreme court ruling deciding that it is unconstitutional for the government to limit “independent” political spending by corporations and unions. AKA making a loophole for anyone wanting to bribe politicians.
wrong, it means that groups of people can band together and spend money on a politician's campaign. which is not briberyif i get together with my neighbors and spend money to fight for an issue we care about. citizen's united protects that ability to organizequoting wikipedia might get you started but it doesn't show you really understand
Bribery: Spending money for an issue you care about.
you have to be an idiot to think that's the definition of bribery
Oh its a deliberate oversimplification, just like what you did since I used your words. But you are technically correct, Bribery is a legal term so if you make it legal its no longer Bribery even if the act itself is identical.Fundamentally however "groups of people can band together and spend money on a politician's campaign" does cover the act of using corporations or unions to funnel money into the pockets of politicians and this inevitably leads to politicians doing what you want them to do.. such as lowering taxes.. or bailing you out.. or giving you government contracts..
that's literally how its supposed to work, even if there are downsides its better than the alternative of saying "you people can't pool your money together and fight for a cause"you can't outlaw lobbying; how would that even work?
... "That is literally how it is supposed to work."So why is bribery wrong then?
bribery is giving money TO A PERSON, lobbying is giving money to a campaign
... You know that is the same right? I mean even if we sidestep how it indirectly profits the candidate or the people associated with the campaign its also super easy to "launder" the money through your campaign and just put it into your pocket. Something Trump does regularly.
no giving money to a campaign is not the same as giving money to a person. you cannot spend your campaign money on anything personal
Yes you can. There are tons of ways to turn campaign funds into private funds. For example if you retire then all your PAC money you have left over can be used in all manner of ways including for yourself. Other ways is to funnel campaign funding into a charity that you own and extract it from the charity or you can do what Trump does and schedule events in properties you own at increased rates and extract it from there.Lastly you can also bribe people indirectly. You do not need to give them actual money when you can just give them goods or services of value. Things like luxury vacations is common or items of value. Funding their campaign also counts towards this form of indirect bribery since what you are buying is his position of power which means you hold leverage over him and can use it to extract favors.
you have no idea what you're talking about, its illegal to use campaign funds on your person
you're just bubling around and changing the subject ever post. you have no focusdonating to a campaign is not the same as giving money to a person; therefore joe biden being given money directly via his son is a serious crimestupid swede focus on your own country, as you all get raped by muslim invaders and have your culture destroyed. america was smart enough to ban all entry by muslims
I already described in detail how someone could, if they wanted to, extract campaign money for personal use and also explained to you how funding a campaign is also giving someone something of value and as such can be used as a form of bribe in and of itself without ever becoming pocket money for the candidate.
we aren't talkinb about how you "could" your method is illegal and is thus not the same as what someone is doing, investing in a campaign is NOT the same as giving money to someoneyou ignored how your country is being raped by muslims =)
All the methods I have mentioned are legal and used by politicians today in USA.
they're not legal and donating to a campaign is not the same as bribery
They are legal, I just explained to you how to do it completely legally and campaign donations can be bribery which is why you have campaign finance laws.
the things you described are not legalyou also ignored how muslims are raping your countryyou're just a stupid foreigner who knows nothing about america
They are legal. Even the illegal things they are doing is not being enforced which also makes it technically "legal" but yeah there are SOOOOO many legal loopholes for how to move campaign money to your private bank account. The fact that you are trying to deny this is quite frankly sad.
show sources proving they are legal
www.fec.gov/.../Turn your leftover campaign funding into a PAC and use that to fund personal travel is a common enough thing.
please cite the exact quote from this that you think makes it ok to use campaign funds for personal expenses
House candidates, individuals traveling on behalf of House candidates, their authorized committees, or the leadership PACs of House candidates are generally prohibited from engaging in non-commercial campaign travel on aircraft. This prohibition does not apply when the travel would be considered an expenditure by someone other than the House candidate, the House candidate’s authorized committee or the House candidate’s leadership PAC (for example, if the House candidate were traveling on behalf of a Senate candidate instead of on behalf of his or her own campaign).This highlights two different loopholes where you can first of all just get an exception and secondly you could easily fabricate an excuse to go anywhere you want by cooperating with another politician.
yea so that specifically says on behalf of the campaign, it can't be for personal useyou can't read
No it says its generally restricted to campaigns, not always and having one of your colleagues officially just ask you to travel somewhere is hardly an actual hindrance since they dont really have to justify WHY you need to go somewhere.
it doesn't say you can spend it the way you want. go get raped by muslims along with the rest of the swedes. i'm done with your ignorance
House candidates, individuals traveling on behalf of House candidates, their authorized committees, or the leadership PACs of House candidates are >>> GENERALLY <<< prohibited from engaging in non-commercial campaign travel on aircraft.That is not a definite statement meaning it does not apply to all cases.As for the other case there is no way to define or confirm if it was private flight or not. If the other politician said they asked for their sake how would you disprove that? Its simply an impossibility which means they can abuse this however much they want and legally too.
this thread is about biden dummy
What's his position on flies landing on people, nowadays? It used to be evidence of demonic possession, iirc. If it's "yet to come", presumably there's nothing in the video.
i'm watching them ignore it right now, literally someone on this thread went on about how the article is about trump didn't even hear the story
they're trying, but its trending on all the news tabs on youtube
biden's poll numbers are dropping; not that polls meant much
its pretty close to the election to bury anything. everyone is looking
I hope it gets out
looks like it did huh?
Good. Let the Salt flow
of course a willing puppet like you would say that
Whereas you're willing to believe any nonsense that comes your way, as long as it confirms your prejudices. Guiliani's being fed disinformation by Russia, via Ukraine, just the sort of thing Trump was impeached for.
like how you're willing to believe any nonsense the left says?
Like what, for example?
While you're trying to come up with an example that doesn't make you look silly, it's not just "the left" that are saying there's Russian disinformation, Trump's administration is, too:"On September 10, 2020, the U. S. Treasury Department sanctioned Derkach "for attempting to influence the U. S. electoral process," while also alleging that Derkach "has been an active Russian agent for over a decade, maintaining close connections with the Russian Intelligence Services.""In case you didn't know: "On December 5, 2019, Derkach met with President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani in Kyiv to put together a corruption case against Biden's son Hunter, according to Derkach."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrii_DerkachSo, like I said, obvious disinformation.
its still giong; that's 3 days of "nothing"!
Painting means “taking a person as a target” on social media or otherwise on the internet, that is, putting people against a certain person.
well that's a meaningless word to me, the information in here is true and significant and thus should be talked about
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!