I'm sorry but god didn't give humans the right to think on their own. I had to say c because it was the only one that didn't involve something that doesn't exist
Why did you say c when it has to deal with a woman thinking on her own and your answer says she doesn't have a right to? - 2 months ago
Answerer
I totally believe a women should have the right to chose on her own, that is obviously the correct answer! I probably would have gone with D if you hadn't got god involved. I believe in spontaneous generation, and most other basic scientific principles.. I don't believe however that god gave us the right to think, I don't believe he created heaven and earth either. I am educated in science, and there is just too much evidence to convince me that god does not exist. I'm sorry - 2 months ago
N/A
(Age:30 to 35)
When: 3 months ago
I think each person has to make their own decisions, but I think that sometimes, depending on what decisions we make, we all have to live with either the guilt or consequences. My dad admitted to me once that he had gotten a girl pregnant before he met my mom (whom he got pregnant outside of wedlock too), and he talked the girl into having an abortion. He told me that he felt guilty and condemned all of his life. He also told me that when he met my mom, he purposely got her pregnant. I think he did this because he was trying to make up for what he considered a mistake of the abortion previously. However, it was evident to me, all the years that I was growing up, that he never really wanted to be a father and that he did not have what it took to be a good father and/or truly care about me, so sometimes I wish that I had been aborted too because of the way that my father treated me while growing up. He was physically and verbally abusive to me and everyone around me because he did not want to be a father. He was too immature and emotionally unstable to raise children. Over the years, however, I'm glad that I was not aborted, but I wish that he had made the choice for the right reasons - to not abort me because he loved me. Instead, he chose to not abort me because he had a guilty conscience about the first baby! To this day, my dad and I do not speak to each other and I think that's sad.
Society will never agree on this subject as it deals with different ideologies of life.
If a girl gets raped and becomes impregnated, should she be allowed to have an abortion?
That's the classic argument and if you say yes, why then shouldn't a couple who didn't want a child be forced to raise one. Not that I feel sympathetic towards the parents but rather unwanted child.
Sure you can put them up for adoption but what are the percentages of positive outcomes of that? A child without love goes deep down in the "unconscious" mind as Sigmound would've said.
"well you shouldn't have had sex then if you don't want to deal with the repercussions."
Although true, I understand there is that line of responsibility and also the "I'll just get an abortion" excuse. Which I think is very disturbing but not far fetched to how people deal with things.
"don't drink and drive." How many of us have driven home a little more tipsy and made it out okay?
Yes, don't have sex until you're ready but people do it.
"abortion is killing a human baby." If I masturbate, am I aborting billions of babies? Is a baby only when the egg and sperm are one, 1 month, 1 year?
When a girl releases her egg, did she abort a potential human?
Its a question of the heart and the mind . That's one of the toughest decisions to make . I've been involved in that . Basically we were seperated for ten days when she found out and told me . She wasnt working and I wasnt making much money with the job I had . My car wasn't reliable and hers was looking like it would be repossessed . After arduous discussion she reluctantly decided for an abortion . Its bothered me for over a year now . I know its bothered her because she has a low chance of having kids to begin with . She felt it was meant to be . A question of the heart . I felt it was unfair to the kid because of our love and financial situation . A question of the mind . Its bothered me because there's always that "what if ? " . Maybe our relationship would have worked out . I know that if we decided to have it, I would have loved it more than life and that bothers me . Knowing that fact, can an abortion ever be the right decision ? All I know is that I don't know anything and no one can answer this for you . What I do know is that I'm pro choice . And I know that there aren't any loves in my life now,but there could have been two . And I know id be happy .
Choice C just infuriates me. While I am very pro choice, I would not personally be in favor of an abortion. That being said, why is it a womans choice? Why isn't it the couples choice? Why should a man be obligated to financially support some womans choice? Either it needs to be the couples choice or the womans responsibility.
In my opinion, the only fair way is to have some kind of contract for the man to sign, stating that he was willing and able to provide an abortion (including covering the cost). That way, if the woman decides to keep it, it's her problem. Most issues involving children in any way are so heavily loaded against men. At least this way it would be fair. - 6 months ago
I think it's okay. Its down to the "couple" to decide whether they are ready for a baby in their lives. If they decide to have an abortion, then hopefully they've learned from it, and will then use contraception in the future ..
The way I see it, there are two basic mindsets one can have when approaching this question: Religious and Secular/Non-Religious. From the standpoint of a secular person, the question of when a cluster of cells becomes a human is a scientific one, and there is no answer that is 100% universally accepted. However, most scientists agree that the point at which an embryo has a functional nervous system (i. E. When it is developed enough to "suffer") is when it becomes a human.
Now, when you cross over into the realm of the Religious things tend to get a little hairy. Most would say that life begins at conception (because that is when god gives it a soul/spirit/whatever). However, things like chimera and twins seem to disprove this idea. The Bible does not comment directly on abortion, even though abortion was practiced even during biblical times. All Biblical arguments on abortion are indirect and open to interpretation, and debate continues even among the world's most respected theologians. Even so, the Bible seems to suggest in several places that the unborn are not endowed with the qualities or rights of personhood. In fact, the Jews, who are famous for their preservation of tradition, have never considered abortion to be a sin.
Pro-choice activists also have a near-argument stopper in Exodus 21:22-23, where the person hood of an unborn fetus is almost explicitly denied:
"If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury [i. E. , to the mother], the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury [i. E. , to the mother], you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot"
The traditional interpretation of this text, which even rabbinical scholars accepted for thousands of years, is this: if a man hurts a woman enough to cause a miscarriage, he reciprocates according to how much injury he caused her, I. E. , an eye for an eye, etc. However, if the miscarriage resulted in no injury to the woman, then all the assailant had to pay was a monetary fine. The fact that the Bible does not equate the assailant's life with the stillborns life is proof that the Bible does not count the fetus as a person.
In any case, do what you want, based on whatever you believe is right, and don't try to go around shoving your morality down other people's throats.
GIJoe, yes, I would be perfectly fine with that. Its not as if I'd have a choice as an embryo to send my future parents an email trying to sell myself by telling them of all the great things I will do but only if they choose to have me. How about this, how would you like it if I were to tell you what clothing you are allowed to wear, what food to eat, how to speak, what girls you are only to date and how to live your life on a day to day basis. Would you like that? People want choices. - 6 months ago
Answerer
GiJoe you are making a logical error here. If you don't exist, then you can't care whether or not you exist. When you think about it, billions of years passed in this universe before YOU existed and it never inconvenienced you at all. :P - 6 months ago
I believe even if there was no religion, people would still debate this topic just as fiercely. We are all born with a sense of right and wrong, and we all draw the line differently. Being agnostic, I look at this from a semi religious standpoint. but what really sways me from a scientific standpoint is, at the moment of conception, an entirely new, unique and different being is created. Thats why I'm against it. Its a person that will only exist once, and never again. Why cut its life so short? - 6 months ago
Answerer
Sugarcoat, at the moment of conception it is not a "being" at all. It's a cluster of cells. When you scratch your nose, you kill thousands of cells (which, due to advances in science are ALL "potential" human beings by the way). This thing is incapable of experience or feeling. It is not conscious. It is not a person. - 6 months ago
Its not a embryo when you get a abortion but a fetus there's a huge difference. The whole point about the not existing was to get the point across that you wouldn't have been given the chance to succeed. You wouldn't be given the chance to have a family and have fun enjoying life. - 6 months ago
Answerer
GiJoe, you are making a judgment from the point of view of a being that is conscious and aware. Even as a fetus, there is no functioning nervous system. It cannot think. It cannot even feel. Until it has it's own functioning nervous system, it is the medical equivalent of a tumor inside a woman. The ONLY difference is that it has the immediate "potential" to become a fully developed human being. Following YOUR logic, denying the opportunity for something to "potentially" make a person is murder. - 6 months ago
Answerer
Thus, every time ANYONE declines ANY potential chance to make a human being, they are committing murder. Every time a couple decides not to have sex, they are committing murder, by your very own logic, by not allowing the eggs and sperm they carry to fulfill their "potential" to make a baby. - 6 months ago
A little late here, but even though I'm Pro-Life, I have to say, that according to the Roman Catholic Church, the soul is given once you are born (which I disagree with, but is an entirely different topic) and I have to say that, according to Law (at least where I live) the embryo has all the rights and duties, given by law to humans, at the moment of conception, so technically if you abort, you are violating the future child's rights, which apparently are never taken into account nowadays. - 6 months ago
Abortion is basically killing an innocent human baby before birth. Anybody that voted for answer d should rethink why they voted it because god did give us the choice to do what we want in life but not when it involves killing an innocent life. 'All persons have a basic right not to be killed, but they can forfeit that right if they commit a serious enough crime" What crime did that baby make?
Technically, there is period of time before the law considers the baby a "human" so one should not take the moral high road and dismiss the opposing viewpoint. Quick question, if the mother decides to keep the baby, are you willing to look after it? - 7 months ago
Answerer
If I was the father of course I would be willing to look after it. You don't make sense the law considers the baby a "human" what is it a alien come on think! I guess a beating heart doesn't mean anything - 6 months ago
I should clarify, I didn't mean it was your biological baby. Lets say your neighbors daughter got pregnant by another guy and she decided to have an abortion. You come along and tell her how she is killing a human being. Are /you/ willing to prevent the killing and to adopt the baby and raise it as if it was your own child? Yes or no. If 'no' then why not? - 6 months ago
Answerer
I can't be responsible for somebody else's actions I would rather them put the baby up for adoption and hope that a family that might not be able to have a baby or want to just adopt come by. - 6 months ago
Hey. Just keep the religious out of it! Look at the moment. Can you afford it! Cause if the kids is out, he deserves the best. So no messing around. More importantly it should be both individuals choice.