Home | New Members | Expert Answers | How To Videos | Our Blog | Sign Up | Sign In
Invite Friends
 
GirlsAskGuys.com GirlsAskGuys.com
  Chat Flirting Dating Relationships Sexuality Break-Up Behavior Style Other
Anonymous User

Will You Marry Me? And...Sign This Prenup?

Average Rating:
Your Rating: 
MiserableBoringEnjoyableInterestingFascinating
 
Anonymous User (Age:18 to 24)     When: A month ago
Views: 1180     Category: Relationships

Back story:

We started dating, and we hit it off right away. From the very first day, there was really strong and powerful chemistry between us. The second day we knew each other we already felt comfortable enough to be intimate "both sexually and emotionally". By the end of that week, we made things official. Two weeks later, things started getting pretty serious. I just knew she was the woman I wanted to spend the rest of my life with. After 2-3 months, we moved in together and have been living with each other for 6 years.

She's a high school teacher, and I just finished my residency and will be working as a doctor soon.

I've been thinking about it logically; because if you think about something so serious emotionally, you're bound to (1) leave yourself open for emotional blackmail and manipulation by the other person until they get what they want (2) not make the best choice for what's in your best interest.

The way I see things, is that I have nothing to gain from even getting married. When two people love each other, what do they want to do? Be together; well we already are together. We don't need to be married to live together, to love each other, to have sex, to go through life together, or even to start a family. What do I gain from marriage, that I don't have without marriage? Nothing. What burdens do I take on with marriage? The risk of having to pay alimony in the event of a divorce, the risk of accumulating and building wealth with mostly my income, and then having to part with half.

Nevertheless, even though I have no gain from it, I want to do it for her, because I know it's important to her. She's always wanted to get married, and she obviously needs a sense of financial security and stability.

I spoke to a friend of mine that's an attorney, and he said the most bulletproof way to protect income and assets is to form an irrevocable trust and LLC. My income will be paid to the LLC which the trust will own, and all assets acquired will be done so through the trust, so it can never be considered marital property. The trust will make distributions during the year to meet only our living expenses; and in the event of divorce, only my living expenses. The existence of such a trust will be fully disclosed prior to the marriage.

But I want her to have some choice. I know our incomes are different, and we will be contributing disproportionately. For as long as we're together, I want her to know that she will have the lifestyle we can both have, but "IF" we no longer are, I want her to understand that it's unreasonable to expect to enjoy the benefits of being together, when we no longer are.

I just know that if I ask her to sign one, she will start with her emotional blackmail/manipulation routine. First putting my love for her in question, then trying to make me feel bad and guilty, then crying. I just want to know how to best approach this issue.

If we can't agree, then I think it's best we don't even get married.


Update: I think it's important to re-note that (1) we don't even need to get married, (2) there's no need for a prenup when you have an irrevocable trust.. I WANT to do it for her, I'm already being flexible and giving her choice..    A month ago

Update: I feel I need to clarify, that I don't want to marry her simply because that's what she wants. I "WANT" to spend the rest of our lives together. I do love her. And if that's what she wants too, great! That's called marriage with a prenup.    A month ago

Update: I'm also not "looking forward to divorce". I'm planning "in the event" of one. That's not setting up the relationship to fail and all that other crap. That's just being smart and behaving how a responsible adult should with serious life steps like these.    A month ago

3000 characters left  Anonymous Spell Check Spell Check
 Report Question Widgets Note This
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 Share on Facebook
  Poll added by question asker. Cast your vote to see the current results.   What is this?

You should have her draft her own prenup, talk about what you want in it and don't agree to, until you both reach a mutual agreement.

Forget the prenup, with the irrevocable trust and LLC, none of the income or assets are ever actually owned by you, so they're never your property, the court can't even enforce child support, much less alimony or division of assets.

Forget marriage all together. If she is only focused on what she wants and can't consider the fact that you're contributing disproportionately, then she's being selfish and it's not a good preview of how the rest of the marriage will be like.

I have an other suggestion (please explain)

Answers

    From Guys  
22
From Girls  
29
 

Best Answer

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: 27 days ago
just get her at a time when she's relaxed and in good humour- over dinner after work would be a good one. maybe cook her something simple like meatballs and spaghetti from scratch link and serve with light dessert if you like. If you never cook for her though, this is not going to work because she'll know somethings up. So only do that if you cook for her anyway. But defo mention it to her when she comes home from work when she's sitting down watching tv etc.

I'd do it soon too because you need to get it sorted. Maybe just start with a general conversation on marriage-on marriage, kids and money (using the types of questions I've given you a link to). when the pay-gap comes up, maybe mention the pre-nup thing then. It's a good way to initiate the conversation in a more natural subtle manner rather than saying "this is what I want and that's it", even though you should still keep your eye on what you want. If someone keeps complaining, a good tip is to say "Ok I recognise what you're saying but..." and then use the same statement like "i want to sort this out before the wedding" or "i want us to have stable finance" etc. Its called the broken record technique. Basically if you keep using the same words, she's more likely to back down. But stay calm all the way through-dont retaliate if she says anything, just listen because she'll calm down eventually (if she does get annoyed) and remain cool and collected. give her the week I mentioned. say that you're willing to compromise some things if she gets annoyed and see if you can work on that/discuss them with lawyer afterwards).
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Thanks you. I really do appreciate it. I feel I should mention that I'm like Richard Gere, in the sense that, how often do you see him getting angry or retaliating? I've never had a problem having emotionally heated discussions and staying calm and composed. Which actually tends to p*ss her and most of my exes off for some reason.

I trust my friend, and I've known him since undergrad in college. But if she wants her own attorney, she knows my family would pay for whoever else she wanted - 27 days ago
Question Asker As great as your suggestion is, I can't help feeling guilty reading it am picturing myself going through with it. I just feel it's somewhat calculating an emotionally exploitative/manipulative. First seasoning her emotional state so she's more suggestable to what I want to tell her, then giving her resistance no traction until I psychologically break her into feeling "resistance is futile" and giving up her position. That to be, is the same as forcing her; only this is indirect. - 27 days ago
Question Asker Not putting down anything you've said, because I really do appreciate it, but if I was looking for ways to manipulate the other person while feeling no guilt or shame for doing so, the possibilities are endless.

I just don't want that to ever enter into my relationship with s/o I want to spend the rest of my life with. I feel that if you taint respect, there's no way to ever remove that stain. Isn't there a more cut & dry, or more open and honest way to go about us talking about this? - 27 days ago
Question Asker Wait, I just realized the dilemma. It's a choice between being direct and honest and encountering loads of relatiation, or being indirect and manipulative but not encountering as much relatiation. Mostly because our interests are not in sync, so retaliation is natural. Though I would much rather prefer an honest discussion, even if it meant retaliation; rather than a dishonest discussion with less retaliation just for the sake of pushing my point or getting what I want. Thank you. - 27 days ago

What Girls Said

mynikos
38  
mynikos      When: 10 days ago
I think it would depend on the terms of the pre-nup. Has she been with you all through med school? What kind of wife will she be? Will she take care of you in every way but financially? I think a pre-nup is ok for people who are established and already have a marriage & kids behind them. But when you're young, building a life, a family, etc, I don't agree with it. I believe you are both building a life and estate TOGETHER and a pre-nup is not a good way to start building a life. The whole point in getting married is to have a LIFE PARTNER. She may not be contributing financially, but if she is doing everything to be a good wife, to be your helpmate, etc, she deserves to have some value assigned to that. I think for you to put all of your money where she can't touch it, except for the critical household funds, is ridiculous. Do you not trust her AT ALL? If that's the case, there is really no sense in even getting married. If you loved her, you would want her to feel like she is a part of your life...an IMPORTANT part. Unless she's proven to have issues with handling money, I think that part is WAY out of line.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
Tamikaze Anyways, pre-nups only protect assets you gained as a single person before you got married. He definitely does not address the fact that he has been in school and residency and how much his partner is helping him now. It's as if he thinks all his career is something he has accomplished without any support from her. By having a stable relationship you can focus on school and your career and put more in to it than fellow classmates who are single and spending time trying to meet someone. - 9 days ago
Answerer I totally agree. I wonder if this prenup protects her from the massive student loans he's racked up. It's hard for someone to be a loving, devoted wife w/a husband who doesn't want you "meddling" in his world. That's a recipe for divorce. She may not have a skill that will generate that kind of money, but if she is skilled in creating a happy home environment and raising their children to be loving & happy...I don't think a man can ask for more. If momma ain't happy, ain't nobody happy. - 9 days ago

appletar
76  
appletar      When: 11 days ago
This is one of those uncomfortable things that need to be discussed before marriage and kudos to you for thinking it through so well. Based on what you wrote and the feelings you two share, this should be just locigal sense. However, we woman can be emotional createres! LOL! Perhaps have a thrid party involved like a lawyer or counsellor. If the "logical" part of this comes from an "authority", (although you do want to disucss it with her personally too) she may accept it without feeling like your love is in question. From an outsider view, however, it does not appear that you are being foolish. Even the deepest loves break up for some reason sometimes and it makes sense to protect your assets. Good luck and let us know what happens.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: 15 days ago
I work at a family law firm (DIVORCE).
Believe me, if you have money... I sugget you get a pre-nupt.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: 28 days ago
Absolute trust is just plain stupid-trust to a certain point is fine. All romantic relationships are conditional-as they should be. My parents divorced so I now have a huge fear of marriage/divorce etc. It is enough to make me not marry at all. It IS justified. I just don't want to make that amount of committment to any one person. It's nothing to do with love. I have an enormous ability to love but boundaries are important-ie what you are prepared to accept/not accept. If you don't have this in relationships, you will probably end up being a doormat. I don't want to sign a legal contract binding me to someone (ie marriage) as I regard it as a legalised form of slavery. I'm not saying I would never consider it one day but I would extreme reservations about it. Not everyone needs to get married. There are alternatives like living together which can be considered. After a few years living with someone, you can be legally recognised as someone's "common law wife/husband". Its not marriage by any stetch of the imagination but it does give you some protection.

And who is to say the questioner will ditch the wife/run off with younger woman etc? That's all speculation and its unfair to diss someone you don't even know like this. I don't know him either but I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, rightly or wrong, and give him what I hope is constructive advice. I don't think the questioner is being a misogynist either. The only problem I have is that I don't think he actually wants the marriage, quite aside from financial arguments. Get the finances sorted-fine, that's easy. But make sure you actually want the marriage or else it is doomed. I have heard of many women issuing ultimatums and pressuring men to marry and stories of resulting unhappy marriages-but how could it be otherwise when someone was pushed into marriage against their will? If a woman had posted this question, few women would disagree so vehemently. But because its a man, people will jump on the bandwagon and say its chauvinistic when its actually not. Pre-nups are a good idea because some men and women are golddiggers. Look at Kevin Federline who married Britney Spears or Kerry Katona's scumbag husband. Or take ZsaZsa Gabor who said that she she got a house every time she divorced a man.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Thanks, that was an objective and unbiased response. I'm guessing you're a professional working woman. I appreciate everything that you said. But I'm still curious how I should go about getting the ball rolling and bringing it up, so we can eventually have this level of conversation, but without encountering all that emotional resistance? - 28 days ago

confusedgirl22
1050  
confusedgirl22      When: 28 days ago
I have another option. Why not live with her for a few years until you are both around 28-30. You are way too young to consider marriage. This is probably why you're not overly enthused by it. Marriage involves responsibility and making sacrifices for other people especially if you have children. You can't be selfish with children! You have to give them your time. So it's a good idea to be selfish in your 20s and focus exclusively on what you want and then settle down in your 30s. Please ignore the negative comments. You are being pragmatic which doesn't sound appealing but its just the truth. Marriage is a leap of faith-it does not always work as statistics show. Go in with best intentions but if its not working, then accept that and move on.

Trust your gut instinct. Only marry if YOU want to get married, not because you're being coerced into it by a fiancee. If YOU do not get married, then consider just living together and making financial provisions and legal safeguards in other forms eg wills. If you decide to get married, draft a pre-nup. Show your fiancee, let her mull it over for a week then make a decision. If her demands are reasonable, then compromise will probably work. If she is being greedy, then please do not get married. You need to discuss some pre-marital questions [ link before you get married with your fiancee.



Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Thank you. that was a very neutral and objective answer.

I'd still like to know how you think the best way to bring something like this up is. - 28 days ago

just4clarity
486  
just4clarity      When: A month ago
See, I think a pre-nup is something I would agree to. But ONLY if I were the one to suggest it... You get me? A pre-nup to me says either you don't see the wedding as being a marriage for life, or you don't trust me.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
v0nDutch If I make more money than the guy, I would want a prenup and it would be okay. but if he made more money than me and wanted a prenup then that means he's selfish. - 29 days ago
Answerer So do you want a husband or a meal ticket? - 28 days ago
Question Asker I don't know if VD is serious or just trolling. that's quite the self-serving double-standard of the century. - 28 days ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
I am curious why you do not discuss what should happen in the case you decide to leave your wife through no fault of her own. So she has babies with you, spends her prime years with you and then all of a sudden you decide life is real good, you are tired of being married and want to trade her in for a younger girl? A lot of professional men do that. It does happen.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker That's insulting to my character. I can understand that my character isn't something she can be certain of, which is why we should have some provisions on that in the pre-nupt. But she knows that better-looking women have wanted me and tried to get me. She knows I've said no to them and rejected them, because I wanted to be with her. She knows I continue to constantly reject them, because I'm not looking for a depreciating & disposable sex toy object, I'm looking for a partner, and I found her. - A month ago
Question Asker I both love her and I'm "in love" with her. I do want us to be together until one of us passes away. And I do want to make her happy and take care of her; for as long as we're together. If (big "IF") we ever fall apart and go our seperate ways, there's no reason she should expect me to still take care of her. She's no longer a part of my life, and I'm no longer a part of hers (if we ever part). A pre-nupt simply aknowledges she has no expectation to obligate me to take care of her if we part. - A month ago
Answerer Just like you know your girlfriend's character but also recognize that in divorce people can change, well of course, that would apply to you to. Also, your original proposal was a trust to protect your income, which is not the same as a pre-nup which would protect your assets gained BEFORE marriage, which as a new doctor you have more debt than assets. So, again, if you fall apart because of your choices, not hers, why should she be treated poorly? - A month ago
Answerer You still are completely skirting around the issue of you being the one to want to leave her through no fault of her own. If you fall apart and go your separate ways after she has had children with you, and spends her best years with you, and it was all due to you and your decision and she loves you and doesn't want a divorce, what are you offering her in your Trust/Pre-nup plan? Why should she suffer due to you and your bad choices? - A month ago
Question Asker "what are you offering her in your Trust/Pre-nup plan? Why should she suffer due to you and your bad choices?" Marriage is not a "rent-a-ho" program. There's no compensation someone should expect in the event of divorce simply because they lived with the other person.

Under this plan, the childrens' care will be provided for. From there on, she will live with no benefit or burden from me. If she feels the children are a burden, I'll gladly take care of them to not "burden" her. - A month ago
Question Asker For as long as we are together, we get to enjoy the benefits of being together, and bear any burdens of being together. If we're apart, that's no longer the case. I don't understand the audacity it takes for someone to feel entitled to have the other person bear a burden to you, so you can still have some of the benefits of being together; even though you've gone your seperate ways.

Though, I see what you're saying about a bilatteral choice vs. a unilatteral choice to divorce. - A month ago
Question Asker There are only 4 possibilities after marriage.

1. We're both happy

2. We're both unhappy

3. She's unhappy, even though I still love her and want to be together.

4. I'm unhappy, even though she still loves me and wants to be together. - A month ago
Question Asker #1 is what we're all hoping for. If #2 happens, that means we both weren't happy with each other, or we both didn't care about the other person's happiness; and we both want out. There's no problem there. You chose to invest your time into becoming a teacher, I chose to invest it in becoming a doctor, let's take what we both respectively put it, and live our seperate lives from that point on. Whatever we had between us is no more. Don't expect anything from me, because I don't from you. - A month ago
Question Asker So far, if that doesn't sound "fair", then it's probably because you believe marriage is an investment, and that divorce is a means of cashing out. That's the only reason someone would feel a sense of entitlement. A pre-nupt tells me, no, I don't think of marriage that way. I love you, that's why I want to be with you, not because I want someone to take care of me or compensate me for doing them the favor of investing my time to spend it with them (as if their time is worthless) - A month ago
Question Asker Let's suppose that after the first bite of that infamous wedding cake, she turns completely asexual, gains 50+lbs, and that sweet loving women I wanted to spend the rest of my life with turns into a nagging, whinning, selfish b*tch that fills me with agony just by being next to her. What do I do now? Do I leave and pay the burden/cost, or stay to avoid the burden/cost? If I'm miserable, is it fair to financially bind me to be unhappy? Shouldn't I have the freedom to be happy? Or shouldn't I? - A month ago
Show All
 

vsss223
241  
vsss223      When: A month ago
We fret so much over the consequences of the unknown
that sometimes we opt to retreat rather than to take risks.
Everyone experiences fear when they feel their safety and security
is under peril. Often this threat is only perceived and not realistic;
we indulge in fear of the unknown. In your situation- obviously you are worried about the "what ifs" of marriage. And- on an extremely negative scale!
It is common- because we ALL face fear of the unknown- We are only Human.

But- marriage is a commitment, a bond, and a un- separated love. You should NEVER get married if you are not 100% in love… hence the divorce rates being so high. Some guys (you are a great example), are only willing to get married to please the woman- perhaps so she doesn’t leave . You only wish to maintain that comfortability. After a long road with a woman in a relationship (yours being 6 yrs), this gets tough because there is usually always a commitment waiting. This is understandable from the woman’s perspective- but chances are- if you have not married her yet- you most likely don’t want to! Doing it to please her is never a good reason.

The thought of divorce should not arise in your thought process if . . .

A) You are REALLY in love with this girl and want to spend the rest of your lives together.
B) And if you really love this girl- you would not have to develop excuses in your mind to justify your soon to be behaviors that (which will effect her negatively) haven’t even occurred yet.

Lets break this down analytically...

You say you love her right?
If you really love her with all your heart, and you know she is unstable financially,
why would you even think of eliminating something that can help her, save her from difficulty in the future IF you both happened to divorce?

If you love her NOW – don’t you want her to be safe, happy, secure, comfortable etc. -whether it be now or years from now?

So why are you already thinking of ways to destroy her or take things away if the marriage doesn’t last?






Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker That's rich. I have to tell my little brother to use that one when trying to get laid. "If you really love me, then the thought of me using you or leaving you after we have sex shouldn't even arise in your thought process. you wouldn't be developing these excuses in your mind to justify your behavior. If you have feelings for me, wouldn't you want me to blow my load all over your face?"

I love conditional statements that support what I want the other person to do; very clever. - A month ago
Question Asker I will give you credit though for being the most feminine and tactful response out of all the other girls who had something to say.

But fear is natural. And giving her safety and security (through the right to assets and income) means giving up safety and security on my part; that's just the cut & dry reality.

Trying to persuade me to overlook that reaks of ill intentions. Trying to make me feeling bad or guilty, reaks of manipulation. So let's cut that out and look at it rationally instead - A month ago
InquisitiveMale I agree with everything said retaining to the accused not wanting marriage but not the pre-nup. Preparation for the unknown is what separates the successful from the unsuccessful. Always have a contingency plan. This does not mean retreat from the unknown just proceeding with caution.

Running blind is the quickest way to the poor house.
- A month ago

serm416
557  
serm416      When: A month ago
WOW - I've just spend a couple of minutes reading up on all the other comments and your extensive justification for them...

A chinese proverb..."Fish live in vast sea as freely as birds fly in the boundless sky". The English tranlation is "Imagination is your only limit." You've obviously invested a great deal of time and energy figuring out how to justify your faulty logic when it comes to this relationship and what you are and are not willing to do within it. Is this REALLY what you want in a loving, committed marriage and in what should be the most rewarding and EMOTIONAL relationship you'll ever have?

Being clever isn't doesn't necessarily mean you'll be happy. I am envisioning you as a sad little man...no matter what you actually look like.

Challenge your initial premise - get some therapy.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker In argumentation, when one person can't prove their point (usually because they lack any support for their argument, or continuing down that path would only prove the other person right) it's usually much easier to resort to "ad hominem" (personal attacks against the person)

That's truly being "clever". Being rational (the opposite of clever) is doing away with evoking emotions in others as a way to support your argument; and instead simply pointing out the facts. - A month ago
Answerer Oh - thanks for the education...Good job - you can spit out some remarks from a college seminar you took on argumentation. Yipee. I still think you're not the best catch this women can make and while you appear to have many intellectual talents with regard to writing, arguing and defending your point - its' obvious that you are getting off on defending yourself a little too zealously. A bigot towards women. And still a sad little man. And still in need of therapy. - A month ago
Question Asker That's nice dear. Thank you for your input. - A month ago
anonymous4 You are the most narcissistic man I've ever heard... - A month ago
noricat Dogpile on the OP for wanting to protect him,self financially from the all to well known fallout of a failed marriage, right, bravo girls, way to prove you have all grown as modern new age women.

All you've said ASAIC is "I think its horrible that your not rolling over and taking it like a MAN"

So much hostility to a guy who isn;t playing by your rules. :/

lol - 9 days ago

serm416
557  
serm416      When: A month ago
WOW - what an offer. You don't sound manipulative, greedy or self-centered at all. You sound just like the man a women dreams of! Let's see...when I grow up - I want to marry a man who will not be particularly interested in buying the cow since he's drinking the milk...I want a man who is unwilling to share a full relationship with me on the basis that if things go wrong I don't want to have to support the person...When I grow up I want a man who will devalue the relationship before it even starts - and who will be tricky enough to circumvent the law on marriage on the basis that he never felt compelled to 1) be married in the first place and 2) has so little idea of what cherishing another person means that he's making it abundantly clear that he doesn't really want to do it...but golly I guess if I do...I'll make sure my good lawyer buddy helps me figure out how I can always be in the "win" category of screwing her first.

Your last statement sums if up pretty well for me...she shouldn't get married to YOU. Could you send me her phone number so I can let her know what a f***ing asshole you really are?
You obviously are a very clever dude - so clever you are too intellectual to HAVE a relationship. Please NEVER have children - or better yet - be a Darwin candidate.

And finally - if she wrote YOUR question about you while trying to decide if you were worth her time and effort...WOULD YOU FEEL CHERISHED, RESPECTED OR IN LOVE? I'm disgusted you fooled a medical school into accepting you because you obviously have a sociaopathic personality. Get a life!
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker Do you mean anti-social personality disorder? If so, a psychopath literally (pathos: Greek = suffers) from their "psyche". If it's any kind of personality disorder you'd like to make me a candidate for, I would go with schizoid personality disorder, since the hallmark of the disorder is complete lack of emotion.

So what you're basically saying is, a woman dreams of a man who is dumb and naive enough so that she can manipulate, and be happy catering to her needs while ignoring his own? - A month ago
Answerer Dude - you are missing the point. Apparently you are missing the sarcasm as well. Women do not dream of marrying men who are dumb but they do dream of someone who is capable of being in an intimate relationship and who cares for them. Your whole premise starts out with the idea that you are going to be screwed - which seems likely to happen if you are so vigilent and worried about the end result. I still think she's better off without you. - A month ago
Question Asker So, if she would have the right to half of my assets and income in the event of a divorce, she wouldn't be better off without me? But if she doesn't have the right to half of my assets and income in the event of a divorce, she would be better off without me?

I might not be acknowledging the sarcasm, but I'm definitely making note of the irony. You seriously have the audacity to try and make an emotional/love argument while it's clear how important financials and money really are to you? - A month ago
Answerer Money is nothing. In fact my ex-husband left our marriage in much better financial shape then when he came into it. So money isn't my issue - it's yours. I'd like the women to be better off with you!!! as a loving person whose committed to the relationship fully. But hey - at least make sure your "pre-nup" specifies that she gets to keep everything of hers prior to the marriage and she doesn't have to contribute to the trust if she never gonna see any of it. - A month ago
Question Asker Obviously. not only prior to the marriage, but anything earned by her during the marriage as well. there's obviously no way I would want her to put a dollar into the trust, since that would be comingling. - A month ago
noricat Again, another emotional pointless lash out at the OP for not wanting to be responsible for an overgrown little girl in the event of a divorce. Why do women get so hostile at the prospect of a guy who is actually smart and intelligent and wants to play on a level playing field with a girl (as in a genunie relationship based on more than the perks of a marriage contract)?

Its so childish and just makes you look like a little manipulative insincere toddler rather then the "loving" partner. - 9 days ago
Answerer Noricat - you come late to the discussion. And if all you can do to add to it is call me an insecure toddler - you also are in need of some maturing yourself. He asked if she should marry him...and the answer is NOT IN A MILLION YEARS. - 9 days ago

click11
372  
click11      When: A month ago
sometimes trust doesn't always work out. but I'm sure there's a prenupt where she gets to keep what's hers now and then whatever you make during hte marriage you split. but if she makes a lot more then maybe you should just sign it. if you don't hink anything thing will ever happen, then you don't have to worry about what happens with her money in case of a divorce.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

the-love-guru
2140  
the-love-guru      When: A month ago
This breaks my heart. And this is exactly why Americans have one of the highest rates of divorce! Our values are so mixed up. Marriage was created to be the greatest and strongest bond one could experience.

I don't agree with living together before marriage (studies have proven that those who live together before marrying are more likely to divorce- it's true), but it shoes that you don't value the sanctity of marriage. Yeah, I'm old school (and people will vote down my comment), but I believe that marriage is "until death do us part". If you're worrying about protecting your assets, you don't truly trust her, but you also don't have 100% faith in your future marriage.

If you were a multi millionaire who couldn't trust any woman, that's one thing... but c'mon! You're still a resident. If you're going to make the woman you love (and who has lived with you 6 YEARS without a marriage commitment) sign a piece of paper that ruins the beauty of marriage, you don't deserve her or the experience. Marriage means trusting the person with your heart and future... 2 things you obviously can't bear to abandon.
Do you agree?
Agree   3 Disagree   3
Report
 
InquisitiveMale I can understand why studies would show couples that were living together previous to the marriage are more likely to divorce. Think of the personality of someone who would do this. There probably the type of person who believes in remaining in a marriage even if it makes you unhappy. It?s a mind setting that should naturalize any weight the survey holds. There an abnormality of the prospectors. It?s basically worthless information. - A month ago
InquisitiveMale Love is often not enough to sustain a marriage. Things change, people grow, and life is forever evolving. Someone who prepares for the unknown does not deserve a statement such as ?you don?t deserve her or the experience?.

If I?m in good health I shouldn?t invest in medical insurance? God forbid things make a turn for the worse at least I?m protected. It?s the same mythologies.
- A month ago
Answerer Why invest in something unless you have faith in it? Yes, people change (and some are unaware that their spouse is a pathological liar/cheat). I understand, but as the type of woman who's dating a old-fashioned and respectful man, I think a long relationship is neccessary. Marriage is a lifelong commitment, and unless a SERIOUS and impossible situation should arise, I'm in it for go. I'm sorry, but people today are just too lazy. Don't rush into marriage; it's not always "fun", but suck it up - A month ago
Answerer And if those statistical findings are, as you say "worthless information", why is discussed in psychology and other social science classrooms around the country? I believe that's just an opinion you're stating. We're talking about legitimate results from qualified psychologists that are PUBLISHED in psych journals, not some college kid asking his buddies what they think about the matter. - A month ago
Question Asker 28 years ago, an article was published in the Journal of Dermatology dealing with hair loss. The author claimed to have found a shocking correlation between men who were married, and hair loss. As his data noted, married men suffered hair loss 17 more often than unmarried men. Two years later the same author noted that this was not due to marriage, but due to "age". Married men were usually older, and that's why they suffered more hair loss. Age & marriage where highly correlated, not hair loss - A month ago
Question Asker Just because an article is published in a prestigeous journal doesn't mean it has any real value. Similarly, just because a college kids is talking with his friends about something, doesn't mean it's worthless. Need we remind ourselves of John Nash & Game Theory?

To some degree, I see what IM is saying. Any study done on those couples carries with it a "huge" bias from a rather self-selected sample. - A month ago
Question Asker Couples where both partners are not happy, would "divorce" prior to a marriage (and would never enter into the statistics to begin with)

Couples where both partners are happy, and choose to marry quickly (enter the statistics as not living together prior to marriage & not divorced)

Couples where both partners are not happy, but continue to live together, and end up getting married (eventually get divorced more often, but due to the tolerance of the passive partner eventually wearing thin) - A month ago
Question Asker So the statistics are just like the hair loss example; there is a correlation, but no meaningful relationship. All the correlation proves is that a "push-over" partner who will tolerate being unhappy and "not break-up or leave" there and then, but instead continue to live together and even get pressured into getting married, will eventually discover that their unhappiness has its limits, and they will eventually call the quits. That's what it proves, not that living together leads to divorce. - A month ago
Question Asker Any misrepresentation of the statistical relationship is no doubt an effort by anti-living-together-before-marriage conservative or religious zealots, or by the few get-married-quickly-without-living-together-god-forbid-you-discover-how-horrible-I-really-am-prior-to-getting-married-then-you'll-never-marry-me women.. - A month ago
Question Asker One "marriage" & "living together" statistic that's ignored are the couples who are happy, who do love each other, and continue to live together without ever getting married, but without ever breaking up or leaving each other either. - A month ago
Show All
 

xxLadyDamselxx
15  
xxLadyDamselxx      When: A month ago
It just seems to me that you're doubting that you two will last, which you probably won't if you have doubts. Trsut her, trust your love and get on with it. I can ensure you you will be happier (if you truly love her) married.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report

eyesbleedforhim
54  
eyesbleedforhim      When: A month ago
I'm a girl and I believe a pre-nupt is a GREAT idea! You should tell her it has nothign to do with her but somthing you just feel like you want to do. Just in case. If she gets all emotional than that's her fault. If you cave in now when you're married she'll do the whole blackmail/emotional thing to get whatever she wants and your money. She'll make you feel bad the whole time and insist that you buy her a new car, or a new boat or whatever to keep her happy because of somthing you did 'wrong', which if she loves you enough to marry you she WONT do. She'll understand
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker I bet all guys had a "muahhaha" moment reading that, but that's only because that whole argument in pro-male-interest emotional blackmail (as opposed to pro-female-interest emotional blackmail). First off, I don't want to be in a relationship where either one tries to manipulate the other, and that goes for me too. I respect her, and I'm not going to throw that kind of argument her way. I'm looking for something more pure-logic, neutral and objective. - A month ago
Question Asker Though I must say, it's been a pleasant departure from all the pro-female interest emotional blackmail responses.

if you don't mind, I'd like to know "why" you think a pre-nupt is a "great" idea; as a girl. it's really not a gender-based question. it's really a question of economics. the lower earner is anti-pre-nupt while the higher one is pro-pre-nupt. now that you mentioned it, I'd like to explore the topic through your eyes as a woman. - A month ago

jrose
678  
jrose      When: A month ago
I don't know about the laws in your state about common-law, but I do know here in Canada, if you live common-law for a certain period of time (a year I believe) then it's treated as a marriage and assests are divided anyway. So maybe you should look into that- you might lose anyway. As for her being manipulative and guilt-tripping you- it doesn't sound like to me you're cut out for marriage if you think your girlfriend being hurt by the fact that you're going into marriage thinking of divorce is manipulation- maybe it's just how she feels, it's certainly how I would feel. It seems a bit mercenary and materialistic.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report

Roshell2009
324  
Roshell2009      When: A month ago
I was shocked that you would say if you asked her to sign one she would start with her emotional blackmail/manipulations routine & she obiviously needs a sense of financial security and stablility!

She has a degree and a job, that in itself is stability, maybe not on a Dr's level, but its stable.

I don't think the question should concern a pre-nup it should be why you would even consider being with someone you have so little respect for? You stated you did not need to marry, so don't. Let her find someone who will cherish, respect, and appreciate her.

If I have spoken out of turn forgive me, but marriage is an adjustment when you are in love, imagine what it would be for you.

Good Luck
Do you agree?
Agree   4 Disagree   0
Report

krystia
76  
krystia      When: A month ago
If you love her and she wants to get married, then you should want to get married for her sake (as long as you're merely neutral on the issue). Especially after six years. The good thing is that you seem to have already figured this out, so kudos to you!

As someone who will inherit a reasonable sum of money from her parents after marrying, I say that pre-nup/other arrangement would be best. If she loves you, truly, then she may be hurt but eventually she'll understand. It's a requirement you're making in order to do what she wants. it's a good compromise.
Do you agree?
Agree   3 Disagree   0
Report

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
I think you should forget the idea of marriage. Not because of any "selfishness" on her part, but because you simply have the wrong mind-set to get married to anyone. Marriage is challenge enough without coming into it seeing it as you clearly do. I think (just my opinion) that you are setting yourself up to fail. Clearly you DON'T trust her, nor do you love her enough to take this sort of risk. (Be honest with yourself.) She isn't being manipulative in wanting marriage or in being upset that you don't want what she does. She's responsible too, though, in agreeing to live in a semi-married state for 6 years without an actual committment. If she wants to be married, she should look elsewhere...from a man who won't see it as a situation in which he has nothing to gain and everything to lose. If this is where you are, it's where you are. You just shouldn't be getting married is all. Marriage often entails opening yourself to enormous risk, emotionally and financially. That's why they have the whole "better or worse, richer or poorer, in sickness and in health" part. And that's the point of the committment; it means that you won't just "walk away" if you wake up not "feeling it" one day. Don't do it. Not if you feel this way.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker If we get married, I simply earn more, and have more to lose from divorce. She has nothing to lose from divorce, only something to gain. We then have a conflict-of-interest. In order for me to protect myself, (against loss) that means I would be taking away her gain in the event of divorce, which gives anyone enough reason to find all sorts of justifications of why it's wrong and leaves enough financial incentive in place to resist and reject such an agreement. - A month ago
Question Asker A very creative argument is "but marriage is more than just money, it's also about love". Yes, there's no denying that but, "it's also about money, at least to a court of law in the event of a divorce".

For the same reason that you can't just focus on the money part and ignore the love part, is the same reason you can't just argue to focus on the love part only and completely ignore the money part, especially when courts don't care about love and only care about money. - A month ago
Question Asker If s/o is trying to argue that by trying to protect yourself from losing what you've worked hard for, so that s/o else can't realize a (free load) gain, makes you a bad person. But s/o should feel like a good person for not protecting themselves and leaving themselves at risk in the event of a divorce, because that means they love and trust the other person. That's the very definition of emotional manipulation my dear. - A month ago
Answerer No, no one is a bad person here. And no one is manipulating anyone's emotions. I just don't think entering a marriage with one eye on divorce is a great way to make a marriage work.You are focused so much on what you clould lose here. Doesn't it worry you that you still feel that way, even after 6 years? - A month ago
Question Asker It doesn't worry me at all. Honesty is defined as what you would do when nobody is looking. Ethics are defined as control over one's self and power over others for the sake of upholding equality and morality. Prior to her getting what she wants, I have no reason to believe or be 100% certain of either her honesty or ethics. It's not until marriage when true colors will show, and by then it may be too late. 50% of couples thought they could trust the other, and they were wrong. - A month ago
Question Asker It's also a really great way to make marriage work. If I was in a position where I could only gain from divorce, and knew the other could only lose, for as long as I was married, I would have power. I could make them cater to my happiness while ignoring theirs, for if they didn't I could always threaten them with leaving, which would be costly to them and only beneficial to me. To ensure a balanced and fair marriage, I think a pre-nupt can actually prevent a marriage from going into divorce. - A month ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
You two live together? Do you pay all the bills? It seems to me that you have been together during most of the time that you have been working towards your career. I can understand a pre-nup when you created wealth before meeting your spouse. But to act like a partner and spouse has nothing to do with giving us the opportunity to achieve our career goals doesn't match reality. Further, there is the concept that if together you have a certain lifestyle, and I have no doubt for a long time that lifestyle has been filled with frugality and lack of time together due to the demands of your career, and that a spouse should not be penalized and have their lifestyle seriously diminished while the other is rolling in the dough. What if you tire of her in 10 years after you have kids and you decide you want someone new. That isn't her fault. And since she has no say in requesting to stay in the marriage, she will suffer the consequences of your actions without any recourse. If I were her, I would look for someone else. I certainly wouldn't have children with you and live out the better years of my life with you only to have you decide one day you are tired of me, want all the money for yourself and perhaps my chances for marriage are now limited.

I think your idea is awful and this is coming from a woman who has to pay alimony and child support to her ex-husband, not one who is receiving it.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker I'm sorry, I don't understand your rationalization to justify those demands/expectations. As a man, from the moment you are born, you can only depend on yourself. If you want something, then you have to find a way to get it, not look for someone else to get it for you. If I want a lifestyle, I work hard so I can afford it. I don't look to commit an other person into financially sponsoring it, and them making them feel bad if they don't want to, while trying to justify my demands to them. - A month ago
Question Asker In my 25 years of time life has given me thus far, I could have chose to spend it many ways. I could have had sex with strangers, done drugs, go drinking, have fun. Instead, I studied and worked hard so that I could enjoy the fruits of my labors while others sacrificed that luxury so they could enjoy their younger years. - A month ago
Question Asker What you are attempting to do, is somehow justifying an other person saying "hey, I couldn't get myself to produce enough to finance the lifestyle I wanted for myself, so why don't you just finance it for me?" If we are together, it will be by choice. But even if we're no longer together, I think you SHOULD still support me or give me what you worked for. Why? I can make up a ton of quasi-moral justifications, my creativity & imagination is endless. - A month ago
Question Asker When we are together, we can enjoy the benefits of being together. One of those benefits is financial. But when we are no longer together, why exactly should one person get to still enjoy any financial benefit from being with someone they are no longer with? To demand that someone be forced to finance the lifestyle of an other is unreasonable. That shows the psychology of a dependent & useless human being, a financial paracite looking to commit a host to work for them. - A month ago
Question Asker By agreeing to keep finances seperate, she is showing me (and I am showing her) that neither one of us is looking for a free pass on life. that if we ever decide to go our seperate ways, whoevers fault that may be, we were never dependent on or looking to someone else for any financial gain. therefore, we shouldn't care that we won't get to enjoy the financial benefits of being with them, and we can continue to live the life we have made for ourselves. - A month ago
Answerer I am starting to suspect you are making this up, that you are not a doctor, but a mysogynist. If you hold so much contempt for this supposed girlfriend you say you have, why are you with her? Oh, and that is a rhetorical question. - A month ago
Question Asker So if I want to protect myself against being used and want to be safe, and don't want to give someone the opportunity to take money that I've worked to earn if we are no longer together, all of a sudden I hate women?

i suppose that if you don't want to have sex with every man who wants you because you're afraid of STDs or being used just for sex and then him leaving afterwards, under that same chain of logic because you want to protect yourself, that would mean you hate men? - A month ago
Question Asker I suspect that you took something said very personally and it bothered you inside on a personal level; enough to try and take that kind of low blow.

I hope you learn to redirect your anger and hate away from the higher earner who just wants to protect what they worked hard to have, and towards the real source of the problem; lack of ambition and motivation, and dependency on others for security, stability and level of lifestyle you want to live. Nobody is responsible for you except yourself. - A month ago
Answerer I am a higher earner. I just don't get why you talk about this supposed girlfriend as if she is a stranger and the enemy. Get married if you want. If you don't, then let it go. Guess you do not want kids. Luckily child support is controlled by the courts and a trust won't help you there. You are acting like the court would award your ex-wife everything. That is not what happens. You just do not sound like you are talking about your life. It all sounds so theoretical. - A month ago
Question Asker I'm guessing you're used to the "supposed/imaginary" routine working with your friends or people you work with. I deal with people who shoot rhetoric much lower than that on a daily basis. I believe you've become girl#4 now to try and dodge a question with the use of personal attacks or calling validity into question by trying to make the other qualify themselves.

Is it because you feel some level of shame in seeing the inequality when the financial/legal dynamics are analyzed? - A month ago
Show All
 

nermalinda
407  
nermalinda      When: A month ago
Honestly, I don't think you should get married to someone who you think would emotionally blackmail and manipulate you for wanting to protect your assets.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report
 
noricat REASON! LOGIC!

Behold, it was mentioned...from a woman!

Thank you Nermalinda for reaffirming my belief that the inequalities between the genders in society are mostly social constructs. The guy who marries you is one lucky fella, I wish all women could be more into the relationship and less into the finances/late game benefits.

I had a long term girlfriend who kept nagging about marriage (I was only 20...), I loved her but I wasn't taking that gamble at that age, so I moved on.

Agreed. - 9 days ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
I read through all the responses on here that were said and there is only one thing shows as plausible. Setting up said trust seems to have come to mind once only once it was decided to marry her to make her happy. Which could also be the reason for her feelings(or as you call it emotional blackmail). So you want to find away to discuss said prenups. Well what you offer is, I am keeping everything of mine separate from what will ever be ours together, which by the way doesn't make anything you contribute to the marriage greater than hers, because only hers will be what is considered martial property. So her contribution is more than yours(since that seems to be of great concern). So in approaching that while topic with her, try sitting just down with her and telling her how you see it. That you have nothing to gain from marring her, but that you want to marry her because it is what she wants and you want to give her that. Tell her you understand her obvious need of financial security. Let her know she is more than welcome to enjoy what you make while she is with you. And when she gives you a reaction based on her feeling you can tell her to stop with the emotional blackmail/manipulation routine. Let her know that if anything in the relationship changes the way you don't like it you are more than likely to walk or find someone that makes you happy, hence the reason you want nothing of yours to be considered martial property because any infidelity on your part makes a prenup void of all meaning so if you have a trust in place to prevent that so you can do whatever you want. Honesty is always the best policy. I mean at least she then knows how you feel about the whole matter. Oh and don't forget to tell her that you are being flexible and giving her a choice in the matter.
Do you agree?
Agree   3 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Aside from irony and sarcasm as a mode of persuasion, and the presupposition of alterior intentions and motives, this was a really great response with a lot of new things I overlooked.

the irrevocable trust was not my idea, but that of my friend who is an attorney. - A month ago
Question Asker He also suggested to offer her a pre-nupt for the same exact reason you highlighted, so that no marital property ever exists b/w the two of us. that in the event of a divorce, we can both just walk away and take with us exactly what we've produced in our life up until that point, as if the marriage never existed. it completely bypasses any financial effect of being married, which is exactly the point; to break out any and all financial aspects from the marriage for the both of us. - A month ago
Question Asker "Let her know that if anything in the relationship changes the way you don't like it you are more than likely to walk or find someone that makes you happy"

you believe I should rather be financially locked-into a relationship I'm not happy with?

as opposed to choosing to stay in a relationship where I'm happy?

I don't aspire to get lazy and ignore my partner's happiness after I get married, so I don't need to financially bind my partner to me to feel safe & secure that they wouldn't go - A month ago
Question Asker "any infidelity on your part makes a prenup void of all meaning so if you have a trust in place to prevent that so you can do whatever you want"

I never thought about that. Though, if s/o doesn't cheat, it's because they don't want to. Likewise, if s/o does cheat, are you saying the other partner is entitled to financial compensation?

If so, forget med school. I should just get married and withhold sex. My partner will either have to turn asexual or cheat, then I divorce them and cash out? - A month ago
Question Asker "the reason for her feelings"

those are unclear. how do I know that after she takes a bite of the infamous "wedding cake", she doesn't suddenly develop permanent pms, gross spending habits and turn completely asexual? I don't. there's no guarantee. I have no more reason to believe it will or won't happen after marriage than she does to hold the fear of me cheating.

but what "if" it does? then I'm screwed, either trapped being unhappy or giving away half what I worked for to be free again - A month ago
Question Asker It all comes back to what the poster below you said.

it's a conflict of interest on who will have to bear that risk, and who will just dump that risk on the other person.

she either dumps it on me and I have to bear it. or I either dump it on her and she has to bear it.

anything else beyond that is just rhetoric trying to justify the choice of the person dumping the risk onto the other, and comfort & motivate the person bearing it. I guess that's what we really have to talk about then. - A month ago
Answerer I wasn't being sarcastic in how it was said.Apologizes if it seems that way.No point it trying to sugar coat it and paint a pretty picture.How it is proposed that she can't afford to set up protection for herself in the same manner as you.If she were to cheat courts would give you some compensation out of what she acquired in the marriage because that is martial property.
Being with s/o for 6+ years you tend to already know how they are.She might not have see you as that type, its a shock to her. - A month ago
Answerer That is part of marriage, the trusting of each person.When you begin with the idea of it failing you tend to just let it happen, either consciously or unconsciously.Not say that's what you intend.If after being with someone 6yrs and marriage to them makes you unhappy maybe you weren't that happy with them to begin with.Things you ask no one knows.If you are that fearful of losing what you are working for maybe it's best to just not worry about marring her and just keep things as they are. - A month ago
Answerer As much as you that you want to do it for her.You seem to feel that everything about her will change once you marry her.That her reasons for being with you for last six years was because you will one day be making more than her.With you feeling you have nothing to gain and everything to lose you have turned her from s/o you care about enough to be in a realationship into s/o who is after you purely for your money.Maybe you should take a look at what lead you to be with her when you first started - A month ago
Answerer Your relationship with her.Look at things from a different prospective.Why she makes you happy.What she does for you.How much you value the time spent with her.And over all would marrying her make it that much better.That's just something to keep in mind as you continue looking into things. - A month ago
Show All
 

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
after reading this whole thread, I think it's safe to say that you know how the game works

i'm not going to try and emotionally blackmail you, or try and make you feel guilty in the hopes that you'll give in and agree to what the group is saying. it's pretty clear you understand enough about group psychology and sociology to be immune to such modes of persuasion

i actually agree with you

i may not want to admit it as a woman, hence replying anonymously, but marriage isn't exactly all about love. yes, part of getting married is financial security. if you take that away from the deal, then there's really no point in getting married. you're right, without the financial aspect, there's no difference between being married and unmarried. are you happy now?

if both people made the same money, their incentives are the same. but the second there's an imbalance of financial power, interests change. this isn't a male/female issue. this is a stronger/weaker issue. the person who is financially weaker will obviously want to feel a sense of financial security from the person who is stronger. look at k-fed and britney! it's not just women who do this. plenty of men who make less manipulate women who make more into getting married and exposing themselves financially without the legal protection of a pre-nup

i agree that you're being smart and doing what's in your best interest. and it's not right for anyone to try and manipulate you through personal attacks or emotional blackmail, just so you can do something that's not in your best interest. you've invested hard work in life and sacrificed having fun during your younger years so that you could make yourself into a valuable earning asset. you're absolutely right, it's not fair that someone who hasn't done than get to enjoy the benefits of your hard work.

but if you agree with that, and we're both in agreement so far, you have to consider things from her point of view too

for whatever reason, she's not a doctor. she's not as valuable of an earning asset as you are. for as long as you are together, I would imagine she gets to enjoy the benefits of the financial security you can provide. but the issue for both of you is "what happens if we are no longer together?"

from her pov now, she's invested 6 years into you and god only knows how many more years while being married to you. if she gets divorced when she's older, and possibly with kids, it's nearly impossible to find someone who will want to marry her. the reason she is getting angry and defensive when you bring it up is because if you are protected and safe, that means she isn't. that means if 10 years down the line you run off with the new hot resident or nurse and leave her alone, she's screwed. she's used to a lifestyle of being with you that she can no longer afford to live by herself, and that's not fair to her.

that's just something to consider in your quest to give her choice in this whole matter.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Hmm, I see what you're saying. It's a conflict of interest then. If I'm financially safe and protected, that means she's not. And if she is, that means I'm not. And unfortunately, it's binary and discrete with no intermediate. It really comes down to who is stuck bearing the risk of a possible divorce. It boils down to risk allocation, her or me? because in all fairness, it's not easy for a divorced man to rebuild his life and find a new partner with half his wealth and income either. - A month ago
Answerer No doubt. it's not an easy discussion to have. it boils down to who holds more power. you hold more financial power, so you're really in control. the fact that you're even bothering with all this is just a formality. but just so you know, this is also a fear we all have too. nobody likes to feel like they have no control in a relationship. it takes a strong person and a lot of trust to be married to a man who still has financial control. I would personally feel powerless and I wouldn't like that - A month ago
Question Asker "it takes a strong person and a lot of trust to be married to a man who still has financial control." which implies that because you don't trust that man, you want him to surrender his financial control, while simultaneously calling his trust of you into question if he proposes a pre-nupt. but I'm not going to go back and forth with more red herring fallacies. - A month ago
Question Asker I see what you're saying, and I suppose I could turn around & simply offer an ultimatum like "listen b*tch, I make more money, you either agree and we can be together, or disagree & go find someone else". but powerplays & ultamatums are not something you do with those you care about. it's cheap, it's low, and disrespectful. What I want to do isn't a formality. I want us to both go in this marriage being in mutual agreement and understanding of why we are together, & what happens if we're not - A month ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
See girls this is why you must get educated, and do your best to get beyond men :)
Do you agree?
Agree   5 Disagree   4
Report
 
Question Asker If by that you mean, "a man is not a financial plan", then you're absolutely right.

if you can't just accept living your life together and being with each other, and not asking him to expose himself legally and surrender control over his financial life, then I would say it's best you stay away from men and learn to take care of your own self instead of looking to commission someone else to do it for you under the guise of love, family and marriage; that's just low and disgusting. - A month ago
Littletad I don't even think the question asker is worthy of being called a "man". - A month ago
Answerer Ha, I love how I get down arrows on this, I can guarntee their all men. No woman I know would disagree with me on this. - A month ago
Question Asker I actually gave you the positive rating. I'm a strong supporter of any advice that discourages women from being prostitutes, paracitic luxury items, or otherwise dependent on men.

Any young girl reading your post would do well to make herself a valuable member of society and be productive in this world. If anyone gave you a negative rating, they simply don't understand the aftermath ripple effect that your advice has on the world for those who listen to it and understand it. - A month ago
Answerer Exactly!! Thank you for the rating =) - A month ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
Hm, well I'm with you on marriage not being necessary to "prove" you love each other. I've always viewed marriage as something that makes dealing with legal matters easier. Being a common law partner works, but only well if you've been together for a long time and even then you can run into obstacles. A relative of mine lived common-law with her "husband" for over 30 years and when he died she had a hell of a time with his assets and their bank accounts because they didn't have a marriage certificate. I know he wouldn't have wished that sort of hassle on her, especially while she was grieving.

The way you described your relationship it doesn't sound like you want it to end, nor do you think it will end anytime soon. I think you need to get that across to her. You need to let her know that the chances of you splitting up are next to nill, but this is only a precaution and will make things easier on both of you to move on if it ever came to that. You really need to reassure her that this is something you don't want to happen. It's like making up a will. You don't want to die, but it's smart to have one just in case.

I think the hostility she has towards you when you bring it up is that she feels like you don't trust her. That you think she would be the type of person to manipulate you and not play fair. I'm not exactly sure why you want to do this as I don't really feel like it's necessary. I feel like if you're going to spend a lifetime with someone that you will share your lives with them. If you're married for 30 years and then you decide to get a divorce, I think that everything you have is yours together. The money, the assets, all of it. You will have bought a lot of things together and you can't label it as mine and yours because it's both of yours together. No one should get more than the other, but for 30 years it would deserve a fair split. And then you would move on and any future income would be yours alone. But that's just my opinion.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report
 
armyant Things bought together during 30 years of marriage being evenly split isn't exactly in the same ballpark as a marriage of scarcely two years ending up with the lady walking away with half of the fortune her sorry husband toiled for years, prior to marriage, to accumulate. That's what happens every day in the US. Moderation comes to all things in society, though, so women who demand this kind of trust, before they'll consider a man, will soon find themselves quite alone. Progress waits not. - A month ago
Question Asker Fear of taken advantage of/used, and misogyny are a very fine line to flirt with. Yes, women who demand that kind of blind trust and for men to bear that kind of risk will no doubt find themselves alone. I do appreciate your input. And what you are saying is both logical and corrent. But again, please stop implying that my girlfriend is a money grubbing gold-digging whore; she's not. And this poster made some very good points, which I also agree with. - A month ago
Answerer Armyant, of course it's not in the same ballpark, but I would think if you've been together with someone for 6 years your marriage would last longer than a mere few years. It's not like they just met a few months ago and are getting married right off the bat. I think what you're talking about happens because of people rushing into things and not knowing each other well enough for that sort of responsibility. I'd hope if you're getting into marriage both parties are mature enough to settle fairly - A month ago
noricat Think of it this way QA, if she was so dependable and trustful, why does she make a big deal out of what is understandably a purely logical course of action?

How your girlfriend reacts to your proposed prenup will tell you all you need to know about whether to marry her or not. - 9 days ago
Answerer That's true. I personally wouldn't sign a prenup, but I would explain my reasons and try to reassure my fiance that I'm not marrying him for his money. I would not be opposed if he wanted to keep his own separate bank account with his savings in it and if he wishes to spend that on our family it would be his choice. I don't think marriage entitles you to everything the other person owns, only what you wish to share together. I don't like the idea of distrust. He should know my char well enough. - 8 days ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
Jeez, your getting so ahead of yourself. Why are you even assuming she would want your money if things ended, not all women are out to gain money from their ex spouse after seperating. Just sit her down and say exactly what you put in the description above, there really is no best approch to this other than being honest with her. If she doesn't agree, than just move on.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker She's not that kind of person. But any divorce attorney is, and if the law allows someone to be legally entitled to something, then it would take an awfully strong character to say, "no, even though I have the power to take someone else's money and justify it to myself to somehow that it's rightfully mine, I won't". It's human weakness. Has nothing to do with female nature or her nature; it's just human weakness. That this is protection against that human weakness. - A month ago
Question Asker I am honest about it. I don't hide behind emotional arguments or throw around the love & morality bullsh*t card. I'm not looking to emotionally manipulate her into doing something she doesn't want to do. But every time I have brought it up in the past, she has reacted with anger, hostility, and it's counterproductive to us reaching any sort of agreement. I want to know HOW to bring it up this with without having that kind of reaction. - A month ago
Answerer Well since you have brought it up to her and that's the reaction you have gotten than I don't think her reaction will change. You need to be blunt with her and stay clear of any sugar coating. Simply tell her, that you love her and you want to be with her, but in order for you two be legally married you would like a prenup signed, go on to tell her that she is more than welcome to draft it with you, and be a part of it. By allowing her to be part of it, it is in some sense giving her some control - A month ago
Answerer If she continues to be adamant about it than ask her if she would like to continue the relationship without marriage. If she says no, than you really need to end the relationship. If you have been honest about it and explained it all than there is nothing more you can do. Just keep it short and to the point this time. Tell her you would rather know now because if this will never be resolved than you two do not belong to together. If she's unwilling to compromise maybe that is the way its - A month ago
Answerer To be..and there is nothing wrong with that. There are plenty of guys who would marry her without a prenup, and plenty of girls who would marry you with a prenup. - A month ago
Answerer Overall, it doesn't matter how you go about it because she knows what she wants, and what she wants is a marriage to you with no prenup. This next talk should be your final talk regarding this matter. Any time spent in this relationship without a definitive answer from that point forward will be pointless because you both want two different things. - A month ago
Question Asker It's not that simple. I wish it was. I can't just bring it up and be stern. This isn't a surgery. I know when I talk, she feels weak and submissive, so it would be unfair to her to even raise up the topic like that, because then she would bend over backwards just to not ruin the relationship, and I don't want her to do that. I want her to feel comfortable enough to really give her input on this. So I have to go about it in a soft way, despite know how she's going to react. - A month ago
Question Asker I also don't want to frame it like a final talk, because that's too much pressure and will seem like I'm making a threat to end things, and she might just agree for the sake of being afraid to have the relationship end. It's not that cut & dry when you've been with s/o for six years, when you've already made it this far together. I think she deserves some more sensitivity and understanding so she can be honest with her wants and viewpoints with me. I want her to be happy, not miserable. - A month ago

DyingAngel
411  
DyingAngel      When: A month ago
Well it kind of sounds like..well when this fails I don't want to have to owe you anything. If you are going to marry her, there are things she will be doing that you won't. So toss out the money factor. Say you are both make the same amount. There will be more contributions made by her by way of things done in the home, i.e. she has 2 jobs. One that pays and one that doesn't. If you have children with her. She will be doing most of what goes along with that. She will throw her body through all of that for the both of you. Already you are doing less than her. So you can't really say she will be contributing was less than you. You have to include all factors in that. You are only looking at the money aspect. And solely that aspect. You don't even want to get married. Getting married is something you would do to just appease her. Not a valid reason. So basically you are wasting her time. You have no plans on wanting to anytime soon, except to make her happy. So you aren't really ready for that type of commitment. Yes, it's true that in America most marriages fail. But generally people take marriage very one sided. What do I get? What do I gain? Marriage is a partnership not just one person. You're stuck on the me so you really shouldn't be getting married anyways. Thus you have no need to be planing out a pre-nup.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   5
Report
 
Question Asker When I said "emotional blackmail/manipulation".. this is exactly what I was talking about.. ambiguous and vague statements that basically amount to; "a full-time maid/nanny would cost $40,000 a year, so if her two jobs are work $82,000 and mine is worth $185,000; you should consider ur contributions even, and if things go sour, even though you busted ur ass in medical school, because I'm a woman, I feel you should let her enjoy any financial benefits you can give her even after you are no longer together" - A month ago
Question Asker This is exactly why getting married without an irrevocable trust and pre-nupt isn't even an option. if 10 years down the line she decided she's no longer in love with me, or she found s/o else, or she's not happy, why should I have to swallow earning 400% more, and having to give away half of it to s/o who decided to leave? and do you think it's fair that s/o gets to enjoy any financial benefit from me after they chose to leave me? sure it's nice to free load.. but it's not fair or right - A month ago
Question Asker What about if 10 years down the line, I'm the one that's no longer happy? what if she develops a habit if nagging wildly? what if we no longer have sex? what if she quits her job and decides to stay home just because that's what she wants to do? What do I do then? Are my hands just tied because of fear of losing half of what I have & having to pay her for the rest of my life? I'm sorry, no thank you. If I'm not happy, I want to be able to take my hard-earned financial secuity & find happiness elsewhere - A month ago
Question Asker If she has a problem with me not giving up control over my life & financial security, and knowing that every day we're together is because I WANT to be with her, not because I'm FORCED to be or TRAPPED with her; then SHE is the one that's not ready for a serious relationship yet, not me. SHE is the one who is WASTING my time. There are plenty of freeloaders out there, but I'm not a public charity.

If she is ready for a serious & fair relationship, then she won't have any issues with a pre-nupt - A month ago
Answerer I understand the wanting to protect yourself. But if you only concern is to protect the money you will make once you start your career you don't even need to get married. As I said marriage is a partnership regardless of whatever. Martial assets are what you make once you are married to said person. If you feel that they have no right to what was made as a couple then don't bother getting married. As for paying after your planned split one shouldn't have to. SO if you feel that being married to - A month ago
Answerer Say 5 years means they should get anything for what they invested is kinda wrong. She hasn't trapped you in to anything by saying that she wants to marry you. Yes you can protect yourself from have to pay for when you are no longer with that person but you can't say that she can be compensated for the time they did but in. - A month ago
Question Asker Some balloons are green, but some strawberries are red; therefore you don't even need to get married. (non sequitur) It's NOT my ONLY concern to protect myself. But logically. She wants committment. I want to give her that. BUT, the law wants half my money if I do and things don't work out. - A month ago
Question Asker What I'm proposing is, hey, I WILL give you committment, if that's what you really want. but just agree that that's all you want. if that's all you want, and YOU don't care about assets and income and all that stuff. If all YOU care about is the relationship and marriage, then I don't see where the problem is with signing a pre-nupt. I don't see why all this defensiveness and drama. Unless that's NOT the ONLY thing YOU care about.. - A month ago
Question Asker The lifestyle we will both enjoy, for as long as we're both together IS the compensation we BOTH receive while being together, and what we both LOSE when we're no longer together. The same way I'm not going to demand she comes over my home to clean, cook, take care of the kids, have sex, tell me she loves me, give me companionship, etc. Is the same way she can't demand that I continue to give her $93,000 of my salary when we're no longer together. - A month ago
Answerer Marriage isn't a perfect happy fairy tale. Yes there are problems that arise. And you have to work at it. If you want to bail cause she nags or cause of lack of sex you should consider that in think about getting married. Communication is required to keep both parties happy. But in a world where divorce is the happy solution than trying to talk and fix problems hey you should pay for that, if you can't take it for what it is a union of two to a whole. The commitment she wants, she wants with - A month ago
Show All
 

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
This is never going to fly with her. No matter what you do she is going to get hurt. She just invested 6 years into a relationship with a man who is now asking her to sign a prenup? Either you will end things with her and she will be devastated, or you will bring up the idea of a prenup and she will be devastated. If you feel you have no gain from marrying her, than you obviously don't love her that much. You may believe you do, but it is clear that you don't. You are already thinking about your money over her. I think you know in your heart you won't be spending the rest of your life with her, and if that's how you feel, do not marry her. This is a woman who will one day mother your children. The woman who will be there for you from the moment she says "I do". The woman who was there throughout your schooling, and I am sure has encouraged you since day one...and you really have the nerve to ask for a prenup? I am not her but I can tell you that would be the most insulting thing a man could ask a woman. You know her for 6 YEARS. This is not some fly by night girl you met in Vegas who your about to marry in a side road chapel. This is someone who you spent almost a decade with. There is no way she is going to agree with this. When you marry, you do it for life. If you are already thinking about a prenup it goes to show your not in this for life. No couple I know has ever signed a prenup, and the only time I have heard of people signing them is when one spouse makes far more than the other. I noticed the money is getting to your head so soon, but let me tell you that money is not your friend it is your enemy. Asking for the prenup will prove that.

Honestly, your best interest would be not to marry her. Things come naturally when you love someone. Do not marry her just because she wants to. You need to sit down and really think about this by leaving your money and assets out of it and thinking about what YOU want. Asking for a prenup will ruin your relationship with her FOREVER, just remember that.
Do you agree?
Agree   4 Disagree   5
Report
 
Question Asker I've invested 6 years too.. we've both invested equally into this relationship so far.. from this point forward.. our investment will be disproportional..

If I'm reading what you're saying correctly.. you would be insulted.. and she would be hurt.. that I am proposing that she will not get to enjoy the financial benefits of being in a relationship with me.. if we are no longer in a relationship together? and you simultaneously try and use an "if you love her" argument? the irony.. - A month ago
Answerer If you have your mind set already, and no how you feel about it, than you shouldn't even be asking this question, its that simple. - A month ago
Question Asker I was curious on how to "go about asking for a pre-nupt".. I wasn't curious on "if I should ask for a pre-nupt" - A month ago
Answerer No need for all of the unnecessary details if that's all you wanted answered. - A month ago

ray658
190  
ray658      When: A month ago
Instead of already assuming the marriage won't work and looking into ways to protect your assets, I think you need to slow down and do some major soul searching. If you are considering marriage just because your girlfriend has always wanted to get married, that is not a good reason and it probably will fail. Since you are asking the question, "what will I gain from marriage?" you may not even want it at all. It's better to be upfront with her about this and discuss it together, before it's too late and 3 years down the line you are going through a divorce. Find out why she wants to get married, and don't assume that it is primarily for financial security. It is 2009, and most women have moved beyond that. Also, if that is her main reason for wanting marriage, you should reconsider your relationship.

I agree that you must think logically- but if you really loved her, your emotions would naturally come into play, and it wouldn't be all about money just like everything else. I don't think its healthy to think about things on either a purely emotional or purely logical level- there should be a balance between the two. I know it is a reality in today's world that you need to think about what will happen if it doesn't work out, but you are focusing way too much energy on this. How about figuring out how to make it work instead?
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker I agree most women have moved beyond that.. but we're obviously not talking about her.. She's a teacher.. making $42,000 a year.. I'll be making a little more than four times that.. and to ask me to waive my protection, and assume the risk of giving away half of what I mostly worked to build.. is unreasonable no matter what flowery and morally cute justification you try and give to it.. No soul searching needed.. I love her.. and I want to take care of her.. for as long as she's in my life.. - A month ago
Answerer That's fine. Just be prepared for some second guessing and doubt from her end. Make sure you set aside some time to really discuss this the right way and not throw it in her face a day after you propose. Otherwise, it will backfire. - 12 days ago

Besu4
248  
Besu4      When: A month ago
This could break up your relationship. You both need to compromise. Don't forget to be flexible because she is not going to like this.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker I agree.. we both do need to compromise.. can you please elaborate what she needs to compromise on.. and what I need to compromise on.. so we can assess if it's actually a compromise.. It seems like everyone is looking to use emotional blackmail to try and persuade me to leave myself legally and financially exposed.. and if things don't work out.. pay for someone who is no longer a part of my life.. because they once were.. - A month ago
 

What Guys Said

Hughman
160  
Hughman      When: 2 days ago
You should always act to please yourself. This doesn't mean being selfish per se. You may not want to get married, but marring the woman you love makes her happy, which makes you happy.

Now, if she really loves you, she'll sign the pre-nup, no questions.

If she starts the blackmailing option, because she's a money-grabbing status wh*re she'll say something like this: "Why do we need a pre-nup? I love you and will never leave you!"

You retort "Then it isn't a problem that you sign it, as it will never be used. Shit happens - and it's covering you as well I might add"

If she continues to pester you about it, get rid of her before you lose your assets and a chunk of your soul to her.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

StarBuckeroo
191  
StarBuckeroo      When: 9 days ago
Look at it this way, a Prenup is simply insurance. You buy house insurance, and hope to never have to use it. A prenup really just gets everything straight legally. . .You can always choose to have the pre-nup dissolve after 10,15,20 years or whichever. . . But, pre nup is not setting yourself up for failure, its a smart financial decision for both of you and a smart decision for your marriage. . . You guys can plan, if there were divorce even being talked about, you can agree that you do 400 hours of marital counseling before you are able to legally get a divorce. . . and you can be specific with everything... I would google the benefits of pre-nups, I did before and it really opened my eyes to the idea and also gave me some relief knowing all of the different options that I can include within it. . . If you haven't discussed it with your partner yet, I would just research it before you do so, so that you sound confident in what it stands for and assure her that it isn't something that says 'I don't want to get screwed over in case of divorce' . .. but, in reality, that is what it is. . .It is a document of marital insurance.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: 9 days ago
Mate, I've read so much of the replies and comments and you know what?

Just tell her marriage isn't your thing.

Tell her you want to make her happy and that is the only reason you've considered marriage so much.

Tell her how it is: Sign a prenup or forget the whole deal, because as far as you are concerned the relationship works great as it is.

Chances are she'll be a bit of a typical western pampered princess and throw a strop. She either stays or she leaves but at some point you just gotta shrug it off and accept that it isn't meant to be.

I could love a woman allot but I am not going to be manipulated, you shouldn't;t feel compelled to either.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report

averagejoe
192  
averagejoe      When: 10 days ago
prenup
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

Verbal
240  
Verbal      When: 22 days ago
If love knows no bounds, how can one ask another for a pre-nup? A pre-nup is for someone who does not trust another and hense without trust there can not be love and should never be a marriage.
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   2
Report

stktder
261  
stktder      When: 24 days ago
Ok, I understand you two are just starting your lives together. THAT MEANS YOU ARE POOR AS CRAP AND HAVE NOTHING TOGETHER. What do you not understand? You are both equals financially. If you were older and one had a lot more wealth than the other, I could see protecting your assets. That;s not the case with the two of you. Next, why should you get married. The answer...Because you don't want your children to come into the world as BASTARDS. By getting married, you are declaring her is your wife and the children as yours. Should something happen to you and you die, it would mean they have legal rights to claim your estate. So now, here is the big question? Do you really love her or are you just screwing her over?
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report

BrianS198
52  
BrianS198      When: A month ago
That's a tough one dude. Neither one of you is wrong, you just have different interests in mind; however, it clearly sounds like you are not interested in marriage at all. May I ask what it is that you don't like? Marriage should always be a mutual thing. If you don't like the title, then don't get married. It's that simple. Now granted, sometimes sacrifices should be made as well. For example, you're sacrificing your ideals for her sake, so perhaps she should disregard her judgment and do something for you (ie. sign the pre-nup). I think this is a fairly valid argument, so I would definitely pass it by her. If I was to do anything, I would just let her know that you love her very, very much and your only qualm with marriage is the logical point of it (which I might add is perfectly acceptable); yet you will get married because she enjoys the thought of you two being married together. As a result, maybe she can sign this pre-nup for your sake. Don't get me wrong, I personally disagree with you and really putting all your possessions on the line is the ultimate test; yet, what is a possession but a possession? They're just things and that's it.

Bottom line man, re-assess what you guys have in common and what you don't. If she's prone to blackmail you (perhaps inadvertently), then maybe it's not the best idea to get married at all. Even though you've been together six years, you never know if someone is out there that's even better for each of you. Sorry that my response has been fairly redundant, but I hope it brought you some thought. Best of luck!
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

InquisitiveMale
2374  
InquisitiveMale      When: A month ago
First things first, the pre-nupt...

There is nothing wrong with creating a pre-nupt so long as it covers your assets previous/after the marriage and not the mutual wealth youve accumulated while together. I.E - Protect your current assets and your salary pre-marriage.

The best way I believe in dealing with money is simple. You pool your money together.

You put a percentage into your retirement fund from the pool.
You put a percentage into a savings account from the pool to cover any unanticipated expenses.
Pay your mortgage, heating, electricity and such from the pool.

Finally you divide the remaining amount equally between the two of you to do with as you please. You should have your pre-nupt cover any items purchased with your own allowance but its not vital.

The most important thing for you to protect is of course your salary aft marriage.

Second thing, marriage...

Of course you do not need to get married but marriage is much more the legal documentation meant to solidify the relationship. If this is all you think it is then you will be unhappy to know that after a set amount of time living with someone your considered legally married by the government anyway.

Marriage is a symbolic gesture of pure intent. It a physiological reinforcement for most women. Telling a girl you don't intend to marry them is like building a house on a foundation of sand. Its unstable and you never know when things will collapse. To the majority of the female population marriage, controversial to what you think, is a necessity.

I don’t understand why you think your being flexible when you say you're willing to marry her if it makes her happy. I think your being stubborn and she is the one being flexible. She is the one waiting in anticipation of a proposal for… 6 years?!?

Conclusion…

The pre-nup is acceptable in my opinion. Whether she takes it that way I don’t know but I really don’t see that as a sign of distrust. Like I commented to someone who said differently; if I'm healthy I shouldn’t invest in medical insurance? No, you get it incase god-forbid things do take a turn for the worse. Things happen.

Chance your mind-set to the whole marriage thing. She’s the one being flexible and hoping for the best while you take an elongated amount of time to come to your senses.

MY opinion, not yours.
Cheers.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

jacquesvol
8875  
jacquesvol      When: A month ago
My brother married last year. Their oldest kid was 6 then. (the youngest 4)
No reason to get married since there seems to be a certain lack of trust as to the future of marriage.
No reason to get married but for your children.
But you know each other since 6 years. Time enough to know if you can trust each other or not. Time enough to know if you can discuss the exact conditions of a prenup, hers or yours or a combination of both.
You seem to be in love, but realistic.
Who could determine what's best better than you? One of the members here, not knowing you or her? I doubt it.
Certainly not me. (I'd discusss her proposed prenup as first option, vote A)

PS, don't tell I told you but you could park the construction in a "tax friendly" State (DEL) or country (Virgin Islands, Bahamas, Lichtenstein, Vanuatu, Channel Islands, Gibraltar, there are many more of them -- avoid Switzerland!)

PPS, Highschool teachers can be wonderful people: I married one.

Best wishes!
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

VampSoldier
123  
VampSoldier      When: A month ago
Mate, you are looking at this too black and white.

It's simple...
Do you love her?
Does she love you?

Now if you answered yes to both of them you need to tell her straight that you see marriage as less a public sign of affection like she undoubtedly sees it as and more another way to throw your money away and possibly increase your expenses in the future.

To be honest if you are this worried about it then you obviously already have doubts the marriage is going to work.

My sister and Brother-in-law have been together 10 years, of which they've been married 3. My Brother-in-law owns everything but my sister and him did not agree on anything and you can call him foolish if you like but he is not.

The way he sees it is the way I see it. He loves her and he would do anything for her. They didn't have to get married but it's every little girls dream to one day marry and every woman grows from a little girl.

Yeah if you broke up in the future you'd not lose all your finances, etc...

No offence but I think you are treasuring your personal wealth and assets far too much. It is meant to be about the two of you and not what the two of you have between you.

Sure you're the breadwinner and you could stand to lose a lot of money if it did turn sour but you should be going into it thinking, "it won't go sour" and even if it did, you know that she is secure and looked after. The last thing I'd want to think is my ex was out in the gutter somewhere.

If you're not ready to marry, just tell her how you feel... if you are then surprise her... not with a pre-arranged pre-nupt but a simple dinner, a chat about your future and how you both feel about where you are both going... then propose to her with a nice ring.

No matter what you decide in the end, I wish both you and your girl the very best. Hope all goes well for you...
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report

odysseus864
29  
odysseus864      When: A month ago
This sounds like a scenario in Game Theory. This won't help you; but it might help other high earners who are single and concerned about protecting their assets. If you realize that (A) love inhibits the abilities of most people to think rationally, and (B) money changes people's incentives; then you need to take the money out of the equation and make the decision before you fall in love. You could set up a contract with a third party (before you meet your partner) which states that "in the event that you fail to set up a pre-nup to protect those all of those assets before you marry, those assets will be given to that third party" or to a charity or whoever, just so long as neither of you get those assets. Even better, make it an anti-charity. If you're anti-gun, have it go to the NRA. If you’re pro-life have it go to Planned Parenthood. Now not getting a pre-nup becomes a moral dilemma for you. And their choices become "you, the pre-nup, and the money" or just you minus the money.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker If I could vote for funniest response, you'd win. I agree with what you're saying about taking money out of the equation. What's up with this third-party stuff? Why should neither one of us get those assets? She's invested her time to produce X-dollars.. I've invested my time to produce Y-dollars? Why can't she walk out with X-dollars and I walk out with Y-dollars? Why must she insist on being able to walk out with (X+Y)/2-dollars [when X - A month ago
Question Asker Why must she insist on being able to walk out with (X+Y)/2-dollars (when X < Y)? If a man makes more and wants a pre-nupt, he's "heartless". If a woman makes more and wants one, she's "smart". If he makes more & doesn't want one, he's "loving & trusting". If she makes more & doesn't want one, she's "stupid, like Britney". If he makes less & doesn't want one, he's "after her money". If she makes less & doesn't want one, she's "stupid". What's Game Theory say about that? - A month ago
Answerer You're right; it's double standard. The idea is that by making the first move and limiting your choices, you're putting yourself into a better position. It's like sawing off the steering wheel and holding it out the window in a game of chicken. Now the other driver knows you can't swerve; he'd be crazy not to swerve himself. Even the least rational people can realize that it's better to take the pre-nup with the money than to get nothing at all.... - A month ago
Answerer ...Now you can stay on their side and say "honey, I wish I hadn't made that contract because you know I trust you unconditionally; but it?s done now. What about a college education for the kids? What about living in a safe neighborhood? We?re talking about our future.? - A month ago
Question Asker You're definitely a guy. you start off so good and then fumble on the 1 yard line. I don't understand what you meant by the last part. - A month ago
Answerer You don't have to express any opinion about the contract if you don't want to; the point is, you are unable to do anything about it. The ball is in thier court; and they have to decide whether they want to start that marriage with or without that money. And how much convincing do you think that will take? Do you even think you'll have to open your mouth? By not signing the pre-nup they lose everything and gain nothing. At that point it's like a marriage license; it's a non-issue. - A month ago
Answerer It doesn't matter what you say or don't say, or mean or don't mean. Your past self has made a decision that changed the parameters of the game from simultaneous play to turn based play; one in which you've already made the first irrevocable move. - A month ago
Question Asker I don't know enough about game theory to understand what you just said. And I don't feel that strongly compelled to google it either. But I'm sure it's quite profound. - A month ago

superajay007
61  
superajay007      When: A month ago
frankly speaking , you are selfish person ,if the girl whom you love know all this she will hate u? not only this girl no girl will marry if you are intentions are known .marriage means sharing happiness , sorrow, ...everything not only money. may GOD bless u
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Hail Lord Xenu! - A month ago

Profundus_Sententia
138  
Profundus_Sententia      When: A month ago
I think everything that needs to be said has been said at some point, but just to cast my vote in words.

Agree on a prenup.

If she says it is horrible of you to think of a prenup because it is imagining the possibility of a divorce, it is just as bad to refuse to sign one for the same reason. It is hypocritical.

Protect yourself, there are too many dishonest people out there. This is a case where there are no losers. You aren't taking anything of hers away, just preventing her from taking what you earn if she decides to leave.

It may seem destructive to someone thinking about it emotionally, but logically, it is the best decision (or the LLC, but that is unnecessary if you 2 can agree on terms)
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report

nymphoman
950  
nymphoman      When: A month ago
If marriage is something you have discussed before then you make sure she will be fine with pre nuptial agreements and if its a surprise thing then there's nothing wrong with being engaged and discussing these legal things and small print as it is only a step towards marriage and not a binding contract.
I am sure as two mature professionals in careers that need sensible approaches you can both settle on an agreement.
Some people may think you are preparing for divorce before you have a ring on her finger and that it is a pessimistic move but I believe in protecting yourself because it saves regrets later on.
It may not sound like a romantic movie but I was sat with my fiancée and a solicitor the day before we said I do.
This isn't a soap opera girls, divorce is a possibility so it's best to be insured against being taken for a ride as so many guys are (sorry but the guys usually are the ones who are screwed by the courts decision, fact).
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker I appreciate it. I just want to talk about the pre-nupt first before I actually propose. because if I propose first and then bring it up, it's sort of like trapping her, building up pressure for her to agree just so she doesn't have to back down from the marriage her friends and family now expect her to follow through with. How did you bring up and talk about the pre-nupt with your fiance'?

ps. I love your default pic dude, is that from the crow? - A month ago
Answerer Yep, the crow is one of my fave movies.
I simply discussed it over the time we was engaged, I am quite honest and don't believe in mincing words, It wasn't so much as pre nup as in protecting my assets because I have none, I just needed to make sure I was clear on my role as a parent, I wanted to make sure if she cheated on me or something I would get full custody as per agreement.
So there we was, her pregnant, day before wedding and discussing divorce and custody with a solicitor.
..... - A month ago
Answerer ... I understand exactly what you mean and how it must feel but you have to also protect yourself.
It may seem harsh but then it isn't something you can just take a chance on, We would all like to pretend we will marry and live happily ever after so it doesn't matter but in a real world who knows what will happen.
I think that you are kind of stuck really, either spoil the surprise to discuss pre nups IF you get married in the future or just be harsh and honest during the engagement.
Good luck. - A month ago
DyingAngel Did you know doing that the day before you get married can also mean it can be tossed aside in the even of divorce, just letting you know. - A month ago
Question Asker Yes, that's why it's being done well prior to 30 days of the engagement, so that argument won't be available in the event of a divorce. - A month ago
Answerer I don't know how it works there but in the UK seeing a solicitor regarding 'in the event of divorce' is fine, after all its your perogative to make sure you aren't about to make a mistake and there's nothing stopping either party from cancelling the wedding if it's an issue.
Engagement is not a legally binding contract and therefore seeing a solicitor to tie up loose ends is fine.
I don't see how making sure everything is OK and there's no loop holes is ammo in a divorce court. - A month ago

OMG_look_its_nickels
176  
OMG_look_its_nickels      When: A month ago
Back in the old days, women were considered to stay at home, clean, and watch the babies. Men would do the work, and provide sole income.. this is why they ordered for alimony and all that crap. nowdays, women are working, and make as much as men do, and can support them selves... the roles of a husband and wife are completely interchangable now.. the dad can be the stay @ home mom while she works, or they can be equal income contributions.. nevertheless, almony laws are really no longer needed.. bring this up to her & explain, that without a prenup, the playing field just isn't fair.. it's not fair for women to work for a living, bring home 30K a year, and on top of that, another 5K a year in ex husband expenses

.. Put it to her this way... a prenup is a legal document that says "You leave with what you came with."
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker If I was in a relationship with a man, maybe I could shoot a pure-logic statement like that his way. But as you can see, women are far more conversationally complex creatures. There's an ocean of resistance caused by her conflict of interest that I'll have to navigate through, and waves of emotional arguments I'll have to reject before I can "hopefully" communicate the same exact message in about ten times the time it would take with a guy. - A month ago

rocksongwriter
2451  
rocksongwriter      When: A month ago
As your wife, wouldn't she own half of the rights to the trust?
Do you agree?
Agree   0 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker No. a trust is its own separate legal entity, owned and managed by a trustee, appointed by the trustor, to work in the best interest of the beneficiaries. not only does my wife not have any rights to property the trust owns, "I" myself won't have any rights. the owner will be the trust, not me. hence, in the event of a divorce, I won't actually own any property, therefore there can't be any division of assets - A month ago

Littletad
14583  
Littletad      When: A month ago
Your not giving her choice. Your only worrying about yourself and trying to save your own ass.

Yes you have money and a considerable amount of property that is yours. But marriage isn't about that. Hell marriage shouldn't be about that. It's about commitment. What's yours is hers, and what's hers is yours. Even if your assets are greater than hers. It does not matter. You let money and property delude your sense of what a marriage is all about. Is that that truly love? I don't think it is, no matter what you say to convince yourself it is.

I'll give you this. Yes I do agree that divorce is crap. And it's a pain, especially when it comes to calculating income and who gets what. Usually, men get the shaft. And women get more out of a divorce than the man. I do believe that to be true. But what I do also believe, is that sometimes people get married for the wrong reasons. Or sometimes, they don't even realize what they are marrying.

But your case should be different. 6 years you've been together and yet your sounding more like your attorney than you are a boyfriend. Hell a loving boyfriend for that matter. The fact is, I think you've lost sight of what marriage really should mean. You are not ready for marriage. Sadly, your girlfriend is, but she's about to realize your true selfish nature. I suspect momentarily you'll be single.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker I agree with you, marriage has nothing to do with money. It isn't about that. Hell, like you said, it should be about that. Now, when we all of a sudden try to not make marriage about money, WOAH hold up, there's a problem; how dare you!

Please elaborate your system of values so I can at least understand the train of logic.

It's easy to make personal attacks, very easy. But they amount to nothing if they have no logical basis and only flowery emotional language as support. - A month ago
Answerer My system of values? You still need more elaboration? We'll, okay. Here it goes. Last I check, your not a doctor yet. You say you will be. Congratulations btw. But beyond all that, the point is that your talking about things that are in future tense. Your not even engaged and yet your planning your divorce plans in the present. Rather than having faith in your relationship your building on relief efforts in the event of a divorce. Logically you'll say that this is your right and it's "smart". - A month ago
Answerer Now try explaining that to a woman whose spent 6 years with you. 6 years of commitment. Yes, you've both put in the same amount of "labor". So why are you the only one thinking of a prenup?

Your nowhere near the stage of a divorce, yet your already thinking of such negativity. Does that not tell you anything at all? If it doesn't, then you surely lack "system of values". I can't help much beyond that, but tell you good luck . - A month ago
Question Asker I have no idea why you're throwing moral guilt-trips around in the hopes of getting me to change my mind on this matter. My question wasn't if I should or shouldn't have an unprotected marriage. Having an unprotected marriage is out of the question. My question was HOW I should bring up the topic of a pre-nupt.

But for the sake of argument (and curiousity); what would you do? - A month ago
Answerer Were throwing moral guilt trip threats at you because you don't seem to realize what's at stake. Or maybe you do, but it's not going to stop us from at least voicing our opinion about the WHOLE matter and not just how to approach the topic with her.

Now you asked me. And personally, yes I'd be safe. I'd be worried about divorce in my mind. I think everyone does to some extent. But that's why I would not get married unless I damn well knew who I was marrying. I wouldn't suggest a prenup. - A month ago
Answerer I'd stay with someone for a while, at least until I felt we were both ready for marriage. If I'm ready to accept the responsibility of marriage, then I'm ready to accept the possibility of divorce as well. God-willing, I'll do whatever I can to make the marriage work, but I am not suggesting a prenup. To me, that suggest that I'm more interested in myself and my future, than I am of ours. - A month ago
Question Asker Well, in case you haven't noticed, my girlfriend of 6 years hasn't been successful, I doubt internet rhetoric will. Emotional manipulation works on some people. Not saying that I'm above it. But when someone opens and closes up people and risks the lives of strangers every day, doesn't believe in a man in the sky watching over us, and has nobody but himself to blame when you have to tell a family you couldn't save their loved one; I think it's safe to say I'd try appealing to reason, not emotion - A month ago
Question Asker Interesting. So an emotional-only marriage is problematic. If a marriage doesn't also involve money, there is something wrong. If one wants the former, they must be bad and immoral. If one wants the latter, they must be good and moral. Therefore, if they want to not feel bad, and instead feel good, they should agree to the latter and denounce the former. It seems not everyone is immune to emotional manipulation. - A month ago
Answerer It's your right to think like that. Liberal and safe, worried about your personal belongings that you've worked hard for. Completely your right.

But here you reveal another shocking, and alarming, new tidbit. What on earth do you mean your girlfriend of six years "hasn't been successful"? She's a teacher. Do you base respect of a profession by income? By what you just said and revealed, I feel sorry for her. She's with someone whose heartless and only reasoning is logic. How regrettably sad. - A month ago
Question Asker The power of reading within context my friend; "she hasn't been successful in emotionally manipulating me, what makes you think you will?" - A month ago
Show All
 

armyant
2898  
armyant      When: A month ago
Your marriage has a 50% chance of failing and that's a pretty big gamble to take with half of what you own, considering women file for more divorces than men do. Take this attitude for example:

"She just invested 6 years into a relationship with a man who is now asking her to sign a prenup?"

See, for this type of person, dating someone is just an investment and they expect a return on their investment when they can divorce the guy for all he's worth. Whenever you date a woman, if you hear her complaining about these contracts that deny them access to other people's property, run for the f***ing hills.
Do you agree?
Agree   2 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker I understand what you're saying, but nobody is putting a gun to my head and forcing me to enter into marriage with no pre-nupt. The worst than can happen is she says no to the pre-nupt and therefore to the marriage as well. Most guys in the professions would never get married w/o one. I'd rather see where her interestes really are. If she has a problem with a love-only marriage, and wants to keep money in play, then I agree with that you're saying. - A month ago
Answerer Sounds like you've got yourself covered. - A month ago
Question Asker Obviously women initiate 74% of all divorces. The financial incentives in place warrant it. If I'm putting more money into the marriage, and risk leaving with half, I have incentive to work on the marriage and to try and avoid a divorce. But if I'm putting less into the marriage, and risk leaving with half, I have no incentive to work on the marriage, and I have plenty of financial incentive to leave and file for divorce. - A month ago
Answerer Schildkrote wrote about this very same reasoning in conjunction with the rise of material interests in people's priorities as having caused the downfall of marriage in modern times. I do not doubt this hypothesis. - A month ago
Question Asker What I find interesting is how the courts haven't considered these results as evidence of imbalanced and unequitable divorce law. If the gap between filing for divorce between genders is that big, it would stand to reason that perhaps some change is needed in the law; or men simply need to take matters into their own hands and protect themselves while rebalancing the financial incentives of marriage, so that there's incentive to make things work and keep your partner happy, not leave. - A month ago
Answerer I believe it's very telling if someone's pushing your relationship towards a threshold that changes nothing about your feelings or situation aside from granting that person access to your holdings. Often this is done by appealing to "tradition", but in a time when all traditions that favor men have been considered important to abolish, I don't see a need to keep the ones meant to protect women either. - A month ago
Question Asker It's an insecurity most women have, on how to provide for themselves and secure their financial future. And yes, I agree with you, that for the longest time, marriage was originally created by fathers to protect their daughters' future interests. Then it was used to manipulate men into exposing themselves financially and giving up control. But today, women are doing away with that. To most women, the very idea of doing that is demeening. And I'm sure that's exactly how my girlfriend feels too.. - A month ago
noricat And yet...there is always that small percentage of doubt...

Stop pussyfooting around man, just tell her, prenup or she gets used to "common law marriage".

I totally agree with armyant, if your girlfriend is pushing for that threshold (essentially a financial and legal contract and hence has nothing to do with love) but is resistant to another contract that keeps things equal and fair, then I think you've greatly misjudged your girlfriend.

Women are masters at keeping things to themselves. - 9 days ago

 
Anonymous User
N/A  
Anonymous User      When: A month ago
Just have tell her why you want her to sign it, by the way if you live in the same household for 7 years by law you are a "married" couple and you have to split everything two ways as if you were getting a divorce, this is in the US by the way.
Do you agree?
Agree   1 Disagree   0
Report
 
Question Asker Not in new york state where there is no such thing as common law marriage ; ) - A month ago
noricat Common law marriage is a dumb idea anyway made by a woman leaning judiciary to try and continue the entrapment of men who have no interest in being entrapped. - 9 days ago

Dela1111
5637  
Dela1111      When: A month ago
I think this is a perfect example to all women of a guys mindset. This girl has given him everything without any real substancial committment and now he really has no reason at all to marry her. The only reason he's even considering it is because its important to her.
So to all you women, try thinking about this guys story.
Do you agree?
Agree   3 Disagree   4
Report
 
Question Asker Marrying s/o because you want something from them, or not giving s/o something because you want to artificially create some incentive for them to marry u; are equally immoral, manipulative and wrong.

I love her. And because I know how important something is to her, I want to give it to her. That just so happens to be marriage. But if s/o told me that unless I agree to be their financial slave, then I don't love them; well then that person doesn't really love me to ask me of such a selfish thing. - A month ago
Answerer I never said people should be married just because of some incentive, but I do point out that if a guy can get whatever he wants without marriage, few will actually make that step towards marriage since they don't need to. - A month ago
Question Asker I see what you're saying. So what are you suggesting? Not living together until marriage, with morality & religion as the excuse? No sex until marriage, with morality & religion as the excuse? Arranged marriages as the only means of marriage to prevent dating? It's already done, and you can see how well that works out. The world would be divided between prostitutes and hoards of lonely women. - A month ago
Question Asker Besides, it's impossible to enforce collective action. this is why women hate sluts. while they're trying to hold out, and create some value for themselves by not giving everything up naturally or playing hard-to-get, other women come in and say, screw that, I want him. And naturally, what does the guy do? He picks that girl. Competition in the marketplace makes any such attempts at collective action only possible in the theoretical, not in practicality. - A month ago
Answerer Religion is just an institution of social control that without a doubt serves a purpose. Morality as a spiritual thing doesn't exist but the behavior it promotes DOES lead to success, nobody can doubt that. I don't believe in arranged marriage but they do last much longer than marriages for "love." As far as girls hating "sluts," they just need to realize that: yes a guy will hook up with a slut, but he WONT (unless he's an idiot) marry her. - A month ago
Answerer I'm not going to deny that yes I am a conservative, but I am not a conservative because "god says so." I believe that many of the practices that are also laid down by religion can prevent many if not all of the problems that face our society today. Example: 400 billion for single mothers, 300- 400 billion for crime (a fact that many criminals come from a single mother. Now what do you think waiting until marriage to have sex/ kids would do to these numbers? - A month ago
Question Asker The more interesting question is what YOU think a sex-until-marriage would would do to those numbers.

do recall that this world existed many years ago. do you know what demand it created? the demand for prostitution. do you know why this world fell apart? to attempt to do away with prostitution and solve the problem of many women being left either unmarried or as single mothers with absent fathers.

we should learn from history's mistakes, not aim to repeat them. - A month ago

stercor
2861  
stercor      When: A month ago
Some choice, guy. It's a Hobson's choice.
Seems like your money is more important than the relationship.
Of course, you take a risk in a relationship; so does she. People change over time.
But, if you two make a promise to each other that divorce is not an option -- we can work it out.
"Murder maybe, but never divorce."
Then it shouldn't matter.
Do you agree?
Agree   3 Disagree   3
Report
 
Question Asker Our relationship is fine the way it is.. but I know.. a sense of security and stability is important to her as a woman.. and I respect that.. because I love her.. so instead of simply saying that I'm happy with the way things are.. I want to give her marriage.. but I do expect the same respect back from her.. instead of emotional blackmail and "you value money over love, if you really loved her" guilt-tactics.. and "if" we're no longer together.. she has to know that means financially too.. - A month ago

Euro-Raver
2453  
Euro-Raver      When: A month ago
you're crazy...good luck getting that past her
Do you agree?
Agree   4 Disagree   1
Report
 
Question Asker Well, if she doesn't want to agree to something that's fair for the both of us, then that's a good preview of what the marriage is going to be like. Her throwing around her emotional blackmail to try and make me feel bad and guilty.. until she tries to manipulate me into getting her way.. No thanks.. if we can't agree to something now, I doubt we're going to be able to if things ever go bad.. - A month ago
 
Find more questions on Prenuptial agreements     
Home > Relationships Questions > Will You Marry Me? And...Sign This Prenup?
 
Join GirlsAskGuys
Members earn points to get Expert Advice on Video, Amazon & iTunes Gift Cards, books and more!
Male Female
 Open Contests  
Crazy Thanksgiving Story with Family
Thanksgiving is right around the corner and just like the last year and the year before, you will most likely spend it with your family. And just like everyone else, you have a crazy uncle or an...
$20 Amazon Gift Card   $20 Amazon Gift Card
Check out the winner of the last contest!
Worst Pick Up Lines
Winner received $20 Amazon Gift Card
View All Contests >>
Questions on Prenuptial agreements
A Guy Asked Who believes in Prenuptial Agreements?
According to numerous statistics, 50% of American marriages end in divorce. With such less than favorable statistics, does anybody think that having a...  
A Girl Asked How do you get a guy to spend money on u?
I don't wanna sound like a horrible person for asking this but how does a girl find one of those guys who spends his whole paycheck on her, and how do...  
More Questions on
Prenuptial agreements
Expert Advice
More Video Answers
A Guy Asked  Question: Is there a such thing as hanging out too much?

Video Answer From Tamsen Fadal
Click here to watch larger video
Relationships Xpers
  
Shlei3
14534  
Shlei3
Engaged, 26 years old
United States
6 Questions - 999 Answers
Relationships Xper: 3499
kingbrother
12252  
kingbrother
Single, 16 years old
United Kingdom
0 Questions - 1017 Answers
Relationships Xper: 3081
Hercules
14690  
Hercules
Single, 20 years old
United States
2 Questions - 734 Answers
Relationships Xper: 2619
Littletad
14583  
Littletad
Single, 26 years old
United States
5 Questions - 616 Answers
Relationships Xper: 2214

What is Xper? View Rankings
Disclaimer: GirlsAskGuys cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers, opinions and advice submitted by members. Please use common sense when following or omitting any content on GirlsAskGuys.com
Browse Categories: Flirting  |   Dating  |   Relationships  |   Sexuality  |   Break-Up  |   Behavior  |   Style  |   Other                                         Home Top
  Site Links     About GirlsAskGuys     GirlsAskGuys Widgets     Help Us Improve!   RSS Feeds
Home
Videos
Partners
Search Questions
Terms of Use, Privacy
Help, New Members
About Us
Contact Us, Send Feedback
Sitemap
Advertise With Us
Resources
Post your questions on your blog, website, or any social networking page. You can embed into MySpace, Facebook and more. Click here for more info.
Have a suggestion? See a problem on the site? Click here to give feedback and suggestions on the new GirlsAskGuys, and help us give you a better experience. Visit our blog here
 Subscribe
Add to My AOL
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
©2009 girlsaskguys.com™. All Rights Reserved.